Total topics: 460
The confederate flag is a symbol of slavery.
We should burn the confederate flag and replace it with the 2nd amendment flag. I prefer freedom over slavery.
But also keep in mind the real modern day slavery is done by our adversaries; the Chinese communist government.
I am a Yankee; the Yankees; the Northern Republicans won the war. Now, lets stop slavery worldwide!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Lets say there are 700K people living in Native Reservations. America attracts like 2 million immigrants/year.
Offer these 2 million immigrants US Citizenship if they move into Native American reservations and vote to eliminate the reservation, integrating it with their respective states. No human being is illegal (including colonists who settle Native Reservations to claim the land for the US). The most common counterargument:
The Native CulTUeE!!
What is their culture? Knowing some native language known by practically nobody where you also know English most of the time? Yeah; preserving Native Languages is totally useless; the natives should learn behind their inferior language (because pratically nobody knows it compared to English) and learn English like everyone else in the US. A language is a tool for communication and nothing more. Your language is not worth preserving.
Watch a bunch of lefties call me racist (even though I litterally want to abolish ICE and repeal Qualified immunity) because I am an expansionist, and I think learning Cherrokee is totally useless to do in this world.
They will complain, but I listen to this guy on this issue:
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
If the left can swap out their POTUS, then the right can swap out their VPOTUS.
People say:
Trump ditching Vance will hurt him
Why? The left benefitted when they replaced Biden.
Trump brags about him only hriing the best people
He's fired a bunch of people before; Vance can just be the next one.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Me: The democrats consistently want to reduce unwanted pain. The GOP doesn't consistently believe in anything.
This guy: Everyone wants to reduce unwanted pain.
Me: Then explain how banning abortion, legalizing AR 15s, separating undocumented children from their families (whether through state force like deportation or inaction like letting the parents die due to lack of healthcare or food), continuing the drug war and locking people up in jail for weed, forcing students to take on huge loans to go to college, and not raising taxes on the globalists to pay for it all reduces unwanted pain? If people with George Soros level wealth pay 70% of their income in taxes, that produces way less unwanted pain than the amount of unwanted pain it would offset.
Now, I'm upfront and I don't value reducing unwanted pain, but I value LUSHOOTY (Liberty Unless Significantly Harming Others Or Too Young). But how can the republicans be against unwanted pain consistently?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
You see this child:
Lets say this child comes to the US with their parents, doesn't have papers, and gets sick enough to where they will go in the hospital and one of the 2 following things will happen:
- The child has their health bills paid for by US taxpayers.
- The child dies a painful death.
I am willing to prefer option 2 to option 1 because my tax dollars matter more to me than the life of a stranger child (this applies to all children regardless of citizenship status). I don't care if the child looks like this, or this or this. I do not want my tax dollars going to take care of other people's kids; my tax cuts matter to me more than their lives, so I am literally willing to look at these poor desperate kids and turn them away and let them die.
If you select option 1 and you are on the left, then I respect that; I really do. You believe unwanted pain should be reduced, so you logically from your brain patterns would pick option 1 and I don't agree; but I can respect it. But most conservatives and libertarians don't have the integrity to say what I said because they are afraid of looking unpopular to normie America, who doesn't care how much it costs; they don't like seeing children suffer, so they would tolerate the tax hikes they don't notice to save more people. At least the leftist is honest; I can respect that. But most of the conservatives and libertarians aren't honest. Conservatives and libertarians should pick an option and I don't care with what option they pick; but if they don't pick option 2; then they should leave the party; no hurt feelings towards them; you can pick option 1 and I won't be upset; but just be honest.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I tend to frame popular ideas in an unpopular way. For example, I think we should commit a full blown Halocaust against the murderer and r@pist communities because I don’t want tax dollars going to feed them.
If that turns you off, then fine. But the majority of America agrees.
My tax cuts matter more to me than murderer lives. My tax cuts even matter more to me than the lives of other people’s kids. If you think that’s hate speech, it’s just fiscally conservative speech.
Some poor people will suffer if you cut taxes and government spending. That’s just harsh reality. Accept that or become fiscally left.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
If the democrats can re select Biden as their POTUS candidate, then Trump re-selecting his VP pick is not as unorthodox I think. Whoever his VP pick is, Roosevelt will claim they are a bad VP pick and I think republicans in general would like it.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I've noticed when the right so strongly believes in an issue (like being pro deportation), the most extreme proponents of that belief will argue that it's, "not political" when in fact it is. The far left does this with abortion legalization, "Abortion isn't political; many republicans get abortions".
The people that tell you Issue X is not political are wrong; the issue is strongly political; they just assume nobody disagrees with them on immigration, abortion, guns, taxes, or anything like that when in fact, they are incorrect.
If you have a strong opinion on an issue, at least acknowledge that you are being political.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
What's the difference?
Seeing immigrants as human beings means seeing Pablo (married to Maria), with his 6 year old son that likes Trucks and 4 year old daughter that likes dolls, Edwardo (married to Suzanna), who has a 9 year old son that loves sports.
Seeing them as population means seeing 4 adults and 3 kids (interests of stranger's children is irrelevant to me; I don't care so no need to bring it up), not wanting to kick the adults out even if undocumented, but not giving them welfare even if it means their kids starve because your personal lives in harmless cases are irrelevant to me. I don't care about where you are from; be fiscally productive and take care of your own kids.
Immigrants aren't human beings; they are population.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
In the US, an immigrant is not allowed to legally run for POTUS. I don't see the point in that law.
If you are a left winger, then who would you rather have as POTUS? Cenk Uygur or Donald Trump?
If you are a right winger, then who would you rather have as POTUS? AOC or Elon Musk?
In both situations, people would pick the immigrant.
Also:
If you are a left winger, then who would you rather have as POTUS? AOC or Donald Trump?
If you are a right winger, then who would you rather have as POTUS? Bernie Sanders or Will Witt (PragerU representative)?
In order for the left and right winger to pick someone from their party, they would have to pick someone under 35 (and they would), so neither party has a principled stance against those under 35 from being POTUS.
Because of this, I think the minimum age to become a POTUS should be 0. Now, if a 5 year old is running against a 45 year old in a primary, then the 5 year old isn't winning, but if a 34 year old runs against a 46 year old and the 34 year old is very good at arguing, then it's fine if the 34 year old wins the primary and eventually the general.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Poor people are fine. Republican voters are fine. When you are a poor republican voter on the other hand, you make no sense to me. You may not want Lia Thomas to compete with women in sports, but is that really a bigger issue for you than your healthcare bills? Or your child's college education costs? If George Soros is paying more money in taxes, then why would you care? You are not George Soros.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
You guys can give your thoughts; the issue for me is just too far away for me to actually care.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
1:32. Elon Musk Supports Palestine. Same with Putin. Zelenski supports Israel; maybe the left can stop funding Ukraine from that if they are going to be so pro Palestine.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
This transwoman (whom apparently is loved by white supremacists) is somehow worried that some mobsters are going to destroy her property due to her beliefs and kill her family members.
1st off; they don't even know where you live. 2nd off; if they did, then they wouldn't have the ability or the will to actually commit murder like that. Richard Spencer is a white supremist as well; he didn't get lynched; he didn't even get his ass whopped until he decided to go to Seattle and start talking about his ideas. It doesn't make assaulting powerless people ok, but imagine I go into Dearborn flying an Israeli flag (or Morningstar heights flying a Palestine flag). Only an idiot does something like that. Richard Spencer wouldn't be attacked if he stayed in rural white MAGA America and neither would this paranoid person. Just like black people from Harlem are going to be scared of attacking someone from rural white Trump country.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Musk isn't being a shitty father; he's being a conservative father.
If you think shitty=conservative, then say so; like what do you want me to tell you?
I respect the liberal that says, "All conservatives are shitty people with shitty opinions" than the one that says, "It's possible to be a conservative that I respect" and doesn't state how that would be possible.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I live in a very battleground city; there are large numbers of both democrat and republican voters in my city. I ask the Trump supporters why they like Trump over other republicans, they claim it's because he's an alpha dog (vibes). I ask the Biden supporters why they like Biden over other democrats, they claim it's because he's a calming old man (vibes).
The right likes alpha vibes and the left likes calm vibes. The right may occasionally try and say, "Biden has an open border" (not true; he's done more deportations than Trump; I criticize them both on this, but I care about policy; they don't; they only care about vibes). The left may occasionally say, "Trump's Mr. Jan 6". If Trump never did Jan 6, then I would be way more open to be willing to vote Trump over Biden; the left wouldn't be; so it's not a genuine concern they have. They then say, "Trump's racist" over what was initially his border wall idea (so to them, pro ICE = racist; not even a belief I have even though I'm anti ICE, but a belief they have). Biden deported more people than Trump, and the left doesn't call him out on it; they fall in line. My dad is an example; when Trump was POTUS; he was a teacher; he had undocumented students in his class he respected. Then Biden comes along and does the same stuff as Trump,, my Dad falls in line with Trump's policy done by Biden.
People say Trump apperantly hates black people because he wanted like the Brooklyn 5 to be killed. Trump genuinely disagrees with the court ruling (just like many on the left do with Andrew Tate and Kyle Rittenhouse). If you genuinely believe Andrew Tate is a rapist and the court ruling was wrong, then it's realistic to advocate for the death penalty for Andrew Tate (same with the Brooklyn 5). It's a problem if you act on it and murder Tate or the Brooklyn 5; but speech is just speech; actions are different.
Biden though has said he doesn't want his kids growing up in a racial jungle (this is more racist than wanting people you believe committed r@pe to be killed). The never Trumpers didn't care that Biden said this and never took it back. Why? Because they just like his vibes too much.
I don't think I'm going to vote; and honestly Kamala pisses me off too because she said in a democratic primary that she believes Biden r@ped Tara Reade (which would be fine) but then she ran as his VP for clout and status. Anyone that is willing to be the VP for someone they believe is a rapist has bad moral character. I said that about Kay Ivey endorsing Roy Moore for senate (she believed he is a rapist) and I have to be consistent. I will be remmoving my Harris profile picture shortly.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
My grandmother: Illegal immigrants need to be deported!!!
Me: I don't give a rat's ass if you are undocumented or an anchor baby or anything like that.
My grandmother: How DARE you be so offensive by calling people anchor babies!
Me: What's more offensive, calling someone an anchor baby, or separating an anchor baby from their parents? You statists need to chill.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I've decided to at least attempt to leave this site at least on this account. I've noticed that when I'm tired, I tend to be way more willing to talk politics than when I'm mentally alert. This wouldn't be an issue except sometimes I get tired at work, and if I start talking politics at work, then I risk getting fired; and I would rather lose this account than lose my job. I intend on still being active on my satire account because it does take a decent amount of energy to make satire (and laughter is good because everyone here knows I can say the most horrible stuff on my satire account and everyone knows it's a joke and I don't actually believe what I say there) and I don't think I can elaborately plan satire when I'm at work (plus if I said at work what I said on my satire account, I might not get hired anywhere; I might even get reported to the police). But it takes enough energy and I should indeed know my audience (which I'm working on). Like, I don't really talk politics with my family anymore even when others are talking politics because they've decided that my opinions are so horrible to them that they don't want to hear it; and I can't force people to listen to opinions they find horrible (and I think it's kindof pointless).
Lets say every single Trump supporter (or Biden supporter if you like Trump) on this website ended up changing their minds on Trump and voted the way you wanted them too. It won't change much; it will have virtually no impact on whether Biden or Trump wins the election. I don't believe companies check this website, but I need to learn to stop talking politics when I'm tired (otherwise it could plausibly happen at work). Because of this, I'm asking the mods to ban this account.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
- You want a wall on our southern border and our northern border.
- You don't want a wall on our northern border, but you also don't for our southern border.
- You are a racist.
I'm #2.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Their summer camp was this alphabet designed camp.
Today, when people go camping, they sleep in cabins; back in my day; we slept in tents, and sometimes, on the ground.
They do art and crafts, my generation rode dirt bikes, swam for 1600 meters at 6 AM, I biked from my house to summer camp for a merit badge (85 km) in 4 hours, if I got lost, then I was screwed. They claim racial diversity is a strength; but my type of diversity is the following representation:
- An axe
- A pocketknife
- A water bottle, to deal with the hot summer in late July. We didn't drink Lattes from Starbucks, but liters of god's energy drink; water.
- An SPL
- A bow and arrow
- A rifle
Their shots were COVID shots; our shots came out of the barrel of a shot gun.
They find their way around the city; we found our way around the woods with nothing but a map and a compass. We had to be patient; gen alpha doesn't have to be.
They collaborate; we compete.
There is a lot that you go through when you are an old school eagle scout.
Kids these days are too soft; they need to go to bootcamp; any man that cannot do 500 pushups in 24 hours is week. I prefer Kamala over Trump, but I'm not like these sissy entitled Manhattan brats that claim transwomen are women but can't define what a woman is; I just hate Jan 6.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Because of this, I'm voting for Harris in 2024 and will change my profile picture shortly.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
They believe abortion is 1st degree murder. But they also say, "leave it up to the states".
If you believe something is 1st degree murder and should be tried as such, then you would believe both of the following:
- There should be a nationwide abortion ban at conception.
- The penalty for killing a zygote should be the same as 1st degree murder (usually life imprisonment). They say, "We only want to go after the doctors who perform abortions", but then doctors won't perform abortions, meaning the woman who wants the abortion performs it on herself (making the penalty for women who self perform their own abortions life imprisonment).
Pro choicers are also cowards.
If you believe in, "my body, my choice" to justify legalized abortion, then this does extend to the moment of birth. It would mean you would want abortion to not just be safe and legal, but common. When something can arguably be as bad as murder, the more common it is, the harder it would be to be banned. There is an argument that meat eating is murder, but nobody tries to ban meat eating because it is extremely common. There is an argument that r@pe is as bad as murder, but nobody tries to legalize it because compared to eating hamburgers, r@pe is extremely rare.
If abortion was as rare as r@pe, then pretty much everyone would want women that get abortions to be tried as murderers; if it's as common as eating meat, then pretty much nobody would want to ban it (and just as how vegans often get made fun of for being vegan due to their rarity, a world where 97% of women get abortions on a regular basis would bust the balls of the, "personally pro life" crowd of women (who would have to appear to be pro choice at least publicly). If a vegan calls for banning meat eating enough times in public, they get shunned by society; so if a vegan wants to ban meat, then they usually keep it to themselves; if vegans made up 84% of the population, then many vegans would advocate for banning meat.
So the easiest way to keep abortion legal is to make it safe, legal, and common. Safe, legal, and rare is kindof a contradiction.
You don't need to subsidize abortions to keep them legal (if you want a hamburger, then you pay for it), although it helps because it increases the rate at which people get abortions.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I see young dudes from the 2020s and I see young women from the 1960s. I notice they act very similar with their temperaments. I saw young guys from the 1960s and they had similar temperaments from women from the 1900s.
Whatever direction this nation is going with temperaments, women are about 60 years ahead of men. The thing is, I think America's temperament quality is regressing and technology may have had something to do with it, but we need temperaments like what we used to have; society was much better behaved then.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
1. Create a world where the internet is so common and people use it so much that they are almost addicted to it.
2. Encourage parents to let their kids use the internet.
3. Let people in school know that in prison, there is no Wifi.
A lot of mass shooters are addicted to the internet. They wouldn't want to go 50 years without the internet. You would save so much money on law enforcement and the crime rate would plummet.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Their argument is, "We don't want the government to have the power to take someone's life."
It sounds pretty convincing until you realize the alternative, giving the government the power to steal $25.2 billion from the taxpayer and using it to fund the living expense of murderers and rapists.
Now this is when the talking heads of the LP say the following:
The death penalty is more expensive than life in jail
To which I respond: It doesn't have to be. The cheapest way to do the death penalty is cheaper than the cheapest way to do life imprisonment. The cheapest way to to life imprisonment is free food, healthcare, and shelter for 50 years, with expensive guards. The cheapest way to do the death penalty is a bullet to the head 10 minutes after a guilty conviction. Some innocent people will die, and from the AUP/leftist perspective, they don't care about taxpayer money, but from the libetarian perspective, they are willing to sacrifice a small number of binnocent lives to cut government spending.
So from the libetarian perspective, why would it make sense to be against the death penalty? If they don't care about money, then how are they libetarians? Wouldn't they be members of the green party (or the socialists if they really like guns)?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Pro lifers and pro gun control people: Human life is PRICELESS and must be saved no matter what!!! If it SAVES just ONE life, then the control is worth it.
Me: If that’s true, then the government can force people to adopt as many starving children as they can afford (if it saves just one life).
Human life is not priceless. That may make you uncomfortable because you want to act like you care about your life as priceless and want to apply that to everyone. But you value your life way more than you do other people’s lives, and you are selfish (nothing wrong with that; I’m very selfish because I’m willing at some point to spend money on a house for myself but I don’t want to adopt a child; I do not love that neighbor as myself).
So either the Bible is wrong and the left saying, “If it saves just one life, then it would be worth it” is equally wrong, or you better get to adopting as many kids as you can afford.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
How come the left is more upset about Trump’s shooting than the right was about Jan 6 (basically an assasination attempt on Biden and other politicians)?
Don’t act like the parties are the same. One has a consistent anti unwanted pain ethos and applies it even to people they hate; the other is only interested in power and they only like Trump because of his vibes (which while I admit Trump’s vibes are entertaining, they should be frankly irrelevant for an election).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
TW: My pronouns are she/her.
Me: Fine; I will use those pronouns with you.
TW: What are your pronouns?
Me: Release, Epstein's, List! Once that happens, my pronouns would change to get, the, rope.
If Epstein did what he did in the suburbs, he's getting lynched!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Her comment: "It's easier to come out as trans than it is to come out as republican."
Me: Depends on where you are. In Hollywood, it wouldn't matter as long as you are an anti Trump republican and as long as you don't lean into any GOP issues due to the low IQ of most people (when someone says they are republican, I assume they are pro life, anti gun control, pro Trump, and believe transwomen shouldn't compete with cis women. I'm indifferent, but if I was a Hollywood leftist, I'd react poorly to someone coming out as a republican, but their IQ is low, so you say you are an anti Trump republican but are right wing on abortion and trans stuff, as long as you keep that hidden; the left will assume you are a RINO). In Redneck Tennessee, this couldn't be farther from the Truth. In battleground country, it doesn't matter.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I want to see what the left says about this. How could the democrats just spike up like what they did in Wisconsin? I've heard that mail in ballots went 77% for Biden; that's not 77%; that's 95%.
The media isn't making sense. If there is no good explanation, then I might have to vote Trump. I don't want to have to do that, but hey; if they actually rigged an election; drain the swamp!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I know how the left really cares about mental health. I have an idea: Encourage people to wait until marriage because a high body count is very bad for mental health.
They don't care about abortion or religion; fine. They care about mental health.
Anti abortion conservatives and pro mental health liberals can unite on the following belief: Premarital sex is bad and should be strongly discouraged just like smoking!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The GOP has no consistent ethos. The Democrat ethos is they are anti-unwanted pain.
The idea that the 2 parties are equal doesn't make sense to me. The democrats are more respectable voters because they have a consistent ethos and the GOP doesn't.
The democrat voter block is superior to the republican voter block from an intellectual standpoint, even if I personally lean more libertarian. Libertarianism and Democrat ideology; they are equal because they are principled with something (for the libertarians, it's pro freedom, for the democrats, it's anti-unwanted pain). Republicans don't have a consistent ethos, so their combination of beliefs is inferior.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
This is what's causing me to back RFK over Biden.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
It makes more sense to colonize Antartica than it does to colonize Mars.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Science and Nature
What % of hockey's entertainment is the fights? For me, it's like 50%.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Sports
Bonds have a lower expected rate of return than stocks and I don't care too much about risk.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Economics
I think it would be a good idea to let mods appoint other mods because Michael doesn't use this site anymore and he's harder to contact.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
There is the gun control advocate in power in a state that runs on a tough gun control platform in a state where they are expected to lose to a challenger and they lose. And then there is the same guy who tries to violently overthrow the government of his state because he lost.
The 1st guy doesn't matter; the 2nd guy committed treason and should get killed for it. If Beto did what Trump did on Jan 6, then I'd want him killed.
This is why as an anti-Fauci, anti-gun control, pro-nuclear energy, high slope patriot think Trump should be executed for Jan 6.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
There is the gun control advocate in power in a state that runs on a tough gun control platform in a state where they are expected to lose to a challenger and they lose. And then there is the same guy who tries to violently overthrow the government of his state because he lost.
The 1st guy doesn't matter; the 2nd guy committed treason and should get killed for it. If Beto did what Trump did on Jan 6, then I'd want him killed.
This is why as an anti-Fauci, anti-gun control, pro-nuclear energy, high slope patriot think Trump should be executed for Jan 6.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I know there is Barney, but I don't know who else.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Call me whatever name you want under the condition that it's accurate. But you won't be able to call me a liar.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I support Patriot care! It's about punishing the bureaucratic government for getting involved and controlling our lives by forcing them to pay for the healthcare of American Patriots (paid for by raising taxes on the globalist elites)!
Think this is a good idea? I really don't like the government and I want to punish them somehow in a way that would improve our life; forcing them to pay for my healthcare as an American Patriot and forcing them to pay for the healthcare of other American Patriots.
Tax the globalists!!!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The conservatives: The 2nd amendment protects the first amendment!!
Me: You realize that you already don't have free speech. If you say something conservative on an account corporations see and they don't like it, then you get fired (or you don't get hired). That's capitalism. What are you going to do; take up arms against Home Depot because they fired you because of something you said on the internet?
If the government took away your right to free speech, then you are just as likely to take up arms against that government as you would take up arms against Home Depot for firing you. You don't have the guts to kill others over the right to free speech (which to be fair, neither do I. It violates my morals and I hope it does to you as well), so don't be all bark and no bite.
When Elon Musk banned people for calling Nazis white trash, you didn't care.
Capitalism is more important than the right to speak about issues that you will never be able to change. I learned that the hard way; now I don't think I'm ever going to get hired. I've deleted all of my social media posts; the ones on DART I would like to see get deleted, but I don't think they will because the mods (aka Barney) have more faith in the privacy of DART posts from corporations than I do, but I want him to delete every post I made on both of my accounts.
I don't make the same mistake I did. The right to post about certain opinions whose policies you will never get to change is less valuable than your income. I don't plan on posting anymore, and I hope Barney fufills my request to delete all of my social media posts (including this one). If he has more faith in DART's privacy from employers than I do, fine; he can take that chance and post on DART and have his posts stay up. I want all of mine taken down. We have different opinions and should be able to live by those opinions.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Statement 1: Opinions are like assholes; everyone's got them and they all stink.
Statement 2: Donald Trump is a porn star because he shows his asshole to everyone and his fans pay him money for him to show his opinion/asshole.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
- Say that I don't believe in premarital sex.
- Get married to a rich guy.
- Take half of his money in a divorce.
It's called being smart. I'm not knocking the women who do this; they are immoral, but smart.
I'm always signing a pre nub before I get married and I encourage every married couple to do this even if the husband is only 1.5x as rich as the wife. If she doesn't sign, then you don't marry. Big deal. Women are run of the mill; there are billions of them. You (the man) is gaining in attractiveness; the woman is fading. If my woman doesn't sign a pre nub, then we are breaking up. If she wants a ring that costs anything more than $1, then we are breaking up. I'm the man; I'll find someone else. My woman won't have nearly as easy of a time.
I'm the man; I have standards. A woman can have standards as well; but if a woman is an economic parasite, then we break up. Call it a "feminist" relationship since I think the woman and man should have equal power (and equal responsibilities/expenses) and I don't want kids.
I don't want a gold digger wife and therefore I don't want a tradwife. I want my woman to earn her own income and this way she isn't taking money from me. I prefer a career woman who can be a bit rude to an incompetent woman who is a bit polite; I'm a man; I have thick skin and can take rude women. The career woman isn't going to be a moonch. A prenub would be signed and if the relationship stays sexless; then I'm fine with that.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
If you hate public school (not just think it can be improved, but if you hate public school), then don't become a leader for a public school.
If you hate charter school (not just think it can be improved, but if you hate charter school), then don't become a leader for a charter school.
If you hate government (not just think it can be improved, but if you hate government), then don't become a leader for government.
Any politician that says, "Government is bad, now vote for me for government", I'm not voting for them. If they alternatively say, "Improve government" or, "My opponent's government is bad", then I'll hear them out. But politicians should cater to the high IQ; not the low IQ.
There are 3 voters; one of an IQ of 140; another of 120; and another with an IQ of 100. The first wants a plan to get us out of debt (something that benefits everyone). The 2nd cares about abortion (something that could directly impact them or someone else significantly, but it's not as big of an issue as the US debt). The 3rd voter wants to know a politician's take on some stranger trans woman competing with cisgender women in a sport that does not directly effect them or too many other people to nearly as a significant degree (compared to abortion and the US debt). The 3rd voter probably doesn't have any kids that are good enough at sports to in theory lose their spot to a transwoman or is in that position themselves; it doesn't matter. They have very strong opinions about Israel/Palestine when the news was preaching about it (and will lose interest the moment the current thing switches enough). They don't offer any solutions to help both sides be happy; nor do they understand things from the other side (an example would be to let Israelis and Gazans move to the US to escape bombings from their governments).
The IQ=100 group make up probably 90% or so of the voters in this country. For this group, if they love Trump, then nothing Biden can do will get them to switch their vote to Biden. If they hate Trump, then nothing will get them to switch their vote. Like for me, if Trump never did Jan 6, then I would legitimately consider him a good alternative to Biden. I may not vote for him, but I would at least consider it.
Most people that hate Trump, Trump could have never did Jan 6; they would want to impeach him. He could have advocated for abolishing ICE and most people who hate him would hate him for it. Trump could be pro choice and most people that hate him would still hate him. Why? Vibes. Trump gives off vibes that a large part of the country clicks with and a large part of the country hates. Same with Obama. There are few willing to admit voting for him because he's black; but most Obama voters like Obama's vibes. Obama could bomb a place; kill a bunch of innocent civilians; and most Obama voters wouldn't care.
Most Trump voters will be anti war only if Trump is anti-war. Trump said he would bomb the shit out of ISIS (which would have killed a lot of innocent civilians) and then the anti-war pro-Trump crowd doesn't change their vote based on it.
The low IQ majority only care about vibes. I can literally say this to one of these low IQ people, they say, "Your right man" and they will assume I'm talking about someone else.
This country is filled with sheep. Asking them to be their own Shepard is an impossible request because their IQs just aren't high enough for that. Most Trump supporters would vote for Jessie Ventura over Biden if the coverage was the same (Ventura has very Trumpian vibes). Only policy should matter (and the rare instance of character flaw, like raping a child).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Trump says he will accept the results of the election only if it's a, "free and fair election".
Can anybody who likes Trump please tell me how the election will have both of the following criteria:
- The election is a free and fair election.
- Trump loses this election.
? To me, it seems mutually exclusive.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
When you are anti-abortion and you believe the following:
- Murder should be punished with death.
- Abortion is murder.
Then it makes sense to punish abortion with death. Now if this turns you off, it's understandable; you are AUP; fine. Not everyone is.
Go after the doctor
If you do that, then doctors won't perform any more abortions, which means the women who want them will get them done personally and will do them on themselves. So whatever punishment you give to the doctor, you would give to the woman (whether it's a murder charge or no charge).
But bodily autonomy with the (unwanted pain vs preventing fetal homicide dichotomy) is for men only; not women in all states that banned abortion. I'm not endorsing that; but it's the truth.
Either preventing fetal homicide should be the consistent goal or preventing unwanted pain should be the consistent goal; but it's only consistent in the states where abortion is legal until the moment of birth.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Debate on this DARTers. I’m courious as to the No side’s reason.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The GOP with Ukraine: America first!!!
The GOP with Israel: America Last!!!
Any justification the right uses with Israel and the terrorists, the left can use for Ukraine and Russia.
Examples:
Israel is out ally
The left can say this about Ukraine.
Israel provides us with help against the terrorists
The left can say this about Ukraine and Russia.
This is how I know the right never meant "America first". The right's ethos is owning the libs, often in ways that make the right look silly.
I'm America first for both Ukraine and Israel.
The left is anti war funding for Palestine, but not Ukraine. I'm sure their excuses are similar.
Excuses are like assholes; everyone's got one and they all stink.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics