Total debates: 25
Primary burden of proof rests with Con. Con also must prove that if there was election fraud, then it would have been enough to make Trump the winner if it was completely fair. In other words, Pro must prove that either there was no election fraud, or that it wasn't enough to overturn the results, and Con must prove the opposite.
No description has been provided
God: a perfectly good, omnipotent and omniscient being that created the universe. Please note that neither side has to prove that god is real or not, you just have to make a case that your side is more probable than the other.
No description has been provided
By Trumps Tariffs, I mean any import taxes enacted by Donald Trump when he was president.
Don’t think I need to do any description, but if I should, ping me in the comments.
RCV: Ranked Choice Voting, a system of electing officials where you can rank different candidates. For more details, defer to link in comments.
Half troll debate, half serious, so don’t read too much into it.
RCV: Ranked Choice Voting, a system of electing officials where you can rank different candidates. For more details, defer to link in comments. Electoral College: The current system by which America elects its president.
This debate will determine who would make a worse President: Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.
Veganism: a practice where you do not eat any food that was made from or by an animal. For instance, meat and dairy products are not allowed.
Christian god as described in the Bible cannot exist.
There have been a lot of serious and meaningful debates in this site, but that’s boring. I’m doing the stupidest debate I could think of, is the ocean a soup?
*God: a perfectly good, omnipotent and omniscient being that created the universe. Please note that neither side has to prove that god is real or not, you just have to make a case that your side is more probable than the other.
I recognize that I’m using vague words like, “better” so keep in mind that this is a standard debate. Neither side should have to prove that they are correct, because they can’t really. The goal is for each side to try and persuade some hypothetical person who is neutral on the topic, not to prove anything. It's technically a matter of opinion, so I just wanted to clarify that.
Altruism: the act of doing something that has no Benifet to yourself to only benifet others.
No description has been provided
Disclaimer: Please note the use of the word "biggest" in the title. I've learned my lesson, and I will not be using ambiguous terms like "main".
I've been doing a lot of serious debates recently, so I thought I would take it easy, and just have a fun talk with another Star Wars fan. I know this is a matter of opinion, so that's why it's standard not rated. If you are going to accept this debate, please come in with a "let's just have some fun" mindset.
If you accept this debate, you will argue that Donald Trump's rhetoric towards immigration would be beneficial to the Economy if he were president, and he enacted those policies.
No description has been provided
Whoever accpets this challenge will be arguing that the existence of animals and humans was the direct result of the Christian God.
The United States Economy is bolstered by immigrants from other countries
The U.S. should remove the Penny from it's currency