Total debates: 411
Please read the full description. That title is full of potential misunderstandings of my intention. This is a bit different of a format that I'd like to try.
Let's start by coming to an agreed upon definition of religion. I'm focusing here on the more practical, everyday usage. I acknowledge some worldviews would be very unappplicable here. Perhaps I'm just being too pedantic. I'll just start with this: Religion is a system of beliefs and/or a code of moral conduct that passes judgment on a person or person(s) based on their adherence and obedience to certain rules, laws, and traditions; or the performance of required acts and rituals.
I find most debates im arguing against a false version of Christianity. This is probably more geared towards non-belivers, but it's not required.
A tutoring session on argument structure and logical validity.
I would argue Biblical faith is not belief without evidence, But instead, Trust without reservation. Furthermore, We shouldn't chastise our fellow believers for having doubts or questioning God. Just to be clear, I'm hoping for a debate between two people assuming the truth of what's found in the Christian Bible. Not one which spirals off to a debate of God's existence.
I take the stance that for either worldview, It's foundation is formed in a unprovable, "faith" based assumption (axiom). Open to arguments from non believere who think theirs is proven or Christians thinking you can prove the existence of God.
Enter this debate at will. Yes. I am doing it again. Yes. I will provide better arguments.
No description has been provided
All reasonable men endowed with the blessing of faith are in no contradiction one to the other. All faithful men endowed with the light of reason are indeed at harmony in and among themselves. For there exist no tension or opposition between faith and reason. Indeed, the Christian religion is most reasonable and becoming of the intellect.
No description has been provided
Think that God doesn’t exist? I think He does. Prove me wrong.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I will argue that religion is valid from God's perspective. So, anyone who is a theist but not a subscriber to religions can accept the open challenge.
Proposed: Jesus was tempted by Satan but three times, yet there are so many sins. There are three sins into which all others are encompassed.
This debate will be centered around the issue of the burden of proof, and whether it applies to atheism.
Some people seem to believe the Bible is perfectly non-contradictory, and this baffles me. Hopefully, my opponent can help me understand how a person who has studied the Bible can believe it at no point contradicts itself.
God is a delusion and atheism is the only rational option.
Enter this debate at will. I don't want Singularity here because I want to debate with a different view.
No description has been provided
It's all in the title. My reasoning is surprise.
This guy is a idiot
No description has been provided
Here you and i can talk about scripture, it can be about anything in it. However we only discuss under the rule that we believe the bible to be true and that God exists.
Jesus completely fully died and rose (gaining life) again from the dead.
The 942-year-old debate over Christmas Break
Why the Bible is from God and the others are not.
One week this time
No description has been provided
The Bible is internally consistent.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I'm posting this from a phone so I intend this to be a relatively concise debate.
No description has been provided
I am here to defend the soundness of the Kalam Cosmological Argument and its conceptual analysis.
No description has been provided
There ain't no God
It is possible for the Christian God to exist.
No description has been provided
I want to challenge you to a debate, on God. I assume the burden of proof.
Is the trinity pagan? If it is (Which it isn't), then you need to provide evidence for that claim. Rules of the debate: 1. Don't uses logical fallacy. 2. Stay on topic. 3. Give your opponent evidence. 4. Don't mock or call someone names. 5. Don't declare victory.
We will argue whether Christianity, based on the Bible, is disadvantageous to the person who believes.
I think it doesn't, basing on the studies that I found. Rules of the debate. 1. Don't troll or name call. 2. Don't use logically fallacies. 3. Don't waste anyone's time. 4. Bring good arguments. 5. Stay on topic. Benediximus! (Latin for good luck.)
I contend that the belief of the Trinity is unsupported by the Holy Bible and is an invention of later scholars.