Total debates: 411
No description has been provided
Was Jesus Christ morally superior to Mohammed?
No description has been provided
Read description before accepting.
Prove "Jesus is God" by using "I and the Father are one." John 10:30-38 (NIV), if it is possible to prove.
Is the belief in any God reasonable?
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Make sure to read description before accepting.
No description has been provided
Islam is the true religion. We can discuss every topic that makes you say it isn't. Just write a comment about one(!) topic and we'll debate about it
Marriage between Prophet Muhammad (saw) and Aisha (RA) Marriage was normal (especially for that era) Marriage was Successful. There were no grievances from any side. It was acceptable until recently.
No description has been provided
This debate will discuss whether or not "sola scriptura" - that is, the doctrine that Scripture is the only sufficient material needed to determine all dogmatic and moral principles pertaining to Christianity. Any source is allowable to be cited by the contenders, not just Scripture to prove their point.
I will take the Con, meaning I do not think that God exists in the sense that it is an individual supernatural personality. The opponent will take the Pro, in that they think God does exist in the sense of an individual supernatural personality.
Islam Vs Anything Islam vs Anything means, I would be debating any other belief or no belief at all, which further means, my opponent can be from any religion or atheist. But not any random person who just oppose Islam. I would invite any person from any faith or atheist to be my contender, but not just some arbitrator person who oppose Islam.
Please send a message to me on the topic so I can start the first round with a full introduction.
What is a very close definition of God? and is God real or not real or both or not both?
I will debate that religion and the concept of god is a net positive for the world, while my opponent will argue against.
I am arguing That you don't need money to live a rich life. I want relatively experienced debaters to take me on. I need to see how good I am.
I have to do it unrated as mods are not protecting me from votebombing abuse and it's entirely exploitable.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
- intentionally left blank -
The church should not have any control in the government.
I am for Catholicism, con is for any protestant denomination.
Challenge to a certain someone, but differently.. Only one person can accept this debate, tigerlord. Unless specifically mentioned in the comments of a change, or he declines. Either way.
No description has been provided
Directed evolution is where God had a hand in controlling evolution, 6 Day is what Genesis says.
It seems that christianity is the only religion to encompass all the moral problems of one's soul and convert it into a just logic of cosmogonical organization.
No description has been provided
Pro is for creationism. Con for Big Bang.
Pro has BOP to show that there is absolute, definitive proof that the God portrayed in the Bible exists. Pro must also show why the God from the Bible must exist and not other versions of God from abrahamic religions or other religions in general. So, for instance, a generalized argument that proves the existence of God but not the biblical God specifically will not work as that argument can used to justify the existence of a non-biblical God (for instance, Allah from Islam).
Im Super new to this so yea, anyone really can take me on.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I believe Catholicism teaches an erroneous definition of Justification and incorrectly conflates it with Sanctification. Thus leading to a belief of infused and varying grace that we can earn through righteous works. Special Rules: 1. Only quoting written Scripture to argue a point. (Not saying we can't quote from CCC or other sources, just not for making a point, only for clarification of a stance) 2. No rudeness/name calling
Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3:23-38 both purport to be the genealogy of Jesus, and they have little in common.
Read full description.
The burden of proof is on Atheists to prove that meaning and morality can exist in a universe with complete annihilation, no God, no gods, no afterlife, no reincarnation or nothing transcendent whatsoever except for math or what have you. I will be arguing for Theism of all sorts, and why any sort of Theism makes more sense then Atheism in regards to consciousness and it's well being.
I believe that the Quran contains 0 contradictions, it is up to Pro to dispute this claim.
Read the full description.
Looking for a good discussion with a young earth or old earth creationist. I will take the pro position that evolution and the bible are compatible while the con will argue against this.
I believe that there are no contradictions in the Quran so I will be Con. Pro holds the BOP and has to prove that there are in fact contradictions within the Quran
No description has been provided
The Bible states that God is an omnipotent and omnipresent being, meaning that he knows all and is all. If we correlate this with his judgements of people who die not believing in him, it is flawed