Total debates: 50
Enter this debate at will.
This sounds like something DynamicSquid would do, but okay.
Enter this debate at will.
No description has been provided
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will.
No description has been provided
My opponent is to provide the logical structure (just premises and form, no defence) of the ontological argument they want to defend in round 1. Structure: Round 1: Pro Waives, Con States the argument. Round 2: Arguments & rebuttals Round 3: Arguments & rebuttals Round 4: Rebuttals and summing up (no new arguments)
The Debate will focus on how the Democrat Party, from its beginning and all the way to the 21st century has been and continues to be anti-black.
This is to continue Waterphoenix's debate. I think pineapples should be allowed to be on pizza even if I don't like it and I hate it.
All reasonable men endowed with the blessing of faith are in no contradiction one to the other. All faithful men endowed with the light of reason are indeed at harmony in and among themselves. For there exist no tension or opposition between faith and reason. Indeed, the Christian religion is most reasonable and becoming of the intellect.
Enter this debate at will.
No description has been provided
Enter this debate at will. Seldiora and Dr.Franklin may be interested in this debate, and because RM knows basically everything, he may accept this as well.
Enter this debate at will. RM and Fauxlaw may be interested in this topic.
China's Response to the Coronavirus was Inadequate
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will. I don't want Singularity here because I want to debate with a different view.
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will.
No description has been provided
This is a debate about Plants vs Zombies.
No description has been provided
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will. Sigmaphil is discouraged to enter this debate since he did last time.
Enter this debate at will. Most people don't hold the position of Con, but if someone does, I hope I could put up a good fight with the pen that is mightier than the sword.
Enter this debate at will.
No description has been provided
Enter this debate at will.
No description has been provided
Some have criticized space exploration as wasteful spending, noting that billions of humans still suffer from a lack of basic material well-being. How can we justify devoting time, money, ingenuity, and political capital to (for example) landing a probe on Mars when (for example) nearly a billion humans live below the global poverty line?
No description has been provided
This is a lighthearted debate, but however if you want to go full-on evidence you certainly can.
This is entirely for fun. I claim real men make quiche
I will be defending my client, Pele, against modern criticism from Maradonites, Messiaens and Ronaldoists.
I will be arguing for Taoism, and my opponent will be arguing for Confucianism. Both will be arguing which school of thought is more beneficial to humanity in general.
No description has been provided
I am arguing con. Debate whether reality TV feed us the wrong things.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
’If’ is not utilitarian because it only acknowledges what is currently not true.