1470
rating
50
debates
40.0%
won
Topic
#2083
Pineapple on pizza should be allowed
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 7 votes and with 38 points ahead, the winner is...
User_2006
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 9,090
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1440
rating
6
debates
0.0%
won
Description
Definition provided. I have learned from my loss with Pense.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pizza
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pineapple
Round 1
I would thank EricT the Ambitious to accept this debate and I look forward to a fantastic organized discussion.
Point 1: Pineapple is healthy
This source illustrates how it is healthy to eat a pineapple. Self-explanatory. Definitely better than some of the other toppings especially if you want vitamin C.
Point 2: People actually like it
Most British people who participated in the poll stand on my side. 80%+ of them like pineapples and more than half(53%) like pineapples as a pizza topping.
56% think pineapple pizza should be allowed, out of more than 1700 people, according to an online poll.
On average, 68-85% of Canadians think Pineapple pizzas are okay and only 15-32% of them think pineapple pizzas aren't okay.
An ESPN account got the result of 60% ending up thinking pineapple pizzas are allowed.
In Australia, 49% of Domino consumers like Pineapple as a pizza topping.
46% of people in this sample said "yes" to pineapple pizza. on the contrary, Anchovies pizza only had 14% in favor of them.
In fact, so many shops in just NYC alone, with a topping of 14% liking, would mean Pineapples should be allowed in stores since it is at least 3 times as favorable.
Tim Carman's twitter had 59% saying "yes" to pineapple pizza,
This poll had 53% saying "yes" to pineapple pizza.
Hawaiian pizza are pizzas with pineapples on it. It has been made since 1962. Cutting stocks of thousands of diners, including ones that had been at least 50 years old, would be a massive inconvenience.
(53+56+68+60+49+46+59+53)/8=55.5, and 55.5% means majority.
Conclusion:
- More than half of the people thinks pineapple pizza is okay.
- Pineapple pizza is not more unhealthy than other toppings.
- Pineapple pizzas are in popular pizza diners, especially in Hawaii and Australia. Cutting stock on these things will be massively inconvenient.
I will stop here. I tried to do a Trent0405-type argument here and it may not look like it. I wish my opponent the best of luck. Thank you voters for reading this text.
Pineapple on pizza is disgusting
Round 2
My opponent had failed to refute my points. I give my opponent another chance before it is too late. I extend every argument I have made.
Pineapple on pizza is disgusting
That is one person. In reality, 55% of people who bothered to answer the polls think PIneapple pizza is OK.
ok you wanna go you dirtbag. i wasnt the one that got their time wasted explaining an argument only to get trolled. yes, i did that to you! Also, i wasnt the one that wanted to debate about goddamn PINEAPPLE PIZZA. you want me to debate. there is NOTHING to debate about. you can have your pizza however you like, no one cares. i hope you didnt use too much time writing your argument
I don't even have the power to delete comments but I just thought I'd take care of that one LOL
**************************************************
>Reported Comment: Ragnar // Mod action: Not Removed
>Reason for Mod Action:
The reported comment contained no reportable content.
**************************************************
I am finally winning something.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: oromagi // Mod action: Not Removed (borderline)
>Points Awarded: 7:0; All points to Pro.
>Reason for Decision: See Votes Tab.
>Reason for Mod Action:
The vote was borderline. By default, borderline votes are ruled to be sufficient.
**************************************************
I am finally winning something
When the topic is very evident, I use your style, which is short description+Source.
cool to see I influenced someones argument style. LoL
Damn, you just roasted a banned debater.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Crocodile // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 7:0; All points to Pro.
>Reason for Decision: See Comments Tab.
>Reason for Mod Action:
I'm very lax on certain things just being implied (such as the non-forfeiting side not forfeiting... hence why I want to change the voting rules), but it needs to be said: Advertising your debate is fine, but it in itself cannot be the reason for your allotment, even on an FF.
**************************************************
Crocodile
13 hours ago
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:
https://www.debateart.com/debates/2093/is-erict-a-sh-tbag
*Is tHiS NoOb tRapPIng??? "??:?!??!*
https://images3.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED382/5c0383f5d5257.jpeg
fuck you you bitch
I fucking love your argument. Except the fact that you're a shitbag
EricT sure is very ambitious.
I see no reason to disallow 🍍 on 🍕
No, it is meant to be mentally and rhetorically allowed. I am trying to make people believe it is okay to put pineapple on pizza. That aside. I predict RM will accept this but I'd hate to see such a great debater to debate me 4 times in a row and winning them.
"Allowed" as in legally permitted?