Greyparrot's avatar

Greyparrot

A member since

3
4
10

Total topics: 499

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
34 6
That's not astro turf...that's galactic turf!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
10 3

This is what democracy looks like.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
14 4
No free food for NY criminals:

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
12 5
Biden Gets REVENGE For Democrat Betrayal, Congratulate Trump In Speech As Democrats SEETHE Over Loss

In 4 years, you cannot say Biden has looked more happier and energetic than now.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
4 3

Kamala isn’t malfunctioning. This is really her. Sharp as a cue ball
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
3 2
Do it!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
20 7

Remember, this is the smartest and most qualified out of ALL Democrats.

November fun!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
13 5
Kamala Harris’ Marxist dad issued warning against mass immigration: ‘Serious problem for blacks’

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
4 3

Actually it was 2 savage answers. I also liked his answer "what price on National Security is worth it to you?"

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
1 1
Liberals Make FAKE Image Of Kamala Working McDonalds Using OBITUARY PHOTO In SHOCKING Scandal

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
5 3
Joe Rogan Trump Podcast BREAKS 10M Views OVERNIGHT, Trump Says NO INCOME TAX As He Nears 2024 WIN

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
61 12
What's your prediction when we have "Election Week" like 2020 and we won't have the votes counted until an undetermined date past Nov 5?


What does the Democrat party gain from weakening the perception that an Election shouldn't last forever past a legally proscribed day?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
8 5

Liberals MELT DOWN CANCELING Subscriptions After The Washington Post REFUSES To Endorse Kamala

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
5 3

You can always trust the Bee to provide clarity on these things.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
27 5
Assuming you had no intention of making America great?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
67 15
For FLRW?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
29 5
lol, enjoy November folks.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
5 4
The number one reason the Democrat party ousted Biden in a soft coup is because of the pressures of the lobby class afraid that their money spent on Congressional races would be wasted.

Knowing that Kamala is now going to be blamed or praised for what happens in these critical Congressional races, how do you think those races will turn out? 
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
6 3
Since Kamala is almost certain to lose this November, who do you think has the best chances in 2028? 

My pick will be Gavin Newsome.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
8 5
Why did she skip the Al Smith dinner?

I apologize in advance if my question doesn’t include the usual loaded premises, false dichotomies, or false equivalences.


Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
12 6
so... first 60 minutes edits an interview to make Kamala look good...then CBS cuts 5 minutes from the house speaker to make Kamala look good.


This is why billionaire media is officially garbage for those who want full free speech. Corruption and propaganda.

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
10 3
Utility is a genuine need that stands on equal footing with ethics. Both guide society, but utility emphasizes practical benefits, ensuring that solutions address tangible needs. Ethics, while crucial, can sometimes be co-opted to serve ideological agendas, fostering inequality or corruption under the guise of moral superiority. This can limit innovation and favor those in power. Utility-driven approaches, by focusing on outcomes and practical benefits, can help create a more equitable and efficient society, ensuring that resources are directed toward solving real-world problems rather than maintaining appearances to serve the powerful elite class.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Philosophy
14 5
DT: We should use the military to stop political violence.

KH: Trump wants to use the military on me (political opposition.)

Logical conclusion: Kamala admits to planning to engage in political violence?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
14 5
Q: Literally any question regarding government policy.

A: "I come from a middle class family"

It's the standard bowl to create the word salad.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
56 8
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
21 5

Kamala is on The View when she’s asked a very simple question. And the answer she delivers is probably the worst thing she ever could have said.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
37 9
Western nations now own more land in Ukraine than Russia currently holds.

Full context of this war racketeering found here:
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
9 3
I was thinking about how Kamala started using a new buzzword last week...holistic...and I asked AI what it thought about it...
It then launched into this huge scathing critique of the government in general...

When the government tries to address too many issues at once—much like a holistic approach—it can end up being ineffective at solving any particular problem. This is a common critique of large, all-encompassing government interventions: the broader and more diffuse the focus, the more difficult it becomes to implement effective solutions.
Here’s how trying to do everything often results in doing nothing well:
1. Diluted Resources and Focus:
  • When the government attempts to address multiple complex issues at once, it spreads its resources too thin. Whether it’s money, personnel, or time, resources are finite, and trying to allocate them across too many areas reduces the effectiveness in any one area.
  • For example, a holistic approach might involve tackling poverty, healthcare, education, and climate change all simultaneously. While each is important, addressing all at once can mean none of the solutions receive the focus or funding they need to be truly impactful.
2. Bureaucratic Inefficiency:
  • Governments tend to develop large bureaucracies to manage holistic programs, leading to inefficiency and a lack of agility. When multiple agencies, departments, and stakeholders are involved, decision-making slows down, and accountability becomes unclear.
  • As a result, the complexity of holistic approaches can lead to mismanagement, waste, and delays, which undermines the intended outcomes. The more layers of bureaucracy involved, the harder it is to ensure solutions are executed efficiently.
3. One-Size-Fits-All Solutions Fall Flat:
  • Holistic approaches often rely on one-size-fits-all solutions, assuming that a broad strategy will address multiple issues across the board. However, this overlooks the fact that problems often require tailored, specific interventions based on local conditions or sector-specific challenges.
  • For example, a holistic program for poverty reduction might include education reform, healthcare expansion, and job training. While these are important, a single nationwide approach may not be effective in every region, as the causes of poverty differ between urban and rural areas, or between industries.
4. Lack of Accountability:
  • When the government takes on too many responsibilities at once, it’s often difficult to hold any one entity accountable for results. With so many moving parts and different departments involved, failures or inefficiencies can be attributed to "the system" rather than any specific policy or leader.
  • Targeted approaches, on the other hand, tend to have clear objectives and measurable outcomes, making it easier to assess the success of policies and hold those responsible accountable.
5. Crowding Out Private and Local Initiatives:
  • A holistic government approach often attempts to centralize problem-solving at the federal level, which can crowd out private or local solutions that might be more effective. By trying to be involved in everything, the government sometimes stifles the innovation and efficiency of private companies or local communities that might have better, more context-specific solutions.
  • Local governments and private enterprises are often more nimble and better equipped to tackle specific problems. A targeted approach allows these entities to step in and fill gaps in a more tailored and effective manner.
A Targeted Approach Gets Results:
  • More Focused Resources: A targeted approach, such as focusing on job creation or tax incentives for businesses, allows the government to channel its resources toward a specific issue, ensuring the problem receives the attention and funding it needs. This concentrated effort can produce more immediate and measurable results than a broad, unfocused program.
  • Better Adaptation to Local Needs: Targeted approaches can be customized to fit the specific needs of different regions or sectors. For instance, an economic development program for rural areas would likely need a different set of tools than one for urban centers. A focused approach allows for flexibility in addressing localized challenges.
  • Clear Accountability and Metrics: By addressing a specific issue, targeted approaches allow for clear benchmarks of success or failure. If a program is designed to increase employment or stimulate growth in a particular sector, the results can be easily measured. This makes it easier to fine-tune the approach or replace ineffective strategies.
Conclusion:
When the government tries to do everything, it often ends up doing very little effectively. Holistic approaches that spread resources across multiple issues can lead to dilution of focus, inefficiency, and bureaucratic bloat. In contrast, targeted solutions concentrate efforts on solving specific problems, leading to more efficient use of resources, better accountability, and greater flexibility to adapt to local conditions.
By focusing on a targeted approach—whether it's through tax cuts, deregulation, or specific economic incentives—the government can make a tangible impact in areas where it matters most, without overwhelming itself with trying to solve every problem all at once.

Sheesh.... seems like AI is getting ready to take over.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Miscellaneous
13 5

The IRS officially announces an endorsement for Kamala Harris. It's a smart move because of the direct alignment between her policy goals and the agency's long-term needs for enforcement, regulations, and reform. The Biden-Harris administration’s plan to hire 87,000 new IRS agents represented one of the most significant boosts in the IRS's capacity in decades. This expansion is not just about creating jobs—it’s about giving the IRS the tools and the power it needs to combat tax evasion by Americans and corporations. By endorsing Harris, the IRS would align itself with a leader committed to ensuring that the tax system works for everyone, not just the wealthy or tax averse Americans.

Harris has championed policies that prioritize fairness and accountability, two principles that are deeply intertwined with the IRS’s mission. The addition of 87,000 IRS agents ensures that the agency can properly audit and enforce tax laws on high-income earners who have been skirting their obligations for years. This bolstered workforce should work wonders for closing the tax gap, where trillions of unrealized dollars go uncollected due to lax enforcement, mainly benefiting the rich. A Harris-backed IRS is more likely to focus on restoring the integrity and respect of the tax system and ensuring that tax laws are enforced obediently and equitably.

For progressives and socialists, Harris’s commitment to expanding the IRS isn't just a technical solution—it's a bold step toward reducing wealth inequality by reducing wealth. By endorsing Harris, the IRS signals its dedication to building a more equitable society where the wealthy pay their fair share, which Harris will define, while working-class people aren't left to carry the tax burden alone, which some feel they currently do. This grand partnership ensures that public services like education, healthcare, weapons manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, abortion pills, green energy, and infrastructure are properly funded through fair taxation, which is why the IRS's endorsement of Kamala Harris is a no-brainer for the future of the nation and the IRS.

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
26 7

As a long time and dedicated supporter of Harris/Walz, we need to discuss the polling gap with 14% more men leaning toward Trump while 12% more women are backing Harris. IMHO, this reflects a broader shift away from traditional "high testosterone" ideals, which have long dominated masculine political discourse. The truth is, we don't need leadership rooted in brute force or outdated notions of strength. Feminine fragility could actually work in today's world. Kamala Harris has always shown a collaborative and inclusive leadership style that resonates with women and progressive low-T men who understand that true power comes from empathy, intelligence, and coalition-building.

The fact that more women support Harris must be celebrated as the new world order, not seen as a shortcoming. Women are traditionally lead movements for justice, climate change, racial equity, abortion liberation, and social equity, and their support for Harris is a recognition of her commitment to these issues. At a time when the political right continues to push for aggressive, divisive policies, Harris offers a path forward where emotional intelligence and accommodating diplomacy is the true strength of a leader. We need leaders who understand that the future is about shared power and collective progress, not catering to the ego-driven needs of a select few.

For men who feel left out or threatened by this change, it's time to embrace a new vision of masculinity. Being strong today means standing up for racial equity, being open to progress, and rejecting the toxic bravado that Trump represents. Harris/Walz isn't just a ticket for women or the marginalized; it's a brave new future for everyone who believes that strength is measured by your ability to care for others, to uplift the vulnerable, and to lead with compassion. There's no place for outdated "high T" politics in the world we're building.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
12 6
Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed a series of bills aimed at combating the use of AI-generated content, specifically deepfakes, in political ads and communications. The primary focus of this legislation is to prevent the spread of disinformation during elections. The new law prohibits the creation and distribution of AI-generated deepfakes that manipulate candidates or election officials in a misleading way within 120 days of an election and for 60 days afterward. This is in response to growing concerns about the impact of AI technology in undermining public trust through the spread of fake audio, video, and images.

The law also requires platforms to remove deceptive AI content when flagged and mandates clear disclosures if AI is used in political ads. Violators can face civil penalties, and courts can issue injunctions to halt the spread of such content. While supporters argue that this law is essential for protecting democracy and ensuring voters have accurate information, critics, including figures like Elon Musk, have raised concerns about the potential for this to infringe on free speech, especially regarding satirical or parody content.

This legislation comes as California prepares for what is being called the "first AI election," where AI-generated content could play a significant role in shaping public perception


Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
27 9
Where she called for very fine people on both sides to tone it down a notch....
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
63 13
Why is Biden supporting Trump???
Master troll move maybe?

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
34 8
what a waste of money despite the pander value...


5% graduation rate....
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
10 4
The point of Arlington Cemetery is to go and show respect for the men and women who have given their
lives for this country when you make it political you take away the respect of the people who are there....

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
22 6
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The woman who got 13 U.S. Service members killed in Afghanistan has issued a statement condemning a man for bragging about going to comfort the families of the fallen soldiers.

"How dare Trump go lay flowers on the fallen soldier's tombs, just because their families asked him to," said Vice President Harris. "It's disgusting -- showing up to a memorial service you were invited to. Anyway, why should he be the one accepting an invitation when I'm the one who got them killed?"

According to sources, Trump has been accused of accepting invitations from multiple Gold Star families to a solemn ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery, where he honored their fallen sons and daughters. "It's disgusting," said MSNBC's Joe Scarbarough, watching as Trump laid a wreath onto a tomb. "This just shows what depths Trump will go to, even leaving the campaign trail to attend a memorial service. Is there no low this man will not stoop to?"

Historically, getting soldiers killed through horrific incompetence has been seen as damaging politically, but after Trump's attendance at the service, the Harris campaign has decided it's time to change that narrative. "So what if she got thirteen people killed and claimed to be totally comfortable with that decision?" said campaign manager Julie Rodriguez. "Nothing is off limits for political gain, even the very deaths she caused. You get someone shot, just accuse your opponent of playing politics by going to the funeral. Then, sit back and watch the media take it from there."

At publishing time, the Harris campaign had accused Trump of offering a tissue to a crying widow.

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
53 10
I'm of course talking about Hillary, if far-left wing media is to be 100 percent believed.

So the best woman in all of America is still no match politically for a game show host with balls. 
Feminism failed in 2016, and will fail again in 2024.

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
17 6
In these challenging times, it's truly inspiring to watch Kamala Harris step up and do what’s necessary to safeguard democracy. She’s mastered the art of connecting with everyday Americans, whether it’s through her well-timed chuckles or a carefully curated wardrobe choice. We should be thankful that DNC selected Kamala is out there, tirelessly reminding us that democracy needs as much protection as her next perfectly crafted soundbite.

However, while Kamala is busy ensuring our political system stays intact, let’s not forget about the health risks lurking in our kitchens—or, as the CDC recently warned, our bathrooms. Yes, you heard that right. Apparently, washing your collard greens in the bathtub is now a thing, but it comes with a stern warning: Don’t do it! The CDC cautions against this practice, citing the potential for cross-contamination with bacteria like E. coli, or ingestion of bleach residue. So, as much as you might be tempted to dump your veggies in the tub for a quick rinse, just remember that your bathtub might not be the best salad spinner.

So, as Kamala continues to pander her way to protecting our democracy, let’s make sure we don’t let our guard down at home. The CDC is clear—keep the collard greens out of the bathtub. Stick to the sink, where at least you know the risks are limited to a bit of soap residue. Because in the grand scheme of things, we need both a healthy democracy and bacteria-free greens to thrive.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
11 7
Kamala Harris ROASTED After GETTING BUSTED LYING About Working At McDonalds As A College Student!

Walz; steals military valor
Kamala; steals McDonalds valor
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
13 4
1.  If you are capable of lowering prices for Americans, why haven’t you done it in the 3½ years you have been in office?

2. You say housing affordability would be a “Day One priority” if you were elected. Why is it not a priority now? Housing isn’t affordable for the average American in 99 percent of the nation.

3. You co-sponsored Medicare-for-All and the Green New Deal? Do you still support these multi-trillion-dollar takeovers of the American economy?

4. You talk a lot about "freedom." What about the freedoms of Laken Riley, Rachel Morin, and Jocelyn Nungaray? These women were killed by illegal immigrants who were let into the country under your watch.

5. President Trump didn't need a "border bill" to secure the border. Why did you support executive actions like stopping construction of the border wall and halting deportations that intentionally unsecured the border?

6. Trump was the first president in decades to start no new wars. Under your watch, wars are popping up in Europe and the Middle East. Why is that?

7. Why did you conceal Joe Biden's cognitive decline from the American people?

8. You supported the Defund the Police movement and have said more that police doesn’t mean more safety. Why do you want fewer police officers?

9. You’ve called for getting rid of cash bail and your campaign hasn’t backed away from it. Why do you still support such a radical view?

10. You have sent anonymous aides out to claim you've abandoned the radically liberal positions that you've held for decades. Do you think lying to the American people is the best strategy?


What other things would you like to know about Kamala?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
13 6
Kamala Harris and her allies in the controlled media have been working hard to rebrand her awkward cackling as an expression of joy, attempting to portray her as "America's mommy." Meanwhile, RFK Jr. has thrown his support behind Donald Trump, seeking to prevent what he views as the degraded Democratic Party from maintaining control of the White House. As we enter the final stretch before November, the political theater is in full swing. Many passionate but perhaps naive individuals believe that their party holds the key to America's future, thinking their vote will steer the country toward their preferred social outcomes. However, the partisan divide in America has reached an intensity not seen in over 150 years, and the majority of Americans can no longer find common ground. The political landscape has shifted from a battle between left and right to one of perceived good versus evil, where compromise seems impossible.

What many Americans fail to grasp is that Congress and the president are not the primary drivers of the laws that govern the country. Instead, it's corporations like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Amazon, AT&T, Alphabet, Pfizer, and lobbying groups like AIPAC that effectively write the laws. Senators and congressmen are often just there to rubber-stamp legislation crafted by these powerful interests. The government, despite the lip service it pays to the people, has not been "of the people, by the people, for the people" for a very long time. What we're witnessing in the lead-up to November is largely theater, designed to distract the public from the real workings of power in Washington, D.C.

In reality, most legislation is subcontracted to K Street, the hub of lobbyists in D.C., who craft laws on behalf of their clients—clients like big pharmaceutical companies, defense contractors, and even foreign governments. These lobbyists then sell their legislation to the elected officials who are supposed to represent their constituents' interests. But instead, these officials often act in the interests of those who fund their campaigns and offer them perks. When you vote for a representative or senator, you're not choosing someone who will write laws; you're choosing someone who will either approve or disapprove of laws written by lobbyists. Essentially, you are electing a hostage negotiator to the stage set by corporate lobbyists. D.C. has become the legislative arm of big business and global finance, rather than a government that truly serves the American people.

source:

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
15 5

We should be deeply concerned about the profound negative impact Donald Trump's leadership has had on the integrity and unity of our nation. Throughout his tenure, we witnessed a consistent pattern of divisive rhetoric, disregard for democratic norms, and a troubling lack of accountability.

Trump's repeated attacks on essential institutions, including corporate press and the judicial system, have undermined public trust in institutions and weakened the foundations of our democracy. His handling of critical issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, was defined by misinformation and negligence, leading to massive loss of life and prolonged economic hardship for millions of Americans that would have been saved with more money and more vaccines.

Moreover, his foreign policy decisions often alienated our long-standing allies while cozying up to authoritarian regimes, compromising our global standing and security and embroiling the globe in warfare. The incitement of hostility and the normalization of hateful discourse during his administration have left deep scars on our social fabric, fostering increased polarization, rioting, and social unrest.

We need to recognize and address the damages caused by such leadership to prevent further erosion of our democratic principles and to restore integrity, empathy, and compliance in our governance. We must stop playing nice and hold our leaders accountable, and strive for a future that prioritizes unity, truth, and the well-being of all citizens.

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
18 7
When Kamala makes a campaign promise, is it a vision for the future, or an apology for not doing it the past 4 years?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
People
5 2
When Kamala makes a campaign promise, is it a vision for the future, or an apology for not doing it the past 4 years?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
5 3
"Breaking News: If there's one group of people we can all agree on to give us the unvarnished truth, it's the folks Donald Trump personally fired! I mean, nothing says 'trustworthy' like someone who was dismissed from a job for not going along with the program, right? These brave souls, who now definitely don't have any axes to grind, are the true keepers of honesty and integrity. After all, who better to tell us how things really went down than those who got the boot? Because nothing motivates transparency like a pink slip from Trump Tower!

They’re not just spilling the beans; they’re cashing in on them too! After getting the pink slip, these former employees are generously compensated by the DNC with book deals and cushy gigs as MSM contributors. Because nothing screams 'honesty' like a hefty advance and a seat at the media table! Watch as these ex-staffers—now beloved by the left—enlighten us with their 'unbiased' revelations, proving once and for all that a firing is the best endorsement for credibility.

Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
39 9

Key takeaways: 

  • Kamala Harris avoids press conferences and relies on scripted speeches and campaign videos.
  • Supports significant government spending, including supporting $2,000 monthly payments during COVID-19.
  • Harris has flip-flopped on key issues like fracking, government-run healthcare, and gun control.
  • She has a history as a "tough prosecutor" but later supported progressive causes like bail funds during the George Floyd protests.
  • There are reports of high staff turnover and a toxic work environment in her office.
  • Has commitment to equity, as a "woke" candidate with potentially excessive government intervention policies.
  • Harris's policies, once rated as the most liberal, will increase national debt, inflation, and government control more than Biden's did.

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Category:
    Politics
    35 9

    They threw out the customers that were there to install the bus full of paid actors they brought with them!!!!
    Created:
    Updated:
    Category:
    Politics
    13 6
    this little segment has a good rundown of inflation and price controls. I posted it here to avoid the usual suspects.
    Created:
    Updated:
    Category:
    Economics
    17 5