Instigator / Con
1500
rating
4
debates
62.5%
won
Topic
#5805
We ought to do and/or not do something(s).
Status
Open challenge
The first member to accept the challenge becomes the contender.
Debate will be automatically deleted in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 5,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- 1,800
Contender / Pro
Open position
?
rating
?
debates
?
won
Description
I'm defining "ought" in the same way it's usually defined in the "is-ought gap".
In other words: a non-descriptive, prescriptive obligation to do something(s).
For PRO to win the debate, they need only demonstrate that the resolution is *probably* (>50% likely) true.
For CON to win the debate, they need only demonstrate that the resolution is not probably true (≤50% likely).
Round 1
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet