Total debates: 205
Science is objective and has a time tested method of finding truth Science and Technology make planes fly cure cancer it is the only truth the only magic that governs our lives it works bitches, and has proven we need stricter laws
There is no logic in having opinions, beliefs or faith because only facts and speculation/inquiry are valid in discerning objective truth.
I have always had my doubts but wished for it to be true Hve we been visited long ago by if not green men then maybe purple women?
I am Pro, come have a friendly discussion with me.
Scientists don't know everything, they are regular human beings
Is life created by god or did it evolve?
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
God supports this
Does consciousness arise out of matter? Can we create consciousness?
No description has been provided
Let the person who takes this debate go all the way.
No description has been provided
Origin of life debate
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
All in the title. I only have one rule. Only accept my debates if you actually believe the opposite position.
We will argue over whether a young earth is supported by science.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Should animal testing continue to be legal in parts of the world?
No description has been provided
A debate concerning the shape of the earth.
Genetically modified organisms are absolutely essential to humans.
The universe is made from only one particle in 3 states - left spin, right spin and no spin. There are not dozens of different sub-atomic particles.
CO2 doesn't cause climate change.
This debate is about if Viruses are alive. Three rounds, one for making positions, one for refuting opponents, and one for recapping.
In this debate, I try to prove that time is discrete, like little grains of sand in a clepsydra.
No description has been provided
Pro (nmvarco) will be arguing that humans are the cause of climate change. Con will be arguing that humans are not the cause of climate change.
Conifers are superior organisms to humans.
In this debate, Pro will be arguing that nature (biological factors such as genes), on average, has a more significant impact on human adult intelligence than nurture (the effect of environmental influences) while Con will be arguing the opposite, the BoP is thus shared.
Abiogenesis is the best explanation for the origin of life on Earth...see how.
No description has been provided
We will debate the different ways to colonize our solar system. My contender is not a Con we are debating different ways to do this.
This is a debate on mandatory vaccinaiton policy
No description has been provided
Should we bring back extinct species? I think so!