Total debates: 205
Debate me whether the Bible aligns with science or does it contradict Science.
No description has been provided
Prove "Triadic Dimensional-Distinction Vortical Paradigm" is NOT very versatile in explaining numerous facets of reality without contradiction numerous facets of reality; in meaning, it explains many of our realities as in the way we see the world in the normal scale, without contradiction; for there to pose no opposition to the explanation of many of our realities as in the way see the world in the normal scale.
The weakest basis if not one of them to be an atheist is a lack of evidence.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Pro will argue that science and the existence of God are capable of being reconciled. Con will argue that either science or God disproves the other.
I believe that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.
I am claiming both that math is an art and that math is not a science
No description has been provided
This debate will address whether a law should exist in the United States restricting abortion from the point of conception.
No description has been provided
Is the Holy Spirit of God's supernatural revelation, whereby a man may know and understand the veracity of His word in the Holy Scriptures (66 books of the Bible), sufficiently valid as a scientific means of substantiating the truth of God's word in the Holy Scriptures?
Fossil fuels should be banned.
IID = It Is Debated. Pretty straightforward. Abortion is murder.
The actual risks of Global Warming have been exaggerated and dramatized by politicians and environmentalists.
No description has been provided
Current evidence about Global Warming/Climate Change is misleading and too simplistic to accurately determine the cause. The fears of climate scientists and environmentalists are irrational.
Politicians fabricated Global Warming to sell us electric cars, thereby allowing them to tax us so we have to pay more for their expensive policies. I have studied this subject more now, so I can debunk anyone claiming Global Warming is real.
We need Elon to tax them to get to Mars.
From a medical standpoint, science has shown vaccines to be unreliable and cause long-term damage. Society has a moral obligation to get rid of vaccines and opt for natural cures instead.
There is no way humans came from monkeys!! Evolution is a hoax and Charles Darwin is a conspiracy theorist.
No description has been provided
Gender Affirming Therapy Is Dangerous
No description has been provided
dont come with weak arguments , this property that property like... dopamine strike to the wall ! seeking scientific factual debate !
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Theoretical concepts of an existence which is not the 3rd dimension are only possible "theoretically".
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I am going to argue that "most" contemporary mainstream scientists believe personhood begins at the point of fertilization
ID vs macroevolution
This is a mini debate about using thorium as nuclear energy
The choice to transition is often described as being unnatural. My position is that it is not. The con position would be that it is unnatural.