Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
3
debates
66.67%
won
Topic
#5847
humans are to be classified under what cell human or plant?
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After not so many votes...
It's a tie!
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
0
1408
rating
401
debates
44.01%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
I highly expect you to rebut in debate
- As team prop i am saying the cells found in the human body are to be classified under animal cells FIRST REASON some animals like rats and monkeys are used to taste medicine before human this highly shows that the cells are really similar that's why our cells are to be categorized under animals
secondly it is said that animal cell is shapeless well it is proven that human cells are shapeless to further support that statement the cells in our bodies take any shape our bodies have . For this debate i don't have much to say because science has done everything for me what is left is for people to believe .
"secondly it is said that animal cell is shapeless well it is proven that human cells are shapeless to further support that statement the cells in our bodies take any shape our bodies have . For this debate i don't have much to say because science has done everything for me what is left is for people to believe ."
The opposing side has setup only one round to make an affirmative assertive statement without proof just saying " it is proven".
Human cells are not shapeless. Why? It's because what was just said. The opposing side said "human cells". In order to affirm or declare that there are "cells", plural, there is more than one. If you know there is multiple or more than one, you know where one begins and ends and another starts and ends , so forth and so on.
,
What do you get when you're able to do that? You get a circumference or outer border, outer perimeter, outer boundary, outline. How are shapes formed? They're crafted with none other than outlines and perimeters.
A body of water or a mass of water is formless and shapeless as just water being everywhere not having a perception of where it ends or begins.
We as people have a shape. So either way, being made up of cells , the cells will take shape that shape us.
So the nature of a cell has shape . It is not shapeless in and of itself to take on any form or adapt to any shape. We as people can't do that. If our cells were that in nature, we could be shape shifters.
So because you haven't said much as you've stated, it has left you without actually demonstrating anything. Just saying science has done it is just another assertive claim and to the point of where people only believe and not know from science, questions whether it really is evidence or theory.
So the opposing side hasn't met the burden so it is actually a forfeit from the opposing side.
Thank you for an easy negation.
Case closed at this time.
in this debate each team is to state whether a human being cells are to be classified under animal or plant then prove
Is there some more info on this debate?
What exactly are you trying to debate? Your title is a little confusing...