Total debates: 285
I will take the PRO position, that a computer will be never able to replicate the human mind perfectly
No description has been provided
THBT Free will, not determinism, is, on balance, the best explanation for man’s active interaction with the universe
Truth: Any and all facts that accurately reflect reality rather than fiction or misinformation (which are unaffected by beliefs except upon a meta-level). Kritiks of definitions are totally acceptable in philosophical debates. I am Pro
it is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both.
The resolve as proposed in topic
No description has been provided
As above That's right
Good and evil co-exist as opposing necessities of free will
No description has been provided
It is time to bring it back.
Resolution: There is no end to the body of knowledge
No description has been provided
mostly intended for fruit inspector but anyone can accept
I0_0I = Pro life Opponent = Pro Choice
There is no chance of CON winning this debate
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Christianity is often criticized for it's stance on moral issues. I am interested to hear if anyone can provide a consistent system of ethics that is superior to the Bible.
Hello everyone! I have heard and seen a nonstop flow of political rhetoric from both main U.S parties (Democratic and Republican). Anyhow, I wish to delve into and hopefully debunk what I find to be bad ideas from both sides of the aisle. In this second installment (see the border wall debate) I wish to switch party lines and take on federal government benefits (including health care and welfare) that many mainstream Democrats defend.
No description has been provided
The Titanic is sinking. There are not enough lifeboats for everybody. This debate is about the policy of prioritizing women and children for life boat seats during the sinking of the Titanic. Death23 is CON. Death23 is arguing AGAINST women and children first.
No description has been provided
I'm becoming increasingly convinced of this view. I'm interested to see what y'all think as opposed to not-so-good ol' DDO.
By "exist" I mean to have objective being in reality. By God I mean an omnipotent, eternal being. By motion, I mean the actualization of a potential, in other words, change.
Scientist believe that a pig is as smart as a 3 year old child.
| Abortion is moral | Theweakeredge: Pro | Contender: Con
| Wagyu Pro | Contender Con |
"I think and therefore I am" - can science kill its creator, the mind?
Resolved: It is illogical and impractical to oppose that which does not exist.
I (Pro) will argue that morality is subjective. My opponent (Con) will argue that it is objective.
| Wagyu Pro | Contender Con |
| Wagyu Pro | Contender Con |
Calm debate concerning the nature of reality.
| Homosexuality Is Not Moral | Wagyu's: Pro | Contender: Con |
Trying to flesh out ideas in Kantian Ethics. A debate should help me structure my thoughts.
No description has been provided
Instigator Position: Affirmative (Pro) "Gender is not a binary" Contender Position: Negative (Con) "Gender is a binary" BoP is shared
No description has been provided
Come in. The full description is what you are reading.
No description has been provided
Utilitarianism is a moral system, which I will defend in the debate.
4 rounds - 30,000 character limit : Theweakeredge: "Objective morality is not real" Let's try this one again, shall we?
No Covid conspiracy theory allowed either for or against flat earth theory.