Total posts: 780
Posted in:
ive not been on a river that i can remember. but that sounds nice!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
correct me if i am wrong please, but it sounds to me that you are disagreeing with the labeling on the grounds of semantics? or do you simply reject the idea that trans women and cis women are seperate?
Created:
Posted in:
Been a few years. How is everyone doing? i got an email about dart qualifications and stuff.
Created:
Posted in:
Ui looks okay. I Haven't been on here in awhile.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
I told you to not mention or talk to me.
Created:
My words would have more meaning if you could "hear and understand" but you cant right now. God willing when you seek God you will know the truth.
Created:
The church are those filled with the holy spirit. And what i answered already is your question about jesus leaving a church or book.
You will have to do research on defiling the hands when it comes to scripture. But basically scripture is verified by its holiness and by Gods spirit.
Created:
Probably 5 or 6. 10 votes so far already. @ilikepie5
Created:
Simple. Because these books "defile the hands" i already answered that. He left the church and his spirit.
Created:
What you are not understanding is the WHY of why i made #1-#5. Its because they are different points and proposals. You can consoladate similar points. Example.
#21 trolling will now include targeted messages to people who have blocked you.
Also, multiple reports of trolling will result in a 24 hour ban.
You see the difference? Its the same subject.
Created:
Posted in:
Niv is not very good. You didnt even try to look at the hebrew. I guess the truth doesnt matter to you.
Created:
Nonsensical nature of rules is not for mods to determine but for website owner. The mods interpret, adjust and enforce the rules agreed upon.
Direction is one role.
Making it move is another.
Created:
Posted in:
Im glad you do as well. I dont like package deals
Created:
Posted in:
Venus does have some relationship to lucifer in astrological approach
Created:
The scriptures to follow are written down.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
@Dr.Franklin
@sigmaphil
@PressF4Respect
Yall as well. Would you vote the same?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
@ILikePie5
@Discipulus_Didicit
@K_Michael
@Jeff_Goldblum
Would yalls votes be the same?
Created:
I made a thread of how you should have worded it.i encourage you to watch responses.
Created:
Posted in:
You can report for cross thread or call out if you want. I just want to show ragnar how he Should have done the listings
1. Conducts in regards to trolling
Voting "yes" to this question will add the following rule to coc
- Removal of the trolling and insults rules, but adding a no targeted harassment rule.
2. conduct in regards to mod harrassment.
Voting yes will effect the following rule.
- Removal of the harassing the moderators is ok rule (don’t worry, we’ll still have thick skin).
3. rules to protect children
• Added clauses to protect children.
Full text is available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DT0dprecA-ehRtRHO4tDPmUZel4hlUrWKdydLbyFlKk/edit?usp=sharing
4. Allow PM sharing with moderator approval?
Voting “yes” would add a clause to the no sharing of Private Messages rule, to allow moderators to grant permission to settle disputes.
Currently there have been outright lies about the contents of PMs, and the victims are without real recourse. This is intended to correct that oversight.
5. Change the Voting Policy to have S&G to include organization
Voting “yes” would amend the Spelling and Grammar in the Voting Policy, to allow consideration of organizational issues, such as a 10,000 character true wall of text (no line breaks) vs a case which is easy to navigate.
Note: This is intended to inform a larger effort to overhaul the voting policies in a similar manner to the CoC.
---
Created:
If yo cant tell what im trying to show ya, you shouldnt be a mod.
Also i didnt add 100 changes. At the most i added 30. And that was to word 2 and 3
Created:
-->
@Barney
1. Ratify the new Code of Conduct?Voting "yes" to this question will overhaul and streamline the Code of Conduct.A few key changes:
- Removal of the trolling and insults rules, but adding a no targeted harassment rule.
- Removal of the harassing the moderators is ok rule (don’t worry, we’ll still have thick skin).
- Added clauses to protect children.
Full text is available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DT0dprecA-ehRtRHO4tDPmUZel4hlUrWKdydLbyFlKk/edit?usp=sharing2. Allow PM sharing with moderator approval?Voting “yes” would add a clause to the no sharing of Private Messages rule, to allow moderators to grant permission to settle disputes.Currently there have been outright lies about the contents of PMs, and the victims are without real recourse. This is intended to correct that oversight.3. Change the Voting Policy to have S&G to include organizationVoting “yes” would amend the Spelling and Grammar in the Voting Policy, to allow consideration of organizational issues, such as a 10,000 character true wall of text (no line breaks) vs a case which is easy to navigate.Note: This is intended to inform a larger effort to overhaul the voting policies in a similar manner to the CoC.---Again, feel free to make any suggestions.
Let me show you how you SHOULD have done it.
1. Conducts in regards to trolling
Voting "yes" to this question will add the following rule to coc
- Removal of the trolling and insults rules, but adding a no targeted harassment rule.
2. conduct in regards to mod harrassment.
Voting yes will effect the following rule.
- Removal of the harassing the moderators is ok rule (don’t worry, we’ll still have thick skin).
3. rules to protect children
• Added clauses to protect children.
Full text is available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DT0dprecA-ehRtRHO4tDPmUZel4hlUrWKdydLbyFlKk/edit?usp=sharing
4. Allow PM sharing with moderator approval?
Voting “yes” would add a clause to the no sharing of Private Messages rule, to allow moderators to grant permission to settle disputes.
Currently there have been outright lies about the contents of PMs, and the victims are without real recourse. This is intended to correct that oversight.
5. Change the Voting Policy to have S&G to include organization
Voting “yes” would amend the Spelling and Grammar in the Voting Policy, to allow consideration of organizational issues, such as a 10,000 character true wall of text (no line breaks) vs a case which is easy to navigate.
Note: This is intended to inform a larger effort to overhaul the voting policies in a similar manner to the CoC.
---
Again, feel free to make any suggestions.
Created:
-->
@Barney
I still say you should divide #1 into 3 seperate votes. Like i said earlier, we aint congress to put good with bad bills or bad with good bills
And dont try to over exaggerate it by saying we will have "infinite" more things to vote on if we do things that way.
We will have 3 more at the most. If you feel like there is to many items for meep process then just do a better job and bring 1 subject at a time.
Ill give an example. 1: child protection rules
2: harrassment toward mods
3: trolling
Honestly you are trying to make a package instead of topics and it is deceitful. Its exactly what congress does. They are smarter though, they stick it in the midst of 5000 words so people dont see it.
Created:
Inspiration is when ever holy men write or speak the words of God, they arent exclusive
Created:
Excellent. Now lets discuss it.
Spamming
Posting or bumping spam threads, comments, or replies is prohibited. Spam is any content which is nonsensical or excessively repetitive.
Posting or bumping spam threads, comments, or replies is prohibited. Spam is any content which is nonsensical or excessively repetitive.
Nonsensical. Could bumping a post be considered nonsensical after say, 6 months of no addition to thread?
A few websites will report or even ban necroing especially if their design is to show the latest "bumped" or tagged thread.
Whereas another site will ban people if they dont keep posting comments or questions in a relevant thread.
Now, its up to the website owner to decide which method helps best to make a productive (and in this case, progressive) atmosphere where new ideas and debates are encouraged for discussion, and older ideas and debates can be revisited for knowledge or inspiration. Based on this format, would it impede the goal of the website to constantly rebump forums or debates? Would it bring a disharmony to new ideas and discussions?
If so, then under semantic and logical process, this can be infered as a "nonsensical" act.
- having no meaning; making no sense."a nonsensical argument"
- ridiculously impractical or ill-advised.
Created:
Posted in:
Its star of the morning, not moring star. Biblically he is refrenced as son of the morning. Common mistake when you dont look indepth in the hebrew.
Also, history channel and nat geo pushes an agenda with christainity because of company pullings.
Created:
Oh, i forgot to say my vote directly. No to 1 and 3
Created:
Inspiration of the holy spirit is scripture.
Created:
Scripture wasnt chosen by tradition but by inspiration of God. Similar to old testament choosing of scripture. You ought to look up how they chose tanach over book of enoch for example.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
2: religious views. This is probably the biggest reason, its not that i hate you or anything, you just simply disregard and/or mock my views of God. If there is a desire for you to learn about God, ill do what i can to help nuture that. But these people simply dont care about God and tend to do DA or PA against me (DA direct attacks, PA personal attacks) or use fighting words.
Created:
You gonna be trolled anyways. If you make a rule saying not to insult mods for example. They could call ya ignorant and make it not be an insult. So non specific terms is a cop out. A clear general rule works for most situations. A rule that wont be tried doesnt exist.
Created:
You remove the troll and insult rules, this place will be another ddo.
Also what do you mean by harrassing? Do you mean interrupting a lunch break with a complaint or someone getting cused out cause the mod broke the rules? Harrassment should be clearly outlined and defined.
What clauses should be added to protect kids? That they arent supposed to be here if 13 or under? How are you gonna know when it is a kid?
And now you want to tell people how to type their arguements and count it for or against them in debate? People should be considerate of how they type out arguements, but its not up to mods to tell them how to. The most important thing is the reasoning. Not the spelling or typing.
These are all my questions, suggestions and objections. I ask yall to consider them. We dont need a more controlling website, just one that enforces civility as we debate and/or bond together over what we like.
Created:
Will the 3 points under ratifying conduct be under different questions? We arent congress where we have to stick in good stuff with bad stuff.
I dont mind pm sharing specifically, as long as its approved by person.
I do have a question to add. The possibily of having RO on request rather than under mod approval. No one is going to suffer from not talking to someone they dont want to.
Created:
Posted in:
Not really. And im not gonna go off topic about it.
If they violate rules, warn em, they keep doing it, ban em.
Created:
Posted in:
To answer your question. I hope to God it doesnt get made.
Created:
Posted in:
I dont consider it star control. Is it developed by toys for bob or designed by paul reiche III or fred ford? No, its not.
It aint star control as far as im concerned, just a rich company buying crap from poorer companies because of its legacy.
In 2017, Reiche and Ford announced plans to create a direct sequel to The Ur Quan Masters,[72] which would effectively bypass the story from Star Control 3, created by the now defunct Legend Entertainment.[79][80] This announcement comes after years of fan requests for a sequel.[81] wikipedia.
Anything other than that. Star control and star control II, i will not discuss
.
Created:
Letting people worship what they want caused most of the wars we have. If we all believe in 1 God and worship him in spirit and truth, there would be less or no wars.
Created:
Jesus left both. The spirit of truth and a church. You will know who interprets the scripture correctly by their fruits.
If a person says "speak in tongues to be saved" watch that person and compare it to scripture. If a persons says " faith alone will save you" watch that person and compare to scripture.
How do we know we abide in the truth? We love God, we love the brethern, and we obey God. (See 1 john 2:1-9)
Hereby we know we are in the truth.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Depends on what you are talking about. If you are regarding this thread, you dont have to care, though it would be righteous to give truth and instruction on how to serve God.
If about this topic, then everyone should care, as a belief that denies scripture will lead to damnation. Specifically if it denies Jesus Christ and how to be saved.
Created:
My interpretation is through the book and the spirit. God by divine providence protects his word, but that doesnt mean he instantly mutes people who speak wrongly of it, or misinterpret it.
I have yet to disagree with scripture, what i disagree with is the idea that man has to interpret it by traditions they establish.
Ill stick to the word of God and be saved, you keep your "oral traditions" and not obey God. Unless yall repent and obey scripture, you will be damned.
Created:
Posted in:
Its an intresting idea, but machines will not replace all humans. Too many tasks, too much thought needed.
We will not be seeing that day.
Created:
-->
@DeusVult
Oral traditions are tainted eventually. The same traditions are both oral and written. I adhere to written tradition as it isnt corrupted by mans understanding, but at most by weather and time
Created:
Posted in:
No, i block you because of your disrespect and your promotion of a false gospel, you and your friend is blocked for the same reason. If you ever want to know the real gospel, let me know.
Created: