Total posts: 393
Let’s chat about
the atheist religion and it's superior to the God religions.' morals.
Believers in the mainstream god religions often denigrate and discriminate against atheists, non-believers and rival religions on moral grounds. Godless mean without a moral sense to them.
I seek a solution to this problem, as the godless, statistically speaking, seem more moral, law abiding and peaceful than traditional mainstream religious believers who, ironically, claim a superior moral position, while having an inferior one. Statistics are quite clear on this.
As a Gnostic Christian, I get it from both sides. From believers who see me as an atheist and from atheists who see me as a believer. Both sides are wrong, given that Gnostic Christians are esoteric ecumenist and free-thinking naturalist, --- who hold no supernatural beliefs, --- regardless of the lies put into history by the inquisitors who decimated us, --- but never annihilated us. We are a religion of perpetual seekers of knowledge and wisdom, who raise the bar of excellence whenever we think we have the best ideological position.
This prevents the idol worshiping of the immoral gods, that the mainstream religions are prone to follow. This makes Gnostic Christianity a superior ideology. Perhaps this open-mindedness explains the hate towards us from god believers, as well as towards atheists and other non-believers that believers target.
Solutions to this endless denigration and discrimination are hard to come by, given that governments are not promoting any kind of dialog between the various religions and non-believers and allow religions to continue promoting vile homophobic and misogynous teachings.
To my way of thinking, be you following a theology and named god, a philosophy of a named philosopher, a religion that puts man above god and focuses on knowledge and wisdom like mine, a political tribe like Democrats and Republican, statism or any other thinking system, --- all groups named are following an ideology, --- and can thus be seem and described as a religion.
It is thus proper English to call atheism a religion. In fact, given the stats, atheism is a more moral religion than most. I am thinking that if all atheist proudly took on the religion label, --- as their atheist churches are doing, --- more god believing religionist would likely opt for atheism as their religion so as to improve their moral sense.
Take your deserved bow my atheist friends. You are now second only to my own Gnostic Christianity. We Gnostic Christian did what I advise here before the inquisitors got to us and that may be why we were known as the only good Christians.
Believers in the mainstream god religions often denigrate and discriminate against atheists, non-believers and rival religions on moral grounds. Godless mean without a moral sense to them.
I seek a solution to this problem, as the godless, statistically speaking, seem more moral, law abiding and peaceful than traditional mainstream religious believers who, ironically, claim a superior moral position, while having an inferior one. Statistics are quite clear on this.
As a Gnostic Christian, I get it from both sides. From believers who see me as an atheist and from atheists who see me as a believer. Both sides are wrong, given that Gnostic Christians are esoteric ecumenist and free-thinking naturalist, --- who hold no supernatural beliefs, --- regardless of the lies put into history by the inquisitors who decimated us, --- but never annihilated us. We are a religion of perpetual seekers of knowledge and wisdom, who raise the bar of excellence whenever we think we have the best ideological position.
This prevents the idol worshiping of the immoral gods, that the mainstream religions are prone to follow. This makes Gnostic Christianity a superior ideology. Perhaps this open-mindedness explains the hate towards us from god believers, as well as towards atheists and other non-believers that believers target.
Solutions to this endless denigration and discrimination are hard to come by, given that governments are not promoting any kind of dialog between the various religions and non-believers and allow religions to continue promoting vile homophobic and misogynous teachings.
To my way of thinking, be you following a theology and named god, a philosophy of a named philosopher, a religion that puts man above god and focuses on knowledge and wisdom like mine, a political tribe like Democrats and Republican, statism or any other thinking system, --- all groups named are following an ideology, --- and can thus be seem and described as a religion.
It is thus proper English to call atheism a religion. In fact, given the stats, atheism is a more moral religion than most. I am thinking that if all atheist proudly took on the religion label, --- as their atheist churches are doing, --- more god believing religionist would likely opt for atheism as their religion so as to improve their moral sense.
Take your deserved bow my atheist friends. You are now second only to my own Gnostic Christianity. We Gnostic Christian did what I advise here before the inquisitors got to us and that may be why we were known as the only good Christians.
Since following an ideology is a prerequisite of religion, atheism can be considered a religion, since atheists draws on philosophical ideologies to guide ideas, behaviors, and actions, like that of any religion. That is why atheist churches are called atheist churches.
Atheists Are Sometimes More Religious Than Christians
A new study shows how poorly we understand the beliefs of people who identify as atheist, agnostic, or nothing in particular.
Americans are deeply religious people—and atheists are no exception. Western Europeans are deeply secular people—and Christians are no exception.
These twin statements are generalizations, but they capture the essence of a fascinating finding in a new study about Christian identity in Western Europe. By surveying almost 25,000 people in 15 countries in the region, and comparing the results with data previously gathered in the U.S., the Pew Research Center discovered three things.
First, researchers confirmed the widely known fact that, overall, Americans are much more religious than Western Europeans. They gauged religious commitment using standard questions, including “Do you believe in God with absolute certainty?” and “Do you pray daily?”
Second, the researchers found that American “nones”—those who identify as atheist, agnostic, or nothing in particular—are more religious than European nones. The notion that religiously unaffiliated people can be religious at all may seem contradictory, but if you disaffiliate from organized religion it does not necessarily mean you’ve sworn off belief in God, say, or prayer.
The third finding reported in the study is by far the most striking. As it turns out, “American ‘nones’ are as religious as—or even more religious than—Christians in several European countries, including France, Germany, and the U.K.”
“That was a surprise,” Neha Sahgal, the lead researcher on the study, told me. “That’s the comparison that’s fascinating to me.” She highlighted the fact that whereas only 23 percent of European Christians say they believe in God with absolute certainty, 27 percent of American nones say this.
America is a country so suffused with faith that religious attributes abound even among the secular. Consider the rise of “atheist churches,” which cater to Americans who have lost faith in supernatural deities but still crave community, enjoy singing with others, and want to think deeply about morality. It’s religion, minus all the God stuff. This is a phenomenon spreading across the country, from the Seattle Atheist Church to the North Texas Church of Freethought. The Oasis Network, which brings together non-believers to sing and learn every Sunday morning, has affiliates in nine U.S. cities.
Last month, almost 1,000 people streamed into a [Atheist] church in San Francisco for an unprecedented event billed as “Beyoncé Mass.” Most were people of color and members of the LGBTQ community. Many were secular. They used Queen Bey’s songs, which are replete with religious symbolism, as the basis for a communal celebration—one that had all the trappings of a religious service. That seemed completely fitting to some, including one reverend who said, “Beyoncé is a better theologian than many of the pastors and priests in our church today.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...theists-religious-european-christians/560936/
Created:
-->
@Shila
I understand the situation and the great reward for humanity.
What is the problem with A & E following Satan's God given command to ignore God's command?
Yahweh did not put Satan there to be ignored.
Get with the story by recognizing that in the myth part of Christianity, just as in nature, the epitome of evil to a man is a woman.
Have you not noted the definitely female breasts they give Satan in the Vatican's Expulsion painting?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
Christians sing of Adam's sin being a happy fault and necessary to God's plan, just as nature would sing.
What help would you give, given that if they sin, they profit?
Any help would likely harm them more than any good from no longer sinning or competing as evolution would call it.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Conservallectual
I see a lot more good in the world than evil.
For instance, globally, we continue to pull people out from under the poverty line.
If you do not see the great human progress, what do you see?
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Think DNA genealogical trails and you might have a different view.
If a father has no claim to his potential child, that is a double standard.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
There is definitely a double standard in play, on a number of fronts.
Does reversing abortion laws give all non-white Americans a better socio-economic demographic position?
Statistically, more non-whites are aborted than whites.
Reverse this trend and the shrinking white demographic dominance goes into overdrive.
White is demographically shooting itself in the foot.
White power, at this point in time, is being quite generous to non-whites.
One might see it all as a huge white restitution and reparations to all those non-whites we white predators stressed.
Are white Americans who are on the right, aware of what they are giving up, demographically speaking?
Should the non-white Americans be on the right wing side on this, just for the benefits of fast tracking their control?
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
Compare the Jewish view and whatever view others put into the die for me Jesus delusion.
Ezekiel
18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity
of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the
righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the
wicked shall be upon him.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
The world reeks of it.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
Their need was obviously not met.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
It is demonstrable.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
Now you are wasting my time.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
To believe in miracles or the supernatural, is not the brightest way to think.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
My interest is in the garbage Christian morals.
We do not know if a Jesus ever existed, but we do know that Christian morals are garbage.
Regards
DL
Created:
You refuse to discus your immoral views.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Superseded???
You mean we were exterminated by those of your inquisitor ilk.
You will not be enlightened by me if you continue to believe in the supernatural and miracles that allow you to abdicate your own responsibilities.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
Not a word on the poor morals.
So many do not want to stop sinning.
A good way to end here.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
I cannot agree.
Most religious are moral agents.
Most do not and cannot walk their religious talk in most sane and just nations.
Society would not allow it elsewhere in the free world.
We are all natural mimics and slaved to our tribal natures.
We crave fellowship and that can only be found in tribes and groups, regardless of the ism the group is mimicking.
It is great that the God religions are dying and the religions that put man above God are gaining converts.
Religions overall, as I see things, are all going Gnostic.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me,
The only escape from this curse was to be born of a Virgin as in Jesus’s case.
===========
Yet Jesus taught the opposite.
I gave you those quotes in----
On Jesus dying for
Christians. Try to think in a moral way.
It takes quite an inflated ego to think a god
would actually die for us, after condemning us unjustly in the first place.
Christians have swallowed a lie and don’t care
how evil they make Jesus to keep their feel good get out of hell free card.
It is a lie, first and foremost, because, like
it or not, having another innocent person suffer or die for the wrongs you have
done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is
immoral.
To abdicate your personal responsibility for
your actions or use a scapegoat is immoral.
Christians also have to ignore what Jesus, as
a Jewish Rabbi, would have taught his people.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul
that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father,
neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the
righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon
him.
Deuteronomy
24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children,
nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be
put to death for his own sin.
Psa 49;7 None of them
can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
There is no way that Christians would teach
their children to use a scapegoat to escape their just punishments and here you
are promoting doing just that.
Jesus is just a smidge less immoral than his
demiurge genocidal father, and here you are trying to put him as low in moral
fiber as Yahweh. Tsk tsk.
Regards
DL
Created:
What you see as evil in the world, some see as good.RegardsDL
I hope I am wrong in that case.
------------------
Christians sing that Adam's sin was a happy fault and necessary to God's plan.
They are right, even as they have forgotten why.
If you wish to argue, lets.
----------------
Can you help but do evil? I do not see
how. Do you?
And if you cannot, why would
God punish you?
Christians are always trying
to absolve God of moral culpability in the fall by putting forward their free
will argument and placing all the blame on mankind.
That usually sounds like
----God gave us free will and it was our free willed choices that caused our
fall. Hence God is not blameworthy. Such statements simply avoid God's
culpability as the author and creator of human nature.
Free will is only the ability
to choose. It is not an explanation why anyone would want to choose
"A" or "B" (bad or good action). An explanation for why Eve
would even have the nature of "being vulnerable to being easily swayed by
a serpent" and "desiring to eat a forbidden fruit" must lie in
the nature God gave Eve in the first place. Hence God is culpable for
deliberately making humans with a nature-inclined-to-fall, and "free
will" means nothing as a response to this problem.
If all do evil/sin by nature
then, the evil/sin nature is dominant. If not, we would have at least some who
would not do evil/sin. Can we then help but do evil? I do not see how. Do you?
Having said the above for the
God that I do not believe in, I am a Gnostic Christian naturalist, let me tell
you that evil and sin is all human generated and in this sense, I agree with
Christians, but for completely different reasons. Evil is mankind’s
responsibility and not some imaginary God’s. Free will is something that can
only be taken. Free will cannot be given not even by a God unless it has been
forcibly withheld.
Much has been written to
explain evil and sin but I see as a natural part of evolution.
Consider.
First, let us eliminate what
some see as evil. Natural disasters. These are unthinking occurrences and are
neither good nor evil. There is no intent to do evil even as victims are
created. Without intent to do evil, no act should be called evil.
In secular courts, this is
called mens rea. Latin for an evil mind or intent and without it, the court will
not find someone guilty even if they know that they are the perpetrator of the
act.
Evil then is only human to
human when they know they are doing evil and intend harm.
As evolving creatures, all we
ever do, and ever can do, is compete or cooperate.
Cooperation we would see as
good as there are no victims created. Competition would be seen as evil as it
creates a victim. We all are either cooperating, doing good, or competing,
doing evil, at all times.
Without us doing some of
both, we would likely go extinct.
This, to me, explains why
there is evil in the world quite well.
Be you a believer in nature,
evolution or God, you should see that what Christians see as something to
blame, evil, we should see that what we have, competition, deserves a huge
thanks for being available to us. Wherever it came from, God or nature, without
evolution we would go extinct. We must do good and evil.
There is no conflict between
nature and God on this issue. This is how things are and should be. We all must
do what some will think is evil as we compete and create losers to this
competition.
This link speak to theistic
evolution.
If theistic evolution is
true, then the myth of Eden should be read as a myth and there is not really
any original sin.
Doing evil then is actually
forced on us by evolution and the need to survive. Our default position is to
cooperate or to do good. I offer this clip as proof of this. You will note that
we default to good as it is better for survival.
Can you help but do evil? I
do not see how. Do you?
And if you cannot, why would
God punish you?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
Let's chat on the morals that would have you ignore what Jesus taught, and sin to be saved?
On Jesus dying for you and Christians. Try to think in a moral way.
It takes quite an inflated ego to think a god would actually die for us, after condemning us unjustly in the first place.
Christians have swallowed a lie and don’t care how evil they make Jesus to keep their feel good get out of hell free card.
It is a lie, first and foremost, because, like it or not, having another innocent person suffer or die for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.
To abdicate your personal responsibility for your actions or use a scapegoat is immoral.
Christians also have to ignore what Jesus, as a Jewish Rabbi, would have taught his people.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
Psa 49;7 None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
There is no way that Christians would teach their children to use a scapegoat to escape their just punishments and here you are promoting doing just that.
It takes quite an inflated ego to think a god would actually die for us, after condemning us unjustly in the first place.
Christians have swallowed a lie and don’t care how evil they make Jesus to keep their feel good get out of hell free card.
It is a lie, first and foremost, because, like it or not, having another innocent person suffer or die for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.
To abdicate your personal responsibility for your actions or use a scapegoat is immoral.
Christians also have to ignore what Jesus, as a Jewish Rabbi, would have taught his people.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
Psa 49;7 None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
There is no way that Christians would teach their children to use a scapegoat to escape their just punishments and here you are promoting doing just that.
Jesus is just a smidge less immoral than his demiurge genocidal father, and here you are trying to put him as low in moral fiber as Yahweh. Tsk tsk.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
What you see as evil in the world, some see as good.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
Sons of Gods screwing our human women caused Yahweh to use genocide on the whole of Noah's earth.
To think that a returning, genocidal Armageddon holding savior like Jesus is good, is way too immoral of a position for me to endorse.
What denomination do you follow?
Why would you think that a God who can cure as easily as kill would choose to kill?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
I am a realist and see a lot more good than evil.
As a Gnostic Christian, I can see the underlying perfection of what is around me.
The Gnostic
Christian reality.
Gnostic Christian Jesus said, "Those who seek should not stop seeking until they find. When they find, they will be disturbed. When they are disturbed, they will marvel, and will reign over all.
[And after they have reigned they will rest.]"
"If those who attract you say, 'See, the Kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you.
If they say to you, 'It is under the earth,' then the fish of the sea will precede you.
Rather, the Kingdom of God is inside of you, and it is outside of you.
[Those who] become acquainted with [themselves] will find it; [and when you] become acquainted with yourselves, [you will understand that] it is you who are the sons of the living Father.
But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty."
As you can see from that quote, if we see God's kingdom all around us and inside of us, we cannot think that the world is anything but evolving perfection. Most just don't see it and live in poverty. Let me try to make you see the world the way I do.
Here is a mind exercise. Tell me what you see when you look around. The best that can possibly be, given our past history, or an ugly and imperfect world?
Candide.
"It is demonstrable that things cannot be otherwise than as they are; for as all things have been created for some end, they must necessarily be created for the best end.”
That means that we live in the best of all possible worlds, because it is the only possible world, given all the conditions at hand and the history that got us here. That is an irrefutable statement given entropy and the anthropic principle.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Shila
Jacob strove both for and against God when creating Jewry.
All of us should seek a master, but only to be able to do better.
Remember that Jesus takes over when he gets to heaven.
So should we all wish to.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@rosends
Jesus asked the Jews in the bible, have ye forgotten that ye are Gods?
No one said yes, yet you see them as the majority.
You win this one.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
Throwing more derogatory names at me makes this your second childish posts in a row.
Let me correct your thinking that I was calling Joseph a deadbeat dad.
I was calling the genocidal prick Yahweh that.
Now go away as I have no time for those like you.
I am trying to improve my style and you are not worth my time.
Regards
DL
Created:
Genocidal a holes, amoral, no. Immoral, yes.
Take all the ego boosts and wins you need, but with someone else, child.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@ebuc
I agree completely, as long as, and I take it that you are referring to adults only, and not those of inappropriate age or mental condition.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Tradesecret
No.
What it make me is correct, unless you have a moral argument against my stated position that are superior.
"Every person is moral."
Yep, even Hitler and Stalin, Right?
Regards
DL
Created:
"And no one is right and no one is wrong."
This is an outright lie when it come to the morality of Yahweh/Jesus.
Christians adore that genocidal prick.
I am right.
Prove me wrong.
I ask that of all Christians and they always run away from doing apologetics for the prick they say they adore.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
More like normal people who have yet to be properly reared.
All of us being tribal, we like to show our loyalty to our own and we do so by looking for something to hate the other side for doing or being.
Note how your own government works.
They do the same thing and will find fault, even where there is none.
It is called putting your tribe ahead of your moral sense.
Regards
DL
Created:
Posted in:
What I find funny about the virgin birth, is that it was ever accepted by people.
People have to see Joseph as being cuckolded by Yahweh, who was practicing bestiality to reproduce a chimera half bred son.
People would also have to see Yahweh as a deadbeat dad, given that he screwed off after impregnating Joseph's wife.
Reproduction wise, man is greater than God, because we can reproduce true and not just a chimera from an inferior species.
We can also make many children while Yahweh can only make one.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@sadolite
"normalizing homosexuality"
When was homosexuality not alive and well in the human tribe/species?
Your hate is what is not normal.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
Wanting all the right all other citizens have is the only agenda I see.
One would think equal rights would be a part of American thinking.
Oh well.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
"It is very unlikely that any ideological opponent of homosexuality, actually has an irrational fear of homosexuals."
I agree.
Homophobes are rational in their arguments that discriminate without any just cause.
They are rational, while being immoral.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@sadolite
Let me add to what you know.
Homophobes are poorly adjusted mentally. They discriminate without a just cause.
They, like you it seems, put sex, gender and reproduction over love.
You do know what love is I hope.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
"And let's be clear....I'm not the slightest bit interested in what other people get up to as long as they do it peaceably."
Nice. That should make you anti homophobes.
IMO, those who do not actively try to convert those immoral jerks, neglect your moral duty.
Right?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
nurtured nature. (See how you deliberately misconstrued my comment)
Nice that you knew I would do so with your made up undefined term of nurtured nature.
If you want to try English I am here for you.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@sadolite
Willful sexual self destruction???
The gays I have known do not do so.
Who do you see doing so, and why?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@FLRW
This indicates that the condition is quite natural.
Did you note that the lower animals seem to be above man on this issue.
We are a really obtuse and stupid species.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@badger
Hmm.
You see a nurtured condition, and yet say that the one being conditioned has no choice but to have the indoctrination stick.
I can't make sense of what you think.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
You indicate gayness is a nurtured condition.
Are you saying gayness is something that a parent can train their children to be?
Why would a parent or anyone else want to evolve a straight person into a gay one?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@sadolite
If I accept that it is a brain disorder, why are the religious hating so many mentally sick people?
That is really immoral and stupid. Right?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Tradesecret
Opinion without argument, and you God is a genocidal prick, be you want to admit it or not.
Moral people will agree.
Regards
DL
Created:
Religions are in the entertainment ands story telling profession, given that the God religions are based on myths and not reality.
We all pay for our other entertainment so it would be proper to pay a church if it provided you with a service.
What other theatre has free admission?
All liars and good con men want to be paid.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
"Right, now it's a time for a sing song."
I like your tone.
I wondered if you had ever questioned a Christian as to why they sing of Adam's sin as a happy fault and necessary to God's plan?
I get silence in reply, as if they did not seem to know or be able to do apologetics for their own theology.
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Tradesecret
Correct.
Both religious and political liars are fucking us all and that is why the less religion the less fucking we get.
Especially given their genocidal, homophobic and misogynous prick of a God.
The secular God, money, is better. Right?
Or do you favor the prick?
Regards
DL
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Always from a moral POV, and have you noted has fast those moral cowards run away?
To promote Christianity is to promote homophobia and misogyny, and that a God who kills when he could just as easily cure, is a good god.
Are you ready to talk that a hole theology?
How about formally? I have yet to even try that.
Regards
DL
Created: