Debate?

Author: Yassine

Posts

Total: 327
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@PGA2.0
I enjoyed it. A really good series! I actually speak and recognize a few words of Arabic (i.e., Inshallah and of course the most common greeting "Salam Alaikum")
- Oh yeah, 40% of Turkish vocabulary is Arabic. I moved to Turkey recently, wonderful people.


It means that everything predicted about the Jewish Messiah was fulfilled by Jesus. It means that the whole OT is a type and shadow of a greater truth, a spiritual truth. Jesus is revealed in most pages of the OT. Not only this, what was predicted of Israel is fulfilled too.
- We too believe Jesus (pbuh) is the Messiah, & that he will descend at the end of time.


Yes, I know.

Psalm 118:22 (NASB)
The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone.


2 Corinthians 3:14-16 (NASB)
14 But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil [a]remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ. 15 But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their heart; 16 but whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
- Do you abide by the OT?


His reputation goes before him. He has gained support. Thus, harder to win against. 
- He's a good debater too.
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@keithprosser
The winner of a debate is the best debater, not the one who is right.
- It helps though. Debates are essentially about creating doubt or convincing others. 

TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Yassine
Why don't you tell me what rules you like to see?
You decide. I either accept or don't.
I don't know, the Quran is a divine revelation & God absolutely exists. But I like your confidence. 
Confidence in your beliefs is not a good argument. My comment was not intended in anyway simply stating what is. I rather the arguments do what confidence can't which is make a convincing argument.
What should be the resolution?
Does the Qur'an support the existence of God?
This would be two burdens you would have to fill.
1) God exists.
2) This is supported using the Qur'an.

Since you are a Muslim you should already have the information with you to make such an argument.

I know I did say I will allow you to make the rules but there are 2 things I would like for the debate.
1) 1 week for me to make an argument/
2) 30k character limit. If that is too much just drop it down to as low as 10k. I don't think I have ever reached the 30k character limit but just to make sure if I do come close most of my argument can be submitted if not most then more than what the other character limits were able to do. 
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Yassine
I enjoyed it. A really good series! I actually speak and recognize a few words of Arabic (i.e., Inshallah and of course the most common greeting "Salam Alaikum")
- Oh yeah, 40% of Turkish vocabulary is Arabic. I moved to Turkey recently, wonderful people.

Yes, I've heard that. It is somewhere I would like to see also. Are you located in Istanbul? So many of the Turkish shows I've watched have a panorama of the city. 



It means that everything predicted about the Jewish Messiah was fulfilled by Jesus. It means that the whole OT is a type and shadow of a greater truth, a spiritual truth. Jesus is revealed in most pages of the OT. Not only this, what was predicted of Israel is fulfilled too.
- We too believe Jesus (pbuh) is the Messiah, & that he will descend at the end of time.
The biblical and historical evidence is strong to say He already has. Argued any other way shows many inconsistencies.



Yes, I know.

Psalm 118:22 (NASB)
The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone.


2 Corinthians 3:14-16 (NASB)
14 But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil [a]remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ. 15 But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their heart; 16 but whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
- Do you abide by the OT?
No, I believe the OT was abolished in AD 70. 



His reputation goes before him. He has gained support. Thus, harder to win against. 
- He's a good debater too.

Yes.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,052
3
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
3
3
3
-->
@Yassine
@PGA2.0
@TheRealNihilist
His reputation goes before him. He has gained support. Thus, harder to win against. 
So does the truth of the Koran depend on how many friends a debater has ?

TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@keithprosser
So does the truth of the Koran depend on how many friends a debater has ?
If you want me to say what is socially accepted would be considered truth then yeah. Sorry to break it to you that humans would rather have comfort than be contrarians or go against the norm majority of the time to take the factual position. If people did work that way we would have an actual unity between guess that is not the case because eventually we would realize this is the end of what we are capable of and if everyone were taking the factual position then everyone would be the same. Facts are not facts if it is changed to suit a worldview. It is a fact when you bow down to its will and accept it for what it is. We just have different areas having different socially accepted ideas which they consider to be true.  

PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@keithprosser
His reputation goes before him. He has gained support. Thus, harder to win against. 
So does the truth of the Koran depend on how many friends a debater has ?

No, with Ragnar, he has gained support because he knows how to argue well, spot fallacious thinking, and exploit weaknesses. Thus, the arguments against his have to be that much better.

The truth claims of the Muslim regarding the Qur'an could very well depend on who judges the debate. If the majority of the population is Muslim then the bias could affect the outcome. Minority positions (things that go against the norm) could receive a negative vote for a number of reasons, to my thinking. One could be understanding. If you are judging an argument that you know very little about it could sway your thinking negatively (lack of education on a particular subject). Truth in arguments is based on whether the premises (one or both in the case of a syllogism) are true and whether the conclusion is sound or cogent. For some, perhaps most, that could be hard to determine in some arguments unless it is very obvious.  


Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Yassine
Ok, so you believe in God's word.

Do you believe in God's spirit?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Mopac
Ok, so you believe in God's word.

Do you believe in God's spirit?
- What does God's spirit mean? In the Quran, 'word' & 'spirit'/'soul' from God refers to Jesus Son of Mary (pbut).
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@PGA2.0
Yes, I've heard that. It is somewhere I would like to see also. Are you located in Istanbul? So many of the Turkish shows I've watched have a panorama of the city. 
- I was in Istanbul, & I fly there frequently, but I'm located in Ankara now. I'm moving there soon though.


The biblical and historical evidence is strong to say He already has. Argued any other way shows many inconsistencies.
- What biblical & historical evidence?


No, I believe the OT was abolished in AD 70.
- What does that mean? Why do you believe that?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Confidence in your beliefs is not a good argument. My comment was not intended in anyway simply stating what is. I rather the arguments do what confidence can't which is make a convincing argument.
- Let's hope so.


Does the Qur'an support the existence of God?
This would be two burdens you would have to fill.
1) God exists.
2) This is supported using the Qur'an.
- Is this to say: God, as defined in the Quran, exists? Or: God exists & the Quran confirms it?


Since you are a Muslim you should already have the information with you to make such an argument.

I know I did say I will allow you to make the rules but there are 2 things I would like for the debate.
1) 1 week for me to make an argument/
2) 30k character limit. If that is too much just drop it down to as low as 10k. I don't think I have ever reached the 30k character limit but just to make sure if I do come close most of my argument can be submitted if not most then more than what the other character limits were able to do. 
- 30k is too much, no one has the time through a 60k character round! 20k tops. & how many rounds?
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@keithprosser
So does the truth of the Koran depend on how many friends a debater has ?
- Of course not, that's nonsense. But in this forum, winning is indeed -at least partially- a popularity contest. 

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Yassine

What does God's spirit mean? In the Quran, 'word' & 'spirit'/'soul' from God refers to Jesus Son of Mary (pbut).

We Orthodox Christians have a prayer that we say to begin our other prayers that explains it well I think.

"O heavenly King, O Comforter, the Spirit of truth, who art in all places and fillest all things; Treasury of good things and Giver of life: Come and dwell in us and cleanse us from every stain, and save our souls, O gracious Lord."


When Jesus Christ, took flesh from the ever virgin Mary and theotokos, He was conceived by The Holy Spirit. It is this same Holy Spirit that we say in our creed, or statement of belief...

"And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, and Giver of Life,
Who proceedeth from the Father,
Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified,
Who spake by the Prophets;"

So we say that the Holy Spirit is what spoke through the prophets.





Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Mopac
We Orthodox Christians have a prayer that we say to begin our other prayers that explains it well I think.

"O heavenly King, O Comforter, the Spirit of truth, who art in all places and fillest all things; Treasury of good things and Giver of life: Come and dwell in us and cleanse us from every stain, and save our souls, O gracious Lord."


When Jesus Christ, took flesh from the ever virgin Mary and theotokos, He was conceived by The Holy Spirit. It is this same Holy Spirit that we say in our creed, or statement of belief...

"And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, and Giver of Life,
Who proceedeth from the Father,
Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified,
Who spake by the Prophets;"

So we say that the Holy Spirit is what spoke through the prophets.
- Some of this sounds like the archangel Gabriel. What evidence is there of this 'Holy Spirit'? Isn't God the giver of life?

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
The Holy Spirit is The Spirit of Truth.

The Word of God is The Truth.



PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Yassine
Yes, I've heard that. It is somewhere I would like to see also. Are you located in Istanbul? So many of the Turkish shows I've watched have a panorama of the city. 
- I was in Istanbul, & I fly there frequently, but I'm located in Ankara now. I'm moving there soon though.
No, I'm not very familiar with Ankara except I know it is the capital. 



The biblical and historical evidence is strong to say He already has. Argued any other way shows many inconsistencies.
- What biblical & historical evidence?
The destruction of the temple and city in AD 70, for instance. The promised Messiah coming to an Old Covenant people that no longer exist in covenant relationship as specified in the (written) Torah after AD 70, for another. 



No, I believe the OT was abolished in AD 70.
- What does that mean? Why do you believe that?
I mean the Old Covenant can no longer be followed as specified per the (written) Torah. The priesthood no longer offers sacrifice as specified. Many are dispersed across the Roman world. The feast days no longer are met as specified. The temple no longer exists in which the sacrificial offerings for the sins of the people on the Day of Atonement were offered to God. The scrolls that contained the lineage details are destroyed. Various passages of Scripture cannot be fulfilled after AD 70 concerning the Messiah.

Hebrews 8:13 (NASB)
13 When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear.
 
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@PGA2.0
Here is a good one from the prophet Jeremiah I am sure you know...


"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more."

The Church!

"Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:
If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.

Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD."


Or to put it another way, The Church ain't going anywhere. Up here is a much less crass and poetic way of saying, "when hell freezes over".


TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Yassine
Is this to say: God, as defined in the Quran, exists? Or: God exists & the Quran confirms it?
Tell me the labels you have for God that are in the Qur'an then I'll say what I'll accept.
30k is too much, no one has the time through a 60k character round! 20k tops. & how many rounds?
30k is the maximum not what we both be reaching. It is there just in case if we need it. You decide on the Rounds. More than 3 less than 5.
Who has the burden of proof? 
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Mopac
The Orthodox Catholic Church recognizes free will as being part of what it means to be made in God's image. That being the case, we do not punish apostates, but pray for them.
- This attitude towards apostasy is quite modern in adoption, especially by the major churches (including the Eastern Church). Apostasy was punished by death -or at least exile- in much of the Christian world, until the late modern era. In the Islamic world, Christian dominions were specifically disallowed from carrying out apostasy penalties even within their domains, though with exceptions. That been said, things have indeed changed now, as secular law & morality took over.


We do not believe in persecuting heretics or waging holy wars. The Church is not intended to be a secular or worldly power, as Christ said "My Kingdom is not of this world."
- Yet, history is testimony to the contrary. The religion is still a source of morality & spirituality, & as a source of morality, it should dictate laws or at least guide them. Believing in the morality of the Church on one hand & practicing the morality of Secularism on the other, I find, profoundly incoherent & hypocritical.


We do believe that all secular or worldly authorities have been given that authority by God, whether they are good or evil. 
- Do you believe God gives authority to those who are evil?


The church's experience is that those who convert from Islam face very real threat of being killed in the Muslim world. Both past and present.
- I wouldn't know how the Church would've "experienced" that... On a case to case basis, leaving a religion sacred to those around you can harvest some bad consequences, that has nothing to do with Islam. I have a friend in Arizona whose father threatened to kill her if she becomes Muslim. Even in America, sometimes it does end with killing [https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2015/12/arizona-woman-shoots-and-kills-atheist-for-not-believing-in-god/]. In South America, it's not even uncommon. As to the directive of religion itself, the rulings on apostasy are clear & detailed (depending on the different schools of thought). A non-politicized or publicized apostasy is inconsequential in Islamic Law. Historically, there are no records of any penalized individual apostasy case by a sovereign authority. The cases in which these things happened, were usually under rebellious or fringe regimes, such as the case of Khawarij. In fact, some of the most famous intellectuals in Islamic history were known to have declared apostasy, like al-Maari & ar-Razi & al-Mutanabi...etc. 


We are really off topic here, I think it would be better to make a new topic if you would.
- Moved.

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@PGA2.0
The destruction of the temple and city in AD 70, for instance. The promised Messiah coming to an Old Covenant people that no longer exist in covenant relationship as specified in the (written) Torah after AD 70, for another. 
- I heard this argument before, it's very flawed, otherwise the Jews would've recognized him as the Messiah.


I mean the Old Covenant can no longer be followed as specified per the (written) Torah. The priesthood no longer offers sacrifice as specified. Many are dispersed across the Roman world. The feast days no longer are met as specified. The temple no longer exists in which the sacrificial offerings for the sins of the people on the Day of Atonement were offered to God. The scrolls that contained the lineage details are destroyed. Various passages of Scripture cannot be fulfilled after AD 70 concerning the Messiah.
- Alright, in a sense I guess. But didn't Jesus (pbuh) confirmed the Torah of Moses?



Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Tell me the labels you have for God that are in the Qur'an then I'll say what I'll accept.
- Wut?!


30k is the maximum not what we both be reaching. It is there just in case if we need it. You decide on the Rounds. More than 3 less than 5.
Who has the burden of proof? 
- If you're not gunna reach it, then you don't need it. 20k is too much. 4 rounds it is. Of course BOP shared. 

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Yassine
Secular is another way of saying worldly. 

You confuse The Roman Empire with The Church. We do not kill apostates.
Muslims do kill apostates though, and this goes back even to Mohammed and his successors.


In the Islamic world, Christian dominions were specifically disallowed from carrying out apostasy penalties even within their domains, though with exceptions. That been said, things have indeed changed now, as secular law & morality took over.

The church has not changed morally, we have always taught the same thing. The Turks imposed on the church to act in a judicial manner through the millet system, but the church is not intended to be a worldly power. Because of how the Orthodox Church is organized, it is able to revert back to normal after government imposition ceases. There has never been a period in history where government didn't meddle with the church, but the church survives.


The religion is still a source of morality & spirituality, & as a source of morality, it should dictate laws or at least guide them. Believing in the morality of the Church on one hand & practicing the morality of Secularism on the other, I find, profoundly incoherent & hypocritical.
Guidance yes, dictate, no. The church is not a worldly authority. Islam is as much a worldly secular authority as it is a religion. We Orthodox are not like this. The church is distinct from secular worldly government. 


Do you believe God gives authority to those who are evil?

Of course. God granted authority to the Roman Empire. God granted authority to the Tzars of Russia, the bolsheviks. The Caliphate. Who can give authority but God? Even Satan has no power but that which was granted by God.


Your examples of "Christians" killing apostates is somewhat silly because none of the examples are Orthodox Christians, and even if they were, the Church's official position is that we do not kill apostates or execute any type of juridical authority whatsoever. In fact, the merging of church and state even has its own heretical name in Caesaropapism. 

I find it difficult to believe that in Islam it isn't the norm for apostasy from Islam to be punishable by death, since this has been the norm since the beginning.




TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
Wut?!
Omnipotent, omnipresent etc,
If you're not gunna reach it, then you don't need it. 20k is too much. 4 rounds it is. Of course BOP shared. 
Who is starting? I would like to since the BOP is shared. 

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Mopac
From whence came your church's morals?
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Mopac
Secular is another way of saying worldly. 
- Sure.


You confuse The Roman Empire with The Church. We do not kill apostates.
- I may not be an expert in the Bible & the various Christian traditions, but I know a bit about history & I don't like when Christians deny their history. *Canon Law*. Death penalty for apostasy was a normal thing in all religious traditions, be it Jews or Christians or whatever.. even John Locke, the supposed father of Liberalism, believed in penalty for apostasy. This whole change of attitude is quite recent...


Muslims do kill apostates though, and this goes back even to Mohammed and his successors.
- The Prophet (pbuh) never punished an apostate for apostasy. His successors diverged on the matter, some penalized whereas others opted otherwise (like Umar).


The church has not changed morally, we have always taught the same thing.
- Have you heard the terms *the great apostasy* (or something), reflecting the huge divergence of the Church from its traditions. I don't think you're aware of the scope & scale of the change the Church experienced the past couple centuries...


The Turks imposed on the church to act in a judicial manner through the millet system, but the church is not intended to be a worldly power.
- The more you say, the more I realize you haven't gotten a clue what you're talking about. The Turks didn't impose anything, they merely let them do what they've always done, that is practice their own laws, which were a mix of Canon Law & Roman Law.


Because of how the Orthodox Church is organized, it is able to revert back to normal after government imposition ceases. There has never been a period in history where government didn't meddle with the church, but the church survives.
- I'm talking about the Church as an authority, not outside governments.


Guidance yes, dictate, no. The church is not a worldly authority. Islam is as much a worldly secular authority as it is a religion. We Orthodox are not like this. The church is distinct from secular worldly government. 
- Yet, history is testimony to the contrary. Christians have never thought that way until post-Enlightenment. This is revisionism. 


Of course. God granted authority to the Roman Empire. God granted authority to the Tzars of Russia, the bolsheviks. The Caliphate. Who can give authority but God? Even Satan has no power but that which was granted by God.
- Alright, this is a bit different than I'm used to hear from Christians.


Your examples of "Christians" killing apostates is somewhat silly because none of the examples are Orthodox Christians, and even if they were, the Church's official position is that we do not kill apostates or execute any type of juridical authority whatsoever. In fact, the merging of church and state even has its own heretical name in Caesaropapism. 
- I call BS. This just undermines more your premise, in that Church authority can not compromised. LOL!


I find it difficult to believe that in Islam it isn't the norm for apostasy from Islam to be punishable by death, since this has been the norm since the beginning.
- Maybe what you believe or don't isn't quite what is or isn't. I was asked this same question by someone on this thread, I'm just gunna copy/paste the response here:


Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Mopac

What is the prescribed penalty for apostasy?
- That's an interesting question, for it involves the first of the 6 Sacred Necessities of Sharia: Religion (the other beings: LifeReasonProgenyProperty & Honor). Religion is indeed a sacred right in Sharia, thus religious freedom -in both belief & practice- is guaranteed & religious coercion is categorically prohibited. This is expressed in the legal notion of 'Ismat al-Millah' (Inviolability of Faith) for Muslims (& non-Muslims in the Hanafi school) & 'Ismat al-Dhimmah' (Inviolability of Protection) for non-Muslims (in the other schools), which mandates that a Muslim or non-Muslim are inviolable in the 6 sacred necessities, i.e. in their religion, life, reason, progeny, property & honor. Thus, the inviolability of a Muslim is tied, not just to his allegiance to the faith, but also to his allegiance to the state & to the community (this is true for other than the Hanafi school). Subsequently, the status of apostates is a special one, for it indicates the simultaneous rejection of faith & state & community at the same time, thus do not warrant neither the inviolability of faith nor of protection. 

- In this sense, Apostasy is seen potentially as a political offense rather than just a civil or criminal offense, hence dealt with accordingly by the state. The punishment of Apostasy thus varies depending on circumstances. It can even be frozen or dropped if the circumstances demand so, or if the state deems it best. Particularly, individual apostasy, as opposed to collective/public apostasy, is regarded as politically inconsequent & thus doesn't warrant a penalty, though it warrants questioning & other civil solutions. Depending on the different legal schools, its punishment ranges from nothing to death penalty. Some schools prescribe the death penalty only for apostasy that involves high treason, banditry, revolts & such (Nakhii school). Some others punish apostasy that also involves all kinds of militancy or hostility (Hanafi school). Some schools punish even whimsical (not founded on solid conviction & sincerity) apostasy (Maliki school).

- The biggest issue jurists face in the implementation of this penalty is its conformity to the principal of "there is no compulsion in religion". For Coercionnullifies Accountability. A coerced person can not be accountable, wether in this life or the next. To reconcile this, the jurists view Apostasy as a negative act (in not upholding the religion & the state & the community) rather than a positive act (in joining a new belief). Example, punishing murder is not coercion into not committing murder (negative act). Further, they also postulate that, in theory, the punishment is actually relief from coercion rather than coercion, for allowing whimsical apostasy would inevitably impede reason & morality in favor of foolishness & immorality, which entails the violation of two sacred rights in Islam: Religion & Reason (& probably the rest). In short, the framework is built in such a way that apostates who are law abiding citizens, genuinely seeking truth, know about the religion & have valid objections against its principals, may be spared from punishment, for these are expected to eventually return back to Islam after engaging with assigned scholars to argue said objections. 


Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Omnipotent, omnipresent etc,
- You mean definition, of course that would laid in the debate.


Who is starting? I would like to since the BOP is shared.
- Alright.

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Yassine
If you believe I am ignorant about something, don't think that puffing yourself and acting condescending will impress me that you know better. 

I know it is hard for you to understand, because the state and church are so intertwined in Islam, but this is not how the Christian Church is. You mock us because governments can and have bullied the church around, but because of how our church is structured it always reverts back to normal. The Turks could not genocide our church out of existence, neither could they, despite their meddling in church affairs, corrupt our faith. The Soviet Union could not genocide our church out of existence, neither could they, despite their meddling in church affairs, corrupt our faith. We are not like The Roman Catholics, who can have their whole church corrupted by one bishop, as they have when they altered the creed of the church. We are not like the protestants, who lacking real holy orders and unity find themselves being corrupted into abominable heresies at the whim of their surrounding culture.

Our is The Church of Jesus Christ and the apostles, the very Church that Christ promised the gates of hell will not overcome. When you say that the church felll away or died and needed to be replaced by Islam, you are calling Jesus Christ a liar.

But Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the law and all the prophets. At the end of Islam is Jesus Christ. 












Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Yassine
The Church does not make secular laws. Historically, emperors and such felt that they should enforce religion on the population. This is not denial of history, I am simply not making the identity fallacy that you are likely unintentionally making.






Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
If you believe I am ignorant about something, don't think that puffing yourself and acting condescending will impress me that you know better. 
- I'm not condescending, I don't like revisionism & denial, which is a RAMPANT thing amongst Christians today to an exhausting degree. 


I know it is hard for you to understand, because the state and church are so intertwined in Islam, but this is not how the Christian Church is. You mock us because governments can and have bullied the church around, but because of how our church is structured it always reverts back to normal. The Turks could not genocide our church out of existence, neither could they, despite their meddling in church affairs, corrupt our faith. The Soviet Union could not genocide our church out of existence, neither could they, despite their meddling in church affairs, corrupt our faith. We are not like The Roman Catholics, who can have their whole church corrupted by one bishop, as they have when they altered the creed of the church. We are not like the protestants, who lacking real holy orders and unity find themselves being corrupted into abominable heresies at the whim of their surrounding culture.
- I don't like either Catholicism or Protestantism for the very reasons you cited, the former lacks scholarship in favor of hierarchy & the latter lacks authority in favor of "interpretation". This does not change the fact that the Eastern Church has authority, both ecclesiastic & moral, in the form of canons, aka Canon Law. Plus, under the Turks, the Church was running in the show...


Our is The Church of Jesus Christ and the apostles, the very Church that Christ promised the gates of hell will not overcome. When you say that the church fell away or died and needed to be replaced by Islam, you are calling Jesus Christ a liar.
- If I call Jesus (pbuh) a liar, then I'm an apostate... You know we don't agree on what Jesus (pbuh) taught.


But Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the law and all the prophets. At the end of Islam is Jesus Christ.
- I don't understand this part?


The Church does not make secular laws. Historically, emperors and such felt that they should enforce religion on the population. This is not denial of history, I am simply not making the identity fallacy that you are likely unintentionally making.
- They do indeed, it's called Canon Law, inspired from the Bible & the apostles writings which deals with both ecclesiastic & moral issues, including penalty decrees for murder or sorcery or adultery or apostasy or theft...etc. Plus, the Church also adopted Roman Law & Islamic Law for a lot of issues.