Total topics: 10
Sometimes you marry rich guy but he is still alive and you cannot get all his money yet. Later on I will make guide on isolating him and making him Hate his kids and visa versa. This is just for getting rid of husband when he is in will. Many ideals. All I believe are legal.
1. Encourage husband to do dangerous things like drag race, go on submersible to Titanic or Go to Wendy's and ask where nearest Burger King is.
2. I would make high fat, high sodium food. This may be enough to give heart attack, but if not see if you can get him drinking and smoking.
3. Tell him big guy at supermarket, grab your behind when walk by. Thousands of people die in fist fights every year.
4. If you are in America, maybe tell him that he does not need to wear bulletproof vest just to pick up child from school. See if you get lucky
5. Start playing videogames with silly kids who will swat you. When cops come tell husband you hear robber outside.
6. When driving Act offended when husband buckles up. Maybe say "why you no trust my driving"
Let your imagination go wild. Many ways for accidents to happen and accidents are not illegal.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Miscellaneous
It seems that pissing off feminists has become a grand new hobby of mine. It's not that hard considering they're all borderline narcissistic. All you have to do is say something they don't agree with and watch them lose their freaking minds. It's funny as hell. Anyone else do this for fun?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I will like to discuss Trans-Exclusionary Revolutionary Feminism (TERF refers to the feminist who believes in this).
It is a very taboo topic these days if you want to survive as a left-winger and I could get cancelled for just typing this no doubt. I ask you this, if being a woman means nothing more than slapping on make-up, having hormones and saying 'I am a woman' then what is the struggle that Feminism is fighting against? If a woman can take hormones, present butch and then say 'I am a man' then is all her struggle as a female beforehand negated in the eyes of affirmative action quotas and other such official measures taken to safeguard females against sexism?
At this point in time, most of the T under LGBT as well as the Q under LGBTQ have found harmony with most feminists because they share many common enemies politically but the volcanic eruption will come at some point, JK Rowling has already clashed with Hermione's actress Emma Watson (Watson on the cancelling side, Rowling on the TERF side). This is a real clash, a genuine complete battle of viewpoints.
I am not being transphobic, I am being what we can call trans-skeptical here. If I tell you tomorrow that I am a woman, did I grow up with all the setbacks in my life that a girl who becomes a woman had? If yes then feminism is defeated, if no then transgenderism has limitations that need to be concrete and admitted.
Remember, feminism fought sexism not genderism, it's very important to understand that lexicality as it's not just 'playing with semantics'. I have no issue with a male acting feminine or a female acting masculine, as long as the true sex is able to be something discussed and known. There will come a true clash eventually and I am quite curious which side of the battle that the Conservative right-wing will join.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Society
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Surpassed my expectations in every regard. Total. Fucking. Masterpiece.
spoiler warning
Feminism in its raw, ferocious form but not hating the men that are good. Black pride in its purest, unadultered, undeniably visceral and justifiable form, the way it makes you feel their rage, to actually comprehend how they felt a release way beyond freedom and safety as they killed and beat the shit out of the white and black slavers alike is built up to in the best way possible.
Seriously proper spoiler warning
When she kills her former rapist in front of their illegitimate daughter who she is not sure is even safe at that point, just that she is alive and is a traded slave probably... the scene is something so fucking powerful words cannot do it justice.
Acting 10, cinematography 10, FUCK it was Amazing, I was ready to cringe at some things or find it too predictable but the flow of scenes was so peculiar in a great way. You had no idea what mood or pace the next scene would have. The accents were done so accurate.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Show business
Disclaimer: I posted this initially on a reddit thread I won't say which and this was literally deleted and I was blocked for this very simple and actually non controversial point. So now I ask two questions. a. Should I have been blocked and b. Should feminism be falsifiable in our political discourse?
I ask this because though I identify as a feminist, I notice many women like myself who do not seem open to the idea that feminism may be incorrect (it isn't) or at minimum wrong on some things, but instead resort to a shutting down of opposing arguments from the other side. This seems to pose 2 major problems:
- Telling people to "stop talking" hardly seems productive in the current culture wars. It seems dangerous and antagonistic to other truths we hold as well, not just feminism but the freedom of speech. Disagreement and even offense cannot be grounds to dismiss speech. Simply because someone is offended that I consider their religion to be oppressive and misguided is not reason for me to stop talking about it or possibly have a healthy rational discourse/disagreement about it. The same would apply to discourses on feminism.
- Feminism falls under gender studies which falls under the social science of Sociology. There are criteria to determine if an idea is scientific or not. In particular, an idea/theory must be falsifiable. In other words, it must be refutable or quite simply, have the capacity to be proven wrong. I am not saying that it is wrong (it's what I believe) I am saying the possibility of it being so. An example in a hard science would be that of the atom, initially people thought that they were like solid balls, then they discovered electrons, then protons, then neutrons. This evolution of thought was as a result of accepting that the theory is falsifiable and "could be wrong" so it was open to criticism and refinement. Another example in the social sciences would be that Sigmund Freud's thought that cocaine was a good form of psychotherapy. Well, despite Freud being the father of modern psychology we do not believe this today because we could criticize and assess his ideas and prevent people with mental health from developing an addiction as well. If feminism is not refutable, then it is not scientific and if it is not, then how will it be different from religion or mere dogma?
As a feminist, I see neither 1 or 2 as desirable. No discourse sounds like a recipe for social strife and I don't think feminism is some dogma to be believed in. I think there are facts to be assessed that will give people good reason to believe it and even if it isn't accepted by someone, at least I know that I was rigorous and thorough in my beliefs.
Thoughts? Does anyone agree? Should feminism be falsifiable?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Current events
All begin their rapper name with S, holy shit.
but to be clear Sa-Roc is on ANOTHER LEVEL you don't even BEGIN TO GENUINELY UNDERSTAND her bars the first time you listen to her tracks.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Show business
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Society