Total debates: 16
In the US, under the 1st Amendment, we have protected free speech, being able to say anything except DIRECT incitement to violence. (e.g. you can’t say “fire” in a crowded theater) But offending someone is not a DIRECT incitement to violence. All this to say, I DON'T believe that you SHOULD say “Nigger” if it is offensive. You should not slur at all. But honestly, it’s all about how you use it. And why do Blacks get a special pass to say it but not other races?
This debate is about whether we should live as if God exists, not about Agnosticism.
RCV: Ranked Choice Voting, a system of electing officials where you can rank different candidates. For more details, defer to link in comments. Electoral College: The current system by which America elects its president.
Pro believes that free speech does include hate speech while con doesn't. Also just because pro believes that free speech does include hate speech, doesn't mean they support it. This is not a debate about whether hate speech is ok or not, it is about whether free speech INCLUDES hate speech or not.
This is because clickbait involves lying, trolling does not necessarily.
For example, Nick Fuentes calls unhappily married men gay, even when they are married to females. Also, it is incorrect: if they are unhappy with their marriage, then they are not gay, as gay initially meant happy, and they certainly aren’t homosexual if they are married to females.
One must either argue that it’s gay as in A) happy, or gay as in B) homosexual. To be clear, the Con must argue that cave crawling is not either A or B.
No description has been provided
We are spiritual beings having a human experience
Rank Choice Voting means that instead of picking person a or person b or person c, you would award a, b, and c all ranked top down points rather than 1 - 0 -0, it would be 1 - .5 -.25. Ultimately, the favored candidate would win and not the “lesser of two evils”. We would have more favorable presidents and really anyone who we elect using this system.
I am only doing this because I don't know how to use forums with this account and I'm trying to make satire. Anybody that accepts will have this debate be an automatic loss for them.
No description has been provided
I am taking a position which is very difficult to defend.
The ongoing situation with school shootings is extremely alarming. Something has to be done. This debate concerns serious debaters who don’t forfeit all the rounds.
People just say anything they don’t like is communist and fascist.
No description has been provided