I put an asterisk on god and clarified what I meant in the description. My three big requirements are that the god your arguing for must be all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good.
I didn’t notice the whole satire thing at first and I almost flipped out LOL. Also, is your username saying that the founding fathers were smoking pot? Becuase if so that hilarious.
That's not really what I meant. I mean that you're supposed to imagine that there is a neutral person that both sides are trying to convince. I just wanted to make it clear that neither side could actually prove anything, and that it's a matter of opinion.
This is ridiculous. How is anyone supposed to argue against this? You can almost never prove a negative, so this is pretty favored to you. Just saying.
I might accept this one, but your either way, your going to have to provide some better descriptions, specifically about what you mean by "evolution". You might mean is it proven that natural selection happens, or that it is why we have all our different species.
I was thinking along the lines of slavery had more of an impact than any other cause you could think of, but if you have a better title, by all means, Im really bad at this kind of thing.
I would argue that most autistic people would be more left leaning because of how discriminative the right is, and people with asd are a very discrimated against group, but that’s just my way of thinking about it.
I’m never lending you any money.
Defining hate speech might be good to.
You should clarify if you mean free speech the principle, or free speech the law.
Free speech the law absolutely does not include threatening speech.
I also think you should probably remove your vote. If you want to do a real one, that’s fine, but if not that’s also okay.
Same here. I’m always down for a good god/no god debate.
I think you just described everyone on this site.
I’d accept if I had the time. Anytime after July 28 I’m available, so if no one has accepted by then, I’m in.
Maybe something like,
Valid: The property of being real and correct. In this case, Trans children are whatever gender they assume.
Might be a good idea to define valid.
I get that your a troll, but your the kind of person who is making the rest of us who support LGBTQ people look bad.
I’ll vote on this one soon
This one seems like a debate you would like?
This is kinda hard for your opponent to argue. They have to prove that there is no chance that they were fake, and 100% chance that they were real.
I put an asterisk on god and clarified what I meant in the description. My three big requirements are that the god your arguing for must be all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good.
What would you say in the case of them using gender affirming care?
Screw the exorcist, I think it’s time for a mental institution.
Ah, that makes sense.
You made this debate twice.
This debate is hilarious.
Votes
I don't really mind if he went over 10k characters. Most of it wasn't that great arguing anyways, and it was pretty short.
I didn’t notice the whole satire thing at first and I almost flipped out LOL. Also, is your username saying that the founding fathers were smoking pot? Becuase if so that hilarious.
Not to be super nit picky or anything, but by god, do you mean strictly Christian god, or any god? Also, “strong argument” is pretty ambiguous.
But it’s still a matter of personal opinion. You can’t actually prove anything.
No, I’m not actually trying to convince anyone, I’m just saying that this isn’t a debate about proving anything.
That's not really what I meant. I mean that you're supposed to imagine that there is a neutral person that both sides are trying to convince. I just wanted to make it clear that neither side could actually prove anything, and that it's a matter of opinion.
This is ridiculous. How is anyone supposed to argue against this? You can almost never prove a negative, so this is pretty favored to you. Just saying.
I’ll accept after you provide a definition for religion.
I might accept, but does it really have to be 5 rounds? no more then 3 is necessary I think, and maybe 2 would even be preferable.
I feel like this exact same thing happened before.
But they are not NEEDED for a moral life. Someone could easily live morally without knowing what they even are.
How could you possibly require Yugioh cards to live morally?
I totally agree with you, but this is kind of a weird topic for a debate. Maybe better suited to the forums.
I might accept this one, but your either way, your going to have to provide some better descriptions, specifically about what you mean by "evolution". You might mean is it proven that natural selection happens, or that it is why we have all our different species.
I was thinking along the lines of slavery had more of an impact than any other cause you could think of, but if you have a better title, by all means, Im really bad at this kind of thing.
I would argue that most autistic people would be more left leaning because of how discriminative the right is, and people with asd are a very discrimated against group, but that’s just my way of thinking about it.
Yeah, for a normal debate I would do that, but I made this one standard, and I'm really just looking for a fun talk with another Star Wars fan.
I might have played devil's advocate here. THought it could be a fun debate, but not if it's rated, sorry.
sry, I do not
I'm beginning to see what you mean
thanks for the tip! I wrote the opening statement very quick and shoddy, so I'll try to make my next ones better.