Total debates: 449
This is a debate on whether or not people that do not contribute to society should be forced to.
The weakest basis if not one of them to be an atheist is a lack of evidence.
No description has been provided
In the US, under the 1st Amendment, we have protected free speech, being able to say anything except DIRECT incitement to violence. (e.g. you can’t say “fire” in a crowded theater) But offending someone is not a DIRECT incitement to violence. All this to say, I DON'T believe that you SHOULD say “Nigger” if it is offensive. You should not slur at all. But honestly, it’s all about how you use it. And why do Blacks get a special pass to say it but not other races?
This debate is about whether we should live as if God exists, not about Agnosticism.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Let's open this up for anybody else available.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Christian god as described in the Bible cannot exist.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Universal basic income (UBI) is the concept of a government program in which every adult citizen receives a set amount of money regularly.
No description has been provided
For example, Nick Fuentes calls unhappily married men gay, even when they are married to females. Also, it is incorrect: if they are unhappy with their marriage, then they are not gay, as gay initially meant happy, and they certainly aren’t homosexual if they are married to females.
Should we be having sex with trannies?
Rated debate on whether God exists! Consider debating me :)
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Substance being the most enduring and underlying reality of a thing.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
One of the biggest questions in America today.
Is Donald Trum to blame for the attack on the capital? Was the attack actually and attack or an exercise of the first amendment?
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
If you accept this debate, you will argue that Donald Trump's rhetoric towards immigration would be beneficial to the Economy if he were president, and he enacted those policies.
No description has been provided
Whoever accpets this challenge will be arguing that the existence of animals and humans was the direct result of the Christian God.
No description has been provided