Total posts: 287
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Of course I am trying to get him re-elected. How else can we take down the Republican Party?
It is likely that damage to America is created by the process of voting holding primary and preliminary elections for a single political office. It is a great expense to be placed on the public and a rather significant waste of time. Did you know everyone who votes in an America is a Republican? We the people who politically vote in America are republican due to the fact a complete state of the union held in our constitutionally described three branches government is in public. It is likely that a high amount of damage to America is created by the process of poorly regulated democratic voting, when holding primary and preliminary elections, for a single political office is a great deal more expense to hold with two elections rather then one plus it is significant waste of time. It is a support of a media not political democracy. There is nothing wrong with call yourself something other than a republican while running for office but doing so is not a 1st Amendment right. Multiple elections at extremely high financial cost and losses of work time are a cost as debt which cannot be paid back.
Created:
Posted in:
Huh? The state considers him married to Malania...
Um? No, people might consider them married the State is practicing criminal law and considers "he" is in a civil union call Marriage as truth, whole truth, and nothing but truth. It is criminal to be registered by license to more than one women for a man in civil union. A legal team believes marriage and civil union are equal, that a man's second civil union is in fact marriage it does not mean the connection made in practice is automaticly true as criminal law is a pratice to the connection of crime not Consitutional Right. A second women in a man's lifetime is not a United States Consitutional Right and while we might use a broken state of the 1st Amendment as unbroken right it describes the freedom of religion preserving a verbal contract as grievance in a filing method by law to a non-religous GOD the can be witnessed as Virmulier. Legally without judical prejudice by some one who in fact horners the publicly made verbal religous contracts between man and women, him and Ivana included.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Public-Choice
We have more evidence that Biden is corrupt than we do that Trump is married to Malania.
Funny story, as an unratified United State Constitutional Right Mr. Trump is not as fact Married to Malania, though she may be Married to him. Like all other people who have placed themselves in a union of GOD held in a state of the union with American constitutional established justice. The person who is in a second union is in a union which is no longer called Marriage. Again, it is harder to explain what is Right to others then simply just use limits set by making up popular crimes held in criminal laws. In basic however it has to do with the idea of holding what becomes a man’s wife in honor before GOD. Even when love and obedience fail.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Trump is about to be Biden's fault if he keeps up on his current path.
Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden are just like all of us. The fault of abortion for had Female-specific amputation been constitutionally ratified they might have never been a citizen of the United States of America, due to a threat posed to they're creator and not the rest of us.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I'll represent all of the people, as long as they tithe, titheing to me is very importantin the Sidewalkerism Political Party.
I see you word progam works even worse than mine with DebateArt. However.
What is the plan to represent all the people? All men had once been held created equal by their creator as President. This has been changed by both Executive officers and congressional officers, men and women. All women might have and can be held equal by their creation as a"Presadera" this self-evident truth can also be held as United State Constitutional right. That is had some women and men chosen not to break the state of the union holding all men as equal by criminal claim of sexual discrimination with the creation of crime, criminal law uses in a process to organize crime and criminal accusation to establish a justice. A method that is known to create plea bargains where a criminal admits guilt to the judicial system often of the wrong crimes to which they have committed as a way to create and hold states of the union to cost and punishment not whole truth. On top of this accused are always divided into two groups the innocent and guilty and this creates a truth that some criminals are in prison for crimes they have not committed but have plead guilty to. Does it not? They are to free of wrong doing just have agreed to lie and say they commited a lesser crime for a cost as well. Is it a cost they pay or do not pay?
A person can never be too old to display an ability of being a President of United States it is an ability, the person simply lose capability to display the ability, or maybe they never had it in the first place. Maybe the voters have just become too smart by practicing law without license to elect a President of the United States of America when all that person ever was is a Political Officer. Sorry about the interruption and new focus of argument for the debate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Also, please understandthough complicated a woman can be an Executive Officer elected to sit at the ovaloffice even though she cannot be President of the United States of America. Thereason a women cannot be Right as President is in principle she is not holding all menequal by their creator as a United States Constitutional Right, nor is a female holding all womenequal by their creator before American Constitution. Meaning all forms of law in America Criminal, Civil, and Constitutional.
Article IIArticle II ExplainedSection 1The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as followsEach State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:– I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.Section 2The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.Section 3He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.Section 4The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Everywhere here is aHe a She must also be added and ratified.
Amendment XIXThe right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Congress mustenforce appropriate legislation, and it requires a ratification of Article II.Not a federal criminal law of sexual discrimination even though sexualdiscrimination can be addressed by the courts if it was the only cause. This isa lawyer attempting to flex knowledge and powers of criminal law over the powerof United State Constitutional Right. When we support a female President, weare in principle acting as your own Legal Counsel. In doing so there is nopreservation, protection, or serving United States Constitutional Right wewould be practicing criminal law unlicensed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
So, as a President of the United States what state of the Constitutional Union are you planning to serve, protect, and defend?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Are you drunk?
No, do not drink alcohol. A person might call a women President in America buta women would be for lack of better word a Presadera under United State Constitutionallaw.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
She will also be the first woman president, so I would expect a rise in popularity.
She will be calledthe first women President in America. There have been female Presidents in other Countries which do not have a United States Constitutional Rights. It is illegal for a woman to be President it is a public demonstration of a voters lack ability to preserve, protect, and defend our Constitution. She is by American Constitutional law even now a Presadera for lack of better words.Presadera creates all American women in a United States Constitutional Right that is equal by their creator. As the word President has created all men equal by their creator once in the past as a United States Constitutional Right.
Using a crime claiming a women cannot be judged based on sex, meaning her gender, discrimination is not a representation of American Constitution it is either a licensed practice of criminal / civil law with a lawyer or the argument of self-representation by a person in criminal / civil law before the court. It is a well-planned out atack and attempt to convert criminal, civil crime into American United State Constitutional Right. There is/was risk as the appointment of office are simply not the same thing Oval and Presidential. What harm is done to all women who are held equal before the court of law? There is harm created in not holding all men equal before law by thier creator. Men cannot be a Presadera either as a fact, as truth, as whole truth. Women cannot be President as fact, truth, and whole truth the two words are not lie the words are right. This process is what happens when the 1st Amendment is not broken by lawers in legal pratice terminating its state of amore perfect union to established justice.
A person can represent themselves as their own lawyer in a court of law as they equally do so outside a court of law. A person simply acts as their own lawyer when voting for a woman as President in America without the liberty of Legal Malpractice Insurance. This is created by using a accusation of crime as cause on a official document such as voting ballot.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
It's the grammar and syntax. I don't want to be overly critical if there's a language barrier.
There has to be syntax language barrier there is no United State Constitution Right in relationship to pregnancy abortion. Unlike crime in criminal law a truth, whole truth, nothing but truth, as self-evident truths in right can be written with all nouns or all verbs. It has far less obligations to edicational gammar.
We do not have to prove abortion is murder, we proven abortion is an admission to murder,
Abort is an officialorder given to stop. We do not official stop pregnancy a woman is medicallyseeking to officially stop birth. A choice has been made to perform an officialstop of birth, not officially stop immigration by birth. By using abortion as acrime in the legislation of criminal law a state of the union has been made to establishjustice. A corruption that will always be as a united state made between allwomen and men and admission to a described abortion. The word Crime is not theword Right, they are in any way the same basic principle.
Demonstration: Ahired killer appears in a court of law at a trail and is ordered to take thestand. While under oath the person tells the jury and court, he / she has officiallyaborted the existence of 100,000 senior citizens. The killer did not know theage of the victims of his official stop of existence he / she called abortion.There are, however, official medical records of all the bodies which aredestroyed in connection to the official terminations.
Please demonstrate/substantiate. (Note: Please demonstrate that the right to an abortion not being recognized as a constitutional right is an admission to murder.)
No. I will onlydemonstrate that a United States Constitutional Right is constructed betterwithout using a newly Drafted / created crime. Female-specific amputation is awitness account to a Supreme Court’s ruling of unconstitutional. I am taking adocumented crime written by Texas and other State legislation changing thewording and calling it at this time the most perfect United StateConstitutional Right there is in connection to females and basic principles inthe risks of birth, as a united state with all fertile women. Law in this judicialmatter does not need to include those who cannot become impregnated man, men,or women.
Can you rephrase this?
Ratifying a United States Constitutional Right is theprocess in which the documented Right is added to the American Constitution byArticle, Section, clause, and or Amendment. Abortion has only been entered intothe Courts of law as a crime and never a right. So far everyone in the worldhas failed to make this connection to established justice. It is not the onlyglobal democratic failure of this type either.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Right. Speaking deals and books which are legal forms of political bribery, and have been for a very long time.
By American Preamble speaking and writing in media form of any kind is a common defense as a connection to established justice. Is the speaking or writing truthful or is it a lie is the bigger link to justice than if it is a form of political bribe, or not.
Created:
Posted in:
Biden will never be impeached on the current evidence. Not in a billion years
True, he like many others had not been a President of the United States of America. Any democratic majority had only ever been trick into say he was as witness in writing on and election ballot. Executive Officer Biden would be relieved ofcommand as a whole truth upon a conviction of crime, no impeached. These two things like criminal legislation and United State Constitutional Right ae not equals.
Also for the recored the tue cost of wrong is currently held at 10 Billion dollars not one million dollars.
Created:
Posted in:
Well that’s just a fact that the court found abortion was not a constitutional right.
I agreed with both State and Federal Supreme Courts, unconstitutional and not constitutional are the same United State. Adding the creation and description of a more perfect United States Constitutional Right is made as a complete united state of law with the words Female-specific amputation as American Constitutional common defense. Connecting all women who are fertile with immigration created in such a way as only made by pregnancy and birth.
What is your take on the issue and why?
Outside of being an issue on my bucket list.
There are two types of law in America. One: criminal law where a crime is written as a wrong that is made. Two: A United State Constitutional Right which is a self-evident truth created with a combination of whole truths which describe the largest connectionand most perfect right which is, or is not adhere to by all women. This purpose of Right is to declare all women as created as equal before established justice and American Constitutional Preamble by their creator, filed grievance.
--> @ Mharman
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
She will also be the first woman president, so I would expect a rise in popularity.
She is not the 1st women by perjury to be called a President in the media and she will not be the last. By American United State Constitutional Right she is the 1st Presadera of the United States of America. There is an accusation of perjury made from improper legislation as filed in media as grievance against the American voter, and a judicial system pending in silence, a witness to a crime waiting to die is not clearing the voter of any potential of criminal accusation. The link to this in established justice was made in organized crime long ago in the justice system.
The United State Constitutional difference between the state of both is made by adding a common defense stating a woman by complete united state constitutional right is a "Presadera" for lack of a more perfect establishment to Preamble. Voters are simply not given the whole truth and nothing but truth by someone unknown and all women both running for political office and not running are held in a state of the union address by this one word. New word or not.
It's a lot to soakin so please take your time and allow all facts to sink in. A women cannot be President even though the people as voter are orginized to commit perjury by use of voting ballot, and public and private media, digital, or other. The criminal legislation of law claims she cannot be denied as a woman Office and is not a immunity to all wrong by its own creation and condition. This due to law as American Constitutional Right describes the democratic process as wrong, along with much of the context of Articles of Constitution. By connection to perjury due to improper congressional legislation made as though it is a teacher making corrections to a students home work or test, it was not.
This United State Constitutional argument is written as an American state of the union between the people and American Constitution. What takes place politically outside America does not matter all nations have liberty on establishing United States Constitutional Right , simple Constitutional Right, or attempt governing by use of criminal legislation held as law on its own.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Good question Mharman.
The principle of pregnancy abortionpresented as a United States Constitutional Right. It was found in a court oflaw to be unconstitutional.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
What shameless corruption? And if you say Hunter Biden I will laugh at you.
Congress has not presented a United States Constitutional Right since 92 and a President might argue Constitutional corrections as far back to Article I. The corruption in question was created by crimin allegislation without balance of power in legislation of United States Constitutional Right. The legislation of only criminal laws stacks the deck of economic growth to one side.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
So you think Harris is going to be president anyway and nobody will kick her out, not even the own americans. Interesting.
A women can never as a United State Constitutional Right be President of the United Statesof America. Any women will for lack of better words be "Presadera."All women have had a United States Constitutional Right to be elected to the Oval Office not having the ability to hold constitutional right as commondefense does not prevent her from becoming an Executive officer. Criminal Perjury might lack common defense. Article II is clear a President is a"He." There is no proper legislation presented by Congress that has ever properly corrected this major blunder.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
It really doesn't matter what anyone tells you. No matter what name is given by anyone half the people will hate it and go on a character assignation smear campaign
That is how justice is supposed to be a more perfect connection to established justice using legislation by crime or civil harm, half the people or more are automatically to be accused of criminal wrong....... For the record a United States Constitutional Right sets the connection between established justice and the people to establish they are not Right in a series of truthful conditions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I need my windows coked (caulked) Maybe she should just switch to Pesi no coke.
Burger! Burger! Burger! Coke! no coke! Pepsi! Pepsi! Pepsi!..........
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Who can assume the presidency of the united states?
According to the United States Constitution any man who can show the best connection to the conditions of the American Consitution Preamble. The restrictions of Exsecutive office is often regulated by a condition to hold certian political "Office." This is why acording to United States Constitutional Law Kamala Haris will never be a Vice President she is not a man the state of the union which best describes her is "Presadera." She simply does not hold the Oval Office by election of the people. A female President is a argument of criminal legilsation as law and there has been little done in the way of proper constitutional legilsation to corect all the words "he" as united State Constitutional Right.
Both the 15th and 19th Amendments are conditional and in essence we can simple combine the two inwriting “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not bedenied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex, race, color, and or previous condition of servitude." America's United State Constitutional “More perfect Right” is to describe "she" in the Articles, Sections, and Clause of American Constitution and add an independent word of representation such as Presadera. Not that it must be that word it is only used here for total lack of all United State Constitutional Right. Thus, we the people are allowed to hold all women as created equal to each otherwithout the use of crime in legislation. This is the far superior United State of Right as there are no accusations of wrong by association to crime. .
: to take as granted or true : SUPPOSE
All men are created equal by their creator as a President of the United States of America by displayed abilities to serve, protect and defend United State Constitutional Right by Oath of Office, Exsecutive Office. No Crime. No SNAFU. For the record as a whole truth, it is fact that a person who splits the American 1st Amendment apart like a lawyer by claiming only “freedom of speech” is not showing an ability to serve, protect, or defend American United States Constitutional Right, they are self-representing themselves in court tward criminal law instead. Saying it is a crime to limit what a Lawyer or Judge might say inside acourt of law when practicing law. I want some of that. This changes outside a court of law, however, as United State Constitutional Right can be sought to share the common defense of no cost so that We the people of this United State might share this liberty without prejudice of judicial criminal legislation, as filed criminal legilsation is literal organized crime. Refusing to commit perjury as it is understood outside a court of law is not an act of discrimination of any kind it may simply appear that way without equal representation, questioning taxation without representation.
Created:
Posted in:
Hip hop and rap are not legible yet understood and people enjoy it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
This isn't legible.
Maybe it has been scrambled so you cannot understand it the queation is, do you need to know?
We do not have to prove abortion is murder, we proven abortion is an admission to murder, is the admission illegal yes it has been proven by the supreme court.
We prove United State Constitutional Right such as Female-specific amputation. We do not have to ratify the United State Constitutional Right only describe as large a group of females, in the best way as a United State Constitutional Rights so it can be said to be a possible task.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
By the way thank you for having this descussion like all other views here I find the points helpful in finding direction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Having a uterus is not a criminal offense.
Not yet......but we debate plausible abortion, and this only takes place without influence on government when male/female couples do not copulate, at least without State license. The term free love from the 1960s has a United State Constitution contradiction which is the difference between a liberty taken to copulate and a free act of copulation. A factual President or Presadera would address the addition to the 1st Amendment as Article and Section to describe clear right between free and cost.
Criminal law already has described orginized crime as a danger and threat to the people. United States Constitutional Right is not a form of orginized crime like criminal legilsation in the literal sense. Falsely admiting or being accused to a crime can be wrong the order to abort brings about the idea of guilt by association of that wrong. This raises questions about the united state created by criminal law and the use of only the practice in laws of the land, as in the process of immigration. The matter is focust on United States Constitutinal right of citizenship by birth. This is a massive United State of Law.
A United States Constitutional right is Female-specific amputation as a state of the union with immigration and citizenship of a newborn. The idea of when life begins is not a matter of Constitution right for the people who come to America, they are not only legal or illegal immigrants. The American Constitution also hold then as ambassadors of foreign powers and Rights of constitutional law change becuase of this fact. People simply may not be able to say in a United States with Constitutional Right, as citizen, by birth, why or why not they are an America, alone. The United States Constitutional law only describes birth in a relationship to established justice in become a citizen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Probably my best point on the topic is simply that slavery is bad. Sadly at the very least leadership in the pro-life movement disagrees… Thankfully in the USA we have protections against that enshrined in our constitution.
No, we do not have protection against slavery. The process was made a power of Congress upon duly conviction this means admitting to a crime or even the first ruling in a courts order of criminal law is/was enough to place a anyone as slave. Slavery had been a product of War, a slave at one time in history was only a P.O.W. sold into private hands or governing force. It still is. The United States of America had made changed that by ratification of an Amendment may not be appropriate nor best state of the union in United State of Constitutional Right.
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
When reading the 13th Amendment it is clear how the words except as a punishment of criminal law can be confusing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
There is no legal construct that can define humanity for us. For my definition, I look at the Word of God, and the biological features and functions of the people He created.
There are legal constructs of human citizenship. He?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
Not necessarily. You would have to establish that abortion is murder.
No, we can just prove abort is an order to officially stop,then prove abort is connected to the termination of a pregnancy, with a connection of a birth by the word abortion to women, by act of conception to men. Once that is done abortion becomes aadmission to a use of lethal force, not murder.
The legislators, by writing legislation with criminal law, the people never had a way of knowing if murder had taken place as there is only a crime involved in establishing justice and never a established right. The victim is not a citizen to be charged with attempted murder of the mother turning the lethal force into self-defense as publicly claimed often. Even though the a as United State of Constitution. The admission to the use of lethal force can be used against us in a court of law, then becoming murder, indenture dservitude, or even slavery by conviction. It is the way an admission to a possible criminal law is collected which can be subject to criminal law, this as a litteral form of organized crime or legalmal practice. By United State Constitutional Right in connection to established justice linking the whole process as well with the RICO Act. With whom does the order of stop officially start? With whom doesthe official order to stop end?
Question, is it implausable argument as women had sought Constitutional Right having been and are sold criminal law instead.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
We have many different ideas of what constitute life, all but one of them being arbitrary. Some say after birth, a baby begins to develop self-consciousness, and that is the deciding factor. Others say it's when the heartbeat begins, taking the term "lifeblood" to its most literal sense. And still others say it's when the human shape develops, at which then the child fulfills the basic taxonomy requirements to be considered human. And yet, still others say it's at conception, when the whole process of human growth begins.
The point is citizenship can start at birth and does not start at conception at all by criminal law, life continues. United States Constitutional Right and criminal law do not agree and the legal criminal argument between the two sides can be profitable. It is people, it is our parents, it is our grandparents that have come to American to chase the dream, though it falls upon the people who as posterity hold not just law but United States Constitutional Right from the fringes of nightmare.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@CoolApe
I think mind argument works well. I don't think most people consider disconnecting brain-dead patients murder, nor do they consider them as living "persons" anymore.A fetus's brain likely has some brain activity going on, so it can't be classified as brain dead. Prior stages with no brain development of the sort should be considered brain dead.
A medical patient with brain activity is not in position to be the cause of death of only women.Period. A medical patient is not on the way to becoming a citizen of a nation, we are on the way out of any obligation to a nation, a non-citizen.
Pro-life side in general does not think a sperm or ovum is a person.
Both Pro-Life, ProChoice are additional self-incrimination to the order to abort pregnancy. Leaving the public to be accessories to a public description of murder as the cause, the reason for a termination is a violation of criminal law for invading the women's medical privacy.
This I believe is wrong, but I won't go into it. Semantically speaking though, I think its fine to refer to any stage of development as a person. People do this kind of thing when they call their pregnancy a baby. A human being's life also starts at conception. It doesn't make sense to stop referring to someone's initial beginning as human being. (Note baby, human being all imply person). However, I don't think semantics necessarily wins all arguments.
Overmany years I have addressed this principle in many ways, however the fact remains life begins at ovulation and at the creation of sperm, then after the beginning life is extended by conception. The magic of the practice of criminal law misdirection. The argument in America was over Female United States Constitutional Right and the question to answer in truth, whole truth, and nothing but truth is why the female request of United States Constitutional Rights fell short. Let us first look at how both the 13th and 14th Amendments share a declaration of Independence from a Constitutional Amendment not a Constitutional Article. The clause reads "Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." It is clearly speaking of Congresses legislation of criminal law and not Congresses ratification of Constitutional Right. Now let’s look at how Pregnancy Abortionstarted as a criminal law, is this what set it to always and forever to be anargument of criminal law and not United States Constitutional Right for females. Legislators of Congresses attempt at enforcing criminal law and not create United States Constitutional Right. Again, criminal law is a practicesold by state licensing in most all nations with social liberties of Justice.
The implausible abortion argument is Pregnancy abortion as criminal law and can never be a United States Constitutional Right no matter the amount of crime enforcement, it is not in the same category of law as a United State Constitutional Right. As fact, as Constitutional Right there has never been a pregnancy abortion in the United States of America all terminations of immigration by birth have allbeen Female-specific amputations.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
What are you copy/pasting from?
What I write as a reply.
Also Article II, Section II, Clause II of the American Constitution, a brief part of its Preamble, and the last clause of the 13 and 14th Amendment which are identical meaning the united state that was created is in question if it is repeated so soon after it was writen as United States Constitutional Right.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
As your statements are not within it, with the closest being related to the president being able to appoint officials for various offices, I worry about your grasp of the human race and how it differs from things like real estate.
So, you understand a declaration of Independence, a right to place all women in a place of equality between all other women in a condition of their creation using oath and series of type truths?
There are connections to justice which have already been established by both criminal and Constitutional law. The assignment of a women as ambassador to the child who isaging inside only her, the child who is not a citizen of any nation until after serviving birth, is beyond criminal law and the child cannot be charged with the murder of the mother. Article II, Section II, clause II describes an ambassador can be appointed by other ways in law, not just by President, Senate, or Congress, the mother is a diplomat, an ambassador assigned by the laws of nature to the child or children.
Your worry is overthe use of law which connects crime with criminals, not my understanding of how to create and establish a larger state of the Constitutional union with right, and we the people. All people in one state of the union are the indication of the most powerful Constitutional Rights there are whereas criminal law always and forever has two states of the union of varying numbers victum and accused. The issue of jurisdiction of criminal law as a State of the union between the people and area of property, land is organized crime described with punishable consequences in the legislation of criminal law itself. A woman is being held as a Presadera in accordance with American United States Constitution ratified or not.
Your worry is over the use of law which connects crime with criminals not my understandngs of how to create and establish a larger state of the Constitutional union with right, and we the people, all poeple the indication of the most powerful Constitutional Rights there are. The issue that jurisdiction of law as a State of the union between the people and land face is orginized crime becuase it is described with punishable consiquences in the legilsation of criminal law itself upon conviction. Thus the United State wrong of a order to abort, abortion, pregnancy abortion. A women can be held as a "Presadera" in accordance with American United States Constitution ratifide or not. Leaving the clear question something could have been achieved and why was it not?
Created:
Posted in:
I have read said constitution, and have never seen anything which even remotely implies such talk of female specific medical issues... Please give a direct quote from it which states pregnant women are "ambassadors" to their bodies?
The child of any and all fertile woman bear is not a citizen of a nation, and it is by Law of Nature she is assigned as its ambassador, no one else. Executive orders overstep as the Oval Office, nor Congress have emancipated all unborn children as citizen before birth.
Whose Appointment are not herein otherwise provided for. The law of Nature has provided for this appointment and this appontment only. The are abassadors not to thier body but to the child which waits for immigration created by birth. Also a Law of Nature.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
That's odd seeing how it's protected by the declaration of independence under the inalienable rights clause, along with both the the 13th and 14th amendments.
Being a United State Constitutional Right is not argued only of ratifide into the United States Constitution. Pregnancy abortion is not a declaration of Independence and is in fact alienable as described in the as pro-life and pro-choice. There is no immunity in a Declaration of Idepoendence. To order a stop to pregnancy by medical process is an admission of command shared by the the male. The fact ist is Female- specific amputation that is a better, new, and clear Constitutional Declaration of Independence where the immigration process attached to birth separates male and female rolls in the process of termination.
It is not impossible to create and see a United StateConstitutional Right outside the United States Constitution. By fact, by Law ofNature all United States Constitutional Right begin outside the American Constitution when not ratified as part of Constitutional law. We debate and have access to two completely differentforms of law 1.) Is criminal law. 2.) Is United State Constitutional Right.What you are to look at is the roll of “ambassador” in Article II, Section II, Clause II, of AmericanUnited States Constitution. It is by a law of nature the complete truth inregard to any otherwise appointed as united state ambassador by justice to establish independence ofall women. A United State Constitutional Right does not depend on crime likie criminal law and itsmethods of filing as grievance. Meaning no license by state is required to pratice the establishment they these Rights are derived by we the people.
There are a couple of additions to the United StatesConstitution that are required to correct the 13 and 14 Amendments, correctthem as appropriate forms of legislation. "Congress shall have power toenforce this article by appropriate legislation." The Amendmentsclearly do not say Congress shall have powers of immunity to enforce articlesof inappropriate legislation and are repetitive making the principle of themholding a factual united state questionable having needed to be repeated inother Amendments.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Not all things that are wrong are murder. I do use the above argument, but only in defense to the ever stupid "abortion is murder" claim.
Criminal law Vs. United State Constitutional Right
Murder is the unlawful taking of life, abortion is by United State Constitution unlawful, thus is murder by association given by the admission the order to abort describes. The problem in criminal law was that the admission was criminal as well. Abortion is legilsated as an argument of organized crime by legal malpractice in criminal law.The United State Constitutional Right some person might be looking for is better described as female-specific amputation although this "Right" may pose in some arguments in the loss of Doctor patient privacy laws. However it does not make the same admission in describing a order to stop it is a order of medical removal.
A women is by United States Constitution an ambassador to the life her body hosts as a form of immigration by "law of nature." It is not a stupid claim, it pregnancy abortion as murder is a grievance that is substantiated by criminal law or judicial organized crime. At this point it had been clearly wrong for legal council and women not to establish a common defense by the establishment of United States Constitutional Right. Was the task to create such connection impossible or is and was it always possible?
Does Female-specific amputation best establish a connection to justice to all women by right and not crime ?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I use word to spell check ...copy and paste. Didn't remember to fix it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
China did notperform abortions as a Nation it conducted Female-specific amputations toterminate the immigration of a citizen of China into the nation of China. Whilein America abortion has since 1973 been against United States ConstitutionalRight, a form of law. Also, making this type of medical process Female-specificamputation as a United States Constitutional right to be assigned held by womenor men. As men are part of what is described as an ordered to terminate givenby a woman to stop officially an ongoing process created as described betweenall men and women involved as a united state of immigration. Not birth as the claimof body autonomy state otherwise failing in an attempt to alienate males fromthe order given by abort.
Law has two forms in America, the form of law towhich abortion was legislated is described as criminal law and is based oncrime and criminal accusation, as a practice of law. This creates an additionalcomplication as by literal definition criminal law is by terms of filedgrievance organized crime, then becoming dependent on United StatesConstitutional right to hold it in connection to established justice. All thiswhile remaining against the law that is United States Constitutional Right.Breaking the process of medical treatment and pregnancy connected toimmigration by law of nature is part of the process of Constitutional right. Wethe people are arguing which is the largest United State between all women andpregnancy, all women and medical treatment, and all women and medical privacy.without the use of crime as a United States Constitutional Right otherwise thelegal practice is left unbalanced and disconnected to highest level ofestablished Justice.
Created:
Posted in:
..." Hackers and security experts at Def Con, the world's largest convention for cybersecurity, have shown that it is very easy to 'hack' AI bots like ChatGPT and Bard, and get to say practically anything. They also demonstrated, it can be done by just using prompts "..
I would just say ...
Code stability and security experts at Def Con, the world's largest convention for cybersecurity, have shown that it is very easy to 'hack' AI bots like ChatGPT and Bard, and get to say practically anything. They also demonstrated, it can be done by just using prompts ".
Computer coding is in some ways similar to legislation of law. How it is written really matters even though poor coding practice works sometime better in short coming applications. Hacking describes how code is assembled not used. The rule of thumb any cost of computing is by the byte. Like a diet?
Created:
Posted in:
(0101010101)₂ = (0 × 2⁹) + (1 × 2⁸) + (0 × 2⁷) + (1 × 2⁶) + (0 × 2⁵) + (1 × 2⁴) + (0 × 2³) + (1 × 2²) + (0 × 2¹) + (1 × 2⁰) = (341)₁₀
Decimal number >>>> 341 <<<<
Hexadecimal number 155
AI electronic bits >>> 0101010101 ergo least complex set
Data compression systems such as Lempel–Ziv–Welch can compress arbitrary binary data. They are therefore not binary codes themselves but may be applied to binary codes to reduce storage needs.
- Morse code is a variable-length telegraphy code, which traditionally uses a series of long and short pulses to encode characters. It relies on gaps between the pulses to provide separation between letters and words, as the letter codes do not have the "prefix property". This means that Morse code is not necessarily a binary system, but in a sense may be a ternary system, with a 10 for a "dit" or a "dot", a 1110 for a dash, and a 00 for a single unit of separation. Morse code can be represented as a binary stream by allowing each bit to represent one unit of time. Thus a "dit" or "dot" is represented as a 1 bit, while a "dah" or "dash" is represented as three consecutive 1 bits. Spaces between symbols, letters, and words are represented as one, three, or seven consecutive 0 bits. For example, "NO U" in Morse code is "— . — — — . . —", which could be represented in binary as "1110100011101110111000000010101110". If, however, Morse code is represented as a ternary system, "NO U" would be represented as "1110|10|00|1110|1110|1110|00|00|00|10|10|1110".
Bit string/ Byte, Word, Dword, QWord maybe the way to identify processing area ofadvanced algorithms in programming.
AI electronic bits >>> 0101010101 ergo least complex set
The steganographic code, commonly known as Bacon's cipher uses groups of 5 binary-valued elements to represent letters of the alphabet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
And that electronic bits filing method is called AI, incorporated by algorythms. Your way behind the times here. Before electronic filing there was electric induced filing of paper cards, or other mechanical apparratus with clicks or holes etc.
Being identified assomething such as intelligence and the accuracy of the intellect benefittingwhat is being called out to be openly smarter are not set. We must still fileflash drives, hard drives, and other forms of media imprinting on behalf of thecomputers, even when automated and the software does much of this task itself.Hard code in CPu’s and GPu ensure this. While, as programmers, people also placedlong term partitions in coding such as the number of bits in any given operatingsystem of memory storge for a computer takes in used. 8 bits, 16, bits, 32 bits,64 bits, 128 bits, and so on.
What acts do people in a coma commit? I dont consider people in a coma conscious, tho, they have whatever degree of lesser complex consciousness occurring. There bodies still function to whatever degree. The bacteria in gut live on, til death, then other kind of bacterial take over, or so I presume.
The acts a personcommits depends on the depth of human comatose. A person who may actwithout consciousness may cause harm to others without remorse. You are stillonly speaking of storage of memory not intelligence the speed to retrieve held datais not Intelligence. A computer has only attachments to become aware of surroundings,and you are correct I do not believe the idea given by educated consensus on Artificialintelligence and computers. It is unrealistic at best. A.I. Describes a characturistic state of mind held by a programmer not the machine programmed.
Roger Penrose list four things ---in book Emperors New Mind--- that, AI algorythms will never do, that humans do.
The constitutional question by connectioon to established justice is made when an owner of a gun is responsible for the lethal force created by the gun and other users, how does this precedent now apply to computers by programmed automation? A warning was issued verbally in public before the event, do not kill us with a computer. This is equal to saying stop do not shoot the constitutional connection of lethal forceis involuntary and crimninal burden by law is shared new by many people not one person or machine, civil liablilities are something else.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
AI is more specialized and far out performs humans.
@ -------> Ebuc
You are not talking about inteligence you are talking about nothing more then a process of filing over others human methods. So, sorry a computer filing system is a human method of filing, its performance and outperforming human filing of information was a goal from the begining.
Keep in mind Artificial Intelligence is also a method of simply say telling a lie out performs telling a truth. Yes, as a matter of fact it is true and no it doesn't help the cause for your effect.
Created:
Posted in:
1} Not sure how your above relates to comment you quote/replied too,
People do act without contiousness it is not unheard of.
1} first and foremost, is defininng consciousness. I say there are degrees of consciousness, ergo, there exists non-biologic consciousness, that, in least complex definition is two-ness/other-ness, that, includes four aspects of consideration
It's the first thing you wrote.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
1} first and foremost, is defininng consciousness. I say there are degrees of consciousness, ergo, there exists non-biologic consciousness, that, in least complex definition is two-ness/other-ness, that, includes four aspects of consideration
Why is that first there are people who operate without consciousness the behavior is a form of mentally illness not artificial intelligent. The first defining principle may be is A.I. used as a verb ornoun?
Created:
Time......
Simply explained is the best made attempt at the beginning mathematics to the end of infinite fractions in human calculation. Time was in its original state a geometric event that occurs in nature. The one event is described as a word, time. The Atomic clock, digital clock, and computers do not tell time. We are told they are telling time the translation an interpretation is not by fact realted to geometric location other wise known as time.
Gravity and energy both share a position time does not hold which is an understanding of motion into past and present. Time is a zone, it is the wording of zone describing a area much like the word space lists a different form of area, but this area of time unlike space holds both past and future in limited capacity. The original time describes where a geometric event will take place in a predictable repeated patter so we might relocate our location as position to be at the point of occurrence to see the geometrical event in person, re-happen.
Time is the Chameleon of Energy. Every person in the world looks at it every day and never notices it for what it is, time. ( John_C_87, 2023)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
The fact that π is transcendental means nothing about its decimal expansion. It is a fact about the number itself.
Except Pi doesn't have a decimal expantion it is an interpritation of mathmatics stating math does not have the answer, most people do not have either. Calculator's do no have the answer, computer's do not have the answer, any mechanical machine that gives you numbers in that fassion is saying, "I do not know but I am still looking."
What I am saying is Pi will never be a precise ratio.
When used in a calculation which becomes part or in most cases multiple parts of a formula, that formula will never have a precise interger as a sum. How deep and the number of repetitions Pi is used in the formula veriates a margine of erea that is not fix by using only Pi.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
You are only reiterating the same argument that I have repeatedly explained the irrelevance of. You will need to point out an error made in my argument, rather than some other one. My argument did not involve the use of a calculator, so claiming that this is where the error lies is nonsensical.
I am in fact only citing the calculator as a source giving the reason why it is a source in my point. That reason is human error. I need to change my approach to what method of mathematics gives us the number.99999... we are debating. Was it addition, subtraction, multiplication,division? The reason of logic behind asking is it will determine if the sum is an answer or a statement describing what is not an answer.
Why I call the value .999999..... agroup. This may have been wrong on my part, though, I am not getting indications on your part that I am wrong yet. ( I call this fishing) Though I am still uncertain it is wrong. I continue to assume the math when performed on paper or by calculator is telling us what the precise answer to the equation is not. This is opposition to the calculator telling us what istrue. First it tells us it is not 9/9th, it then goes on to say it is not99/100th, to which later it goes on to explain under no condition is the answer precisely 999/1000th. Mathematics is so obsessed that unless stopped by humanor natural intervention it will look forever for the precise answer.8 / 9 = .88888888....
8.0
9
.80 Not it!
72
.080 Not it!
72
.0080 Not it!
72
.0008 Not it!
Interpreting the incorrect answer as the correct answer is anerror.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz invented calculus, not Archimedes. We've been over this.
Yes, you are correct and thank you, Newton's work in trigonometry just sticks in my mind better for some reason. I am under the weather and willneed to come back to some of this in a couple days.
You insist on attacking a source that I am not even using. In my arguments that 0.99999... = 1 I have at no point made use of a calculator, so your insistence that it is a result of calculator error is ridiculous. This would be like if someone told you that the Earth was round, and you responded with "well, you can't trust wikipedia!"
It is a machine error or specifically a human judgment call directing the error the machine makes. With all the buttons that calculators can have on it the addition of a couple of buttons which change the fraction value that are translated to decimal by a calculator is not that big of a deal. As we are going to go back and forth with this and in the end, we need a few more different rulers if you agree with me I am going to rest.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Yes, the decimal expansion for π is basically entirely useless within the field of pure mathematics. π itself, however, is most certainly not. π is very important in pure math and the real world. Also, regardless of usefulness, π decimals expansion most certainly is valid.
I cannot say Pi is useless it just happens to be closer to a ratio of 4: 1 than 3: 1 adn tht is the reason it almost works when using Trigonometry. It is trigonometry Isaace Newton formulated as a mathematic and what he had done is added woprk to Achemidese efforts in calculus.
This debate has nothing to do with stars, the Solar System, the galaxies, or the universe, nor does it have anything to do with calculators, despite your insistence that it all comes down to calculator error, which is false. As I have already explained, calculators are entirely unnecessary to prove 0.99999... = 1.
No it is the error in mathmematics at the binary level in calulator and calulating systems the chips and low level coding create the infinite decimal.
Achimedes and the whole Roman empire for a period of time had used a 1/12 fraction as a decimal in place of 1/10 or much of the Romen Empires money.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
In thehypothetical it is just one building: The hotel. Where the buses come from isirrelevant, since as I explained earlier, everything in the video is a stand-infor an abstract mathematical object. Metaphors don't have to be realistic solong as they represent what they are meant to represent effectively. You bringup calculator error again. As I have already explained, calculators are notrelevant here. As to all the stuff about morality and legal negligence, thishas not the slightest hint of relevance to this discussion.
I am going to disagreeand say there are multiple infinite numbers of decimal numbers, created by gradeschool mathematics such as devission, multiplication, addition, and evensubtraction becoming a set if groups according to Wolfram MathWorld.
Agroup isa finite or infinite set of elements together with a binary operation (called the group operation) that together satisfy the four fundamental properties ofclosure, associativity, the identity property, and the inverse property. Theoperation with respect to which a group is defined is often called the"group operation," and a set is said to be a group "under"this operation. Elements A, B , C, ... with binaryoperation between A and B denoted A B forma group. Group --
Agroup G is a finite or infinite set of elements together witha binary operation (called the group operation) that together satisfy the four fundamental properties ofclosure, associativity, the identity property, and the inverse property. Theoperation with respect to which a group is defined is often called the"group operation," and a set is said to be a group "under"this operation. Elements A, B , C, ... with binaryoperation between A and B denoted A B forma group.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
The metaphoric nature of this debate is about Stars, Solar System, Galaxy, and Universe. The debate used infinite numbers created by a calculator to do this, it is the calculator which creates the idea of endless space that a sum may fill. This is not the identical reasoning and logic behind the infinite universe. The bus video is taking this scaling condition in a different direction than the # 0.99999 issue of the debate and the infinite concept of an unexplained volume in a boundless universe.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Yep that's the way we used to do it as kids....Pre decimal.....We called them fractions. But not the same as dividing 1 by 3 decimally. You know what decimal means?
I'm going to take you over the edge of mathematics, I aways found this info interesting though I learned a lot of it through early world history and not math class.
The method Archimedes used himself is a little different zedvitor4 the decimal system Archimedes the person who had written such things as Archimedean property, and calculus, the same mathematician used a decimal system that was based on 1/12 not 1/10 as fractions .12 = 1, .1212 = .11, and .121212 equaled.111 how decimals are used now on calculators and computers. 1 divided by 3, 1/ 3 = .40 not (.33333....) Thus (3 x .40 = 1 as 12.0 ) we translate 12 to mean 1. This also meant that 1 divided by 4, (1 / 4 = .30). A hard to understand decimal value in this mathematics is 7, 1 divided by 7, 1 / 7 = .1111111... the three elevens go on infinitely. What is important to see is that not all of the numbers create infinite values, like before, and what is helpful is the two numbers which do (11, 7) create the same decimalinfinite value of .1111... and it is only the length of the identification stage of the repeating values that change. In case you did not notice how much this math is like algebra, anolog time or how it relates to binary value in bits. I would like to point out It does as it is the foundation of how those three things had been developed. See in Binary and in a decimmal system using 1/12th the numeric values can be seen as two subgroups as either (0 or 1).
As this solution is confusing as anything to look at. I will try and help with a little more detailed lay out. 12 subtracted by 7 equals 5 and the first decimal is .11 we do not go over twelve. (5 x 12 is 60) 8 x 7 is the closes match as it equals 56, 60 - 56 = 4 the value is short so it becomes 11 again. .1111 with a remainder of four. 4 x 12 equals 48, the next match is at 6 x 7 equals 42. It is (48 - 42 = 6). Keep in mind this is math that is Centuries older than what is taking place now.
Created: