Total posts: 287
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Women are diverse. Men are diverse, too. So, you CANNOT say all women are the same, as if they were made by the same model. Likewise the men.
Yes, it can be said, yes it can beproven in a history of established justice, equality had been achieved.Conviction of crime is a method if creating men and women equal. This is awhole truth but does not reflect justice as criminal laws can be written thatmake it impossible for some to afford litigation to defend honor. Do youconcede women and men who are both convicted by a court of law are equal true,I am not asking if they are in fact guilty only if they are equal. I would liketo move on to the search for more information on a pressing matter of theperfect state of the union with justice.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Are men and women equal?
No men and women are not equal in the United States of America.
The very firstreason that men and women are not equal in the United States of America iswomen are not described as Independent from British criminal law and men are.The Second difference is that all men are set by declaration of independence tohold each other as created by their creator to be equal before United States ofright.
Created:
Posted in:
The first amendment protects the right to free speech, not freedom of action.You can under the first amendment, advocate for legalizing drunk driving. That doesn't give you the freedom to drive drunk.It is legal to protest for legalized abortion in Texas and every state where it is banned. It is illegal to get an abortion in these states.
None of this is true but for the sake of argument it is allowed under the Preamble of United States Constitution not the 1st Amendment though the 1st amendments state of the union is broken by legal council. Free speech is not a American Constitutional Right it is an international law which is imported into theAmerica justice system, like abortion criminal law, and slavery laws had been. I guess "Buy American Made" only counts for poor working-class people who work to pay for daily neccesities. The only debate over United States of law is in the term" A legal protest" for it is a declaration of wrong, peaceful assemblies are in no way a protest, and an officer of civil service can be impeached for a violation of this kind. A protest is not a form of peaceful assembly, there are several more perfect words to be used in its place.
Abortion is a potential source of income to the litigation profession as it is a order to stop. The process of medical treatment named abortion was a game of political musical chairs.
You can legally call abortion whatever you want; murder; women's healthcare. But should you be allowed to perform an abortion or receive one? That's the disputation.
Who can order a offical stop is the debate question.
Who can order the Medical Amputation is the whole truth, then why can it be ordered is the question?
The state of the Union is made between women in the Armed Services and women who are Civilians as one American United State.
The debate is to find the most perfect, the largest title of filed grievance between all women connecting them to established Justice. It is important to point out that the argument you are making does not best serve all women such as those who are serving in American Armed Services. Female-specific amputation is a relief of command to the applications on lethal force. Due to obligations of immigration that coincide with pregnancy and risks of pregnancy as a means of attempting to use lethal force against an enlisted, commissioned officer, uncommissioned female officer, and women. There are clearly things that have changed between 1973and 2024 over the United States Constitutional obligations of Right for the burden of posterity a woman holds as a United States of America.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Hard to tell while she is pregnant, but only those that are pregnant can get abortions.
Due to the freedom of speech and freedom of press holding no connection to the 1st Amendment can be used to describe any women or man who is not a medical doctor can perform an abortion. Also, sorry to be the one to break the news but a woman can performan abortion even when pregnant, to abort is not limited by English grammar to only mean one thing a termination of a pregnancy at the cost of life. The meaning to abort is to officially stop an officially started process of somekind, it is when it is connected to a medical process such as delivery of posterity it becomes a harmful self-incrimination. The freedom of speech and press describes that English grammar cannot hold one word with multiple meanings to be magically understood in criminal law.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Until there is a system of government by referendum, a Supreme Court will never knowingly represent the will of the people.
The same applies. Supreme Court will never knowingly represent the will of the people.
The people are topresent a United State law written with instruction of truths describing rightbefore the Supreme Court which comprises the will of the people not crimes tobe used against the people. The size of the united state of the lawdefines the number of people who are represented. The Courts measure thebalance in weight made by the series of rights between the Bill of Rightwritten and the establishment of justice. All that takes place on a politicalscale is the Bill of Rights is never written to be tested for a perfectconnection or less than perfect connection to establish justice.
The grievance filed by women is for a reprentation of United States Constitutional Right as proof that American declaration of Independence and United States Consitution are not the cause of descrimination created around the rather large united state of gender. The obstical of descrimination is that a United States Constitutional Right must separate men and women in order to address the alienation which only a women faces lethal force when having sex be it married or not. It is not a love of American Constitution that drives the concerns over abortion and legilsation of criminal law. The reason for immiediate establishment of United States Constitutional right of limiting posterity is based on women who are placed in the Armed Service of all Nations just like America.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Until there is a system of government by referendum, a Supreme Court will never knowingly represent the will of the people.
The referendum is alegal negligence when addressing abortion, the word describes a violation ofAmerican Constitutional privacy it is a order to stop? The issue in the courtis a point of having a medical treatment that meets guidelines of United StatesConstitutional Right. Have any voters come forward and gone on record againstabortion filed charges of attempted murder against the child in the Texasabortion case? Doctors as witness have already gone on record stating themother’s life is in danger and not the voters, yet only she may be punished anddie due directly to their vote. This is a civil damage passed down to themwithout clarity, with no disrespect to the court meant. I am unclear of allfacts in the argument of the order to officially stop and describe the processas a female specific amputation instead to help protect myself as I feel theFederal Supreme court and states have failed to protect myself, family, andfriends in the past in relationship to this criminal law imported to Americafrom Britian many decades ago. If not to add insult to injury it comes from thesame place as criminal laws which had supported slavery in America when it was unconstitutional.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
No and this is a strawman. In post Roe America, every state has abortion as legal at least to save the mother's life.
It is a agument over malpractice of law or proffesional negligence and is in no way a strawman agrument. Either women die during labor while delivering a child of American posterity or they do not. Which one is it?
As for before Roe Vs Wade States of law did not addess or enforce the order to end life made by the choice of wording and no State had moved forward to establish a state of the union with United States Constitutional Right. An act of criminal law cannot be made legal and abortion was a criminal law imported as a Product of the Courts and English law, most likely by people who had been promoting a religous idea.
When saying abortionwas legal when given as a order to save a pregnant women’s life you are alreadyadmitting it is a crime in the first place. To be direct this abortion issue isjust part of the damages created by the assertion a women can be President ofthe United States of America as a more perfect state of the union then othersthat can be made on their behalf. The word choice sound more like the argumenta couple may have between each other over a pregnancy in the privacy andprotection of intimacy then a United States Constitutional Right all women candescribe and hold. Both by themselves or with a second and third person male orfemale.
The strawmanargument is that abortion is an issue of the courts of law and not impeachmentprocess of officers of politics this would include Senators. There is a strongneed that a woman be removed from bonds of English law and be described towitnesses as being held as a United State of law which is comprised of “Right”not criminal law. Upon this supreme Right a United States Constitutional Rightto govern the establishment of the burdens of posterity can be achieved.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
I think the idea is a silver bullet. I believe abortion should be banned from consensual sex because it kills an innocent human being (maybe even for rape victims). Because of this, I will get avasectomy before I have sex. I believe every sexually active pro life man that doesn't have a vasectomy is a hypocrite, and the same is true for every sexually active pro life woman that doesn't require a vasectomy before they have sex.
Are you saying nomother ever dies while in labor due to medical complications? I understand abortion to be just a great lie as criminal law creatd before America was even established, when we abort something, we are simply giving an order to officially stop a pending process which has been seen as officially beginning. Though a pregnancy may begin it doesn’t ensure it is beginning correctly started in the natureal setting and the pending posterity of a nation leaving the pending posterity open for trying to apply lethal force against only its mother, no one else, just the mother. The United States Constitutional Right that has been created but not explained in writing for vote means the states are allowing voters to cast a vote on the application of lethal being only legal for the posterity or some one outside the danger zone of lethal force as mentioned the presumed innocent child for one as so it may kill its mother and allow it to be placed in possibly someone else’s custody. This is a issue of the 13th Amendment as the court is creating a slave of the presumed innocent child.
The silly fact here is the Supreme court has written an opinion only that does not mention any fact of matter that when a person makes a claim openly in the public they are to officially stop a process like pregnancy, which is untrue as a United State of criminal law to all women, as in many cases it is the pregnancy which is ruler over stopping the pregnancy, this by creating a high level of risk to death. This means the child is attempting to perform a type murder and is simply never held for trial in a criminal court for the crime. The United States Constitutional Right is that the processis not an abortion as said to be but is by facts a female specific amputation or even something else instead. One of the werewolves looking for a sivler bullet as you say in the room is that medical professionals do as a practice of science and medicine perform events which create pregnancies. Literally the scientific community can be the cause of pregnancy of the women as her life is placed in danger by the delivery of posterity, as the medical intervention is to makes attempts to provide a state with the healthiest of contribution to a viable posterity. This however is not the only reason for alarm.
Created:
Posted in:
I've already made a point, and Liam replied with garbage that proves my point about wasting my time with him.
Did you get a receipt for this time which you claim is yours and not ours?
Again, the point is abortion is not an American criminal law it originates from British criminal law where it just so happens American men have a Declaration of Independence which separates them from those bonds. Oddly enough women are not part of that same Declaration of Independence and are not bound together as a United State by a legal non-criminal right such as titles for filing of united consitutional grievance, nor are they given a means to create themselves as women equal before American Courts to all other women.
Denialism and appeals to mockery =/= evidence of an argument.
Wrong kind of argument, denial and mockery are fuel for arguments of neglect not arguments of debate there is no presentation of resolution form dismissal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
What can be said YouFound_Lxam, some people are just awesome at proving someone has not point to make an thus becomes afraid of wasting their time. lol
Created:
Posted in:
Isn't that how wecame up with the issue of abortion in the 1st place. Trying to create the mostperfect connection to established justice, ensured domestic tranquility, providefor the common defense, and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves andour posterity with one word not a word salad?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Then it will be an easy win for you right?
I feel it’s fair to say we are all looking for the bestconnection to establish justice that will serve the greater common good. The order to stop being given as a play on the liberty of wording of abortion is not serving the common good. It serves a master called criminal law, originally not even written in America it goes back to the birth of English Medicine, religion, and English criminal law.
Created:
Posted in:
There is no such thing as criminal law being not of "a law of (sic) United States Constitutional Right (sic)..."
Criminal law " is not a law of United States Constitutional Right", paesano.
Law of United States Constitutional Right. Not only are you wrong about criminal law is in no way to be abridged in writing or when spoken but you are in violation of the 1st Amendment in its entirety, meaning the whole 1st Amendment.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. ( this style of writing is different)
: a formal written request made to an authority or organized body (such as a court)
: a written request or call for change signed by many people in support of a shared cause or concern
:especially : to make a formal written request to (an authority)
: something asked or requested
This is not a criminal law it is a law of United States Constitutional right. It describes a series of things which can be performed in the correct way as right not crime.
Crime of murder
§1111. Murder
(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.
Any other murder is murder in the second degree.
(b) Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,
Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life;
Whoever is guilty of murder in the second degree, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(c) For purposes of this section—
(1) the term "assault" has the same meaning as given that term in section 113;
(2) the term "child" means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years and is—
(A) under the perpetrator's care or control; or
(B) at least six years younger than the perpetrator;
(3) the term "child abuse" means intentionally or knowingly causing death or serious bodily injury to a child;
(4) the term "pattern or practice of assault or torture" means assault or torture engaged in on at least two occasions;
(5) the term "serious bodily injury" has the meaning set forth in section 1365; and
(6) the term "torture" means conduct, whether or not committed under the color of law, that otherwise satisfies the definition set forth in section 2340(1).
( Then this style of writing)
What in the FLYING FUCK does any of this have to do with the price of tea in China, let alone the abortion debate!?!
Have you been living under a rock for the last 50 years. Women are trying to turn a criminal law into a law of United States Constitutional right and have failed horribly. Female-specific amputation is a Constitutional right which shares an endgame of abortion, the endgame is a type immigration of a constitutional described member of America, women. The name of all the children unborn in the American Constitution are identified as " Posterity" It is their United State.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
It should be made clear that the child in Texas has been described by a witness to be attempting to kill the mother and is doing so right now and the Texas prosecutor’s office did nothing but take part in the murder under Texas Constitution. Female specific amputation is a separation process to preserve the Texan Constitutional right for a female who is tasked with the delivery of posterity to defend herself and all posterity as a UnitedState with other women.
Immigration and falsified admissions are both obligations toall United States of judicial Court.
Created:
Posted in:
Word salad. Bad grammar. Bad spelling. Bad everything.
A load of crap can be explained in perfect Queens English...... which could be a warning sign right there……..Doesn't mean the taste is going to improve for anyone over a nice word salad. There is never any good news about how and why the use of lethal force is necessary. I do not have to personally like the more perfect state of the union to established justice made by United States Constitutional Right. We the people must only make them as so to give the people the liberties of choice. I am totally unconvinced that an offical order to stop a pregnancy is the best common defense between all women or between all men and all women as criminal law or medical treatment. So, the bar set for the height of any improvement is and was really quite low.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sam_Flynn
Not how criminal law works, mehoe.
Criminal law is not a law of United States Constitutional Right, paesano.
Biological criteria is met at conception. That's just a basic fact of life, irrelevant of your "whole truth" (it's not a whole loaf of bread).
Literally fact science does harvest, store, and take donations of sperm and human egg keeping them alive so they can be used in the treatment of infertility. Biological material for additional medical treatments is grown after human conception as well as medical conception. Whole truth that is a way of say all the truth that might be gathered as a United State as a complete condition or principle. A medical professional can be found guilty of perjury for only describing a partial truth when giving an expert opinion in an official proceeding of inquiry.
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Abortion is a foreign criminal law written by legislators outside American United States Constitutional Right before America had ever been established an independent state of two forms of law, Criminal law, and Law of Right. A United States Constitutional Right does not need to be ratified before it held before the Courts of America it is a power described to be held by “We the people.” With a condition of being a more perfect state of the union than what is in use at any given time in history.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sam_Flynn
We must accept the fact that 1:Human life begins at conception and should be treated as such."...and should be treated as such." What does this even mean?Treated as [such], treated like....what, exactly??
It means the we must accept that a arprtial truth is nough fact to base criminal law on.
Science describes as whole truth that life begins at the creation of two things independent from eachother an egg and sperm. In the law of nature as whole truth according to science men kill more sperm then women kill eggs. A male female couple can practice medicine and exstend the life of one sperm and one egg in most aplications of sexual intercourse. Just as medical science can preactice marriage and produce life by having sex according to christain law without sexual intercourse.
This debate becomesa matter of equality under criminal law and United States Constitutional right.It is a United States Constitutional right to apply lethal force to a child of certainage when married and unmarried in one way. The parents must neglect the law ofnature they possess as share to save the child and not extend the length of anatural life of a child at this stage as fact. The scientific life expectancyis about 28 days or 1-month. The age is not set by absence of intercourse it isset by the mother of the child and the laws of nature; natures GOD gives them.In whole truth this is the connection Christianity is making as a proposedUnited States Constitutional state of the Union.
Now let’s look atthe United States Constitutional Right executive officer # 45 has made which isnot being placed in writing to be evaluated his abilities of preserving UnitedStates Constitution under House Impeachment. Remember this is not a criminal chargeand there is no presumption of innocence to be expected. It is to be given ornot give by all those under oath during impeachment. A man in attempt to preserveUnited States Constitutional right is use a very young child as a 2nd amendment right to bear arms to attempt to kill all women. Yes, as whole truththe odds of him killing all women is not very likely, though all women areplaced at risk of death randomly as a gamble. Simply said odds dictate not allwomen die simple because that try at creating what American United StatesConstitution describes as a nation’s posterity. The United States Constitutionalright that is created by all men’s independence from English law without women andcreation of men’s own equality is the future and the present are separated by aborder created by law of nature.
As a united stateconstitutional right the very young child cannot even be charged withaccidental use of lethal force it may apply allowing a woman to defend her lifeplaced only her at risk for presenting a nation with the most perfect posteritypossible for her to create. A woman is at War with the laws of nature and allconception or copulation ensures is she is not alone in that battle. Lifeliberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Female specific amputation is not abortion they may both share a use of lethal force but they are in no way equal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Got nothing to do with a union
These are a few United States Constitutional connections in preservation of right.
The moment it was used in a court of law it was made part of a state of the union with established justice Mall. In terms of birthcontrol, it is a great method of preventing birth, yet it has nothing to do with the controversial issue of Constitutional right, immigration, ambassadorhood, and American posterity, the idea has nothing to do with a connection to established justice other than a history of being Unamerican in its creation. The state of law has not filed murder charges against the child yet, another violation of many states Constitution. Instead, it followed voter advice that the child is a person, and a mother is to be criminally charged with abortion forcing her to say she is ordering lethal force. As a many statesConstitutional right, the child is an arm brought to bear against an ambassadorof the United States of America. Abortion was a violation of the person’s right to privacy in doing so the voter has found out the child is attempting to killthe mother. A governor of a state to follow many of the American states own constitutions should declare the voters in the respective states ambassador to unborn children who are now persons.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Sexual abstinence is superior.
How is sexual abstinence a more perfect union withConstitutional established justice? Women who are married are not to consummate marriage. Women who are married are not to have children. Women who are not married are cannot contribute to America's posterity. Abstinence is an argument made for a woman to protect her body not for a woman to hold a united state between all women in relationship to the lives as one United States Constitutional Right.
Created:
Posted in:
Yes that's why abstinence is key . It does, not does not, it does prevent and control birth .
It eliminates birth as a means of the public to create a united state constitutional posterity so in whole true it simply gives someonenothing to control about posterity, other than immigration from people of othernations and not their own. Another whole truth is it prevents life not birth abstinence prevents the creation of life and does nothing in portecting the child who will die during or after birth. Absolutly nothing. There is no united States Constitutional right of common defense for the child or the mother. Female specific amputations control only a united state of immigration found inside the American Constitution. There are simply to many veriables for the court to hold a order to stop as a United State of criminal law against all women within the bounds of legal formations of governing laws in gedneral.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
higher frequencis of loops, so 18 > 20 > 20,00 > 20 million > 10^36 etc.....I dunno, just making clear, any frequency beyond 18 nodal events would be acceptable by me
Higher frequencies are radiation waves of theelectromagnetic form. If you take any two scales of time Hours + minutes andtwist one scale you get the geometric shape of a 3-D torus. This also workswith minutes and seconds, or seconds and hours. Time is a series of mathematicsthat directs us to the discovery of a force of energy which is notelectromagnetic. As for Space-time it is a fiction of a mathematic tensor Timeexists in the three dimensions of space as part of X, Y, And Z Not itsown dimension of T. Inside of the three dimensions it as many dimensions of itsown through the process of synchronization.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Doesn't matter the gender. Both can do the superior act of sexual abstinence.
You do understand a women can never always know her pregnancy is life threatening before she is to participate in the creation of a nation’s posterity?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
It is in terms of birth control. That's the point I was making.
Itis not a form of birth control abort is an order a person gives another person. Abort, abortion aren't even a medical treatment it is something a person might say to stop as a medical treatment. The operation was aborted, a doctor had a procedure that was subject to abortion first thing this morning. Abortion is already a United States Constitutional right and is a Constitutional right conected to confession of a crime. It is said in a harder to understand way like calling sex fornication, but it is already a United States Constitutional right.
The United States Constitutional right can be described as female specific amputation for ending an immigration process from the ambassador of the expected citizen as posterity. We are to be looking for the most perfect state of the union with established justice. A conection which can hold all women in a united state or single group of people when addressing the judicial process. A United States Constitutional right cannot serve two master’s criminal law and Constitutional right as law.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
#24 would be the lates mention as ultra high fequencies are radiation waves.
And Gravity and Dark Energy are two sides of the same coin, and can be visualize in 2D or geodesic curvature format and those two are inherent as diametrically opposites on nodal event surface of a torus. Universe at best, is a spherical ---ultra-high frequency---- sphere-like, however, I remain with the scenario, that, all particles of this Universe ---barring a quantum (graviton(-)darkEon) 14 nodal event--- are overlapping and interfering Quantum Space-time Tori, that are much higher frequencies my minimal quantum tors of 14 nodal events.Either way on higher frequency tori does not change my Univerese is compose of tori, and we just dont see the positive and negative curvature as Gravity, or its diametric opposite negatively curved Dark-Energy, yet each exists as a quanta of 14 nodal events within the minimal 18 nodal event quantum torus.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
You need to supply quote for me to have context. You appear very confused in regards to the my clarity ---for the most part--- my concepts as presented
I could supply a quoter, but you made the comment that gravity is presumed a minute radiation as quanta give or take. Explaining the Torus as mathematical fact the shape is coming from geometrically twisting time with algebra. It is not your fault as it has stated with general relativity and the creation of mathematic Tensors.
I would say you are out of context more than incorrect. If that matters, I am not trying to prove you wrong only set context that I can prove and follow.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
And theorise that their motion is the effect of an attraction, that we consequently refer to as gravity.
True. Say what you are theoretical thinking, not that gravity exists you are saying there is nogravity it is magnetism. We must make a choice is Newton wrong about the lawsof motion or the law of gravity. I know due to the issue of algebra IsaacNewton was wrong about the law of gravity. Knowing why mathematically somethingdoes not calculate correctly means a alterative can be made, a formula writtento test findings repeated as check.
An example of observation in mathematics: Is Pi an Inside Diameteror is it an Outside Diameter. The mathematic question this raises: At whatpoint does the circles circumference thickness come into play on the infinite valueof O.D. 3.14159 the average pencil line thinkes is (0.7).
We do, we can, we have viewed motions set magnetic innature. They can be compared to other motions. It is not only theory, a formulacan be written around it. Numbers can also be used to create simulation and arealways made long before something might be viewed in real time.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
validates
I am taking it you meant contradicts your logic.
As you are describing a magnitude of radiation to create magnetism and are saying that gravity does not exist at all. All observable motion we see and list as gravity within a Universe is magnetism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
"Human life begins at conception and should be treated as such. "
No,the scientific fact is life begins at the female’s creation of egg not theconception of the egg. Conception is a change made as treatment to prolong thelife that has already been started. You are making an interpretation to justifyone form of murder over another form of murder. the united state is all peopletake part equally in not fertilizing the female egg which is the cause ofdeath. Whereas after fertilization only the women who creates the egg can beheld to blame for the death even if the egg is to be a source of lethal forceacting on the woman.
Marriage and civilunions held by law go on to complicate the matter of the murder by negligence for they are instructionto limit the financial support a women may receive by not committing murder by attemptingto at least fertilize all eggs she produces.
"There aresafer and more productive alternatives to abortion".
Female, specific amputations are safer alternative toabortion. FSA is also a United States Constitutional Right holding all womenequal under the same law Agreed of nature assigned to them, ambassador. It ismuch safer as we now can all see by the actions of Colonies of America actingas States of law. Trying to Amend Constitution by writing criminal law todescribe something as not a crime, that does not even make common sense. Wewrite United States Constitutional Rights to establish something as legal thevoter has presented no crime, to make and establish, crime a more perfectconnection to a perfect line on justice something that is perfect and right.
"Sexual abstinence issuperior."
Sexual abstinence isnot superior in safety to female specific amputation. It ignores the UnitedStates Constitutional Right that is inherent to all women as a citizen of thisnation, America among all others. A woman is the border between America posterityin which life must leave her and cross into America, this does not translate inany way to entering the womb of a women to become a citizen of America. Abstinence is only a more perfect state of unionwith a women’s control over her body not her commitments to posterity.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
Either way on higher frequency tori does not change my Univerese is compose of tori, and we just dont see the positive and negative curvature as Gravity, or its diametric opposite negatively curved Dark-Energy, yet each exists as a quanta of 14 nodal events within the minimal 18 nodal event quantum torus.
Here is the problem.Gravity is a motion we observe clearly. Where is it observed you might ask. The earth has a gravity field and all objects on all sides of a sphere move towards the planet. This is a fact, yet the same earth rotates around its core while orbiting the sun the pathway is fixed in one path of motion. There is no obstruction of view, a person can in fact write a mathematical law of motion based on this as to why the events take place.
It is about as easy as writing the theory of General Relativity as a mathematical law, Energy approximate mass multiplied by the constant speed of light squared.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Computers use direct current rather than alternating current.
Yes, they do. Entanglement just reminds me of alternating current and what I have seen in the advances of computing memory just gives me the impression that performance is improved in Quantum computing by this technology. I'm sorry just the way the conversation was reading to me made me just type it out for some reason.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
The point I am trying to make is that through algebra principle the idea is that mathematics can test its own outcome by use of a second method of calculation with the same results, this process is like having to different science experiment come up with the identical outcome.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Early abortion is completely painless, as fetus then cannot feel pain.
The grievance against abortion set by the Supreme court is being changed after years of abusein civil liberty mid-stream. Simply said abortion is nothing more than an orderto be given to officially stop something said to official start, Citizen ship. The fact is in a medical procedure causing pain can be managed ending pain. People in States and Federal government are by criminal law creating a militia at a unknow cost of lives of American women as a United State of criminal law.
Created:
The observation of algebra is to create a test on every solution made, as so to create multiple ways to calculate the same outcome from two or more prejections of mathematics.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Can I make an observation out loud?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Just sharing common defense towards a general welfare. You both are moving slowly off topic. Sorry.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
The one of many problems is that when the Supreme Courtallowed the lower courts to make rulings on abortion there was a creation of a2nd Amendment state militia by Texas. The militia is assembled by all people who vote either way on abortion as a right it is a well documented criminal law and women are its target. It is with use of lethal force by birth as the weapon which is to be apply. This is no longer about a simply malpratice of law.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
How?
It was a criminal law brought to America as a weapon set against United States Constitution right. Women had set a path by civil grievance towards the Executive office it was their burden to describe and create a United States Constitutional Right, now has become the time to test if the task was impossible to perform or intentionally avoided.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Ah, you are a poet.
Thank you...
When you are working towards preserving, protecting, anddefending the United States Constitutional Right you just can't make up crap with criminal law. It’s a whole new level of poetry, it is a series of self-evident truths that are in context to the American Constitution, supporting documents, becoming inalienable from those the truths are told for, as they become thiers to hold and serve as a United State.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Can I ask what is so important about the word abortion?
Why are people set on keeping the name the same through criminal history when they don't see it as a crime?
This is like a sextillion time worse than trying to give anew baby a name. The United States of American has asked that I share the burdens of lethal force with many men who serve in combat, possibly women who have no declaration of Independence in honor of American Constitution, I do so willingly. I am sure when I say I try to distance myself as far as possible from those people who enjoy that burden on our liberty.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Fetus depends upon woman's body. Woman's body does not depend upon a fetus. Woman created the fetus. The only reason why fetus exists is due to woman's action of creating it. Woman has a right to remove fetus from her body to prevent further expense of her body
Maybe a woman has a right to her body, it this right is not the UnitedState between all women who are pregnant and may require medical attention. Theargument is how a malpractice of law is to be addressed by the states ofAmerica after its dismissal from the Supreme court. Immigration is a federalissue a women’s body is not a federal issue, the fact is wherever and when the babyfalls or leaves from the vagina attached to the mother by umbilical cord it is by lawof nature going to fall into a Country on earth, as a united state with allbabies, as so do all babies who rest in the womb of their ambassador. Do you agree or do you have some scientific evidence to establish this self-evident truth?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Restricting access to abortion goes against science, safety, and human dignity and portends a dangerous future.
Abortion is just a word which has an established meaning. Itis a poor connection to established justice and tranquility after almost 50years people, science, say they cannot see the danger, loss of dignity in thisas fact. What you are saying is a violation of United States Constitutional 1stAmendment Right in its entirety. It is a violation of this right as an entiretyas it assembles people by grievance of criminal accusation of a crime describedby the word abort. It is an order to stop and not remove by medical process.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
This instinct is observable as early as 8 weeks when the nervous system develops its first instinctive responses to preserve its life.
Or end its life and the Ambassador assigned by law of naturewho oversees the immigration process of that life. We do not totally disagreeover the declaration of Independence made by men, for men, from Englishcriminal law. Let's just say for the sake of Constitutional Right the problemwith abortion is the name and not the use of questionable lethal force as thatinformation is not always available to us all. I call this situationfemale-specific amputation and understand the Courts of law, all the courts oflaw can rule on this without self-incrimination. What name does the people givethis process of question over lethal force?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
A zygote grows on its own as its own biological creature.
You intentionally left something out as known fact. A zygote grows on its own as its own biological creature and can kill the mother without a murder charge of any kind by criminal law. The people of a state who vote on abortion are voting to assign the court as ambassador of the young child and that power comes from neither United States Constitution. Law of Nature, nor State Constitutions, it is an authority of the legislators of the States connecting them directly to a use oflethal force. I as a person do not have all the information of pregnancies of any or all women as a United State voter and cannot make predictions of the outcome of all birth. What any person can do is simply call all terminations of immigration of this kind as a group something other than abortion. A term like Female-specific amputation as a 1st Amendment Right linking the grievance to a liberty of justice for all instead of breaking a freedom of meaning to place many people in danger of criminal accusations.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
How does the law deal with that ?
Genetic testing...
Created:
Sorry, I'm not educated algebra etc type of such complex mathematics your espousing. Without LINK to simple to understanding clarification of your latter above, I'm clueless. Sorry.
I really didn't comehere to teach algebra in fact I’m not a fan of it and might go as far to say Ihate it as it relies on a large number of rules for it to work correctly. Thereare many online resources, some that charge and others that are free. Theproblem here is that wave forms are subject to Algebra, and you are kind ofsaying you do not understand in depth what you are talking about. Theonly difference in 3-D and 2-D space is the added algebra that is created bythe additional dimension.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
From what I can tell it looks like computers are doing the same thing as model trains now do and use alternating current as a means to hold to strings of information in the same memory space on a processor. Converting the current at the point of saving processed information into a hard drive of some kind after calculations are complete. It’s a faster computing time but the mathematics it practices while performing tasks is still flawed.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
It is the prime numbers and how they are used that creates the entanglement. The idea of space with the use of integers was a failed attempt at addressing the mathematical nature of prime numbers by adding a number across an equal sign in algebra equation that can remove the opposite variable on the other side of an origin positive & negative.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
Prime numbers are a staged event set by rules of division as we build algebra and other mathematics prime numbers can be proven to not exist in equations simply by increasing the complexity of an operation of division to another pair of math function.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Nope. A sperm needs an eggA zygote grows on its own as its own biological creature.
The United States Constitutional argument over basic right is not if a life is involved or not with pregnancies and birth there are two lives and use of lethal force between them both. Only one of the two lives cannot be criminally charged, this person is the child born or not. 1.) Abortion is a word used in describing a crime incriminal law and is simply a term that is unacceptable for a United States Constitutional right between all women that may be involved in the legal argument in courts of law. We have no way to know the abortion is true or if Female specific amputation.
The meaning to abort outside of pregnancy is an order to officially stop something which has officially started and simply said there is no way to know this as fact ahead of time by the voter. The use of abortion in criminal law was not protected by the 1st Amendment is was found to be in violation of the United States Constitution’s 1st Amendment.
A state of the union to established justice was never made by women or by men on both United States of law and Constitutional principle. The inalienable truths that links women with child, pregnant, to the existing United States Constitution are ambassador and a process of immigration. Any and all trials conducted by Courts of law under United States Constitutional right are now taking place before the crime takes place and are based in a admission hidden in the legislation of criminal law itself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You should finish the sentence. It states "all men are created equal" in that all men have a creator endowed right to live
Look at it backwards When we hold life, liberty, and thepursuit of happiness as a state of the union with established justice the wholetruth is all men must be created equal by their creator before life, liberty,and the pursuit of happiness takes place. As a whole truth I can say not allmen have a problem with women when it comes to the termination of a life withlethal force. Afterall women are legally allowed not to get pregnant thisprocess is even supported by most if not all religions, women have been assigneda waiting period by criminal law regulations not to become pregnant.
because we naturally wish to live as observed as a natural born instinct. An instinct observed also in utero, as a baby will recoil from a bright light or recoil from a prick. Starting around 7 weeks.
Are you saying an instinct of an observed utero baby is totry and kill its mothers due to bright light or a prick by a needle, could be. Wedo not know for sure, but we never know what spontaneous thing may trigger thedeath of a mother at the hands of a utero baby when using lethal force either,or the courts for assisting in the murder now that the United States SupremeCourt has sent the likely malpractice of law down to the State Supreme Courtsof law.
Created: