Best.Korea

Dear Shila,

What I think matters. So if I think he is 0, he is 0.

I consider myself as a God. Only God is able to decide who matters and who doesnt. 

And even if others offer clear proof, I can simply say that such proof is illogical because it disagrees with my world view.

Its okay to tell people that abortion is wrong.

However, making a law to ban abortion means taking it too far.

Its against democracy. Its against personal choice. 

The next logical step is to claim that not having sex is murder, since it produces the same outcome as abortion. Literally the same outcome!

It seems pointless that we should go back to times when masturbation was considered murder and when everyone was expected to have straight sex and when having kids was forced on people.

What exactly is the point of returning to the biblical laws? 

In most cases, I am against abortion. However, I would not make my will into law. I dont see the point of such law. It would mostly be used to justify further oppression. 

Dear Shila,

Most people dont understand that I determine everyones value by my standards. Even if he had 10 trillion, I would consider him 0. His spank buddies are also 0. So even when all together, they are still 0.

If he wants me to consider him more than 0, maybe he should stop going around and spanking children.

He is probably a drug addict. So I dont care much about him.

Dear coal,

Your logic is flawed. You are not me. You are just a little worm. Only I have value in this world.

Dear Shila,

Putin said the main reason for "special military operation" is to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO.

Dear coal,

I only read the beginning of your argument. Since I disagreed with it, I assume the rest of it is also wrong.

You probably think you have a right to talk. However, everything what you have said here is illogical because I disagree with it.

I think I am right and you are wrong because you are not me. I decide what is right. You dont.

Do you think I consider you a valuable human being? I dont.

In fact, if you died today I wouldnt care. I wouldnt even feel bad.

Stop giving yourself value. In my eyes, you have none.

World became a much worse place since Biden became president of USA.

Dear Shila,

I do what I want. And I always assume my decision is right. So when I tolerate, I assume I am right in doing that. Since I always agree with myself, this is a really simple process.

I think Uragirimono pretty much won the debate here simply for mentioning democracy.

You cant be in favor of democracy and at the same time oppose to the action of making abortion legal.

Most of the people support abortion being legal. Hence, abortion is to be legal. 

Unless you dont want democracy.

Of course, personally I prefer dictatorship of my own. But I cant help noticing that most people who support democracy are also opposing to it any time it doesnt suit their disgusting world view. 

Uragirimono has fine arguments. But I wouldnt recommend accepting the debate since voters are mostly drug addicts.

Dear Shila,

We have already seen Russians threatening to use nuclear weapons.

Also, they cant afford to lose the war in Ukraine.

Ukraine must surrender or lose by convencional means.

If not, then I predict Putin will nuke Ukraine and justify it with "americans did the same to japan in ww2".

Russia has enough ICBMs and nukes to nuke the entire world.

North Korea will probably side with Russia in case of world war.

So one must wonder what will NATO do if Russia nukes Ukraine. There seems to be no good response to that situation. Attacking Russia is suicide.

Dear Shila,

Thank you for calling me a totalitarian. It warms my heart.

 I think that only I am right and that everyone else is wrong.

This makes sense to me.

Democracy is one form of the system of government.

However, the only system of government that really exists is government from power.

It doesnt matter how its called. Democracy in todays form only exists because those with power sustain it. 

To translate: There is only power, and those too weak to obtain it.

Dear Elly,

That is part of the new isolationist policy. Since I only consider myself as a valuable human being, it follows that others are less worthy. So in that sense, you are less worthy in my eyes.

So I have no problem blocking you.

Since I am a superior human being, all morality is determined by me. I consider my opinion the most important on all matters.

Dear Noobvice,

Even if arguments were given, you would not understand them. So stop asking.

Dear Elly,

If I was punished as a kid, everyone else should be punished as well.

This is fair and makes sense.

Dear Period-Choice,

Is RationalMadmad your girlfriend? Is that why you defend her? 

Listen here pal: I may not have the answer to your question, but I can still block and insult you.

The fact that you are an american means you probably support child abuse.

Every president that you had was mass murderer.

Americans kill children with cars every day.

If America died in a nuclear war, the only real damage would be to the trees.

The war can end if Putin uses 10-20 nukes on Ukraine, preferably on civilian targets. 

Since USA was the only country to use nukes on civilians, Russia must use at least 3 nukes on Ukraine to beat USA.

If USA opposes, Putin and Kim can nuke USA and entire NATO alliance.

Yes, billions would die. But thats just statistic. We shouldnt be bothered by that in the slightest.

In fact, if everyone dies, all of our problems will be solved.

To TWsomething,

Listen here pal. Shila is not a bot. You are just mad Shila is right and you are wrong.

Also, I think abortion can be done with a tactical nuclear weapon. Yes, it would kill the parents too. So what? They would die anyway one day.

Yes, the children deserve to be beaten because there is no alternative way.

I will go and thank my parents right now. I think I even need to pay them some money.

Also, I might need to apologize to them.

But there is a problem.

In many cases where they punished me with the rod, I cant remember what I was being punished for. So I dont know what to apologize for.

Well, I will simply apologize in general and say "I am sorry for all the troubles I caused you when I was a child".

Yes, this seems like a good solution.

I think everyone should punish their children every day. Even if children did nothing wrong, you should still punish them every day so they know who is in charge.

Dear Shila,

Ending all life on Earth would bring many benefits. Yes, one of them would be ending starvation.

Life is the main cause of starvation.

Most of the women in america have 1.7 children.

Dear Shila,

If a nuclear war killed all humanity and everyone died, there would be no more pain in the world. Then we could say that everything is fine. 

But if the stupid fish is gonna come out of water and evolve again, we will have pain again.

So the fish is the enemy.

Our government could build special rockets that target fish. Maybe some poison too.

You want to insult me, call me stupid...ect.

I dont mind. Jesus was called stupid too. They hated him. And he was nailed. And stabbed a few times.

But he won. It says so in the Bible.

Dear Shila,

Our government could invest into developing such a vaccine as top priority, then mask it as a new flu shot.

If 90% of children receive such vaccine, it will reduce total reproduction by 90%.

It wont kill all humans, but it will help.

Nuclear war would also be a positive solution. But they also have to kill the fish too so the fish doesnt evolve into new humans.

Dear Shila,

I will not defend anyone anymore, be it Vietnam or Iraq. Even if Iraq sends me a friend request right now, I would decline then block.

Yes, the poor should stay poor until inflation drives them to suicide. This is right and makes sense.

You dont wanna redistribute the wealth. That would be Communism. Better dead than red.

Dear Shila,

Forced sterilization is also one of solutions. I think it can be done through vaccines.

Dear Shila,

We will see if it works. My other policies failed, or to say: havent achieved expected goals.

The isolationist policy cannot fail more than my previous policies.

Dear Shila,

Yes, one policy of isolationism is the increased use of the block button on people such as you.

The second policy is to mock anyone who disagrees with me.

It should be easy to implement.

I am against abortion.

If you destroy fetuses, you destroy humans.

Future of humanity depends upon survival of fetuses.

Now, of course someone could say: "humanity doesnt deserve to survive".

They would be 100% right in saying that.

So in that sense, abortion can be justified as a way to destroy humanity.

In my opinion, Saudi Arabia is a terrible country. I dont see why would anyone want to support it.

Dear coal,

I know that you think "profile pic = person".

You also said that corporal punishment turns people into doctors and engineers.

Then you somehow assumed that I am still being subjected to corporal punishment.

Then you went on to explain to me how my parents want whats best for me and that whatever they did to me was justified.

You assumed that you know what my parents did to me despite the fact you never even met them.

You used that as an argument to humiliate me in some of your psychopathic way.

Then you blocked me.

Anyway, thank you for proving my point for me.

Thank you for proving with your example that people still support beating children.

You would make your psychopatic ancestors proud.

With love, Best Korea

I also plan to implement some isolation policies in my policies related to this site.

First I had picture of Kim Jong Il.

Then Kim Jong Un.

Then Kim Yo Jong. Do people even know who she is?

Now its Putin time.

To say it simply, I use whatever photo I like and I think that Putin looks good in this photo.

It may upset some people, but thats the sacrifice I am willing to make.

"I'm guessing your parents still spank/whip/discipline you?"

I dont see how that helps your case, but then again I am not a psychopath and I dont understand psychopaths like you.

Thank you.

"so anyone who disagrees with you is a psychopath"

When someone is hitting children or justifying it, yes.

In this post:

2 users have directly attempted to justify corporal punishment.

2 users hinted their opinions, but didnt say it directly. Not that they needed to.

Notice that I will not be responding to "arguments" that speak in favor of beating children. I will simply use them to show the popular opinion.

This society harms children in many ways. Corporal punishment is actually low harming when compared to harm from cars, meat, religion, circumcision, pollution, junk food...ect. Most people justify these things because they are psychopaths. It doesnt come as a surprise to anyone who studied their psychopatic ancestors. In fact, this result is expected.

The formal ban of corporal punishment is usually not enforced in any way. So even those that did ban it didnt ban it.

Also, its literally impossible to enforce. A child subjected to corporal punishment at age 2 is most likely not to even remember. So nobody knows.

USA didnt. So thats 330 million people.

@RAtionalmanmad

I think I need to block you since you blocked me. It seems fair. 

63 out of 190 have banned, yes.

So how much, 30%?

Well, it seems that all studies speak in a single minded unity:

"Corporal punishment harms children".

Its impossible to estimate to what degree is it harmful.

But whats interesting is that almost no country banned this practice. 

The countries that did ban it failed to implement the ban. The people in there still continue with practice.

This is actually very interesting because in this case people literally ignore science and prefer to continue with the method that only causes harm to others.

Its interesting that people only accept scientific study when it suits their interest.

Since most people are self-centred, this is actually expected.

You see, corporal punishment is effective and doesnt cause problems for the parents.

1) If child is annoying, parents just hit a child. Result: child goes crying in a corner and stops being annoying.

2) If child turns into unstable adult, the parents can just deny that they did anything wrong. Since parenting history is usually not provable, no one can say parents did something wrong.

Result: parents justified their position

3) In those rare cases where parents are proven wrong, parents can simply say that they didnt know and that they worked very hard and that they were under a lot of stress at the time.

Result: parents justified their position

So good news for all parents. There is almost no case where parents are at a loss for hitting their children. As long as they dont hit too much, they can always deny or minimize responsibility.

Even if it does mess up a child, no one will be able to prove it. Even if someone is able to prove it, everyone else will ignore the proof.

Really, its a perfect crime. Its a true legacy given to this society by its psychopatic ancestors.

Of course, there are those rare cases where children strike back and attack their parents.

In these cases, parents are still not at a loss. Now they can pretend they are the victims!

Parents are only responsible to create a safe environment. 

For example, not to give a gun to a child.

However, when it comes to childs body, I dont see why would parents have any right to decide about childs body. It doesnt belong to them.

If something doesnt harm a child, why would child not be able to do it?

Well, people have different view about what is harmful.

About child labour: 

Society is responsible not to give jobs to children, same way parents are responsible not to give guns to their children.

I am not someone who believes in objective morality. In fact, I think all moral systems are flawed in some way.

But moral systems usually revolve around amount of life, harm or consent, or some combination of these.

When it comes to harm, most people just assume that all sexual activities are terribly harmful for children. They even want to stop children from masturbating.

So really, what is the point of moral system based on harm if people dont know what is harmful and what isnt?

I think that childs body belongs only to the child.

So only the child can decide if she wants sex.

Freedom of speech also allows an adult to flert with a child, but it seems that others dont want to have freedom of speech in their society when it doesnt suit them.

If an adult simply gives harmless knowledge to a child, its up to the child to use that knowledge or not. 

For example:

An adult explains to a child what is masturbation and child decides to try it.

Yes, adult is turned on.

I am pretty sure that children have nothing against an adult being turned on by them.

In fact, children probably enjoy it.

Its the other adults that find "turn on" as a problem.

Since you mentioned the harm argument, I could simply add that society causes harm to children and to pedophiles.

The society's policy was never about preventing harm to children. It was about punishing pedophiles.

This society has psychopatic ancestors, so the need for violence was probably inherited from them.

What you really want to say is that convicted pedophiles shouldnt be alive.

Since 90% of people agree with that, it follows that you can run for president with that policy.

I am pretty sure that saying "pedophiles deserve the death penalty" would bring at least 20% of population to vote for you.

The other votes you can get by seeing what other decisions are supported by majority and use them as your policy.

"when the prepubescent child finds out (later) that what was being disguised as tickling, caressing, or some trivial game at the time was actually a massive turn on for the adult they are going to feel like they were deceived and betrayed."

The only way they would feel deceived is if they begin to think that "adult being happy" was something they didnt want. Which is odd if they considered an adult as someone they liked and if they too were happy in a relationship.