I did not mean to ping you in the above message.Anyway, here’s a question: Does your info have information on another player? I may or may not be willing to back off depending on your answer.
Something about that feels odd. I have a gut feeling Casey going straight to Pie and then Mharman coming onto Pie within the hour. I don't like it and it's not because I think they are lynching the wrong person, but just feels staged.
I disagree. Scum Pie actively (and successfully) pushed Savant in DP1 of UPick Mafia and also aggressively pushed Moozer during DP1 of Mayday Mafia. This is absolutely in line with his scum play, and that's why I don't like it.
That wasn't a mere molehill. GP's claim was inherently very sus, and his behavior only hurt his case further. Plus, he had a bona fide scum slip by the end of the day.
That's better reasoning, but you have to consider that this is Wylted we're talking about here. A long diary entry about the Israel-Hamas conflict is hardly inexplicable. I don't think scum Banana would likely choose to make herself stand out in that way.
Luna's and Pie's tunnel vision is definitely weird. At least Pie is generally aggressive. If this behavior out of the ordinary of Luna?
You’re forgetting that my behavior is NAI 99% of the time.
What are your thoughts on Mharman trying to play both sides for Owen and joining you immediately after you voted. Oh and also the obsession over the information I have.
Casey’s MO doesn’t feel off. I dislike Mharman more.
That's not true. Behavior is how you catch people in this game. I knew you were sus from your behavior at the end of DP1 of Mayday Mafia, but I didn't stick to my guns, which I still regret slightly, although the town won that game anyway. The fact that you're telling me NOT to pay attention to your behavior and look elsewhere is inherently very scummy.
I didn't see him as try to play both sides for Owen. He was being very open and transparent about his thought process, as he does as town. Owen is a null read for reasons he has clearly explained. Also, he's been consistent about his scumreads, and the fact that he voted for you doesn't strike me as odd, especially given how he's made it clear he still suspects Luna more. As for considering the information you (supposedly) have, it's cost-benefit analysis.
Okay, so your scum pool consists of everyone who is suspicious of you?
I think you should claim
And when I flip town, you’re going to be like wow, it really was NAI. There’s a reason why people can’t read me, especially those who have been playing for a while. I didn’t say stop looking at my behavior, you’re entitled to your opinion. I asked you about your thoughts on Mharman.
Look at pie trying to set up future mislynches. That logic like just made savant look so town to me. Pie is 100% leading a mislynch and trying to set me up for a mislynch tomorrow. That logic is so so bad
You sure love activism against me. It’s admirable that you’re being an activist, but I’m literally town.
This is such a scummy response lol. No, you didn't use the exact words "stop looking at my behavior", but you did tell me that you couldn't be read based on your behavior and directed my attention elsewhere.
That's basically the same thing. It's also not true that people can't read you. I correctly identified you as scum based on behavior during Mayday Mafia as I've already said. Luna also caught you at the end of DP1 of UPick Mafia. Remember this?
Luna was 100% right here. Your logic is bad when you are scum. That's why I sus you, and that's why you're trying to steer the conversation away from your reasoning on Banana.
This statement is actually pretty ironic in this particular game, lol. You'll see why later.
I quit in Mayday Mafia. And idr Luna using that behavior in UPick. Anyways that’s besides the point.
You’re ignoring all the times my “bad logic” got a townie lynched. Earth and Austin come to mind recently. Like I said, it’s NAI.
I know it’s ironic, that’s why I said it, you just don’t get it.
You quit at the beginning of DP3. I had a strong sus on you starting at the end of DP1. And if all this is bedsides the point, then what is the point you're trying to make anyway?
Austin was a special case since if he was town after all, GP would just revive him and he'd be confirmed townie, plus he'd lose his negative utility status. Not to mention, his claim to have been doing a reaction test and his pivot to Savant were pretty sus on their own. Earth also made himself a target by claiming to be a DP3 Informed Townie, which is itself a pretty sus claim. So yes, obviously you aren't always correct as town. I never said you were. The difference is that in those games, your reasoning was not bad, it was merely wrong. There's a difference.
Now that's interesting. That does actually make me reconsider things a bit.
Good vs bad is your opinion. You can’t determine right vs wrong until endgame. Even if Austin and Earth didn’t screw themselves over, my logic was “bad” and you should’ve pursued me.
Why’s it interesting. I was trying to be ironic.
Like, one thing I've noticed about Mharman is that he tends to reason quite openly and be very transparent about his thoughts, but in Inheritance Cycle, he seemed to do that a bit less from my recollection -- not saying as much and letting the town fight itself. The problem is that as scum, you know who is town and thus can generally see the reasons to townread anybody, which makes coming up with solid reasons to scumread someone harder. Townies don't have to fake their scumreads. Mharman copes with this by posting less. You cope with this by trying to find small problems with townies and making them out to be bigger than they really are. That's where what I consider to be bad logic comes into play. You're right that it is largely based on opinion, but to me, it's meaningful. It's why I sus both you and Luna -- your reads on Banana don't feel genuine to me.
I thought it was evidence you actually knew something after all, supporting your softclaim. Apparently not.
LOL @ the OMGUS
