Reincarnation: a real phenomenon that Christianity hid on purpose

Author: IlDiavolo

Posts

Total: 62
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
For example, I heard that Jesus, also known as the Christ, was a "soul" brought from another planet, same with Mary, the virgin. Apparently these "souls" are as conscious as a living person because they accepted to be displaced.

There are many things that need to be discovered and I'm really looking forward to it.
You are distorting the Bible with your alien theory.
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,777
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Shila
For example, I heard that Jesus, also known as the Christ, was a "soul" brought from another planet, same with Mary, the virgin. Apparently these "souls" are as conscious as a living person because they accepted to be displaced.

There are many things that need to be discovered and I'm really looking forward to it.
You are distorting the Bible with your alien theory.

Then you haven't read the bible for yourself, Shila! 

IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
You are distorting the Bible with your alien theory.
I don't care what the bible says. I'm just communicating what the contactees (the new prophets) say.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,367
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
Aliens can seemingly manipulate these "souls".


Now.

Is this knowledge?

Or wild speculation.


There are many things to be discovered, and I don't think this is one of them.


According to the aliens.

Which aliens specifically?
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Now.

Is this knowledge?

Or wild speculation.
1. The "soul" is a concept that is in almost all the religions, philosophies and ancient civilizations. 

2. Several contactees talk about it as a technology that allows the evolution by experience.

3. The urban folklore tells many stories about dead people communicating with the living people either awake or in dreams. You know, the typical ghost stories. 

4. There is a prophesy from a trustable source that says that people will be able to communicate with their dead relatives using a new telecomunication technology. I mean, people will be able to make a sort of video call to dead people in the future. 

5. Scientists research this phenomenon because there are many cases about it and it's then compelling. 

So, if you have different sources that point to the existence of a "soul" that survives a bodily death, then it's worth to research it, imho. 
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
Several contactees talk about it as a technology that allows the evolution by experience.

Mediumship is the practice of purportedly mediating communication between familiar spirits or spirits of the dead and living human beings. Practitioners are known as "mediums" or "spirit mediums". There are different types of mediumship or spirit channelling, including séance tables, trance, and ouija.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,367
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
Maybe one day we will be able to down load our conscious minds to an electronic device. And live for ever on line.

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
You are distorting the Bible with your alien theory.
I don't care what the bible says. I'm just communicating what the contactees (the new prophets) say.
The Bible has not been updated in over 2000 years. No new contactees have been reported.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
The Bible has not been updated in over 2000 years. No new contactees have been reported.
The bible has been translated and distorted by purpose and you believe in it?

I suggest you to come back to the original scriptures, you'll find a lot of surprises.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Maybe one day we will be able to down load our conscious minds to an electronic device. And live for ever on line.
I wish I could download my conscious mind in a reality where I'm the king and have a harem of 30 ladies all for me and have sex all day long, one per day, non stop, forever and ever. Amen. 

Lol.

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,367
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
You never know. 

Technology moves on apace.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
Maybe one day we will be able to down load our conscious minds to an electronic device. And live for ever on line.
I wish I could download my conscious mind in a reality where I'm the king and have a harem of 30 ladies all for me and have sex all day long, one per day, non stop, forever and ever. Amen. 

Lol.
You can still do it. 44.5 % of the population are available.
Christianity is the largest religion in Uruguay, with Catholics having the most adherents, but around 44.5% of the population is non-religious as of 2021. Church and state are officially separated since 1916.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
You can still do it. 44.5 % of the population are available.
Being atheist or agnostic doesn't mean being inmoral. Even in ancient greek people had moral.

I would never desire a harem but for a dream it's totally acceptable.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
You can still do it. 44.5 % of the population are available.
Being atheist or agnostic doesn't mean being inmoral. Even in ancient greek people had moral.

I would never desire a harem but for a dream it's totally acceptable.
He has 44.5% of the population to pick his harem of 30 ladies.
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
He has 44.5% of the population to pick his harem of 30 ladies.
Parece que te colgaste. Intentalo de nuevo. 

Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,485
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
This is similar to the UFO phenomenon. The Roman Empire translated and changed the meaning of the original bible in order to keep people from knowing the real facts, like the reincarnation. Most first christian sects believed in reincarnation, though nowadays Christians believe that human beings have only one life after which their "souls" are sent either to hell or heaven, according to their deeds and the judgement of a "god". Nevertheless, the bible and the science contradict such Christian belief.
So many assumptions without any evidence.  


The current bible has no reference to reincarnation because it was removed but there are some hints that lead us to think that reincarnation was a Christian doctrine at the beginning. "Now the Pharisees who had been sent questioned him, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” John 1, 24-25. In that verse, Elijah had already long died but the Pharisees asked if John the Baptist was him. It's not a direct reference to reincarnation but I think we all understand what the pharisees tried to say.
Matthew 171-11 refutes reincarnation.  It's the story of the Transfiguration. A spooky story often used by UFO loons to prove such nonsense. The glowing body and clothes- the voice from the sky. 

But the two visitors - Moses and Elijah are the figures which refute reincarnation.   Both persons remain the same person - hundreds of years after the died or were taken up to heaven.  Elijah NEVER was reincarnated in John the Baptist. He remained Elijah.  And John the Baptist was born and died and yet Elijah remained Elijah. If the Bible or people in that time were attempting to prove reincarnation - then at the very least John the Baptist would have appeared and whoever Moses had turned into after he died. But no - that's not the story. 


Also, the science has been researching this phenomenon. There are thousands of cases about reincarnation, one of them even adapted into a movie, "Yesterday's children". I wish I knew more how reincarnation works but at least I can make out several things about it from the many readings I had and also from my observations. From what I understand, what religions call "soul" is actually a sort of technology that resembles an AI. The "soul", as well as the AI, needs experience in order to learn and thus to evolve, that's why the soul incarnates in this life or reality, in order to find the experience it needs to evolve. As it is evident, the soul needs a lot of incarnations because a 60 year life in average is not enough (courtesy of the aliens). The evolution process is still ongoing so we are not going to hell or heaven after death as Christianity claims, we'll keep incarnating and evolving until our bodies get enough long-lived to stop the incarnation process.
there are many stories about lots of things in history. How many different stories of the moon landing, of the earth being flat, of the vaccine conspiracy, of every Catholic and Vatican secret, of UFOs and big foot and escaped leapards etc.  How many people die and see a white light and then come back to life?  how many people pray and their prayers are answered? Blah blah blah blah. 

You can believe whatever you want to believe - but the Bible doesn't support your conclusions and nor does Christianity.  We are born and we live and we die. And then we are judged.  Reincarnation is really a joke in any event. the Western concept of reincarnation is much different to the Eastern One. 

In the East, life is associated with suffering. Therefore to get rid of suffering you need to reach nirvana. Nirvana is not heaven as we understand heaven in the West. It is when the individual is absorbed back into the all. People in the East don't want to keep being reincarnated - they want to simply end and become nothing. The West's idea is a Hollywood nonsense with no link back to the religions it is derived from. 


Reincarnation can explain several things about us. For example, children that are gifted with something like music, maths, arts, etc. Science can't explain it.  You'll be asking why we don't remember our past lives, well we actually can but we need to get hypnotized because those memories are in the unconsciousness. There are several things about it that make a lot of sense so I think reincarnation is real and is part of the human being nature. We need to be open minded and keep researching in order to find the truth (although the fucking aliens will bring the truth anyway).
DNA can explain it too.  In any event - there is no reason for Christianity to hide it - they just take the view that it is nonsense and not related at all to the historic religions that they were based on. I also think that you will find that even the Greeks and the Romans did not believe in reincarnation. They died and went to Hades - the place of the dead. The Egyptians might be different. but it is not found in Christian early history, unless you are talking about the Gnostics. And their position is so varied that no one really knows what was believed consistently. 
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Tradesecret
Yeah, you must be afraid of what it's coming the next years. The UFO phenomenon is already a fact, people all around the world are more convinced about it given the clear evidence such photos, videos, testimonies and so on. There will be a declassification of all the alien files that the US have so I recommend you to be prepared, it's not going to be easy for you and your acolytes.

On the other hand, I've got to admit that the reincarnation phenomenon is more difficult to swallow for the people, let alone for the believers. I'm not going to insist on that, then. The only thing I'm going to say is that reincarnation is more suitable for Christianity because all "the souls" have the opportunity to learn and evolve, so noone is left behind, everyone moves forward. This situation coincides with the concept of the "loving god" of Christianity. I mean, what kind of "loving god" sends people to burn in hell for eternity? That's not loving at all. You see the contradiction?
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
The current bible has no reference to reincarnation because it was removed but there are some hints that lead us to think that reincarnation was a Christian doctrine at the beginning. "Now the Pharisees who had been sent questioned him, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” John 1, 24-25. In that verse, Elijah had already long died but the Pharisees asked if John the Baptist was him. It's not a direct reference to reincarnation but I think we all understand what the pharisees tried to say.

What did Jesus say about reincarnation?
The parable of the rich man and Lazarus makes it clear that Jesus didn't believe in reincarnation after death, but in judgment. This is also the teaching of the New Testament writers and was summed up by the author of Hebrews when he wrote, “It is appointed that human beings die once, and after this the judgment” (Heb.)

Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,485
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
Yeah, you must be afraid of what it's coming the next years. The UFO phenomenon is already a fact, people all around the world are more convinced about it given the clear evidence such photos, videos, testimonies and so on. There will be a declassification of all the alien files that the US have so I recommend you to be prepared, it's not going to be easy for you and your acolytes.
Tell you what. When it ACTUALLY happens, then let's discuss it. Now, there is just speculation and lots of people believe in speculation as though it is true. Gee go to any of the thousands of dispensational churches in America and ask them about the rapture. They'll all tell you it's going to happen any day now and they believe it - even though the Bible doesn't.  The church has been saying "it's the end of the world" for millennia. Me, I like to see the actual evidence and so-called facts.  The same applies to the JFK assassination. Rumours and speculation and rabbit holes. 


On the other hand, I've got to admit that the reincarnation phenomenon is more difficult to swallow for the people, let alone for the believers. I'm not going to insist on that, then. The only thing I'm going to say is that reincarnation is more suitable for Christianity because all "the souls" have the opportunity to learn and evolve, so noone is left behind, everyone moves forward. This situation coincides with the concept of the "loving god" of Christianity. I mean, what kind of "loving god" sends people to burn in hell for eternity? That's not loving at all. You see the contradiction?
Well let's disagree about the suitability of it for Christianity.  I think it is hard to swallow because it implies lots of things that are incompatible with facts and logic. But it is also difficult to reconcile with the story of Christianity. It would make a mockery for a start of Christ's purpose to die on the cross. And certainly it would remove the need for the resurrection, which the Church requires as an essential doctrine. Not to mention the story of the Transfiguration which I showed above refutes completely reincarnation.   I think rather than focusing on a loving God. After all, I can't think of any occasion in the NT when any of the disciples or apostles tried to evangelise by saying - God loves you.  I think the primary focuse is on holiness. The angels - never said God is love is love is love. No, they said God is holy holy holy. 

What kind of a just and holy God would let evil run rampant for ever? Why would a just God not punish the wicked?  I see the love of God as part of the Holiness of God. 

For me, a judge in our world demonstrates love to the victims of the family that has been murdered by sending them to prison for the rest of their life. He doesn't show love to the murderer. He does show justice though. I think we can properly make the same leap to God as judge. He shows love to the righteous by sending the wicked to Hell. He shows justice to the wicked by sending them to Hell.  

Love can also be defined biblically as one who obeys the commandments of God. If that is a reasonable definition, then God showing justice to the wicked is actually love. Whereas if he just let them do whatever they want without regard to how they hurt, then that would not be love.  Hence, I don't see a contradiction, on a number of levels. 
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,061
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Remember that religion is just an opiate for poor design.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Tradesecret
Love can also be defined biblically as one who obeys the commandments of God. If that is a reasonable definition, then God showing justice to the wicked is actually love. Whereas if he just let them do whatever they want without regard to how they hurt, then that would not be love.  Hence, I don't see a contradiction, on a number of levels. 
How is it love to sacrifice your son for the sins of others?
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Tradesecret
Tell you what. When it ACTUALLY happens, then let's discuss it. Now, there is just speculation and lots of people believe in speculation as though it is true. Gee go to any of the thousands of dispensational churches in America and ask them about the rapture. They'll all tell you it's going to happen any day now and they believe it - even though the Bible doesn't.  The church has been saying "it's the end of the world" for millennia. Me, I like to see the actual evidence and so-called facts.  The same applies to the JFK assassination. Rumours and speculation and rabbit holes. 
Well, at least you're open to it. Keep it up, when the time comes you won't be caught with your pants down.

Well let's disagree about the suitability of it for Christianity.  I think it is hard to swallow because it implies lots of things that are incompatible with facts and logic. But it is also difficult to reconcile with the story of Christianity. It would make a mockery for a start of Christ's purpose to die on the cross. And certainly it would remove the need for the resurrection, which the Church requires as an essential doctrine. Not to mention the story of the Transfiguration which I showed above refutes completely reincarnation.   I think rather than focusing on a loving God. After all, I can't think of any occasion in the NT when any of the disciples or apostles tried to evangelise by saying - God loves you.  I think the primary focuse is on holiness. The angels - never said God is love is love is love. No, they said God is holy holy holy. 

What kind of a just and holy God would let evil run rampant for ever? Why would a just God not punish the wicked?  I see the love of God as part of the Holiness of God. 

For me, a judge in our world demonstrates love to the victims of the family that has been murdered by sending them to prison for the rest of their life. He doesn't show love to the murderer. He does show justice though. I think we can properly make the same leap to God as judge. He shows love to the righteous by sending the wicked to Hell. He shows justice to the wicked by sending them to Hell.  

Love can also be defined biblically as one who obeys the commandments of God. If that is a reasonable definition, then God showing justice to the wicked is actually love. Whereas if he just let them do whatever they want without regard to how they hurt, then that would not be love.  Hence, I don't see a contradiction, on a number of levels. 
It depends on what kind of Christian church you're subscribed.

As far as I'm concerned, all the Christians that I met have always remarked that God is love, it's like a slogan of christianity all over the world. Justice and holiness is like secondary. As a matter of fact, I never heard about it in my debates with these zealots, everything was about love and compassion.

Maybe you're interpreting it from the standpoint of a person that hates to be challenged, a person that wants the religous dissidents to be punished as painful as possible, a zealot who only cares about himself. In that case, sure, every non christian should burn in hell mercilessly.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
As far as I'm concerned, all the Christians that I met have always remarked that God is love, it's like a slogan of christianity all over the world. Justice and holiness is like secondary. As a matter of fact, I never heard about it in my debates with these zealots, everything was about love and compassion.
When did sacrificing your son to be crucified become an act of love? Or sending famines, droughts, earthquakes and diseases to punish people be seen as acts of love?
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
When did sacrificing your son to be crucified become an act of love? Or sending famines, droughts, earthquakes and diseases to punish people be seen as acts of love?
Y3s, Shirley, th!s is a contr@d!ction of Chr!st!@ns. I'm not dis@greeing w!th u.

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@IlDiavolo
When did sacrificing your son to be crucified become an act of love? Or sending famines, droughts, earthquakes and diseases to punish people be seen as acts of love?
Y3s, Shirley, th!s is a contr@d!ction of Chr!st!@ns. I'm not dis@greeing w!th u.
Were natural disasters attributed to God to demonstrate his power? Did Jesus make his crucifixion a sacrificial act to become a martyr?
Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,485
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@Shila
Love can also be defined biblically as one who obeys the commandments of God. If that is a reasonable definition, then God showing justice to the wicked is actually love. Whereas if he just let them do whatever they want without regard to how they hurt, then that would not be love.  Hence, I don't see a contradiction, on a number of levels. 
How is it love to sacrifice your son for the sins of others?
That's a great question.  But even in the modern world, the rights of the individual become subject to the rights of the many, it isn't that difficult to see. In China for instance, it is considered right and just and therefore loving to humanity as a whole, to subject the rights of the individual for the interests of the whole.  Some might call this utilitarianism. the ends justify the means.  It is loving for China to subject Taiwan to sanctions and pain. and slavery. For it will bring them back to the fold. 

Of Course, the Bible's morality isn't based on utilitarianism, so I couldn't use that as an argument even if the world thought it was a good one. 

The Concept of God sacrificing his Son is, however, very different to a human sacrificing his son on many different levels.  It's not even close to a similar story in the Bible, where Abraham was commanded to sacrifice his son because God commanded him too.  The Story of Abraham and Isaac is useful for many ideas but it is not the story of God and his Son being put to death. 

I suppose the question you asked could be considered on a different levels.

You ask "how could it be love"? You didn't specify where the love is directed or not directed.  If the question was - how is it love towards the people of the world who would be saved from certain death and hell by the sacrifice of this Son then the answer is not difficult. To save anyone from Hell or from certain death by any act that is going to cost you is a demonstration of love towards those people. Whether they accept it as love or not is irrelevant for - one of the definitions of love is sacrificial. Giving up your most valuable things for someone else's benefit. 

If you were to ask whether the death of his son was love directed towards the devil, then I would say, it wasn't. 

Of course, we also need to understand that God is Trinity.  The Son is not a biological son or child like humans have. The Son is Truly God as the Father is Truly God as the Holy Spirit is Truly God. So when God sent his Son to die, we can't put it in the same manner as a human sacrifice.  God also knew Jesus would rise from the dead. Jesus knew he would die but he also knew he would rise from the dead.  And the purpose for his death and resurrection was for Jesus to gain a bride, the church, those who trusted in him. Therein is love by the Father for his Son, for he brought about his bride for him. 

Jesus like many people in this world would sacrifice himself for the sake of others. That too is a demonstration of love. He didn't have to hold himself back. The fact that Jesus was prepared to die not just for his friends and family but also for his enemies demonstrates something more profound than love too. Doesn't it? IT demonstrates supreme integrity, grace and generosity, let alone kindness and mercy. 

So how does it demonstrate love? Well, I would it by saying how does not demonstrate love? In fact to call into question Jesus' motivations is to call into question the motivations of every soldier who has ever fought and died for his country. And every police officer or fire person or first responder.  It's a clear example. And to deny that is well to deny the reality of the world we live in. 


Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,584
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Tradesecret

Jesus like many people in this world would sacrifice himself for the sake of others. That too is a demonstration of love. He didn't have to hold himself back. The fact that Jesus was prepared to die not just for his friends and family but also for his enemies demonstrates something more profound than love too. Doesn't it? IT demonstrates supreme integrity, grace and generosity, let alone kindness and mercy.
No one asked Jesus to sacrifice himself for the sake of others.

Human sacrifice was not part of the commandments from God.
In Jeremiah 19:4-6, Gd tells us that human sacrifice is so horrible a concept to Him, that it did not even come into His mind to demand it from His creation.

It was not a known practice to allow someone to die for the sins of others.Even the disciples did not know why Jesus had to die.

Why was Jesus' death hidden from the disciples?
The disciples failed to comprehend Jesus' explicit and repeated predictions of his coming crucifixion and resurrection because, even while he was revealing it to them, it was being “hidden from them” by the Lord Himself. And only the Lord could remove that incomprehension — which is exactly what Luke says happened.

All SACRIFICED animals had to be slaughtered by a priest, at the Temple (and prior to that, at the sanctuary), and that animal was treated differently - parts were burnt, parts went to the priests and levites, and the rest was returned to whoever brought it.

The Bible tells us Jesus was crucified for blasphemy. He was put on trial for his own sins and found guilty. Jesus was not sacrificed in the temple. He was crucified in a public area. The crucifixion was not performed by priests. The Roman guards then crucified Jesus.

John 19:23 23 When the soldiers crucified Jesus, they took his clothes, dividing them into four shares, one for each of them, with the undergarment remaining. This garment was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom.

Is Jesus' death a human sacrifice?
In response, God didn't sacrifice Jesus. Rather, Jesus gave up his own life. No one forced Him. He laid down His life willingly, as He made clear speaking about His life: “No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. Jesus admits he took his own life even though he was crucified for blasphemy and sedition.

If Jesus claimed that only dead Jews could forgive sins using himself as an example. Then the Holocaust was totally justified. The world needed more Jews sacrificed for the growing population of Christian sinners.

Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,485
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
Tell you what. When it ACTUALLY happens, then let's discuss it. Now, there is just speculation and lots of people believe in speculation as though it is true. Gee go to any of the thousands of dispensational churches in America and ask them about the rapture. They'll all tell you it's going to happen any day now and they believe it - even though the Bible doesn't.  The church has been saying "it's the end of the world" for millennia. Me, I like to see the actual evidence and so-called facts.  The same applies to the JFK assassination. Rumours and speculation and rabbit holes. 
Well, at least you're open to it. Keep it up, when the time comes you won't be caught with your pants down.
People have been waiting for these things forever and ad finitum. I don't intend to spend my time waiting for something that just happens to be in someone elses head or delusion. I have enough delusions of my own. (I can't wait to see how that is used against me, not by you, of course) I haven't seen any compelling evidence for the existence of intelligent life on other planets. We've all seen the videos of the US fighter pilots. But not understanding what something is - doesn't mean we have to fill in the gaps and say - It must be alien. I don't do that about God, I don't believe in the idea of filling in the gaps. I'll leave that people who need to be able to explain everything. I like explanations by the way, but not speculative ones. Not that I don't find them interesting and intriguing, but you can't build your life on such things. 

It depends on what kind of Christian church you're subscribed. 

As far as I'm concerned, all the Christians that I met have always remarked that God is love, it's like a slogan of christianity all over the world. Justice and holiness is like secondary. As a matter of fact, I never heard about it in my debates with these zealots, everything was about love and compassion.

Maybe you're interpreting it from the standpoint of a person that hates to be challenged, a person that wants the religous dissidents to be punished as painful as possible, a zealot who only cares about himself. In that case, sure, every non christian should burn in hell mercilessly.

Perhaps that's true. There are many churches which highlight as the primary thing that God is love.  Certainly I have come across many who think that. Yet most of these churches, also think that God will send someone to Hell if they don't trust Jesus as God.  Not all of them. There are quite a few churches who don't believe in Hell or punishment. Some think that everyone goes to heaven. Good bad or indifferent.  Certainly, God is love. I wouldn't say otherwise. 

But I would also note that within Reformed Churches, and that's the type I attend at, that it is the holiness of God that is his primary attribute.  And that love of God is always consistent with that.  Perhaps since you've never heard a different perspective, you should broaden your discussons. The Reformed are plenty afield. I'm sure you've heard of John McArthur. John Piper. Wayne Grudem. The Red Pen crew.  It actually surprises me that your perspective is so narrow in relation to Christians. From your comments, I would have take the view that you had come across most types. The Reformed View in America is huge. Still, that doesn't matter. There is still time for you to investigate if you choose. 
Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,485
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@Shila

No one asked Jesus to sacrifice himself for the sake of others.
That's right. No human would ask since we are all so proud of ourselves and don't think we need saving.  You've now touching on what we call the Total Depravity of Sin. The original sin.  God decided to do it. He planned it. It was the only manner by which humanity could be saved.  We also call this - the doctrine of inability. That is - that humanity was unable to save themselves - which explains why God needed to do it Himself.  So no human asked. But God did. And God the Son volunteered. 

Human sacrifice was not part of the commandments from God.
In Jeremiah 19:4-6, Gd tells us that human sacrifice is so horrible a concept to Him, that it did not even come into His mind to demand it from His creation.
Again, that is absolutely correct. God forbade human sacrifice. And Israel was the one nation in the world which did not practice it, except when it was taken over by outsiders or when it betrayed God and followed the gods of other nations.  

Jesus' death wasn't a human sacrifice in the same style or method as these other types.  Humanity wasn't trying to appease God. Humanity just wanted him dead. the other thing you are forgetting is that Jesus wasn't just a human. He was also the Christ. He was also DIVINE.  

It was not a known practice to allow someone to die for the sins of others.Even the disciples did not know why Jesus had to die.
It was known for people to be pardoned for someone else. Consider what Pilot asked when he said to the people - who shall we let go? Barabbus or Jesus? The Jewish religion did practise atonement for sins. They had an entire system set up. They also had the practise of the scape goat.  So it's incorrect to say that it was not a known practise.  What was unknown was how God was going to do it. And it was unknown to the Jews, and the disciples, the exact nature of what was going to happen. Even when Jesus told them, they didn't get it. That's why it's such an intriguing thing that such an unknown thing after his death and resurrection became such a central point.  Generally speaking, people who want to start a false religion, don't start with unknown things and make them a central part - and they say they were part and parcel of everything before hand,  If people want to fraudulently do stuff, they start with things that they know everyone agrees with - to get their trust. For it's evidence of its authencity 

Why was Jesus' death hidden from the disciples?
The disciples failed to comprehend Jesus' explicit and repeated predictions of his coming crucifixion and resurrection because, even while he was revealing it to them, it was being “hidden from them” by the Lord Himself. And only the Lord could remove that incomprehension — which is exactly what Luke says happened.
Jesus didn't hide it from his disciples. He told them many times. They failed to comprehend is true. But that doesn't make it hidden. After all, the gospel is not hidden from you, but you don't comprehend it.  It's clear they didn't want him to die. It's clear they wanted him to do other things - like become the king of the nation. Or the messiah in a way that would end Roman rule.  

All SACRIFICED animals had to be slaughtered by a priest, at the Temple (and prior to that, at the sanctuary), and that animal was treated differently - parts were burnt, parts went to the priests and levites, and the rest was returned to whoever brought it.
Yes, that was part of the OT ritual.  In many ways it is fair to say that the Jewish leaders ordered his death. They sent him to his slaughter. The Romans might have been their hands.  The aspects of his death clearly were not the same as some sacrifices were meant to play out. that doesn't diminish what happened at all. Clearly, there were similarities - and there were differences. The differences don't make it invalid. 

The Bible tells us Jesus was crucified for blasphemy. He was put on trial for his own sins and found guilty. Jesus was not sacrificed in the temple. He was crucified in a public area. The crucifixion was not performed by priests. The Roman guards then crucified Jesus.
The Gospels tell us that the Jews wanted Jesus dead. And they also clearly point out that the Jews and the Romans conspired together to trump up a charge of blasphemy.  The NT indicates that Jesus was without sin and did not sin. This must also include any charge that others might have found him false of doing. Blasphemy would only be true if he was not God. If he was God, then blasphemy is not true.  The Messiah was prophesied to die outside the city walls. At the hand of strangers. On a tree.  All of this the Christian embraces as truth.  As I said above, his sacrifice had similarities - one might even say that since he is a priest - his death came at his own hands. No one takes my life. 

John 19:23 23 When the soldiers crucified Jesus, they took his clothes, dividing them into four shares, one for each of them, with the undergarment remaining. This garment was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom.

Is Jesus' death a human sacrifice?
In response, God didn't sacrifice Jesus. Rather, Jesus gave up his own life. No one forced Him. He laid down His life willingly, as He made clear speaking about His life: “No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. Jesus admits he took his own life even though he was crucified for blasphemy and sedition.

If Jesus claimed that only dead Jews could forgive sins using himself as an example. Then the Holocaust was totally justified. The world needed more Jews sacrificed for the growing population of Christian sinners.


Jesus death was not a human sacrifice in the same manner as other types of human sacrifice. It wasn't an ordinary sacrifice like the animal in the temple. There were vast similarities and vast differences. I've touched on some of those things above.  Yet none of these things diminish the role he played. 

It wasn't just a dead Jew, it was a particular line - of the promise - that would bring us to the Messiah. That would point out who he was. The Holocaust was evil. And anti-Semitism has no place in the world.  And without the Christ, then all humanity would end up in destruction - completely of their own free will and choice. Your words demonstrate where you stand. And that is a matter for you. 

IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,632
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@Tradesecret
People have been waiting for these things forever and ad finitum. I don't intend to spend my time waiting for something that just happens to be in someone elses head or delusion. I have enough delusions of my own. (I can't wait to see how that is used against me, not by you, of course) I haven't seen any compelling evidence for the existence of intelligent life on other planets. We've all seen the videos of the US fighter pilots. But not understanding what something is - doesn't mean we have to fill in the gaps and say - It must be alien. I don't do that about God, I don't believe in the idea of filling in the gaps. I'll leave that people who need to be able to explain everything. I like explanations by the way, but not speculative ones. Not that I don't find them interesting and intriguing, but you can't build your life on such things. 
I don't intend to make you believe in ETs, that's your problem. I'm just saying that this possibility should be at least put in your subconscious so that if all of a sudden the fkn aliens land on earth with their huge spacecrafts, you don't get confused or even worse get mentally unstable because all of your beliefs will collapse like a house of cards.

So, if that ever happens your mind automatically will have a response like "yeah, il diavolo was right, there are no angels with wings, they are in reality people from other planets that are trying to get through a genetic project that can solve the main problems of the whole universe. There's no hell nor heaven either, there is just the earth that is going to turn into a better place".

Perhaps that's true. There are many churches which highlight as the primary thing that God is love.  Certainly I have come across many who think that. Yet most of these churches, also think that God will send someone to Hell if they don't trust Jesus as God.  Not all of them. There are quite a few churches who don't believe in Hell or punishment. Some think that everyone goes to heaven. Good bad or indifferent.  Certainly, God is love. I wouldn't say otherwise. 

But I would also note that within Reformed Churches, and that's the type I attend at, that it is the holiness of God that is his primary attribute.  And that love of God is always consistent with that.  Perhaps since you've never heard a different perspective, you should broaden your discussons. The Reformed are plenty afield. I'm sure you've heard of John McArthur. John Piper. Wayne Grudem. The Red Pen crew.  It actually surprises me that your perspective is so narrow in relation to Christians. From your comments, I would have take the view that you had come across most types. The Reformed View in America is huge. Still, that doesn't matter. There is still time for you to investigate if you choose.
I'm speaking about my context. In latin America the evangelical Christians are majority. Their sermon is something like "Jesus loves you" or "Open your heart to Jesus". They think Jesus is God so they worship him. I don't know about the American context, I don't care either.

I'm not against their love message by the way. It's good to preach love to everyone because this planet sucks as it stands now with a lot of wars, violence, abuse and so on. Besides, it's the same message delivered by buddhism and other philosophies as well. The ETs also encourage this message through their contactees, by love they mean living in harmony and peace with other people. The whole universe needs love because what happens in the earth  also happens in the universe, you see how important the earth is for them.