Choose Your Role DP1

Author: Lunatic

Posts

Read-only
Total: 313
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,711
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
Lol, we should just try to lynch scum. I don't care if I die. Definitely don't swap my role if we lynch scum on DP 1, I don't mind dying.
Casey_Risk
Casey_Risk's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,217
3
3
8
Casey_Risk's avatar
Casey_Risk
3
3
8
I'm on break right now and my break is not nearly long enough, so I'll keep my thoughts brief. I would rather us try to hit scum tbh, but if we can't come to an agreement on who is most likely scum, then we lynch Pie. If he's scum, then good, if not, then we get a confirmed townie and info about the mafia that we know we can trust. 

I'll go into more detail later after I get home, but I don't buy that Austin is practically confirmed town if he confirms his role for the simple reason that he could have another role besides Hammerer. The OP suggested that scum would have additional roles, and Pie's info says the same thing. If his other role and his partner's roles are both good, it's more than balanced. Also, Hammerer isn't even that bad for scum. 
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 5,291
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@WyIted
When does your role take effect during the NP? It matters a lot if your target gets to use their current role before yours changes it, or alternatively, if it has precedence in the NP.

Also, you’ve posted a couple of times now without returning to your sus on me. Would still like to know where that’s coming from.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
I'm not clear on the sus here. 

The first point is true of basically anyone who is town, since GP's role will confirm them regardless of their prior role. I also don't really like that you started with that, since the implication is that Austin is a mislynch. I know you used "can" in that sentence, but it's still weird to state this if you strongly believe he's scum, since the flip necessarily would make GP's role useless for this DP.
That’s fair, I wanted to save the best for last.

The second point is really where you're sussing him and I guess I'm getting it a little more based the info you say you've received from Luna. If you're right that scum have been given roles specific to the two Categories town doesn't have in their ranks, then you're correct that no amount of role confirmation suggests confirmation of their affiliation.
Exactly, which is why alarm bells went off when Austin said that just because he’s a Hammerer, his role is confirmable, and thus is town. He’s experienced enough not make that leap. The “muh balance” argument is just garbage. 

I agree it doesn't "hard confirm" him regardless (and I think that was jumping the gun a bit), but he's also not the first person to suggest that scum might have access to roles in the two Categories that aren't in town.
There’s a difference between getting them as a fake claim vs a real confirmable role to mislead town. No one suggested the latter to my understanding.

There is some presumption in that line that suggests that scum could have received a role from those Categories, which seems to be the stronger basis for your sus, but I read this as making a case for why it couldn't be because it would throw off the balance of the game.
Luna already said the balance is wonky because of the inherent choices players made. Balance shouldn’t be an argument anywhere in this game period. 

That's not to mention that this post is from early in the DP, well before there was any significant discussion of what roles scum could or could not have based on what we know from the OP and the signup thread. Maybe he's implying that he has inside information about what roles scum have access to and if I squint at it hard enough I can see your position, but that's not how I'm reading it.
I think the confidence is the key. Read his posts. He’s challenging us to “confirm” his role. And when we “confirm” he wants to be cleared, which is not true at all. He as an experienced player should know this, yet he’s still using it as an argument.

So we have our first unconfirmable role claim. That doesn't automatically make you sus, but I'm going to point it out because this is a marked shift from the claims made so far.
That’s fine. I chose this role over a “confirmable” role because of information in the first place.

It's also a claim I'm unfamiliar with, though I also hadn't heard of a Role Changer. I will, however, note that that particular role seems very tailored to this setup, while your role seems more generalized, so it comes off to me as pretty distinct from the rest of the existing claims and from my own role.
That’s fine. Not much I can do about that except point out this from OP: “As usual, roles may exist outside of normal, roles I self created, or roles could have flavors or mechanics that work differently from popular sites like mafiascum, epicmafia, or mafiauniverse.”

I looked up the role as well. This is an abnormally large amount of information for an Informed player to receive. It's listed as usually getting something like the identity of another townie or the existence of a particular PR. It's weird as well that it partially contradicts the information I spelled out from the sign-up thread and OP, specifically giving you information that scum have access to a role that belongs to their fake Category.
How does it contradict? Everything fits with OP.

If we take this at face value, that means scum have access to two full claims that are, essentially, just real. That's more support for the scum team than I think I've ever seen in a game, but given that this is a unique game, I suppose it's possible. This essentially means that the only ways to determine that scum isn't what they say they are is to find behavioral tells (which is a lot harder to do when they're literally just telling the truth about what they can/cannot do) or find evidence that they used another role/committed the NK.
Yes, which is why I made sure to mention behavioral reads being of priority in one of my first posts if I remember correctly. I specifically mentioned role analysis to be useless

That's possible as well, and given the explicit lack of a TP in this game as well as the issues with balancing it that come from people selecting their own roles, it might just be that Luna wants to force town into a more difficult position using this setup.

Still, I'm struggling to buy this. Is this a rephrasing of what he sent you?
Yes because I can’t C/P.

I'm assuming it's not just c/p'd, so I'll function under that assumption, but the way it's written just seems... off. This all seems needlessly clunky, particularly: "The first to prove the category they know to be fake one to help prove their fake category". Why not just say "Scum receive a role from the two remaining categories"? Why spell out that the purpose is to "prove their fake category"? For that matter, why were you provided the extra information that the other role they received is an "every night role"?
Believe me, I was confused af too when Luna gave me the initial bit. I had to ask a million clarifying questions. As for every night role, I don’t know. Let me try to rephrase. Mafia theoretically can have 2 roles each based on the info Luna gave me. 1 to help “prove” their fake category, and the other a mafia role from essentially a 10th category.

I'm also struggling with some of this follow-up. The way you phrased it above was that they have access to four roles, but can only use one per NP, suggesting that scum have very strong PRs and that they effectively have a pool to select one from and use per night. Now you say that they have four roles and can use two per night, one for each player, so long as they're active roles. The latter does make more sense, but that makes your phrasing on the PM you say you received feel even more off.
I know. It’s confusing af, which is why I asked Luna a million questions. Here is my understanding that I confirmed with Luna. Let’s say that Austin is scum and fake category role is Hammerer and night role is Roleblocker. He will function as a Hammerer during the day and can use his Roleblock at night. Now let’s say Austin’s fake category role involves a day action. Then he can’t use a mafia night action. Ask me more questions. It’s confusing as hell.

I've already discussed some of this, but I'll address a couple of distinct points. Yes, we know balance is wonky in this game. As Luna stated in the OP, though, the reason for that is pretty explicit: "the game balance was entirely determined by player choice". He's clearly concerned about how the balance will play out given what we chose, not so much based on how he set it up. I wouldn't say I agree with him that scum wouldn't be given a negative utility role, particularly Hammerer, though it skirts the line on what I'd even call a negative utility role in the hands of scum. That's a separate issue, but I feel it's worth mentioning.

Apart from that, I just don't buy this scum slip. First off, I don't think his confidence on role confirmation equaling affiliation confirmation is a scum slip. It's more than I'd be willing to say on the subject, but I already expressed my view that strong role confirmations could at least be close to an affiliation confirmation.
For something like Vigilante, I would agree, but Hammerer? Definitely not. You have to note that Austin when he claimed didn’t know that I had this information, which explains his confidence.

Second, I don't think that sentence demonstrates that he "knows that scum were given roles from the two fake categories." Again, I think he's spelling out a balancing issue he would perceive specifically if they received a role in the Negative Utility category.
Again, he’s acknowledging that “scum” were given a fully functioning role from the fake category, which no one besides scum and I know.

I'm going to give this some more thought, but in general, I'm not liking this post.
I think there’s just a lot of confusion. Ask questions. But there is literally zero downside risk to lynching Austin. I’m confident he’s scum.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@AustinL0926
And conveniently puts town on even numbers, losing us a lynch.
???

I'm not even sure what Pie is saying here. I'm saying that:

a. Luna gave me this role (in the form of options)
b. If I was scum, I'd either not have chosen this role if I had other options, or if I didn't have options, then Luna's bad at balancing
No I’m saying you as scum were given negative utility options and you’d elected to choose Hammerer so you’d be “confirmed” and skate by. Balance is not even an argument this game.

c. Thus, I'm not scum.
You’re scum. You’re confident because you have an informed perspective. I don’t blame you. You couldn’t have known that I would get info that implicates you in a scum slip.

I didn't say that scum were given roles from two fake categories.

Pie is straight-up not reading what I said here, either deliberately or negligently.

I said that I was given roles from negative utility category, and that if I was scum, the options that Luna gave me would have been unbalanced.
Why? You can’t claim to know balance in this game and Hammerer doesn’t make you confirmed town. You knew that scum were given the roles from the categories to help “prove” themselves. That’s the only scenario where you can even make that statement.

I'm working from my own perspective of the information I have as a townie, and given that, pointing out that it doesn't make sense for me to be scum.
You’re saying scum can’t be given negative utility as a fake category under a false pretext of “balance” which we know is wonky either way. It’s a false premise.

Saying that "I am [X], "It doesn't make sense for me to be scum]" doesn't mean that Scum is [X]. It's a hypothetical.
Yet the hypothetical implies that you have an informed perspective that scum were given the roles to “confirm” yourself.

I really struggle to see Pie genuinely believing in this. I think he's capable of far better solving.

My hesitation mainly comes that when I flip town, it's going to look pretty bad for him. But I think that he is a good enough player to talk his way out of it. I strongly want to see whether he continues this push, because if he does, I'm going to assume he's just going for the mislynch.
This is just funny. You got caught. It’s understandable. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Casey_Risk
Pie's role claim is interesting. I agree with WF that it does seem to give us a peculiarly large amount of information, and yet I'm inclined to believe him. From a balancing perspective, it makes a certain amount of sense. I also agree with his thought process regarding Austin placing an unusual amount of importance on role confirmation -- that also didn't sit right with me.
The confidence is a massive alarm. He’s experienced enough to know Hammerer doesn’t make him confirmed time. He’s also using “balance” as justification when it’s impossible to determine. I’m confident he’s scum. Worst case we get rid of a town negative utility role but the informed perspective makes him scum for sure.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Savant
Austin's reads seem pretty reasonable to me, which makes me town read him as well. Only thing I'd shift is maybe Earth, who seems pretty neutral to me. But that's barely any difference.
What are your comments on my post? You got your accusation now :)
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@WyIted
That's fair. We could lynch Pie. I would then make GP bullet proof so we have another safe town to be with us at mylo.
Let’s lynch Austin. You can make him BP or if you trust me, convert me to #1.

I will say that despite GP not contributing much, his reads are usually pretty good so we can depend on him to normally make the correct decision

AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,513
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
Pie's whole argument is based on two things:

1. I'm too confident in being town.

He says it's unreasonable to think I should be considered town.

The logic here is simple - I'm literally negative utility, a type of role which I have never seen given to scum and is especially unbalanced in a game where town has seven PRs. I think it's reasonable to work from that perspective in order to see how others read me and read them by proxy.

2. I scumslipped.

He says that I know scum were given roles from the two unknown categories.

That's objectively false. Read my posting. If you think I said that, then tag me.

-

Ngl I was kinda expecting more from Pie, not a wallpost I refuted in 3 minutes lmao.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,513
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
VTL Pie

He's likely scum working in bad faith to try and get me mislynched, and if he's not, then he's a townie who's deathtunneling for no reason while also having a role whose only utility is having info that can only be verified after he flips.

I don't mind either way, but if he's going to claim I said something I never did, while deliberately ignoring any mechanical analysis despite him being a game designer, then I'm fine with this.

Part of mafia is knowing to pick your battles, and I'm good with this one.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,440
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@ILikePie5
@AustinL0926
Ok I'm going to read all this again. My inclination right now is that if Pie is very sure about a scum slip, then he's either scum or Austin is. Of course Pie could be wrong and erroneously confident and we have two townies going against each other, but Pie's intuition has been good before.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,440
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@ILikePie5
Just to be clear, you are investigative role?
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,440
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@ILikePie5
*category I mean
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,440
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@ILikePie5
I realized if all you have is one-time info, it would be good to have WyIted change your role. But we'd need to somehow be confident you are town, which is unlikely rn.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Savant
Just to be clear, you are investigative role?
No, I am Passive. Said that in initial post.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 5,291
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Savant
He said:

My category is Passive and my role is Informed.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 5,291
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
I’ll respond to you when I get on my computer in a bit, going to be difficult covering this on my phone.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@AustinL0926
Pie's whole argument is based on two things:

1. I'm too confident in being town.

He says it's unreasonable to think I should be considered town.

The logic here is simple - I'm literally negative utility, a type of role which I have never seen given to scum and is especially unbalanced in a game where town has seven PRs. I think it's reasonable to work from that perspective in order to see how others read me and read them by proxy.
Again, my argument is that having a confirmable role in the first place is more than enough. If I chose another role we’d be playing a who’s role is confirmed game. We’re past that phase now.

2. I scumslipped.

He says that I know scum were given roles from the two unknown categories.

That's objectively false. Read my posting. If you think I said that, then tag me.
Red herring. I said you knew that scum were given the roles from the categories. You didn’t say fake claims. You explicitly said role.

-

Ngl I was kinda expecting more from Pie, not a wallpost I refuted in 3 minutes lmao.
I like that you’re doubling down.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Here’s my perspective at this stage.

Basically everyone is claiming they have a confirmable role. I had the option of picking one, but I chose not to because knowledge is power. 

The knowledge Luna gave me is that scum physically have their role from their fake categories along with mafia roles from a special selection. Naturally, if I was scum, I would pick the confirmable roles too with the plan to confirm myself and then coast. 

Scum have 2 roles each. One from the fake category to help prove them and the other from a special selection of scum roles.

With this information, role confirmation does not equal affiliation confirmation. Now, there are some roles where it comes really close to it such as a Vigilante. By far though, this game will be reliant on behavior and any night actions we may have.

“Pretty sure this hard confirms me as town, since it'd be atrocious from a balancing perspective to give scum a useless when town has seven non-negative utility PRs.”
Austin says this is a hypothetical. Fine. There are a couple of problems. First he justifies it because of “balance.” We know balance is wonky, so it’s not a good reason at all.

Next, his argument is that scum wouldn’t be given a useless role. Not a useless fake claim. A role. He has that role. No where did Luna say besides to me and scum that scum wouldn’t get the roles in the fake categories too
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,297
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
Official Vote Count:

Pie- 1/5- Austin 
Austin- 1/5- Pie
Whiteflame- 1/5- Wylted

21.5 hours remain in dp1 

ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
I’ll respond to you when I get on my computer in a bit, going to be difficult covering this on my phone.

I’ll be on a place for the next 8 hours. I’ll respond during my layover. Ask questions. I asked Luna at least 20 questions based on the initial blurb he gave me.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@whiteflame
I’ll respond to you when I get on my computer in a bit, going to be difficult covering this on my phone.

I’ll be on a place for the next 8 hours. I’ll respond during my layover. Ask questions. I asked Luna at least 20 questions based on the initial blurb he gave me.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,633
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Savant
I realized if all you have is one-time info, it would be good to have WyIted change your role. But we'd need to somehow be confident you are town, which is unlikely rn.
Like I said, if you trust me till the end change me to #1. If not, change me to #4 or change someone else. I want Austin lynched though. He’s scum for sure. He’s talking from an informed perspective. A normal townie wouldn’t have known that scum were given a real role from the fake category. He’s saying Luna wouldn’t give scum a real role from the Negativr Utility category, but the problem is town don’t even know that scum were given real roles from a fake category. 
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 6,407
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@whiteflame
I assume it's the next no but I did ask. Will let you know when I get an answer
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 6,407
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@ILikePie5
That's fair. Go can save us from a mislynch so no harm anyway

Unvote VTL austin
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,513
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
This argument is asymmetrical for a simple reason: it always takes more work to lie. So I'll make this short.

-

Pie's whole argument, directly quoted, boils down to this:

Red herring. I said you knew that scum were given the roles from the categories. You didn’t say fake claims. You explicitly said role. - PIE

A role. He has that role. No where did Luna say besides to me and scum that scum wouldn’t get the roles in the fake categories too - PIE
And his evidence?

“Pretty sure this hard confirms me as town, since it'd be atrocious from a balancing perspective to give scum a useless role when town has seven non-negative utility PRs.” - Austin
Which is entirely different from what he's claiming. I'm pointing out the options I was given were only negative utility roles, and that it doesn't make sense for me to be scum - not that scum received negative utility roles.

-

Pie is provably lying. Provably lying is scummy.

Simple as that.







AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,513
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
FYI, I don't mind being used as the test for Grey confirming his role. My role is annoying and it's better for me to be vanillaized than anyone else.

I do mind Pie acting like he's actually scumhunting and completely derailing the day by tunneling a townie with provably false claims. That's scummy. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,297
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
Official Vote Count:

Pie- 1/5- Austin 
Austin- 2/5- Pie, Wylted


Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,440
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@whiteflame
@ILikePie5
@AustinL0926
@WyIted
Ok, I was going to say if scum had to claim investigative, then informed would be an easy fakeclaim. But for passive it makes a lot of sense.

After reading recent posts, I lean toward believing Pie. I get that Pie is sort of misrepresenting what Austin said, but he tends to be pretty aggressive as town, so I think it's more about vibes or what he thought Austin was implying. Also, I don't know if Austin would be zeroing in on one discrepancy as town; I think a townie would look for more than one way to support their innocence, while a scum player would be more inclined to zero in on a single mistake.

I could also see how Pie might be scum, but given that we have two good lynch targets, getting either of them is probably a victory for town.

Austin also says "I don't mind being used as the test for Grey confirming his role." If he's town, he doesn't really need to specify that, since if we lynch him and he's innocent we've already agreed on doing that. But if he's scum, he needs to bluff and make it seem like he's not afraid of being lynched. The line just comes off to me as trying too hard not to seem desperate, and through that lens he just seems more defensive here. A town Austin doesn't have much to lose since if he's confirmed he can get Pie tomorrow, who he's pretty sure is scum. (And if we lynch Pie instead, GP will likely die and lose his ability anyway.) Pie will be aggressive either way here since that's just how he is.

Tagging Austin in this even though it's likely going to lead to a huge back and forth, but this is where I'm at right now.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 5,291
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
So I'm going to respond along two separate veins, since this essentially breaks out to issues with your sus on Austin and issues with the information stemming from your role claim.

I'll start with Austin. You've got two big problems with him: his confidence that his Hammerer role vindicates him and the view that one of his posts revealed that he had knowledge he could only have as scum.

I'll start with the former.

We are literally coming off of a game where Earth was town and was the Hammerer. He was broadly townread as soon as he claimed for, basically, the exact same reasoning that Austin has provided apart from the more generalized balance issues. I don't really like that you're just dismissing balance altogether just because Luna said there would be issues with balance stemming from how our choices do or don't clash. I think it's valid to discuss some degree of what's likely based on trying to find an appropriate balance between PRs among scum and town.

All this being said, I'm not automatically concluding that a role confirmed Hammerer must be town in this game. It'd be a weird choice to give scum the option to be the Hammerer, but this is the kind of game that might include such a thing. It's unusual enough that I don't scumread Austin's initial response to having the role.

Then there's the revealed knowledge. The post you keep referencing is this one:

Pretty sure this hard confirms me as town, since it'd be atrocious from a balancing perspective to give scum a useless role when town has seven non-negative utility PRs.
Setting aside that this clearly focuses on balance, an issue you believe is largely irrelevant this game, I don't think his point is that scum were given "fully functioning role[s] from a fake category". He's saying that he doesn't believe they would be given his role, specifically, which doubles down on the "role confirmation means I'm town" argument. I get that you don't like the argument. I don't get how his saying that Luna hypothetically would not give this role to scum is also an explicit statement that Luna has given scum other roles that belong to fake categories.

None of this is to say that I see Austin as automatic town, I just don't agree with how you're reading into this quote and, at least so far, that's the main basis I've seen for you supporting his lynch.