Mayday Mafia DP2

Author: AustinL0926

Posts

Read-only
Total: 317
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,885
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Earth
@whiteflame
VTL Moozer
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,885
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Unvote
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@ILikePie5
Got it. Thanks.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Casey_Risk
Considering that you are the only town confirmed player who's still technically in the game, you're the one I want to hear from most on this issue. If you really want my claim, I'll give it. I'd strongly prefer to wait one more DP but, if you do need more information, I can provide specifics about what happened during the last NP on my end (which doesn't require me to full claim, though it further alludes to my role).
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,793
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
OK, so let's start with the obvious:

I'm not claiming just because you have a vote on me. If people want my claim, they can push me. I will say, I softed my claim last DP, so people are welcome to look back at post #420 (nice, didn't even plan that) and see if they can figure it out.

I don't see any obvious soft claim in that post. Also earth and casey have now both mentioned that your behavior was scummy by being there to vote right at the bell. Banana pointed out the scumminess with pie doing it, but it also had applied to you. Thats three different people who saw the same thing as me scummy. Just because they aren't voting you, you won't claim? Come on, even I claimed, when it was virtually only you asking me for a claim. Moozer hasn't even asked for my claim yet this phase. That's a bit stubborn. I can see not claiming dp1, I didn't because I wanted to bait a scum role, but then figured scum probably guessed my role anyway so I claimed this phase. The longer you refuse to claim while being scum read the scummier it will make you look.

As for this post, I just love how this works. So your argument is that I'm engaging in WIFOM when your whole argument is exactly that. I'm responding to your WIFOM accusations. Nothing you've said so far about my behavior makes me inherently scummy, and I'm noticing that your efforts conveniently leave out large swaths of what I actually posted last DP (including an extensive set of reads and a specific person who I thought should be the lynch) to focus on the one thing I didn't do, and notably, that that one thing was what you, specifically, cut me off from doing. Like, sincerely, what did I have to do to satisfy you here? Post a vote on a non-existent wagon?
I am not dismissing your wifom out of hand, I am dismissing it because it comes off as a poor excuse and I would have to believe in a million coincidences. My "wifom" actually has a well reasoned argument to it that points to suspicious behavior. For you to dismiss my wifom out of hand you have to admit that you are at fault for something. Being busy isn't a crime of course, but can you agree that it is very rare for you of all people to miss out on the end of a day phase like that? Or leave it to an hour remaining? Again my argument is complimenting you, because even if you had I know you would have been prepared enough to start setting up your lynch target way in advance. Moozer wasn't even a viable option for a lynch when you were suggesting it, and had little to no pressure. You were going to leave the day phase knowing you were busy to an hour remaining with no plan in place, just to lecture those who did vote, so a no lynch wouldn't happen. You don't see how that comes accross as scummy, or how you being there to vote immediately after the phase ends seems super convienent? And that you and pie (both the most active posters) both somehow missed the oppertunity to place a final vote, and then both convienently voted the exact same answer with 2 scum being on the wagon... There is no way your telling me these million coincidences aren't scummy, and that they happen to be just coincidences. 

Also, what even is this final paragraph? I gave specific reasons for why I'm sussing Luna that he's just strawmanning at this point. I'm not going to address a bad faith response that doesn't even engage with my points. 
The alternative to me voting owen was a no lynch, which everyone freaks out about is the worst thing town can do dp1, cerulean went into major analysis of why last phase, austin made a huge point about it in the endgame, and its something in general people agree is not a good thing. Imagine the one time I did advocate for a no lynch recently was in the last game. And I was scum. Now I participate in a lynch with dwindling time and you are using that against me? Sorry for not thinking that is the strongest argument. Especially when you yourself, one of the most active posters, somehow misses the opportunity to set up a better lynch target but is there immediately after the lynch takes place to vote on austins quiz and immediately close the thread. Like for you to cast a stone at me when I was openly not even scum reading own, when you had every oppertunity for 3 days to establish who you thought could be a better lynch, is beyond hypocritical.

Great, more WIFOM. Because Pie and I weren't on the obvious mislynch and hadn't actively voted for someone else who definitely wasn't going to be the lynch, we're somehow sus.
Stop right there. If this was such an "obvious" mislynch why aren't you more suspicious of the people who actually wanted to lynch owen, rather than the person who townread him but didn't want the phase to end in a no lynch?

Luna jumps through a lot of hoops here to try to find a way to make us look sus. I'll note that if we were on other lynch wagons, it wouldn't have changed this calculus (literally, it's exactly the same whether we're on a wagon or not), so Luna is now scumreading us regardless of whether we voted or not. At this point, nothing would have satisfied him beyond us being party to this obvious mislynch. 
No actually, the whole argument wouldn't exist if you and pie, the most active posters of the game, had literally voted anywhere. This is a classic mafia play "Let town fvck this up and we can stay out of the blame for it". And you keep trying to make it seem like I am the only one to pick up on how scummy this was. Again, casey, earth, and banana also picked up how scummy this was to some degree even if they aren't harping on it as much as I am. We all four can't be scum. I may be the loudest one in the room, but you have to dismiss all of them as well if you want to dismiss me as the lunatic. :)

As for voting Owen, I'd made myself perfectly clear when I gave out my reads and in direct response to Casey. In both cases, I said I was unwilling to vote Owen. If had gotten to the end of the DP and Owen was the only viable lynch, I would have preferred to no lynch despite what literally everyone was saying. It was a bullshit lynch on a person who at least had a confirmable role, notably something scant few people have claimed to have. You can justify it all you want on the basis that we had no other options, but don't blame me just because you made an obviously bad call.
This is probably the most hypocritical part of your ENTIRE post. First thing it ignores the entire premise of "Role confirmation =/= Affiliation confirmation" Which was the ENTIRE moral of the last game. Being able to confirm yourself doesn't mean you are town. I proved that last game and several people brought that up this game. His role wasn't even why I was town reading him, I was town reading him entirely based on behavior and saying things like "How can I avoid this next time" and all his pleas to not be lynched seeming exactly like how he was town in his first game and got mislynched. But the hypocritical part is you are now doing what you are accusing me of doing, using your town read of owen to get town cred yourself, only you have the added benefit of having conveniently been absent for the most important part of the phase that forces you into a decision. 

Also, this is one of several times you've done this and I'm going to call it out directly: this is not the first game you've tried this tactic of saying how you have certain expectations of my behavior and then call me out for not doing them. Hell, this isn't the first game you've ignored large swaths of what I posted, or where you've pushed back this hard on me sussing you and then proceeded to OMGUS me, notably all behaviors I've seen you do specifically to me as scum.
I have high standards for you as a player, because I have seen what you can do. I think you are one of the smartest mafia players we have on the site right now, and are more than capable of providing a strong case for a lynch on a player you want to get lynched, far enough in advance to you knowing you would be absent. Are you trying to tell me you wouldn't or couldn't do that? I don't think I am ignoring large swaths of anything.

Tell me honestly. If I am scum, do you think I would be pursuing both of the hardest people to mislynch in the game, starting in day phase 1? You just saw me play as scum last game. Is my behavior in this game at all similar to that game, where I played it extremely safe every single day phase, and let town lead every single lynch on relatively safe targets to coast for a win? See where you are losing me is I know you see this, and you even mentioned town reading me for claiming a third role prevention role after two had already claimed. As scum I have a plethora of options to fake claim, not only do I claim without any real pressure, but I claim something that can be seen as scummy since there are other roles similar to mine in the game, and then I go on to pursue the two most active players in the game, and you have to somehow spin that I am doing all this with the intention to play as mafia the hardest way possible for literally 0 reason. And for all the talk about OMGUS its funny you are the one literally omgusing. My first post in the game I cast suspicion on you and pie, and I have been consistent with those reads all throughout the entire game. You actually town read me at one point, and seemingly only recently switched off of that town read when trying to use the owen lynch against me. If anyone is OMGUSing here, it's clearly you. 

No thanks.
I don't think this works out for you the way you are hoping it will. Being stubborn for the sake of stubborness doesn't really fit town whiteflame's MO. Even I didn't play it this hard, and had a clear reason for not claiming dp1. I never really cared about your claim anyway though, asking for your claim is for the benefit of you trying to do something to prove that you aren't scum. I was scum reading you for behavior. You claiming was for the help of everyone else in town reading you. If you wanna die on this hill of your own making that's on you.

Also, one more thought to add that I think everyone should take note of from Luna:

He called me out last DP saying that I was too readily voting Moozer and that I would be more likely to be, in his words, "passive" and "lazy." 
Bullsh1t. That wasn't my point at all and you know it. My point was that as town you would be more willing to look at moozer equally as being town. While I did use the word "passive" in context it meant something different as to what you are trying to spin it as. This is what I said: 

"Not nearly as passive as he usually feels to me, I feel like hes making a mountain out of a molehill with the moozer claim. It piggy backing off of pie who feels scummy to me, makes me less sure about him. Usually whiteflame is much better at catchign scum slips, this doesn't feel like a slip though on moozer part. I just don't like the read, and it doesn't feel like town whiteflame to me."

This clearly indicates that I was scum reading you for not trying to weigh both options, something that I felt you would do as town. And I didn't use the word lazy at all. You adding that for a bit of mis-direction is amusing though. 

Now, he's calling me out for not having voted (again, said I would as soon as my class was done, and Luna specifically was responsible for ending the DP before then),
Now that we know I didn't say the "lazy part" it makes sense yeah? You were super aggressive with moozer but not there for the entirety of the last day phase to push a case on him? Seems a lot like my theory about you trying to make town look bad by mislynching so you can cast blame on them, meanwhile you were literally posting multiple times during the last day. But just because I think you would weigh both the town and scum option of someone doesn't mean I think you would avoid making a decision entirely. 
Casey_Risk
Casey_Risk's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 830
3
3
8
Casey_Risk's avatar
Casey_Risk
3
3
8
-->
@whiteflame
I'd strongly prefer to wait one more DP but, if you do need more information, I can provide specifics about what happened during the last NP on my end (which doesn't require me to full claim, though it further alludes to my role).
I have a few thoughts on the situation. Tbh, I'm still not sure how I feel about you, but there's a particular reason I'm not scumreading you as hard as Luna is right now. That being said, I would actually like to know vaguely what you did last night, since you're willing to share. 
iamanabanana
iamanabanana's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 102
0
2
5
iamanabanana's avatar
iamanabanana
0
2
5
-->
@Moozer325
Well that sucks because I strengthened Pie. 
Dang. :/
iamanabanana
iamanabanana's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 102
0
2
5
iamanabanana's avatar
iamanabanana
0
2
5
I'll add my vote to whiteflame. I don't see why he is any more special than the rest of us who have claimed.

VTL whiteflame
Cerulean
Cerulean's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 217
0
2
4
Cerulean's avatar
Cerulean
0
2
4
Good afternoon, all. I have some thoughts from EOD, but I'm going to backread today first. I'm curious to see the justification for calling 0 scum on the wagon by Lunatic and Banana.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,154
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
Vote count 2.1:

whiteflame (2/4): Luna, Banana

Captain: Are we flying? We're flying, we're flying. Tell them [ATC] what we're doing.
Copilot: Oh yeah let me get [inaudible]
Captain: Gotta get it over again. At least upside down we're flying.
Sound of compressor stalls
Sound of engine stall
Captain: Speedbrakes! Speedbrakes!
Copilot: Got it.
Terrain, terrain, pull up!
Captain: Ah. Here we go!
*End of recording*

The captain and copilot of Alaska Airlines Flight 261 were posthumously awarded the Air Line Pilots Association Gold Medal for Heroism for their efforts to save the flight. A critical flaw in the horizontal stabilizer caused the plane to spiral out of control, yet they managed to maintain altitude for over 30 minutes before becoming inverted and crashing into the sea.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Casey_Risk
I have a few thoughts on the situation. Tbh, I'm still not sure how I feel about you, but there's a particular reason I'm not scumreading you as hard as Luna is right now. That being said, I would actually like to know vaguely what you did last night, since you're willing to share. 
I was roleblocked. My action failed.

whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@iamanabanana
I'll add my vote to whiteflame. I don't see why he is any more special than the rest of us who have claimed.
Generally speaking, my tendency is to avoid claiming if and only if I have good reason to keep my claim unknown. It's not that I'm special, it's that I'm doing my best to help town and I think that claiming would actively hurt town. It's fine if you want to vote me anyway, especially if you don't believe me, but I'll point out that, as scum, I make a solid effort to draft fake claims early and often and I'm usually not this obstinate about claiming.

That being said, if I get a third vote, I'll claim.

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,793
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Cerulean
Good afternoon, all. I have some thoughts from EOD, but I'm going to backread today first. I'm curious to see the justification for calling 0 scum on the wagon by Lunatic and Banana.
I've been kind of harping on it all day phase now, I am sure you will see that when you catch up. But tl;dr, my reason is because I think the scum team is whiteflame/pie, and I found it extremely convenient that they were the highest posters in the game but were somehow unable to be there for the end of a day lynch. It's extremely obvious in pies case. Pie was literally harping how he would rather lynch a miller than have a no lynch, but somehow doesn't vote owen in order to avoid a mislynch? It seemed extremely planned and coordinated. I think they made the play to stay off the lynch intentionally so they wouldn't be implicated by the results. If both of them were on the lynch, and the majority of town voted there are two people on the lynch, and austin gives us information, we essentially have sensor results confirming that 2/5 people are scum. That narrows down town POE a ton. If you are scum you want to avoid that at all costs. You don't find it weird at all that neither of the two most active posters had an end of day decision, but were there immediately to vote there is two scum on the wagon to sabotage the info we got from austin?
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,793
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@whiteflame
I was roleblocked. My action failed.

So for you not to be scum reading ana the claimed roleblocker, I am guessing your "theory" is going to have something to do with a redirector being in play
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,793
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
but somehow doesn't vote owen in order to avoid a no lynch*

EBWOP
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Lunatic
I don't see any obvious soft claim in that post. Also earth and casey have now both mentioned that your behavior was scummy by being there to vote right at the bell. Banana pointed out the scumminess with pie doing it, but it also had applied to you. Thats three different people who saw the same thing as me scummy. Just because they aren't voting you, you won't claim? Come on, even I claimed, when it was virtually only you asking me for a claim. Moozer hasn't even asked for my claim yet this phase. That's a bit stubborn. I can see not claiming dp1, I didn't because I wanted to bait a scum role, but then figured scum probably guessed my role anyway so I claimed this phase. The longer you refuse to claim while being scum read the scummier it will make you look.
Well, then you're not looking very closely at that post, especially since it comes early. If Casey wants my claim, let them call for it. Doesn't even require a vote because Casey can't vote anyway. Call me stubborn all you want, call me scummy for it, I really don't care.

I am not dismissing your wifom out of hand, I am dismissing it because it comes off as a poor excuse and I would have to believe in a million coincidences. My "wifom" actually has a well reasoned argument to it that points to suspicious behavior. For you to dismiss my wifom out of hand you have to admit that you are at fault for something. Being busy isn't a crime of course, but can you agree that it is very rare for you of all people to miss out on the end of a day phase like that? Or leave it to an hour remaining? Again my argument is complimenting you, because even if you had I know you would have been prepared enough to start setting up your lynch target way in advance. Moozer wasn't even a viable option for a lynch when you were suggesting it, and had little to no pressure. You were going to leave the day phase knowing you were busy to an hour remaining with no plan in place, just to lecture those who did vote, so a no lynch wouldn't happen. You don't see how that comes accross as scummy, or how you being there to vote immediately after the phase ends seems super convienent? And that you and pie (both the most active posters) both somehow missed the oppertunity to place a final vote, and then both convienently voted the exact same answer with 2 scum being on the wagon... There is no way your telling me these million coincidences aren't scummy, and that they happen to be just coincidences. 
...Really dude? A million coincidences? We both know that's an absurd framing, let's not kid ourselves. There's literally only one coincidence you called out and I telegraphed it openly. Also, let's not kid ourselves about my "missing out" on the end of the DP. I was on for the end of the DP. I didn't "miss out" on anything beyond getting my vote in before you hammered. I didn't even "miss out" on "setting up my lynch target way in advance," something that you actively sussed me for doing. And now you're sussing me for not doing it? What? In this case, what you're doing is characterizing me as someone who would never do this as town and that I somehow would do this as scum. I don't think that's a compliment, personally, but what do I know? Also, I'm really so done with this "convenient timing" argument. I posted two hours ahead of the end of the DP giving the precise time I would be available. I posted as soon as I was actually available. I sincerely do not give a fuck if you believe me.

The alternative to me voting owen was a no lynch, which everyone freaks out about is the worst thing town can do dp1, cerulean went into major analysis of why last phase, austin made a huge point about it in the endgame, and its something in general people agree is not a good thing. Imagine the one time I did advocate for a no lynch recently was in the last game. And I was scum. Now I participate in a lynch with dwindling time and you are using that against me? Sorry for not thinking that is the strongest argument. Especially when you yourself, one of the most active posters, somehow misses the opportunity to set up a better lynch target but is there immediately after the lynch takes place to vote on austins quiz and immediately close the thread. Like for you to cast a stone at me when I was openly not even scum reading own, when you had every oppertunity for 3 days to establish who you thought could be a better lynch, is beyond hypocritical.
I know what Cerulean said. I know what you were saying and what everyone else said about not wanting to no lynch. That still would have been my preference over lynching someone with a confirmable role in DP1. As for how we positioned ourselves at the end of the last DP, let's compare. I gave an extensive set of reads and directly sussed Moozer. It was confirmed by multiple people, but you keep leaving it out of these responses. Then, I said I would be offline for a little over an hour. During that hour, you hammered, but somehow it's my fault that I only returned to place that vote on Austin's quiz. Whatever. Your position, meanwhile, was to largely townread Owen throughout the DP, but still willingly hammer him in the end. It's the fact that you weren't scumreading him but still willing to do that that sets me off. I don't see the hypocrisy.

This is probably the most hypocritical part of your ENTIRE post. First thing it ignores the entire premise of "Role confirmation =/= Affiliation confirmation" Which was the ENTIRE moral of the last game. Being able to confirm yourself doesn't mean you are town. I proved that last game and several people brought that up this game. His role wasn't even why I was town reading him, I was town reading him entirely based on behavior and saying things like "How can I avoid this next time" and all his pleas to not be lynched seeming exactly like how he was town in his first game and got mislynched. But the hypocritical part is you are now doing what you are accusing me of doing, using your town read of owen to get town cred yourself, only you have the added benefit of having conveniently been absent for the most important part of the phase that forces you into a decision. 
So, let me get this straight. Because "Role confirmation =/= Affiliation confirmation" and we learned that lesson so well last game, the best choice we could possibly make this game is to immediately vote off the only claimed role confirmable player? Do I have that right? Also, my so-called "convenient absence" came well after I'd already said I was unwilling to vote Owen off. So, please, continue straw-manning me as though I'm somehow using my absence from the vote against you.

I have high standards for you as a player, because I have seen what you can do. I think you are one of the smartest mafia players we have on the site right now, and are more than capable of providing a strong case for a lynch on a player you want to get lynched, far enough in advance to you knowing you would be absent. Are you trying to tell me you wouldn't or couldn't do that? I don't think I am ignoring large swaths of anything.
*sigh* Again, I did provide my case for voting Moozer. It's there, in black and white, in a long set of reads that I posted last DP. I appreciate that you think highly of me, but why the fuck do you keep leaving out my reads and claiming they don't exist?

Tell me honestly. If I am scum, do you think I would be pursuing both of the hardest people to mislynch in the game, starting in day phase 1? You just saw me play as scum last game. Is my behavior in this game at all similar to that game, where I played it extremely safe every single day phase, and let town lead every single lynch on relatively safe targets to coast for a win? See where you are losing me is I know you see this, and you even mentioned town reading me for claiming a third role prevention role after two had already claimed. As scum I have a plethora of options to fake claim, not only do I claim without any real pressure, but I claim something that can be seen as scummy since there are other roles similar to mine in the game, and then I go on to pursue the two most active players in the game, and you have to somehow spin that I am doing all this with the intention to play as mafia the hardest way possible for literally 0 reason. And for all the talk about OMGUS its funny you are the one literally omgusing. My first post in the game I cast suspicion on you and pie, and I have been consistent with those reads all throughout the entire game. You actually town read me at one point, and seemingly only recently switched off of that town read when trying to use the owen lynch against me. If anyone is OMGUSing here, it's clearly you. 
Let's not kid ourselves, dude, this is exactly what you've done in previous games. It is not new for you to push this hard on me. Just because you didn't play this way last game doesn't mean you've never played this way as scum. Particularly in games when you're being actively scumread, you try to put that effort down as hard as you can. To your credit, you're not being as rude about it this time, but this is hardly a first, and I'm seeing a lot of whataboutism (seriously? I said I was scumreading you early in the DP and literally your first response was to call me out and VTL me) in your responses that looks awfully familiar. And yes, I was townreading you last DP for your softclaim. Things have changed based on your behavior since then, and I don't think an Ascetic claim makes you look particularly clean.

I don't think this works out for you the way you are hoping it will. Being stubborn for the sake of stubborness doesn't really fit town whiteflame's MO. Even I didn't play it this hard, and had a clear reason for not claiming dp1. I never really cared about your claim anyway though, asking for your claim is for the benefit of you trying to do something to prove that you aren't scum. I was scum reading you for behavior. You claiming was for the help of everyone else in town reading you. If you wanna die on this hill of your own making that's on you.
See, it's responses like this that have me most on edge about you. You keep saying all these things I don't normally do. OK, I have a history as both town and scum. Where, as scum, have I shown this degree of stubbornness? Also, I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'm not dying on this hill. That doesn't mean that your vote alone is going to sway me. If enough people want my claim, I'll claim.
Casey_Risk
Casey_Risk's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 830
3
3
8
Casey_Risk's avatar
Casey_Risk
3
3
8
-->
@Lunatic
EBWOP
I've been playing this game for over three months now and I'm still learning new things. What does this mean? 
Cerulean
Cerulean's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 217
0
2
4
Cerulean's avatar
Cerulean
0
2
4
This game will have a special additional mechanic: upon a player's death, a post-accident report will be conducted to determine the cause of the accident. (OP of the signups thread)
Do we not have a report for Casey's death? The way this was phrased made me think it applies to every death.

 He was also clearly the wrong choice, (WF)
Then you should have said something sooner? I thought he was scum giving up by the end. He was still up there even before you left.

Considering how little we got (the existence of a scum JOAT) (WF)
I do have thoughts about the info we get. It's possible that the information isn't necessarily based on the consensus answer, but rather the proportion of correct answers. Thinking of it this way- if we got the right answer 5-3 vs. 8-0, we might get more information from that 8-0. So it's possible that 2 could have been correct, but because only half the game was on it, the info wasn't entirely useful.

It might be worthwhile, this phase, for everyone to stack on a single choice. We let someone towny be the one to answer and everyone else bandwagons. The idea there is that either we get very useful information that confirms we were correct, or we essentially get worthless information that, at the very least, confirms the answer we picked was wrong.

He hedged a lot in his last post, saying that he saw him as town, but that he was the best of a set of bad options. (WF)
This is a very bad look for Lunatic, in my opinion. There were 40 minutes left in the phase. There's absolutely no reason to hammer that early when WF explicitly asked for more time, especially if you think it's wrong. It's just bad form.

The only option was that Lunatic was trying to draw the lynch on to him because he knew he had a really good legacy role. (Moozer)
Is this a real thought...? The legacy ability would have to be insane.

You were there IMMEDIATELY to answer how many scum were on the wagon. You don’t just let the day phase go on til 1 hour remaining and not vote. (Lunatic)
Do you need a timeline? Here's a timeline:
424 at 8:52 PM: WF says he's starting a class in "about 10 minutes" (9:00 PM, presumably) and that he'll "be on that for an hour" (until 10:00 PM, presumably)
495 at 9:57 PM: Lynch happens
504 at 10:04 PM: WF comes back
(Times are in my timezone, of course. The principle remains the same.)

There was no reason to expect to come back and see Day already over because there would have been half an hour left. WF probably already pointed this out, but I'm a bit steamed about making an honest-to-god activity read because you couldn't bother to be patient.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Lunatic
Bullsh1t. That wasn't my point at all and you know it. My point was that as town you would be more willing to look at moozer equally as being town. While I did use the word "passive" in context it meant something different as to what you are trying to spin it as. This is what I said: 

"Not nearly as passive as he usually feels to me, I feel like hes making a mountain out of a molehill with the moozer claim. It piggy backing off of pie who feels scummy to me, makes me less sure about him. Usually whiteflame is much better at catchign scum slips, this doesn't feel like a slip though on moozer part. I just don't like the read, and it doesn't feel like town whiteflame to me."

This clearly indicates that I was scum reading you for not trying to weigh both options, something that I felt you would do as town. And I didn't use the word lazy at all. You adding that for a bit of mis-direction is amusing though. 
You actually did use the word "lazy" here. You also said "opportunistic." So then your point was that I should have equivocated more on Moozer... but you're simultaneously frustrated that I didn't have a vote on him (which is where it would have been) at the end of the DP? Not helping your point.

Now that we know I didn't say the "lazy part" it makes sense yeah? You were super aggressive with moozer but not there for the entirety of the last day phase to push a case on him? Seems a lot like my theory about you trying to make town look bad by mislynching so you can cast blame on them, meanwhile you were literally posting multiple times during the last day. But just because I think you would weigh both the town and scum option of someone doesn't mean I think you would avoid making a decision entirely. 
Again, you're calling me out for not posting a vote, which would have been inherently aggressive (especially since, by that point, I would have been trying for a lynch) while acknowledging that it was my "super aggressive" response to Moozer that set you off in the first place? Really?

So for you not to be scum reading ana the claimed roleblocker, I am guessing your "theory" is going to have something to do with a redirector being in play
I have a pretty strong behavioral townread on Banana, but I'm willing to at least consider her. Notably, I've been distracted today and my posts have been focused on you and whether I should claim, so I haven't had time for much else.


whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Cerulean
Then you should have said something sooner? I thought he was scum giving up by the end. He was still up there even before you left.
I did say something, once in my reads and once in response to Casey about Owen. Didn't change anything, didn't expect it would since everyone seemed so gung ho about it.

I do have thoughts about the info we get. It's possible that the information isn't necessarily based on the consensus answer, but rather the proportion of correct answers. Thinking of it this way- if we got the right answer 5-3 vs. 8-0, we might get more information from that 8-0. So it's possible that 2 could have been correct, but because only half the game was on it, the info wasn't entirely useful.

It might be worthwhile, this phase, for everyone to stack on a single choice. We let someone towny be the one to answer and everyone else bandwagons. The idea there is that either we get very useful information that confirms we were correct, or we essentially get worthless information that, at the very least, confirms the answer we picked was wrong.
It's worth considering. We can at least try to figure it out and see if we can get some insight into what the information we have indicates.

This is a very bad look for Lunatic, in my opinion. There were 40 minutes left in the phase. There's absolutely no reason to hammer that early when WF explicitly asked for more time, especially if you think it's wrong. It's just bad form.

Do you need a timeline? Here's a timeline:
424 at 8:52 PM: WF says he's starting a class in "about 10 minutes" (9:00 PM, presumably) and that he'll "be on that for an hour" (until 10:00 PM, presumably)
495 at 9:57 PM: Lynch happens
504 at 10:04 PM: WF comes back
(Times are in my timezone, of course. The principle remains the same.)

There was no reason to expect to come back and see Day already over because there would have been half an hour left. WF probably already pointed this out, but I'm a bit steamed about making an honest-to-god activity read because you couldn't bother to be patient.
Thank you. Sincerely, this has been so frustrating to argue about.
Casey_Risk
Casey_Risk's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 830
3
3
8
Casey_Risk's avatar
Casey_Risk
3
3
8
-->
@whiteflame
@Cerulean
Whiteflame, Cerulean, I have a question for both of you. I want you both to take a step back and consider everything as objectively as possible. Who are your top scumreads right now? 
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Casey_Risk
Whiteflame, Cerulean, I have a question for both of you. I want you both to take a step back and consider everything as objectively as possible. Who are your top scumreads right now? 
You have really good timing, I was just starting to type that out.

It might be a poor assumption, but considering the info we got from Austin about Mafia having a JOAT (I'd categorize that as pretty weak info), I think we can at least assume that there were one or zero scum on the lynch. We know you're not scum. I don't believe Earth is scum, nor am I convinced on Banana, though given that she and Moozer apparently had the same target in Pie, that may complicate things. I don't believe Cerulean is scum (I honestly just don't buy that he'd go that hard on someone who was going to flip town, and his posts this DP have me at least putting him in null territory), which means Luna is my top scumread among those on the lynch.

As for off of it, that leaves me, Moozer, and Pie. I frankly just don't believe it's Pie. He's still only a very slight townread for me, mainly because I could see a world in which he is the target of multiple night actions whether he's scum or town, but the apparent Silencing points to scum activity against him. Maybe he's faking it. It's unusual for someone who is Silenced to have so many posts (usually, they're very limited in the number of votes they can cast), but I also don't think Austin's used this role before, so I can see him just getting an unlimited number of votes. So in part, I trust Pie's continued scumread of Moozer, and in part, I recognize that Moozer's given himself an alibi for visiting Pie that just rubs me the wrong way. I'm not sure why he'd townread Pie in particular.

whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,686
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
All that being said, I know that means the scum team would be the same as last time, and I'm not banking on that. If I had to pick, it would be Moozer I'd lynch this DP. In spite of all the back-and-forth with Luna, I can much more readily see a world in which he was town than I could Moozer.
Cerulean
Cerulean's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 217
0
2
4
Cerulean's avatar
Cerulean
0
2
4
-->
@Earth
@whiteflame
@ILikePie5
You have stated that you have a legacy role that activates on death, likely after an NK. I know that's how my legacy role works, so I'm not sure why you'd believe that Luna could use his legacy role if he was lynched. (WF)
It could be different from person to person. Owen's legacy says "after you die," so it probably applies to both NK and lynch. Mine does as well.

And you are silenced, I presume? (Earth)

Looks like it. That would explain why scum didn't kill Pie. (WF)
That's a possible role? We allow roles that inflict vote-only here?? Horrifying, and also frankly insulting that scum didn't even think I'm that threatening.

I picked randomly from my pile of town reads because we didn’t have many claims that had night actions. (Moozer)
Moozer, who do you not think is Town at the moment? I don't feel like I have a good understanding of where you're at, and it looks like you disappeared after this post.

Also, point of clarification- is it correct that a lynch only happens if majority is reached? As in, if the Day ends and one wagon is leading, but doesn't have majority (just plurality), they would survive?
Casey_Risk
Casey_Risk's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 830
3
3
8
Casey_Risk's avatar
Casey_Risk
3
3
8
-->
@Cerulean
Also, point of clarification- is it correct that a lynch only happens if majority is reached? As in, if the Day ends and one wagon is leading, but doesn't have majority (just plurality), they would survive?
Generally speaking, yes, that is how it works. 
Cerulean
Cerulean's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 217
0
2
4
Cerulean's avatar
Cerulean
0
2
4
-->
@Moozer325
Let me finish backreading and I'll collect my thoughts.

To win right now, we need a POE of 3 that contains both scum, so I'll start there.

(Also, Moozer, I forgot to ping you in my last post- read that.)
Cerulean
Cerulean's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 217
0
2
4
Cerulean's avatar
Cerulean
0
2
4
-->
@Casey_Risk
Generally speaking, yes, that is how it works. 
Very annoying, but okay. That does explains Lunatic's rationale about WF and Pie a little bit more.
Cerulean
Cerulean's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 217
0
2
4
Cerulean's avatar
Cerulean
0
2
4
-->
@Lunatic
@iamanabanana
had a confirmable role, notably something scant few people have claimed to have. (WF)
But not a confirmable alignment, which we've discussed.

The alternative to me voting owen was a no lynch, which everyone freaks out about is the worst thing town can do dp1, cerulean went into major analysis of why last phase, (Lunatic)
Did you think the phase ended at XX:00 instead of XX:30? Because unless it's specifically that, then the alternative to you voting Owen there was waiting to vote.

You just saw me play as scum last game. Is my behavior in this game at all similar to that game, where I played it extremely safe every single day phase, and let town lead every single lynch on relatively safe targets to coast for a win?

Being stubborn for the sake of stubborness doesn't really fit town whiteflame's MO
Calling people who know- are these accurate characterizations to typical scum!Lunatic and town!Whiteflame?

I'll add my vote to whiteflame. I don't see why he is any more special than the rest of us who have claimed.

VTL whiteflame
Banana, can you give me a shout on where you're at reads-wise right now? You appear to be in lockstep with Lunatic.
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,793
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
Very annoying, but okay. That does explains Lunatic's rationale about WF and Pie a little bit more.
It’s extremely rare that we no lynch here, the last game was probably the first time that’s happened in a while. I will respond to your analysis of you taking whiteflames side about his activity not being suspicious last phase, but in good faith I’d ask you to go read through previous EODs on dp1 and see how many times you see either of them not take part of a lynch, let alone let it come down to a hour remaining in the phase. Then ask yourself why it would be different this time, when there is a mechanic that literally can hurt scum by them simply being on the lynch. 
Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 8,793
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Cerulean
Meant to tag tou