PART 3/3
11. Savant/Mharman RVS voted each other. Savant goes ballistic over votes on him (you've seen it before), and he also RVS voted me when we were scum together.
I voted Savant because last game, someone mentioned a meme where he dies first every DP1. It was purely a joke. And how is Savant returning the joke “going ballistic over an RVS”?
12. Despite allegedly "sussing" Savant, Mharman did NOTHING to push Savant D1.
Here I voted Savant and pushed for his lynch: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/11342/posts/458723
Here’s where I hard scumread Savant and only decided to vote Austin because others in town were thinking Savant was town, and Austin was a good compromise: https://www.debateart.com/members/Mharman/forum-posts?page=3
Final reads before a hammer (SIDE NOTE: There’s a reason why I wanted to get those out before someone hammered…it’s almos like, hear me out, I was thinking I’d be killed in the night): https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/11342/posts/458871
Literally the hardest push I could’ve possibly made: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/11342-ace-attorney-mafia-dp1?page=29&post_number=861
13. Savant's progression is implausible. He said I was a townread, then voted me based on alleged mechanical reasons that make no sense.
Reads can change. This is irrelevant.
15. Also Savant demonstrated either a bad-faith push or a failure of basic probability when he said the chances I choose three town aligned players d1 is less than 50% (which has nothing to do with the chance of my alignment)
Fair point, but now that we’re discussing the likelihood of your role, I don’t care about Savant misreading probability. Also if Savant were scum, I guarantee he’d double check his probability claims before posting.
16. Savant and Mharman have zero genuine interactions. Read the day.
This is entirely subjective. Everything I said was a reaction to Savant being confirmed, as I saw it.
Also, if we're talking character analysis here, Maya/Mia/Pearl are all Fey members and I fail to see a themesplit that would only include Maya but not the others.
So my speculation based on evidence is irrational, yet yours based on absolutely nothing is valid? Lol. Why does Austin need to make so many reaches to defend himself?
Lol at Mharman's mental gymnastics. Apparently I decided to immediately fakeclaim Dreamer, draw attention to myself D1, resolve several slots as town, retract to avoid a mislynch even though I easily could have chained two if I was scum, then fake having no results N1 even though I was widely townread and could easily have gotten another mislynch off fake results, all as part of an scum gambit to... put myself in POE and locktown several players.
“I’m the deuteraonist! No way I could be scum!”
“I’m Maya Fey in a game with others Feys! No way it’s me!”
“I ‘cleared slots’ and generated activity! No way I faked anything!”
LOL. First of all, when you made your “gambit” as obvious as it was, you undermined it. You cleared nothing; it took the outing of last night’s results to actually clear Savant. For Wylted, it took his confusion, which didn’t take any effor from you and wasn’t related to your dreamer claim. For Lunatic, he claimed after town mass pushed. I don’t think putting someone in the POE hoping town would mass push for their claim is in the mind of a townie pulling this crap. Even then, Lunatic wasn’t confirmed and could’ve been scumread later today if I didn’t confirm him.
Furthermore, you breaded, and then claimed it was a gambit AFTER town started to wonder it you were gambiting, and all three people in your pool had people thinking they were town. If some of those people were scummread and your “gambit” wasn’t sussed out, you EASILY could have gotten a few mislynches off it, instead of falling back on the whole “it’s a gambit” thing that town convinced itself of.
Also, you said you wanted to disrupt scum by forcing resources out of them… what would look more townie then not having any because you’re plan somehow miraculously worked to perfection?
And let’s talk mental gymnastics:
-Being one of three investigative roles is fine, but being the only protective role is somehow a fake claim, because I made the same appeal to it that a DIFFERENT PERSON, playing in a DIFFERENT GAME, under DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES did the same thing.
-Somehow, the long, detailed post of a thought process that matches perfectly with everything I said and did the last two phases is a retroactive justification, but a way-too-obvious “gambit” that the rest of town gave you an easy out on, isn’t, because “muh generated activity.”
-Somehow, Savant and I are scum and faking a redirector, while Earth isn’t lying about the role that counters a redirector.
Mharman's actions are dripping with scum agenda. I've been hard townsiding all game. Lynch that scumbag.
Very impatient of you, after I said I was willing to wait on you earlier, and after you said quicklynching you was scummy.
Looks like you were fearing this rebuttal that I promised.
“Two-six, we don't at n****s, we get at n****s
Shoot a n**** lights out, yeah, my dogs stat fillers
Stat stuffers, triple-double, get your ass black duffled
Body bag, body bag, body bag”