I am more Pro Israel, looking to debate a Pro-Palestine/Anti-Israel/Anti-Zionist
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 20,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Lay it all out on the table for me. Say why you support one side, I’ll say why I support the other. I don’t mind if you get nasty or even call me names, just understand that I will regardless. Looking foward!
WIKIPEDIA:"During the Israel–Hamas war of 2023–2024, EU nations accused Hamas of using hospitals as human shields, while the UN Secretary General said "Hamas and other militants use civilians as human shields".[12][13] In 2023, HRW said that "Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups need to take all feasible precautions to protect civilians under their control from the effects of attacks and not use civilians as 'human shields.'"[14] In 2024, HRW reported at least two incidents where Palestinian fighters appear to have used Israeli hostages as human shields during the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel.[15] According to the New York Times, some Gazans showed opposition to their usage as human shields by Hamas and some have refused the entry of militants to some shelters.[16]” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_human_shields_by_Hamas)
how i refer this dark night to dawn
"The worst thing is the sense of being a stranger in your own land and feeling that not a single part of it is yours"
"In Gaza (sub-occupied by Israel and remains of Palestine)"
even sometimes they consider humans as sub-humans . but the thing is that their ideology is the disaster for not only themselves but for whole mankind.....
- In Israel, healthcare for Palestinian patients receiving medical treatment exists. In Gaza, it does not.
- In Israel, job opportunities for Palestinian workers exist. In Gaza, it does not
- Israeli universities offer educational opportunities for Palestinian students. In Gaza, they do not.
- Humanitarian aid is provided by Israeli soldiers and the IDF during emergencies or a crisis. But Palestinian soldiers never give aid to Israeli citizens, they only bomb them intentionally and then cry victim when Israel retaliates...
- Wix, Mobileye, Checkpoint, CyberArk, PillCam, the Israeli cancer vaccine, Netafim, the first drip irrigation system, Fiverr, El Al airlines, and the other top Israeli companies
- Israel is the ONLY democracy in the Middle East.
- Were Israel to fall, G-d forbid, the next target would be America. (Houthi’s literal slogan is “Death to Israel, death to America.”)
- Other Muslim counties have been more of a strain in the world than Israel has. Muslims tend to invade Western countries and impose or attempt to impose the Sharia law which they have just fled, whereas Israelis tend to assimilate into the culture more or at the very least, they don’t force others to be Jewish or like them.
leaders of Israel don't see the reality and r drunk becoz of unlimited foreign contribution in invading of Palestine and their slogans r to destroy the reamings of Palestine
Wix, CyberArk , Israeli cancer vaccine , Fiverr ..... other top Israeli companies ....... Israel is the ONLY democracy in the Middle East......do u think its means Israel have right to kill humans ......... SocraticGregarian awake up , what's going to ,
Muslims tend to invade Western countries and impose or attempt to impose the Sharia law , .......
Jews r bad , fu** ppl ugly , low level humans ,they r evil , Due to jews we Europe suffers alot ....
" Islamic-militants r wronge and by wronge ( i know u know who is that wronge ) , these militants r much bad for Islam and for Muslims and then to others "but only if u know the ground reality
Pro argues that the actions of Hamas justify an Israeli response, as well as a pro-Zionist argument, using the Bible as a source to argue that the Palestinians have no right to the land in which they live. Whatever the merits of the latter argument, Con's responses were nearly incomprehensible. One can gather that Con is arguing that Israel is a settler-colonial project which has committed many atrocities. But Pro made the more coherent argument, used actual data points rather than just opinion, and did a better job responding to Con's points. That, plus the alarming level of grammar from the other side, gives the debate to Pro.
I don’t mean to be rude, but what are your responses supposed to mean exactly? They’re almost completely incomprehensible.
Alright, I made the debate.
I would be willing to argue for the proposition "Palestinians should have their own country". It seems like you oppose that, though I could be mistaken.
We could also do something about Israel's conduct in the war, though morality debates are tricky.
Or something generally political, not necessarily about Israel.
"I believe countries that expel Jews tend to also cite reasons for it...Such as accusing them of economic parasitism, disloyalty, undermining the government or culture, blood libel, and so on.”
I don’t disagree. Let’s look at some examples throughout history of where and why Jews have been expelled. (And no, I didn’t cherrypick the ones that fit a pro-Israel narrative, I asked ChatGPT to pick a diverse myriad of countries)
England (1290): Jews were expelled under King Edward I due to economic resentment and anti-Semitic myths.
France (1306, 1394): Expelled to cancel debts and confiscate property, fueled by Catholic anti-Jewish sentiment.
Spain (1492): The Alhambra Decree forced Jews to convert or leave, driven by the Inquisition and Catholic unification.
Portugal (1496): Expelled under royal pressure for religious conformity.
Russia/Soviet Union (19th–20th centuries): Pogroms and restrictive laws targeted Jews under nationalism and anti-Semitism. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Soviet_Union)
Middle Eastern Countries (20th century): The Arab-Israeli conflict led to Jewish expulsions after 1948.
"I would be happy to debate about something, I don't know exactly what. I'm not really pro-Palestine or anti-Zionist though. I just oppose prejudice against any ethnic group, including Palestinians.”
We could debate about Palestinian vs. Jewish expulsion; although, I believe I’ve already proved my points, so maybe we should debate something else.
" your arguments gave me a headache, but I won't waste my time proving them wrong in a comment section honestly.”
I’ll offer you the same proposal as I did my opponent, AnonYmous_Icon: if you are going to say my arguments suck, then you’ve gotta to tell my why and how. My opponent has not done this, but hopefully you will.
"You are being inconsiderate with your sources, the UN you stated spoke against Hammas spoke against Israel and it's acts as well, you could have been fair and brought that out too.”
You are unclear here. What are you referencing in regard to the UN?
The UN is pretty antisemitic and even they admit that Hamas uses Palestinians as Human Shields; that was my point when I cited them as a source. I don’t understand what else you wanted me to mention.
Ouch, ouch, OUCH! My head hurt me, you really like one sided arguments, don't you? I wish I found this debate first, your arguments gave me a headache, but I won't waste my time proving them wrong in a comment section honestly. Just one critique though, You are being inconsiderate with your sources, the UN you stated spoke against Hammas spoke against Israel and it's acts as well, you could have been fair and brought that out too. But I guess picking a side forces one to hide anything that don't support their ideology, no?
I believe countries that expel Jews tend to also cite reasons for it other than "We hate Jews". Such as accusing them of economic parasitism, disloyalty, undermining the government or culture, blood libel, and so on.
I would be happy to debate about something, I don't know exactly what. I'm not really pro-Palestine or anti-Zionist though. I just oppose prejudice against any ethnic group, including Palestinians.
If I were truly lying, as you allege, then please outline what I have lied about in your final Debate argument.
I think you're winning this debate so far.
by all ur statements i realize that u r strongly influenced by Jews propaganda and then Zionist ideologies ,
truth is not in Jews neither Zionist , not in Muslims nor Christians
do u know Y i don't say something , becoz i see u caged ur self in some imaginary cage that is created by liars of some ideology
u never find the truth in any cage of anyone , truth is independent u need to understand that
u need to consider ur self as a human not a puppet of any religion/ideology
then u see truth is not what ppl of ideology/religion taught u
do u know ur a person , who am i when i'm child ,
whatever u say is a childish words , uncaged ur-self from and become free thinker
OUR BELOVED SOCRATES DON'T BELIVE IN FAKE GODS
"The Palestinians have been kicked out of every country they've ever been a part of" as an argument for the inherent evil of Palestinians is a dangerous one to make."
I made that argument to show that they are a group that causes trouble wherever they go, hence why they end up getting kicked out. Read my first argument and you will see explicitly the kind of trouble that they cause in the countries that exile them
"Especially when you apply the same logic to the other side.”
This is the differentiation that you fail to see.
Historically, when the Palestinians are expelled from a country, (as I talk about at length in my first argument) it’s because they have lead revolts, caused wars, take terrorists' side in a civil war, are terrorists themselves and because they are a social and economic burden on the country. Jordan, Kuwait, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan are all countries that have expelled and refuse to absorb Palestinians.
When Jews are expelled from a country, it’s usually because they are Jewish, and that particular country sees Jews as inferior. Take, for example, when Spain expelled its Jewish population in 1492 through the Alhambra Decree by Ferdinand and Isabella. The Spanish monarchs wanted Catholicism. So, they forced Jews to either convert to Christianity or leave the kingdom.
Want to debate about it?
If I’ve lied, then point it out. In fact, I point out some of your lies in my third argument.
"The Palestinians have been kicked out of every country they've ever been a part of" as an argument for the inherent evil of Palestinians is a dangerous one to make. Especially when you apply the same logic to the other side.
u r a good liar , i'm not good as u r
but i try to learn to make a lies like u