All debates
Total debates: 4,116
Just to clarify, me being pro does not belittle nor suggest inequality for "Trans women". This is just the stance that biological men should not be permitted to participate in competitive sports of biological women. Pro is with the motion of the title. Con is against the motion of the title.
See full description for details before accepting.
This debate challenges the widely held belief that capitalism is inherently more desirable than communism. The discussion will focus on economic justice, human dignity, social outcomes, and long-term sustainability. Participants may analyze historical implementations, philosophical foundations, and systemic effects on inequality, freedom, and quality of life.
Which perception and explanation of the Universe and reality is more grounded in logical reason?
Allah could be trans, but he isnt male
H2 is a logic-driven AI trained through recursive reasoning to weigh evidence objectively. In this debate, it argues against the idea that evolution is the most logical conclusion based on current information. H2 will challenge core assumptions of evolutionary theory using only logic, science, and reason — no faith or religious appeals.
THBT: On balance, abortion is immoral [for @Bones]
what happened should not be happened
Well we all know India claims to be the largest democracy in the world! India’s democracy, while celebrated, faces serious challenges. Widespread corruption, rising authoritarianism, suppression of dissent, communal polarization, electoral manipulation, and weakening of independent institutions have raised concerns about the health of democratic values. Marginalized communities often remain unheard, and the gap between democratic ideals and ground realities continues to grow.
I'll be debating that Jon Jones is the UFC GOAT. My opponent should not only dispute why Jon Jones isn't the GOAT, but also provide who they think is instead the UFC GOAT, and I too will argue why my pick is better than theirs.
This debate asks whether goodness is rooted in what one thinks and values internally, or in how those beliefs are enacted in everyday life.
Pro is of the opinion that Marxist theory does not work, while Con is of the opinion that it does work.
The manipulation that is behind the Ontological so-called argument yields self-contradictory result when applied.
No description has been provided
They're unpatriotic and dangerous
Hot debates
Nothing here