All debates
Total debates: 3,851
You have to argue that the opponent is a better debater. Why? Because I'm bored and it's April 1st
Use any economic indicator you want. I won't provide a metric for "negative economic effect" because I leave that up to the debater. You can choose your own metric, but you will need to defend why it is a better metric than the ones I will use. Metrics should be used up to the date when this debate is accepted. When I say "so far" I mean up to the time when someone accepts this challenge.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
To clear things up, I am for censorship in this case-scenario. Noticed some confusion in the comments.
Formal debate on Mandatory Vaccination. I am Pro on this matter.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Under the conditions where we are now, the socialism or even better, communism would be the most effective way to solve our global problems
Its impossible for me to lose this debate.
U've to justify the restriction of a debater from debating platform
**For Hero1000 Only** God: a perfectly good, omnipotent and omniscient being that created the universe. Please note that neither side has to prove that god is real or not, you just have to make a case that your side is more probable than the other.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Hot debates
Nothing here