Total topics: 3
First is HR 698: this is Biden’s ‘assault weapons’ ban which would effectively disarm the American people by banning the sale of AR-15s and hundreds of similar rifles.
This bill already has 205 cosponsors. 218 are needed to pass the bill in the House. And we KNOW there are RINOs who will vote for this if it gets to the floor.
If this legislation passes, we’ll never get these guns back
Second is H.R. 715; this is Biden’s attempt to criminalize the private sale of firearms in America and institute a national firearms registry, so the feds know which Americans own guns.
This bill also has 205 cosponsors. But it’s extra dangerous in that the lead sponsor is a RINO traitor (Brian Fitzpatrick, R-PA) which makes it far easier to pass the GOP controlled House.
We all know the purpose of this bill: to facilitate future gun confiscation.
Third is H.R. 2392; this is Biden’s legislation to mandate significant waiting periods before the American people can buy firearms. Criminals would ignore this, of course.
Remember 2020’s ‘mostly peaceful protests’ where we saw mobs of protestors burn, shoot, and murder their way across American cities? Imagine being unable to buy a gun during that time?
Waiting periods get innocent people killed. Period.
If one of these bills passes, it would be a disaster. If all three of these bills pass, it would mean the end of America as we know it because ‘We the People’ would be disarmed!
The Left knows this, and they are going ‘all in’ on these bills.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The stupid shit democrats say about firearms is idiotic and proves their ignorance.
Gun grabbers saying even more stupid shit.
Short answers debunking gun control arguments.
Ending school and church shootings (among other places), END GUN FREE ZONES!
The media refuses to cover armed law abiding citizens who ended a potential mass shooting situation.
Gun control is the WRONG SOLUTION
CNN gun control advocate gets SMOKED in interview!
Discuss.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
- Why was someone who blatantly is affiliated with white supremacists (ones whom paid instantly to get him bail and have been socialising with him frequently before and after he was inititally arrested) at a BLM protest? If he was there to 'defend' then who was it who requested a 17-year-old to carry an AR-15 across state lines in order to 'defend' something? Isn't requesting that illegal?
- Why did he murder Rosenbaum? I am aware of the things Rosenbaum has been found guilty of and that he was very high asking to be shot but nobody in their right mind would presume that the right action would be to literally kill him just because he's asking to be shot.
- Do you agree that if (and it is the case that) the 'mob' only set on Rittenhouse after the Rosenbaum murder on an unarmed man, then it suddenly becomes much clearer who was the fundamental attacker vs defender in the aggression that ensued. Huber was proactively trying to get Rittenhouse to disarm and not escape so thata) he can't go on to murder any othersb) cops could arrive before he's gotten away, to arrest him for the Rosenbaum murder
- After he'd also murdered Huber instead of surrendering, what exactly is he using as his moral high ground?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics