Total votes: 20
FF by opponent
Other person ff
I think, the last round arguement where pro did not have any chance to response should not be considered for victory and pro having good condition let him win. I am giving win to pro based on his food conduct and as he was up there to have any argument but could not do because of FF of his opponent.
Con:
Very tough debate, con argue about banning abortion, it would have been better if he would claim that abortion should be banned partially. What he was claiming, it would be better to ban it partially because it seems the stance of con in debate.
He argued about that some pregnancies are dangerous to carry. It's true, but tbh honest endangered pregnancies abort on its own most of times.
And abortion should be allowed in that case which I think is good point from con.
Pro:
A lot of good arguemnts.
1
Fetus also feels pain, while we protect animals right to not be harmed then how come infant human life and pain felt by him is not important to considered.
2
When wanted pregnancy is ends is tradegy then how come unwanted is not? In both cases a human soul is lost.
3
If someone is physically or financially unstable then adoption and government care is available so this should not be concerned.
4
Male partner should also have say as he is parent too.
5
Physiological impact of killing your own baby. Probably becuse or guilt. A good arguemnt.
It suggest a person kills her own child.
Conclusion:
It's very hard but I would give to pro, if con would have argued about partial ban and not allowing it all together he could win easily . While it seems the case which con was defending.
I would give it a tie, seems both agree on same tbint.
Con left the debate
Con left the debate
Complete FF on both sides
Complete FF by con
FF by con for all rounds
Conduct point because of pro ff