All of law abiding America, everyone will support Donald Trump.
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Send a message for questions on the topic.
Please do not accept if you foresee yourself not having time to participate.
I think, the last round arguement where pro did not have any chance to response should not be considered for victory and pro having good condition let him win. I am giving win to pro based on his food conduct and as he was up there to have any argument but could not do because of FF of his opponent.
Giving it to CON for the simple reason that they made arguments and PRO didn’t.
CON did mention actual problems with PRO’s proposed resolution such as there being law abiding citizens who wont and haven’t vote for Trump and that Trump himself is a felon but the main issue is how this debate unfolded.
Even if CON forfeited the last round and didn’t say anything it would be a tie since PRO didn’t take advantage and decided to ask random survey questions which looked like PRO was trying to conduct an interview not a debate. If PRO said anything related to the topic I would have considered that only and not the last round of CON.
Im not too familiar with the site policy so moderators can decide if this is a last round sweep or it’s unfair of CON to post something in the last round only.
Either way, even if PRO couldn’t respond to CON in the last round I have nothing to compare it to from PROs side since he also didn’t present anything before the last round assuming CON wont show up at all.
Since Con only published arguments in the last round, Pro was unable to address Con's points. For this reason, I will entirely dismiss the final round's arguments.
thanks!
But you can only do it when its your turn to post round.
Just click on publish argument, then write an argument, scroll down, click preview then click post.
bro i can’t figure out how to put in the arguement thing so it keeps forfeiting me… anyone know how to and willing to help?
This is one of those debates where Con can forfeit all rounds and Pro still cant reasonably win.
I don't think it's going to be that bad. In this country, it's very hard to do something like that without being stopped.
That doesn't make any sense. Even if Trump turns out to be a good president, he's never going to be supported by everyone. No president has ever been 100% approved.
Well he might make it illegal to not...