Instigator / Pro
Mall's avatar
0
Mall
1420
rating
398
debates
44.1%
won
Topic
#5806

All of law abiding America, everyone will support Donald Trump.

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Tags
Trump
government
laws
political
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
bellagraceeee's avatar
0
bellagraceeee
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Send a message for questions on the topic.

Please do not accept if you foresee yourself not having time to participate.

Round 1
Mall's avatar
Mall
Pro
#1
Before we proceed, I'm taking a survey on serious participants.

What drove you to accept to debate this topic?

What was or is your impression on this matter?


bellagraceeee's avatar
bellagraceeee
Con
#2
Forfeited
Round 2
Mall's avatar
Mall
Pro
#3
Come on come on.
bellagraceeee's avatar
bellagraceeee
Con
#4
Forfeited
Round 3
Mall's avatar
Mall
Pro
#5
Will the real debaters stand up?

Will the real ones come forward?
bellagraceeee's avatar
bellagraceeee
Con
#6
Forfeited
Round 4
Mall's avatar
Mall
Pro
#7
Joke.
bellagraceeee's avatar
bellagraceeee
Con
#8
I'm terribly sorry for leaving you waiting; I've unfortunately been having some technical difficulties. And that is unfair to you as a person looking for a good debate. Thus, I will try and give some arguments even though I don't know what yours are. Maybe put it in the comments?

My arguments against your claim that all law-abiding Americans would support Donald Trump are as such:
1. As a law-abiding American, I do not support Donald Trump. It is wrong to make a statement assuming the beliefs and viewpoints of groups of people without word from their mouth or valid evidence. I do not understand how you can say that I, as well as all other Kamala supporters that follow the law are guarrunteed to support Trump.

2. Trump is an accused felon and criminal on 88 counts - 34 of which are federal crimes convicted and followed through legally in court. To say that law-abiding people would vote for and support a person who is not a law-abiding person contradicts the basis of the statement; any individual of morality will not support someone who does not have morality. 

3.  Someone's class or legal history does not dictate their ability to support or not support people. It's like saying that all cat ladies will like Taylor Swift; you cannot prove support of the individual based on the character or actions of the one being judged.

To answer the questions you asked in the first round, I accepted this debate because I come from a family of divided politics, and I would very much enjoy a peaceful conversation about politics. My impressions on this matter was that there was a claim that could not be justified in my right mind. I looked forward to seeing where you came from with the claim.

I kept this short to help make this more fair, even though that is far from possible. I hope you understand, and maybe would be interested in redoing the debate now that I've solved my technical difficulties? I was looking forward to learning from each other and helping the listeners to see both sides, but alas. Thanks for chilling a while...