I've read over Roy's argument for pro and I feel Con should be near impossible to win. Of course, Raisor could do it, but again, not even Orogami stands a chance against Raisor in any topic that's not entertainment.
I think the main problem with opponents of transgender is that they mistake gender for gender identity and vice versa. They think Transgender people are trying to philosophically conclude whether they are male, female, or a third gender, while in reality it's a belief similar to religion, that should be respected.
I’m surprised you resorted to using science to refute philosophy. That shouldn’t be necessary. I am not saying transgender is wrong, I am saying it has inconsistencies with a belief mindset (as your sources say it can depend on your brain’s birth state, but some think it is fluid... )
What’s your thought on this? It’s not that it’s bad for society, or science, but rather, on a metaphysical logical realm, it starts to fall apart (similar to a religion)
re-reading the debate, I thought of something interesting. Is it possible for me to manipulate the resolution in any way? Some kind of "failure is the mother of success" kind of thing? Where I prove because we are finding all this fraud and getting rid of it, improves quality of education?
I had trouble linking a second study I found to support the first study. Here it is. I'll re mention it in the last round, but know that there was more than one that added to the 92 % statistics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727534/
thanks for the debate. It helped even further boost my essay. I didn't realize I forgot to stress precisely how deadly it was, or how it was unique compared to other instances of Environment harm. I can't find a good place to insert Unique vs Alcohol, but it definitely helps to think about it.
- Smoking Should be Criminalized (pro)
- Gun Control Should be Tightened in the US (con)
- On Balance Social Media has positive effect on Teenage users' mental health (pro)
- Gay Marriage Should be Legalized (pro)
- Table Tennis is the most enjoyable Asian sport (pro)
- We Should Colonize Mars by 2100 (pro)
- On Balance Charter Schools are Beneficial to Quality of Education (pro)
- Abortion Should be Banned With Exception of Maternal Life (con)
that's kind of the point lol. My usual style isn't this reckless but I thought it was worth a try when Oromagi's own definition gave Con the one out of million chance to give some kind of case.
oh I see what Mall's trying to say, he doesn't understand English traditions and he thinks "white power" is similar to honoring family. If you're not caught up to American news, it's easy to be misguided by white supremist to think it's a heritage kind of thing.
this system is same as DDO. I could make this win/loss next time if you want. Also, I know my counter-argument is flawed, but combined with environment + finance harms, the "my body my choice" begins to break down as it infers "yes, I can wash my body in a toxic river, polluting it even more if I want."
Never mind. I thought it over and I feel like the "assigning roles" in society is probably outdated. If we were arguing about 1600's, Binary vs non-binary might be worth a shot.
Here's an interesting philosophical topic though: In an alternate universe where Gender was binary, would this world be superior to live in than our world? After all, now there are no transgender people being made fun of. And yet, if Gender WAS binary, that could reinforce the stereotypes of man being strong and brave, and women being weak and kind.
have a go.
I've read over Roy's argument for pro and I feel Con should be near impossible to win. Of course, Raisor could do it, but again, not even Orogami stands a chance against Raisor in any topic that's not entertainment.
I think I know what mall wants lol. He wants a cross examination not a debate
hahaha.... nicely chosen. It is impossible for Ayyantu to win this one.
I've had over 250 LD's and only a handful were like that.
then accept this debate. Unless you think "Exquisitely poor" is an exception.
thoughts?
screw it. I'm playing devil's advocate.
I think the main problem with opponents of transgender is that they mistake gender for gender identity and vice versa. They think Transgender people are trying to philosophically conclude whether they are male, female, or a third gender, while in reality it's a belief similar to religion, that should be respected.
I’m surprised you resorted to using science to refute philosophy. That shouldn’t be necessary. I am not saying transgender is wrong, I am saying it has inconsistencies with a belief mindset (as your sources say it can depend on your brain’s birth state, but some think it is fluid... )
What’s your thought on this? It’s not that it’s bad for society, or science, but rather, on a metaphysical logical realm, it starts to fall apart (similar to a religion)
Do you guys just want to use this as the gauntlet debate so we can quickly roll through it?
you also might want to watch this in case you want to take on pro side next time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5k9EDgY8UM.
LETS GO, A MODEST PROPOSAL
*mall looks at this topic, disagrees, and goes to sleep, only to recreate the con side a few days later.*
I've had over 250 lucid dreams, and I can say pro wins this 100%
it has to be a publication or broadcast program, neither of which a conspiracy theorist is capable (not that I know of)
100th debate, yay!
oops, my 10x emission link didn't work correctly. It's here: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/12481#1
I'd argue that Wikipedia is more reliable than ALL news
sorry about my confusing paragraph. I meant to say that encouragement costs 300$/person, a greater amount than 0$/person (legislating a law)
re-reading the debate, I thought of something interesting. Is it possible for me to manipulate the resolution in any way? Some kind of "failure is the mother of success" kind of thing? Where I prove because we are finding all this fraud and getting rid of it, improves quality of education?
then perhaps you'd like to help me argue that 100 character debates should be prohibited on DART... XD
you are welcome to vote, especially since you're one of the top debaters.
what do you think of this? I didn't expect I can I BB to tackle environmental issue logically.
I had trouble linking a second study I found to support the first study. Here it is. I'll re mention it in the last round, but know that there was more than one that added to the 92 % statistics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727534/
thanks for the debate. It helped even further boost my essay. I didn't realize I forgot to stress precisely how deadly it was, or how it was unique compared to other instances of Environment harm. I can't find a good place to insert Unique vs Alcohol, but it definitely helps to think about it.
Imabench: is it my turn to destroy this guy yet with my 1,000,000,000 trickery?
- Smoking Should be Criminalized (pro)
- Gun Control Should be Tightened in the US (con)
- On Balance Social Media has positive effect on Teenage users' mental health (pro)
- Gay Marriage Should be Legalized (pro)
- Table Tennis is the most enjoyable Asian sport (pro)
- We Should Colonize Mars by 2100 (pro)
- On Balance Charter Schools are Beneficial to Quality of Education (pro)
- Abortion Should be Banned With Exception of Maternal Life (con)
"I have this debate in the bag"
Ragnar, whiteflame, Oromagi: we think not.
no. I don't get it. If you FF'd in any of my truly dangerous topics, you would be at a severe disadvantage.
interesting, what does this mean exactly? (how long is this probation period?)
that's kind of the point lol. My usual style isn't this reckless but I thought it was worth a try when Oromagi's own definition gave Con the one out of million chance to give some kind of case.
also when I say Obama I mean Michele Obama cuz Barack is already involved obviously, sorry. Was in a rush.
oh. I missed out on an opportunity to say "pardon my French".
oh I see what Mall's trying to say, he doesn't understand English traditions and he thinks "white power" is similar to honoring family. If you're not caught up to American news, it's easy to be misguided by white supremist to think it's a heritage kind of thing.
this system is same as DDO. I could make this win/loss next time if you want. Also, I know my counter-argument is flawed, but combined with environment + finance harms, the "my body my choice" begins to break down as it infers "yes, I can wash my body in a toxic river, polluting it even more if I want."
I'll bite the bullet. There's some interesting ideas to be made about the con side.
Vote
Bump
sorry if my args are annoying lol, I'm trying my best to play devil's advocate without conceding.
guess I'll die
you are very good at debating!
fingerprints are still different.
in democracy voting should be compulsory (http://www.wacfl.org/joomlaweb/topics/116-lincoln-douglas-debate-topicsLincoln-Douglas)
oops, I missed that one mention in spellcheck
it's all up to you now.
vote.
Never mind. I thought it over and I feel like the "assigning roles" in society is probably outdated. If we were arguing about 1600's, Binary vs non-binary might be worth a shot.
Here's an interesting philosophical topic though: In an alternate universe where Gender was binary, would this world be superior to live in than our world? After all, now there are no transgender people being made fun of. And yet, if Gender WAS binary, that could reinforce the stereotypes of man being strong and brave, and women being weak and kind.
this debate is impossible for con to win. A bit of tweak, please?