perhaps, but if he was given time to prepare and look at rappers then his poetry experience would help a lot with rhythm, and his insults are very creative
just a guess. He's never had a rap battle so I have the evidence advantage. He only took rhetoric class which infers he doesn't know a lot about verse and rhythm
I wonder if con realized this is grueling 5 rounds and it would be really hard to come up with so much unique arguments that don't match my predictions... lol
song definition from wikipedia: A song is a musical composition intended to be vocally performed by the human voice. This is often done at distinct and fixed pitches (melodies) using patterns of sound and silence. Songs contain various forms, such as those including the repetition and variation of sections.
I meant that we will argue that the song displays the message, that the message makes the song a good one (for instance, a song about drugs, alcohol and sex may not be as appealing as one that gives power to women)
hol up a sec, I'm re-reading the debate. Con's stance is a bit slick to examine in detail.
goddamit, now I have to fight the harder debate
oops
perhaps, but if he was given time to prepare and look at rappers then his poetry experience would help a lot with rhythm, and his insults are very creative
I'm excited to see if Oromagi took any poem classes or not ha, would be crazy talented if he could both rap AND debate
just a guess. He's never had a rap battle so I have the evidence advantage. He only took rhetoric class which infers he doesn't know a lot about verse and rhythm
I can understand your confusion about "influential", and I apologize if you didn't know what exactly to argue.
This debate could have been worded "the effects caused by X were the greatest, in the time span of ...[whatever]"
But I'm arguing that "X, which occurred in time span of ...[whatever] would go on to cause the greatest effect".
The first debate, I don't think makes sense in the context of 2010~2019
sorry, typo in r1, 15 year not 10
I wonder if con realized this is grueling 5 rounds and it would be really hard to come up with so much unique arguments that don't match my predictions... lol
good bye pro
this is checkmate.
but whether for you or for me, I do not know.
oro has already been defeated in debate.org
maybe, but 10,000 more than that seems overly reliant on quotes and sources
since it's the top rated debater on the website, I'm going for something a little tricky...
updated
"obscure": less than 250,000 views on youtube
*sorry about the "everyone is sad" (I meant to type "everyone gets sad when this happens" but I ran out of characters)
dude, isn't my post equaling to nothing meaning this debate is stupid? It would mean there is no debate at all
song definition from wikipedia: A song is a musical composition intended to be vocally performed by the human voice. This is often done at distinct and fixed pitches (melodies) using patterns of sound and silence. Songs contain various forms, such as those including the repetition and variation of sections.
the Finnish sentence says that The earth is flat, which I later admit has no meaning and is pure destruction XDDD
I meant that we will argue that the song displays the message, that the message makes the song a good one (for instance, a song about drugs, alcohol and sex may not be as appealing as one that gives power to women)
--> @User_2006
also I'm joking about the total forfeit idea, anyways, the rule was silly to begin with.
thats a neat idea
read the arabic rules. It said each argument must be in a language other than English. Since con violated this rule, he failed the debate.
or are YOU the one who can't win this debate? ;)
oh, not bad...