njk25

Pro's assertion seems completely impractical as correctly mentioned by con

Furthermore I would like to add to cons argument that-

Even if we have armed guards they will be unable to do anything in a large school campus, as reaching a perpetrator a few hundred meters away will take way to long for any sort of prevention of shooting, also as mentioned most school shootings are done by students, and hence an having 'armed' guards is useless, since they most likely not even try to shoot the perpetrator, and do the work of just a regular security guard.

Pro has no logical reason to explain their assertion

Con makes insightful arguments, pro only really starts debating in the last round