Anyone who calls everything they dislike is gay, is probably gay themselves
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
For example, Nick Fuentes calls unhappily married men gay, even when they are married to females. Also, it is incorrect: if they are unhappy with their marriage, then they are not gay, as gay initially meant happy, and they certainly aren’t homosexual if they are married to females.
Trying to weigh this, I am feeling very null to both sides.
Let's see, the whole yield thing is a figure of speech. It can mean surrender, but it can also be a yielding of the floor to let the opponent speak.
This is supposed to be comedy, but neither made me laugh.
The discussion of happy felt like it was dodging the question....
Yeah, whole lot of nothing.
Pro has no logical reason to explain their assertion
Thanks for the compliment btw.
Please vote.
This is the funniest debate title ever written
Thats pretty gay title