I apologise for arguing in the vote, but I do still think it's impractical as a preventative measure since-
It takes only a few milliseconds to shoot someone, and the armed guards can only react after the shooting is already done, till that time many people could've been kiled if it's a crowded area.
And why can't any regular guard frisk? also metal detectors would be way more effective.
I apologise for arguing in the vote, but I do still think it's impractical as a preventative measure since-
It takes only a few milliseconds to shoot someone, and the armed guards can only react after the shooting is already done, till that time many people could've been kiled if it's a crowded area.
And why can't any regular guard frisk? also metal detectors would be way more effective.
I am a new user
That's soo true 😅😅😂😂
I am using the dictionary definition
Anyone interested?
Pro's argument is completely illogical, rejection of a belief system(such as religion), doesn't itself become a belief system
Thanks for wasting everyones time
Come on guys, you scared of a newbie?
This shall be my first debate