Total posts: 7,669
I appreciate very little of what you post, least of all you linking to pure gore and implying something by tagging me into a completely irrelevant thread.
It was on a live gore but if you actually watched the video is was less disturbing than your average R rated horror movie
I see nowhere in this lie you wrote where it covers a way the Democrats benefit the elite rich more, please guide my eyes
The democrats do because regulations make it harder for small businesses to comply which give large businesses more market share and more ROI for shareholders.
If you take a look you see founders In New markets attempt to court politicians to establish an early monopoly. Just after open AI was released they sent a shitload of lobbiests to Washington to attempt to regulate the market so it would be too expensive for other companies to take any of their market share. The same happened with Sam Bankman, he immediately after starting his crypto exchange started lobbying several governments for immense regulation so he could position himself formerly all of the market share and take out other crypto exchanges
Economic interventionism is a tool for the wealthy elite.
Created:
Posted in:
RM,
I guess you bring up a good point by saying g that just because he was telling the truth in one instance it doesn't make him a liar. They should atleast admit he was correct in that instance though
As far as the central park 5 is concerned, they were guilty of being part of the group that attacked that jogger. If one person is guilty of attacking her but 10 others stand around and cheer it on, then obviously she will be afraid to fight back and defend herself and any onlookers will be afraid to rescue her when a large crowd of people are on the side of the attackers.
Those kids aren't innocent. They were engaging in mob violence and criminal activity. If you have 5 people do a bank robbery but only one of them kill the teller when it is done and over with, all 5 get charged with murder.
Perhaps their punishment was disproportionate to the crime, but they absolutely were engaged in criminal behavior and deserved to lose at least a few years of their life for it.
*anyone wondering why I have not tagged RM, he blocked me due to apparently saying g trump was truthful in one instance and giving him a warm welcome. Take that as a reflection on his character however you will
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I mean if your saying everyone in the government is part of the deep state by virtue of the fact they are government officials and elected government office holders it just makes no sense.
No, it's representative of a certain mentality that has taken hold. If anyone is claiming an organized conspiracy they are incorrect. If they are claiming all billionaires, leaders in government institutions or politicians are deep state, they are incorrect.
Nope. Still not understanding what you are trying to say. Especially if it concerns the deep state and some kind of explanation why you believe there is a deep state and exactly what it is and who is in it.
When the word deepstate is stated, the person stating it is usually referring to what James Burnham calls the managerial elite which comprise a lot of people in government and fortune 509 positions, but deepstate clearly is just the portion entrenched in government. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2017/02/james-burnhams-managerial-elite/
It's not organized. It's not intentional. It's just a result of the natural ebbs and flows of society and criticism of a deepstate is just a easy way to make burnham's hypothesis more digestible to the masses.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I just noticed you were back. Glad you are here. I made a thread about you hoping g it would get your attention and cause you to re join us.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
How do the elite rich benefit more under a Democrat economic progressive tax system than the much more lenient Republican one?
Republicans are also for a progressive tax. We agree that the wealthy should be taxed disproportionately. We do want a small government and one tool to hopefully get that done is lower tax rates for everyone, however the paradigm is shifting a bit to republicans openly being okay with bigger government because they see it as removing one tool from their system if the government is always being grown from liberal interests but never for conservative interests.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I doubt that you actually read him, you never give any of the arguments you get from him. The point I that increasing th tax on the rich is not going to cause the debt to be paid down faster or ever paid down for that matter. The debt payments will remain the same. You aren't even advocating for any social programs or anything here. It seems like you just want to tax the rich out of spite or something.
It reminds me of those instances where people are pissed a coworker gets a raise and starts bitxhing that their raise is unfair instead of actually just arguing they deserve one as well.
In both examples it isn't the lack of something that is an issue but jealousy over another's success. You don't want to tax the rich to better fund schools or to provide more food to the poor or to build nuclear power plants for clean energy. You seem to want to just because, and bringing up the national debt, especially after exposing yourself as a routine follower of at least one economist (it should be two one that disagrees with him s well if you want well rounded knowledge) .
Do you think if Paul Krugman was asked why raise taxes on the rich he would answer with the equivalent of
"Fuck'em"
Or
"Fairbess my brother"
He wouldn't cope with mentions of the national debt either. He would list very pragmatic reasons for his stance. Reasons I would most likely disagree with but at least he would be intellectually honest and have very good reasoning for his opinion.
Hell if you run into those reasonings just copy and paste them below. No need to be original. Worst case scenario the reasoning is rebutted, best case you turn me into an allie on atleast one issue.
Created:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-why-us-doesnt-pay-035612736.html
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
It's like when you beat the shit out of your wife, but the pitbull comes into the house from taking a shit. He isn't intentionally keeping you from finishing the ass whooping, but you aren't going to finish it in his presence
Created:
So we just want to tax them out of fairness not because the government needs the extra money. Got it
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
So the All Powerful Deep State is unintentionally controlling all levers of power in this country and they are being elected by the people they are controlling?Is that correct?
I would say unintentionally having a disproportionate influence over.
Kind of the way christians unintentionally influence the movie rating aystem
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Amber
The problems you mention are something that I am working on a bit. I am in talks to acquire the site which will most likely fail. The community was more active and vibrant but a woke person was made moderator and the bans turned the place more into a hive mind. Low quality posters who were right wing managed to escape the ban and since intelligent leftists could not find good debate opponents due to the censorship they left. When th woke moderator stepped down another woke moderator was elected who took the problems created by the first and made them worse. Then he was replaced by a moderator who was not woke but bent his knee to the woke mob too often.
The current mod team is oromagi, barney and whitelfame. All liberal but none are woke liberals. They have made mistakes with who they have banned as well as mistakes with who they haven't banned.
Basically nothing the current mod team can do to erase the previous damage.
I am in talks to acquire the site. Those talks have already stalled and I likely won't be able to do it. I am probably going to have to bootstrap a type of clone site to save the parts of the community that were driven away or rebuild a similar one.
Here is the initial business plan that I need to work on with a team.
1. Create an MVP target the religious portion of the forum which thrives due to the lack of moderation on that part of the site but could thrive more if they were just left alone. It's not the users I want but it serves as a base for what is being built. Slowly expand that micro forum to a debate section and then add a wide array of topics.
2. Spend $1000 on targeted ads of people liking the DART and DDO pages on Facebook, and Twitter. Spend whatever is left on that for an ad on top of thr Google results for when those reminiscing type in debate.org.
The 3rd phase I am not sure will exist but hopefully do something to get the site paying for itself. So maybe pulling in $25 a month in income, and then just put a heavy thumb on the commu itu in terms of cultural influence. Essentially a more Laissez-Faire type of forum that remains within the bounds of what is legal, while banning those who hurl insults. Some insults are fine but we do need to draw a line and right now the line is not consistent.
I will probably have the forum up in 30 days. I built none before but I didn't really own it and it just wasn't good.
So the community you see will either change or the useful portions of the community or what remains of it will migrate to my site which will be completed by Christmas. I know they will.migrate because it's just going to be too convenient not to. We are talking
1. Actually being in the app store
2. Alerts on the phone for messages debate rounds etc.
3. Consistent new drama from reaching out to popular content creators with preexisting beefs.
4. A system for monetizing some debates for debaters . Essentially have a small business pay Linus tech tips to argue their product is the best or something like that.
It's either online debate will be dead or they will be on my site. So I will fix these issues and I already have a few developers who have promised to donate me some time to help.
Created:
Posted in:
Dude the deep state exists in both. In Russia it is an overt conspiracy, in the United states it is largely an u intentional one derived from similar thinking based on the deep state being made up largely of the managerial elite class and people who attend the same 5 or 6 colleges.
When Trump says deepstate he isn't talking about an organized mafia like the one which runs Russia but of a disorganized people with similar blindspots due to not being diverse enough in thought and having a bias towards the establishment. (Meaning they value stability over purely ethical decisions that would destabilize things it's akin to people preferring incremental progress to ripping a bandaid off)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
But they would in fact be inferior to you in intelligence, right?
Yes and those statistics are helpful for determining what sectors of society need the most help.
Then being inferior in intelligence doesn't mean that much though.
Maybe they have lower intelligence but better critical thinking. Maybe I spend my time with mental masturbation such as chess or philosophy while their inferior brain is continually focused on improving themselves or their communities.
Intelligence is just a tool. You can have the body of an elite athlete but if you work in a coal mine instead of winning a superbowl your superior body didn't serve you s well asnit could have. Assuming you value the prestige or money that comes from being an elite athlete.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
- How would you define and inferior human being?
I would look at controllable things. I wouldn't consider myself superior to somebody with a lower IQ than me. If they have a lower IQ but they dedicate their life to public service, spend their weekends in soup kitchens, have an easy ime forgiving people and are a reliable friend I would in fact consider then superior to me. This is why I don't think it's appropriate to simultaneously claim to be the party of the down trodden while also insulting people for having low IQs.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
So why isn't the current level of taxes enough?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Why would having a lower average IQ make African americans inferior?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Why wouldn't they? Why can't our interests be aligned?
I think we should all work on getting along and prospering together.
Created:
So when I asked why tax the wealthy. Does the policy actually help in some way or is it just a punishment. There was zero response so I assume tax the rich is just an emotionally driven thing to punish somebody the left is jealous of and not a sincere attempt to improve society in some way
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
It kind of is a noob snipe because I did familiarize myself enough with the topic of ranked choice to know its the correct side and was downplaying how much I knew. It's one of those topics that smart Republicans and democrats who studied the topic will agree on, like the opposition to the popular vote and opposition to term limits. It falls into the realm of intuively correct but factually wrong.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Democrats are and should be looking to make the 1 percenters pay more. These are the people who got a big tax cut from Trump in 2017.
Why should they pay more?
What would it accomplish is it just punishment for being rich or is there some sort of goal for the money?
Nobody ever mentions a goal when talking of taxing the rich. It just sounds like punishment.
I also would consider anyone making over 200k wealthy. 150k is what a high paid professional is making. Your lawyers and engineers for the most part. Some specialized nurses get 150k.
If the wealthy is deriving most of their income from investments than things like capital gains tax are are really just something that are going to target elderly pensioners who need to stretch their money for the next 50 years while they wait to die.
You also have the fact that the wealthy can just live a life without maintaining citizenship in any country. Perhaps they spend a few months in America then a few months in Paris then Belize etc. You are going to have a hard time targeting those people with taxes.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I couldn't tell you the point of having a good economy if my children are smoking meth, getting their penises cut off and planes are falling out of the sky because meritocracy was subverted with DEI
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Some studies show that black abortions are almost 50% of all abortions. https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2008/08/abortion-and-women-color-bigger-picture
Are you aware that Trump senior advisor Jason Miller, who is married, knocked up another Trump campaign staffer named AJ Delgado and tried to get her to have an abortion?
I don't think the majority of abortions are from powerful millionaires who don't want to take responsibility for their choices.
It's just like when you see that dateline usually covers the murders of attractive white females. This is just where the media likes to point the camera, the majority of murders re not of white women.
Yes you can point out examples where a republican gets an abortion. Your premise that mostly Republicans are getting abortions seems flawed though and we can set up a debate and have people judge who wins once all the facts are out
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I do. I think you can make taxes completely voluntary and fully fund government, and simultaneously create a small basic minimum income, with the same exact tax policy.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Let's say you are a business owner and you need to make a 10 cent profit on each item you sell to make the business worth it.
So you maybe sell bread at $1.10 but it costs you $1.00 to get the bread to the customer.
What happens when you add a tax to the bread of what happens if the bread is taxed at 9 cents a loaf? Do you just accept a 1 cent profit although you have determined it is not worth it?
Most are going to raise the price to make up for the lot revenue. So now bread is $1.20 per package, but then his suppliers raise their prices because they are also subject to the same taxes which adds 10 cents to supplies so really has has to raise the bread price to $1.30 a loaf. A few things will happen
1. The market will tell him that bread sold at that price will not be bought. In which case he has to accept a tinier profit say 1 cents a lot which might not be worth it because he can just sell his business and get 10% returns in the S & P 500.
2. The market will accept his price but now they struggle to pay rent to feed themselves.
None of these options are good. One causes the market to be more dominatedby mega corporations and the other to make us all poor
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
America is practically designed so there is a 2 party system I would argue that there are 4 parties and that we should be divided that way. Here are the actual 4 parties.
1. Socialists such as Bernie Sanders and AOC
2. Moderates such as Hillary Clinton and George Bush
3. Libertarians such as the Paul's
4. Social conservatives
Granted these parties leave paleocons out but they would probably choose who represented them better between 2,3 and 4.
I dont personally have a problem with ranked choice. Many conservatives are against it because it seems to favor democrats. Many are against it because they feel it does leave voices unheard. So so in ranked choice for example it's done in rounds. So the bottom.candidate is dropped and that person's 2nd choice gets their vote instead. My understanding is that the way it works, you can get a lot of instances of issues where somebody with low support would win even though they are hated by a majority of people. I am flaky here.
I would be willing to debate con on ranked choice as a means to increase my understanding of the popular criticisms of it. To me it intuitively feels right. I know that I also felt a national popular vote and term limits also feel intuitively correct but changed my mind on it when I did the research.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Nope, it can't be. You have to consider that we are overdue for a large solar flare that happens every few thousand years and which would absolutely destroy technology. If we manage to make it off thus planet in time and take AI with us or build it off planet, than you may be correct.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
We are designed to die because it brings greater genetic diversity through evolutionary pressures.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
I'm not a Leftest, I'm a Intellectual Elitist. That is the goal of evolution. AI will wipe out all the stupid people no matter what color they are.
So genocide?
You don't really cross me as an intellectual elitist. I routinely have conversations with academics on politics. I email those in academia whose books they have written to challenge them and to learn from them and to sharpen my debate skills.
None of the academics I have talked to have really treated their conversation the way you do. Some where more blunt than others, but mostly they respected their political opponents. They would often steelman my arguments when my arguments were poor and attacked the steel man version and they always acted with humility and assumed or atleast acted like they assumed that their ideals were not perfect and like they could learn something from me.
You don't strike me as having the ability to approach conversations, for example how a Peter Singer would.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
You don't spend much time making arguments and usually you speak from emotions. Your statements look like
1. All republicans are bad
2. Republicans are degenerate. Look at how much politician A. Does not have family values
3. Repuplicans are stupid.
4. Republicans are all corrupt.
It's usually followed by direct insults to individual users.
1. You grew up poor and therefore are bad
2. Your job is blue-collar you are bad
3. Your job is low status, you are bad.
Should all republicans just be genocided?
Are Republicans redeemable if they convert to leftism and is it all forms of leftism or a specific form of leftism they should convert to?
You don't make many arguments to persuade people to your point of view, so I can only assume you believe that minds are made up and that people can't change their opinion.
If you believe minds can be changed, why aren't you behaving in a way consistent with that and attempting to persuade republicans to change?
If you believe that republicans cannot change and will always be republican than why are you wasting your time bitching about them?
If their ideals cannot be defeated because people once they become conservative cannot change to become a Democrat, than why are you asking your time following politics at all?
If you find it fun to follow politics and dunk on republicans, I guess that is fine. Whatever makes you happy, but I can't imagine that it is a fulfilling hobby that wouldn't be better if it was turned to something else.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
The republican party is a bigger tent than the democratic party and makes up the following groups.
1. The moderate ones who are close ideologically to the moderate left such as George Bush and Liz Cheney
2. The fundamentalists which include people like Mike Huckabee, and Mike pence. Whoever you can think of named Mike essentially
3. The libertarian group consisting of the entire Freedom caucus and Ron and rand Paul
4. The paleocon populist portion consisting of people like Pat Buchanon orTicker Carlson.
These 4 groups all have radically different ideologies and often fight for control of the republican party. Until lately though it seemes only moderate portion had what it takes to win national elections due to the country being mostly non ideological pragmatists. For example Barry Goldwater was part of the libertarian portion of the party and was easily defeated on the national level which partially was led by the Romney family.
We take turns hating parts of the party but uniting with them for elections. Prior to the current mindset to hate the moderates and after the Goldwater failure the hate was geared towards libertarians.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Yes, Putin is a conman. He knew that would rally Trump voters (those with IQ's less than 90).
Why do leftists claim to care about blacks who have an average IQ around 80, while continually talking shit about those with IQs below 90?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
“The meeting, which took place at Trump Tower in New York City on June 9, 2016 was pitched to Trump Jr. , Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner, as the opportunity for members of Trump's presidential campaign to receive damaging information about Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton from Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya. It is illegal for campaigns to accept help from a foreign government or from foreign nationals”
So this isn't a meeting like has been insinuated by the left where Trump is getting orders from the Russians on how to behave but at worst him getting information on how to defeat the deep state?
That's assuming this narrative you paint is correct.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Mosted aborted fetuses would have been democrats,It’s statements like this that tell me you are a moron
So it's your belief that all the blacks, teen pregnancy people and women who have casual sex are mostly conservative and would have raised their children to be that way?
Oh ya, Liz and her father were so similar to Democrats. We loved them. Don’t you remember when we called George W “the idiot”.
Most democrats hated them for the simple fact that they thought democrats and Republicans were different. Both sides would essentially have the same policies prior to Trump. The same foreign policy, the same adherence to Keynsian principles, the only difference was cosmetic issues such as gay marriage, gun policies and abortion. If you remove the cosmetic issues that the elite don't care about but the average voter does, you essentially get the same party.
This is starting to change now as there are some good populist movements in both parties. The leftwing populists were subverted with a Biden win but th populists succeeded when electing trump. However prior to the 2016 election the parties were essentially the same, especially when it came to presidents. Can you tell me the meaningful differences between the foreign policy of Hillary and Bush?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
The liberation so many straight men will feel when they realize that they don't need to be incels, they don't need to lie about their body counts on message boards, they just need to date...each other.
No joke. I think this is what is making up at least some of the trans movement, but it is such a new phenomenon that I didn't want to get into it yet.
A lot of incels are getting itinto their heads that it's easier to find love as a woman. So they become trans in order to get laid and finally be in a long lasting and loving relationship.
I don't know what to suggest in this regard. Thy are probably correct, it is the o ly way they can find love.
Studies have found a large overlap with autism, so my theory is that autistic people struggle to get laid because they come across as autistic when hitting on women, but if they turn into women the awkwardness is chalked up to being quirky or some other spin.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I was stunned when the employee recommended I get an LGTV.
Wow, I never thought I would see the day where people at Walmart were degenerate. This is sad
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Liz Cheney
Is this because she hates Trump or is it because she is part of the Uniparty like Hillary Clinton and George Bush?
Actually I am very happy to see the RNC broke and in disarray. Trump has destroyed the Republican Party. It will eventually be gone like the Whig Party.
I don't think so. People generally get more co servative as they age and start learning more about politics. You can argue that Trump isn't really conservative but it's not like conservatives have a home in the democratic party. Anyway the norm in the past is for kids in school to be something like 25% right leaning but recently it has been polling at like 35%. That'd not really a good sign for the left if they want to win.
You also have other demographic slides. The left is essentially neutering themselves. Mosted aborted fetuses would have been democrats, less leftists are having babies, meanwhile fundamentalists are popping out like 8 kids each.
Hispanics are voting republican in higher numbers than 10 years ago as are African americans. That slide will continue to happen the more identity politics are in the forefront of debates. These catholic Hispanics are socially conservative and blacks are naturally socially conservative as well.
The lefts only hope is either mass immigration or to become more populist and peel off people like me who are just rabidly antiestablishment.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Manafort was under surveillance since 2014, long before Trump was a candidate.
The surveillance continued during and after the campaign as well. I believe when Trump mentioned his campaign was spied on it's just saying that Paul Manafort and some of Trump's campaign associates were being surveilled. It's interesting that the hill democrats will die on is claiming that serious campaigns for president will be under scrutiny from intelligence agencies for the simple fact that those campaigns are also targets for foreign spies.
If I was a Democrat, I wouldn't sit there and lie and say "oh no, his campaign wasn't surveilld, nobody associated with Trump was"
Instead I would say.
"Yes in all likelihood when a shitload of new people are lined up for positions of power and high security clearance, no matter what political party they are a part of, intelligence agencies will take an interest (AKA surveillance either direct or through indirect intelligence gathering methods. ) "
But on this subject, can you tell me why did Trump’s people meet with Russians at Trump Tower?
I have no clue. I don't know the context or anything.
Who was meeting with Russians? What were their role in his campaign? Who were the Russians was it random business men or KGB ?
What is the Trump campaigns explanation of this?
What types of state.ents were made by investigators about this situation if any statements were made?
I think I heard something about this but most of the news I heard about Russia collusion was something about videotape evidence of Tru p peeing on Ruasian prostitutes and speculation Putin is somehow using it as leverage over Trump.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
The pursuit of happiness is from the declaration of independence not the constitution
Created:
Posted in:
Wapo is now asking for my email address to read articles. You are going to have to start giving some context or copy pasting the article so I can read them.
I got to where it said he endorsed his daughter in law for RNC chair. I am going to assume it didn't work out since you posted the thread the way you did.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
The question seems silly to me. It is almost like if you told me you only ate pepporoni pizza and I respond ded with, do you find cheese pizza wrong?
It's not wrong or right. They just are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politics/paul-manafort-government-wiretapped-fisa-russians/index.html
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I can tell you that if the United States has SBOs still in the United states operating and they see wokeness as an existential threat (as thy probably should) than Obama planted the seeds if their ability to influence an American election in favor of Trump. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
Obama overturned a law making it illegal for the feds to propagandize Americans. So thy can legally propagandize us, the arm working with the current SBO to ensure the long term survival of the republic. If the CIA was completely organized I would say to watch the narrative change with Anderson Cooper
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/02/25/vanderbilt-anderson-cooper-cia-college/ who is a known CiA asset but only one of many planted in the media, but I sense that the current SBOs are very deep cover and unknown to even CIA leadership.
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/andrew-tate-dad-in-cia-people-think-he-is-an-asset
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What's funny is the other side of intelligence agencies they don't notice.
I. The 1940s after WW2 was coming to a close, every western nation started forming stay behind organizations meant to act like terrorist units should these western nations or the United States fall to the new soviet threat. It is said that America's SBO was disbanded at the end of the cold war. However here are some things that might indicate otherwise.
America was about to fall to the Marxist woke mob and the following things happened.
1. Young men were becoming disenfranchised and were about to exclusively vote left and support the woke mob, but the son of a known CIA agent who is named Andrew Tate came out of nowhere to be the personal daddy of millions of young disenfranchised American boys. All of which will be turning 18 just in time to vote in the 2024 election. (See the portion of first time voters supporting trump)
2. The left had tightened its grip around all of social media and was about to be the only people who could paint a narrative s free speech was being annihilated.
In response to this a billionaire overpaid for Twitter and this same billionaire stands to get billions in military contracts that will make up for the loss. . Almost as if a back room deal was made to save America.
I am sure if you look hard enough you can see the handprints of this disbanded SBO with government ties in a lot more things aimed at saving the republic
Created:
Posted in:
If you are reading this it is entirely possible that you are not a queer. The LGBT movement has tried to make the definition cover just about everything so as to make you personally identify with he movement so as to trick you into defending several forms of degeneracy.
Women who identify as men or gender queer
If you are a female and you like a lot of masculine things, you like to hang out with the boys and watch football, but you are romantically interested in men, Tham the LGBTQP movement has most likely lied to you and told you that you in fact were gender non conforming or that you are a woman in a male's body but a homosexual male.
You aren't. You are a tomboy and there is nothing wrong with that. You don't need to identify with their stupid movement and their attempts to confuse you and trick you into cutting off your tits. He'll I have seen some of you join tiktok, marry a man and have kids with him, but claim to be LGBTQP because you also change the oil in the car and love hunting. You aren't you are a tomboy, stay away from the brain washing.
Bisexuality women
You have been told that you are part of the LGBTQP movement because you like men and you are attracted to women. This is untrue. You have been lied to.
I personally have been with so many women that it is disgusting and I probably have a disease. Every single one with the exception of one, was attracted to other women and open to 3somes or one night stands with other women. If you are mostly in relationships with men, you are co sidereal heterosexual. Do not let the woke mob convince you you are weird or odd or not normal. You are normal. It is normal for a woman to be in mostly male relationships but enjoy the beauty of a woman.
Lesbianism women
If you are a lesbian woman, I have news for you. No you are not. This is a cope. I have slept with at least 3 women who have claimed to be lesbian. I didn't turn them. They identified that way prior to me fucking them, and yes the sex was consensual.
If you hink you are a lesbian, you are a woman with low self confidence. You either think you are too ugly to get a man because you are, so you pretend to be a lesbian because many women are more open to sex with ugly people, though you yourself aren't open to sex with an ugly man.
The second option is you have low self esteem but it's because people are dicks not because you are ugly. You are beautiful, you are heterosexual stop lying to yourself and maybe if you are ugly do lower your standards a bit and find some incel.
Feminine guys who like women
You are not a lesbian or a Trans person. Do not let these sickos talk you into cutting off your penis and joining their cult. If you do want to cut off your penis, just cut off the tip and become a Christian.
It's okay to like cooking or to be into interior design or whatever the fuck feminine men do. It doesn't make you a woman stuck in a man's body. You are being lied to. You are not genderqueer or whatever stupid term wokies created to describe feminine men. You are merely a man who just happens to be into some traditionally feminine ine things and perhaps you carry yourself in a slightly feminine ine way. You are a heterosexual and can wake up now
Gay men
Okay you really are part of the LGBT crowd but you aren't fully gone. If you are a feminine ine gay guy, the woke mob will try to talk you into cutting your penis off and becoming a woman. Don't do this. They are trying to trick you. You are just a gay guy who is still a guy, even if you are feminine. You are loved and accepted for who you are, please do not fall for it. Do not cut off your penis no matter how much the woke mob will call you stunning and brave for mutilating yourself.
Trans people
Okay you guys really are Trans. Or girls . Or.... they them. Whatever the fuck it is you want to be called. There are two reasons for this that have already been scientifically proven. The first scenario is more common, but the Second one exists as well.
1. You hate yourself and see changing gender as a safe alternative to suicide. You metaphorically kill yourself in the process. The truth is that most Trans suicides happen after bottom surgery and this is because when the process is complete and you feel like you escaped the person you hate, you look in the mirror and there he is. Don't fall for this. You are loved and accepted for who you are. You need to get around positive people, but most importantly you need to accept yourself and love yourself for who you are, which is what you were assigned at birth. Yes it would be awesome to be a female. It would also be awesome to be tall, but we shouldn't mutilate ourselves to become that way and we need to accept ourselves even with our inherent flaws, such as being short or being born a man.
2. The second type of Trans person is one who fetishizes being in a female body and gets off to it. You are probably less than 20% of all Trans people. I think you guys are perverts but you should have every right to mutilate yourselves and if you fall into this second category than I hope transitioning does bring you joy.
Conclusion
Do not fall for this lgbtqp nonsense. You are not a member of their sick cult. You can love yourself for who you are and you don't need any of their stupid labels.
Now excuse me while I find another heterosexual woman to help me fuck my heterosexual wife, who is a tomboy.
Created:
Posted in:
Not a single liberal will apologize for calling trump a liar when he said his campaign was spied om.
Created:
Posted in:
The explanation for your experience here is what you have in your bio
The only reason i ever come back to this forsaken website is spite- spite and the very slim hope that some conservative see's something i write-writes it off-then one day, weeks-months-years later- realizes what an asshat they were.
Intelligent people who renintellectually honest assume they're wrong and try hard to be disproven. You come here to preach.
You aren't going to sharpen your arguments because when your premises are challenged, you are going to use copes or just don't a new argument.
Nobody would ask you to change your opinion if an argument is disproven. For a number of reasons
1. Maybe you are arguing devils advocate.
2. Maybe that is just one of 100 reasons you believe something.
3. Maybe your belief is emotion based and that's okay also
However when challenged its just not going to go well if you are here to preach.
Reading g through your debates I can see that usually most of your energy is spent defending your arguments. You spend very little energy on rebuttals and understanding g your opponent's arguments. Your debate ranking is because the best debaters on the site just don't do many debates. You are not the 12th best debater here. Here is a list of debaterswho have gracedthe site at the same time with you and who re better, and this is off the top of my head.
1. Me
2. Oromagi
3. Barney
4. Whiteflame.
5. Lunatic
6. Theft
7. I like pie
8. Danielle
9. Airmax
10. Mikal
11. Coal
12. Rationalmadman
13. David
I will list another 20 later if I feel like it but also add a anyone ahead of you I the rankings as well
Created:
Posted in:
As happy as I am that ISIS has tricked dumb liberals into hinking they are leftists. Free speech absolutist is honestly just a code word for child porn advocate. Most free speech people think CP should be banned. Absolutist distinguish themselves from other free speech advocates by adopting the name absolutist.
This is one of those situations where most of the left wing is good at censoring right wing opi ions they find objectionable and half of conservatives want to widen the definition of porn and ban a ton of free speech stuff as well. .
Most sensible people, which I realize is a mi ority of he right and left these days, would support the free speech of ISIS, Nick Fuentes and Kim Jung Un.
The reason they see it as being under the guise of defending naziism (which by he way Nick Fuentes is not), is because if they can convince your average person that the right only cares about the free speech of nazis it gets them a free pass to censor any subversive thought or speech.
The reason the left does this is because quite frankly can't survive a free speech environment where people can actually debate them. It is why all the top debaters on DDO, which included me, Danielle, Roy lathem and Donald Keller, thett, were essentially all libertarian or paleoconservatives. The one exception near the top of the leaderboard was Mikal who got there with rap battles, but was obviously competent outside of rap battles as well.
The left has noticed that they can't survive in a place where ideals are debated, so they have pushed big tech into censoring everything.
I will say that, not all of their concerns are unfounded. A lot of heir censorship really is just about suppressing ideals they disagree with but some of the concerns they have about free speech are legitimate.
1. Foreign propaganda campaigns such as the Russian ones
2. Widespread disinformation that threatens public health and order. Vaccines, 5g etc
3. Campaigns of foreign intelligence agencies to him morale (Chinese using tiktok and discord for his type of campaign)
However we shouldn't be betraying our values to combat these threats. We combat them by teaching kids young and throughout life about media literacy, cognitive biases and critical thought.
We combat them by building institutions that are actually trustworthy.
We combat it by teaching ethics and leading with Christian values
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Ah yes, the indoctrination.
No it isn't
Do you also tell them that morality is subjective and that your opinion is not any more valid than the opinion of a gay person who thinks differently?
I tell them that morality is objective, but explain to them that I am human and extremely fallible and that I am likely wrong in most of my opinions but believe they are closer to the truth than the alternative, especially with my older son. I am very open about the fact that my opinions are just that.
"Well, so far what happened is that gays get mocked and excluded as a result."
If you say so. I believe Tammy Faye Baker is a model for how homosexuals should be treated by Christians, and she is very popular In a lot of gay subcultures.
If she can be a Bible believing Christian while being deeply empathetic to and friendly towards the gay community, than I believe anybody can.
Created: