Total posts: 7,582
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
The pursuit of happiness is from the declaration of independence not the constitution
Created:
Posted in:
Wapo is now asking for my email address to read articles. You are going to have to start giving some context or copy pasting the article so I can read them.
I got to where it said he endorsed his daughter in law for RNC chair. I am going to assume it didn't work out since you posted the thread the way you did.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
The question seems silly to me. It is almost like if you told me you only ate pepporoni pizza and I respond ded with, do you find cheese pizza wrong?
It's not wrong or right. They just are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politics/paul-manafort-government-wiretapped-fisa-russians/index.html
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I can tell you that if the United States has SBOs still in the United states operating and they see wokeness as an existential threat (as thy probably should) than Obama planted the seeds if their ability to influence an American election in favor of Trump. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
Obama overturned a law making it illegal for the feds to propagandize Americans. So thy can legally propagandize us, the arm working with the current SBO to ensure the long term survival of the republic. If the CIA was completely organized I would say to watch the narrative change with Anderson Cooper
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/02/25/vanderbilt-anderson-cooper-cia-college/ who is a known CiA asset but only one of many planted in the media, but I sense that the current SBOs are very deep cover and unknown to even CIA leadership.
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/andrew-tate-dad-in-cia-people-think-he-is-an-asset
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What's funny is the other side of intelligence agencies they don't notice.
I. The 1940s after WW2 was coming to a close, every western nation started forming stay behind organizations meant to act like terrorist units should these western nations or the United States fall to the new soviet threat. It is said that America's SBO was disbanded at the end of the cold war. However here are some things that might indicate otherwise.
America was about to fall to the Marxist woke mob and the following things happened.
1. Young men were becoming disenfranchised and were about to exclusively vote left and support the woke mob, but the son of a known CIA agent who is named Andrew Tate came out of nowhere to be the personal daddy of millions of young disenfranchised American boys. All of which will be turning 18 just in time to vote in the 2024 election. (See the portion of first time voters supporting trump)
2. The left had tightened its grip around all of social media and was about to be the only people who could paint a narrative s free speech was being annihilated.
In response to this a billionaire overpaid for Twitter and this same billionaire stands to get billions in military contracts that will make up for the loss. . Almost as if a back room deal was made to save America.
I am sure if you look hard enough you can see the handprints of this disbanded SBO with government ties in a lot more things aimed at saving the republic
Created:
Posted in:
If you are reading this it is entirely possible that you are not a queer. The LGBT movement has tried to make the definition cover just about everything so as to make you personally identify with he movement so as to trick you into defending several forms of degeneracy.
Women who identify as men or gender queer
If you are a female and you like a lot of masculine things, you like to hang out with the boys and watch football, but you are romantically interested in men, Tham the LGBTQP movement has most likely lied to you and told you that you in fact were gender non conforming or that you are a woman in a male's body but a homosexual male.
You aren't. You are a tomboy and there is nothing wrong with that. You don't need to identify with their stupid movement and their attempts to confuse you and trick you into cutting off your tits. He'll I have seen some of you join tiktok, marry a man and have kids with him, but claim to be LGBTQP because you also change the oil in the car and love hunting. You aren't you are a tomboy, stay away from the brain washing.
Bisexuality women
You have been told that you are part of the LGBTQP movement because you like men and you are attracted to women. This is untrue. You have been lied to.
I personally have been with so many women that it is disgusting and I probably have a disease. Every single one with the exception of one, was attracted to other women and open to 3somes or one night stands with other women. If you are mostly in relationships with men, you are co sidereal heterosexual. Do not let the woke mob convince you you are weird or odd or not normal. You are normal. It is normal for a woman to be in mostly male relationships but enjoy the beauty of a woman.
Lesbianism women
If you are a lesbian woman, I have news for you. No you are not. This is a cope. I have slept with at least 3 women who have claimed to be lesbian. I didn't turn them. They identified that way prior to me fucking them, and yes the sex was consensual.
If you hink you are a lesbian, you are a woman with low self confidence. You either think you are too ugly to get a man because you are, so you pretend to be a lesbian because many women are more open to sex with ugly people, though you yourself aren't open to sex with an ugly man.
The second option is you have low self esteem but it's because people are dicks not because you are ugly. You are beautiful, you are heterosexual stop lying to yourself and maybe if you are ugly do lower your standards a bit and find some incel.
Feminine guys who like women
You are not a lesbian or a Trans person. Do not let these sickos talk you into cutting off your penis and joining their cult. If you do want to cut off your penis, just cut off the tip and become a Christian.
It's okay to like cooking or to be into interior design or whatever the fuck feminine men do. It doesn't make you a woman stuck in a man's body. You are being lied to. You are not genderqueer or whatever stupid term wokies created to describe feminine men. You are merely a man who just happens to be into some traditionally feminine ine things and perhaps you carry yourself in a slightly feminine ine way. You are a heterosexual and can wake up now
Gay men
Okay you really are part of the LGBT crowd but you aren't fully gone. If you are a feminine ine gay guy, the woke mob will try to talk you into cutting your penis off and becoming a woman. Don't do this. They are trying to trick you. You are just a gay guy who is still a guy, even if you are feminine. You are loved and accepted for who you are, please do not fall for it. Do not cut off your penis no matter how much the woke mob will call you stunning and brave for mutilating yourself.
Trans people
Okay you guys really are Trans. Or girls . Or.... they them. Whatever the fuck it is you want to be called. There are two reasons for this that have already been scientifically proven. The first scenario is more common, but the Second one exists as well.
1. You hate yourself and see changing gender as a safe alternative to suicide. You metaphorically kill yourself in the process. The truth is that most Trans suicides happen after bottom surgery and this is because when the process is complete and you feel like you escaped the person you hate, you look in the mirror and there he is. Don't fall for this. You are loved and accepted for who you are. You need to get around positive people, but most importantly you need to accept yourself and love yourself for who you are, which is what you were assigned at birth. Yes it would be awesome to be a female. It would also be awesome to be tall, but we shouldn't mutilate ourselves to become that way and we need to accept ourselves even with our inherent flaws, such as being short or being born a man.
2. The second type of Trans person is one who fetishizes being in a female body and gets off to it. You are probably less than 20% of all Trans people. I think you guys are perverts but you should have every right to mutilate yourselves and if you fall into this second category than I hope transitioning does bring you joy.
Conclusion
Do not fall for this lgbtqp nonsense. You are not a member of their sick cult. You can love yourself for who you are and you don't need any of their stupid labels.
Now excuse me while I find another heterosexual woman to help me fuck my heterosexual wife, who is a tomboy.
Created:
Posted in:
Not a single liberal will apologize for calling trump a liar when he said his campaign was spied om.
Created:
Posted in:
The explanation for your experience here is what you have in your bio
The only reason i ever come back to this forsaken website is spite- spite and the very slim hope that some conservative see's something i write-writes it off-then one day, weeks-months-years later- realizes what an asshat they were.
Intelligent people who renintellectually honest assume they're wrong and try hard to be disproven. You come here to preach.
You aren't going to sharpen your arguments because when your premises are challenged, you are going to use copes or just don't a new argument.
Nobody would ask you to change your opinion if an argument is disproven. For a number of reasons
1. Maybe you are arguing devils advocate.
2. Maybe that is just one of 100 reasons you believe something.
3. Maybe your belief is emotion based and that's okay also
However when challenged its just not going to go well if you are here to preach.
Reading g through your debates I can see that usually most of your energy is spent defending your arguments. You spend very little energy on rebuttals and understanding g your opponent's arguments. Your debate ranking is because the best debaters on the site just don't do many debates. You are not the 12th best debater here. Here is a list of debaterswho have gracedthe site at the same time with you and who re better, and this is off the top of my head.
1. Me
2. Oromagi
3. Barney
4. Whiteflame.
5. Lunatic
6. Theft
7. I like pie
8. Danielle
9. Airmax
10. Mikal
11. Coal
12. Rationalmadman
13. David
I will list another 20 later if I feel like it but also add a anyone ahead of you I the rankings as well
Created:
Posted in:
As happy as I am that ISIS has tricked dumb liberals into hinking they are leftists. Free speech absolutist is honestly just a code word for child porn advocate. Most free speech people think CP should be banned. Absolutist distinguish themselves from other free speech advocates by adopting the name absolutist.
This is one of those situations where most of the left wing is good at censoring right wing opi ions they find objectionable and half of conservatives want to widen the definition of porn and ban a ton of free speech stuff as well. .
Most sensible people, which I realize is a mi ority of he right and left these days, would support the free speech of ISIS, Nick Fuentes and Kim Jung Un.
The reason they see it as being under the guise of defending naziism (which by he way Nick Fuentes is not), is because if they can convince your average person that the right only cares about the free speech of nazis it gets them a free pass to censor any subversive thought or speech.
The reason the left does this is because quite frankly can't survive a free speech environment where people can actually debate them. It is why all the top debaters on DDO, which included me, Danielle, Roy lathem and Donald Keller, thett, were essentially all libertarian or paleoconservatives. The one exception near the top of the leaderboard was Mikal who got there with rap battles, but was obviously competent outside of rap battles as well.
The left has noticed that they can't survive in a place where ideals are debated, so they have pushed big tech into censoring everything.
I will say that, not all of their concerns are unfounded. A lot of heir censorship really is just about suppressing ideals they disagree with but some of the concerns they have about free speech are legitimate.
1. Foreign propaganda campaigns such as the Russian ones
2. Widespread disinformation that threatens public health and order. Vaccines, 5g etc
3. Campaigns of foreign intelligence agencies to him morale (Chinese using tiktok and discord for his type of campaign)
However we shouldn't be betraying our values to combat these threats. We combat them by teaching kids young and throughout life about media literacy, cognitive biases and critical thought.
We combat them by building institutions that are actually trustworthy.
We combat it by teaching ethics and leading with Christian values
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Ah yes, the indoctrination.
No it isn't
Do you also tell them that morality is subjective and that your opinion is not any more valid than the opinion of a gay person who thinks differently?
I tell them that morality is objective, but explain to them that I am human and extremely fallible and that I am likely wrong in most of my opinions but believe they are closer to the truth than the alternative, especially with my older son. I am very open about the fact that my opinions are just that.
"Well, so far what happened is that gays get mocked and excluded as a result."
If you say so. I believe Tammy Faye Baker is a model for how homosexuals should be treated by Christians, and she is very popular In a lot of gay subcultures.
If she can be a Bible believing Christian while being deeply empathetic to and friendly towards the gay community, than I believe anybody can.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
So you are mocking homosexuals while teaching that its wrong to mock homosexuals?
No, explaining that homosexual behavior is unethical. Lots of people have different models of ethics and the child needs to understand he needs to treat people good and respect them and maybe connect over the ethical principles they gree with.
Having gay friends is actually lots of fun, and homosexuality is on the rise in popularity, so I dont see the point of teaching a kid that homosexuality is wrong.
Brushing your teeth twice a day is the rule in my house and what dentists recommend. Just because I tell him kids who brush once a day are doing it wrong, doesn't mean I am banning him from hanging out with kids who brush once a day.
If he is straight, he will be straight anyway, and if he is gay, it will hurt him
Wrong. Most sexual preferences are conditioned. No kid is born having a fat fetish or a foot fetish or a same sex fetish. Preferences are conditioned. It doesn't mean they can control their conditioning, they can't to a large degree but sexual preferences are for the mot part conditioned though I will admit there is a tiny genetic component.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
If tha is the case then you have the incorrect definition of freedom. If you want a real discussion, since most people would interpret the word freedom to mean something different tha you, these types of posts should be precluded with the semantics you are working with. I would suggest you remake this thread with the definition of freedom you provided me as the introduction to your argument.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
There is simply no way for you to teach a kid that homosexuality is a sin without that kid later mocking gays in his school.
What if you also teach him mocking homosexuals is wrong?
Also just for clarification, I didn't call homosexuality a sin. I called homosexual behavior a sin. If you are a homosexual, God has destined you to become a celibate priest or monk or nun, and to use your feminine side to balance your male side so you can bring a balanced perspective to the theology you put out into the world.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I have seen people advocate for this with good philosophies to back it up and it's part of the reason I dropped being a libertarian. For libertarians to be ideologically consistent they need to give kids the right to do whatever they want.
The libertarian cope Is ofcourse some form of co tract theory that parents automatically have with children when they are born. It's nothing more than a cope. The libertarians who are libertarians just because they think the ideology works better usually will state some sortof age of reason. It's ideologically inconsistent with libertarianism but it doesn't matter since they promote libertarianism for practical reasons.
I would agree with the practical libertarians reasoning.
Children are stupid, easily victimized, naive and weak. The results of allowing them total freedom is that they would die within a week. A baby will eat something that will kill them or put a fork in a outlet if you let them . Plus if they have freedom it removes your obligation to clothe, feed abd shelter them. So they would die pretty fast. For toddlers that can reach a doorknob, they would probably not be housebound and die trying to cook for themselves, open up the door and run into traffic and die. This is all without getting into the myriad of things that won't lead to death, but would significantly harm the quality of life.
Freedom is an extrinsic good not an intrinsic good. Read it again.
A fish in a fishtank is not free, but if you take a hammer to the fishtank so he is no longer trapped by it and he will die.
If you free a bird from a cage and it flies into your homes sunroof to get outside but crashes and dies, he was free but he wasn't better off for it.
There isn't much value in freedom for children. Parents need to be there to protect and love their children. Not to grant it freedom and also themselves freedom by removing the shackles of their responsibility (which shackles parents and kids) and the shackles of their love.
When the kid is slightly less naive so he doesn't jump into a strangers van who has candy, when he understands the world better so he doesn't pull down boiling water on his head when trying to cook, when he can defend himself by speaking up for his own best interests than he can be afforded slightly more freedom in proportion to this, but that freedom is an extrinsic good created by the child growing as a person.
Created:
To be fair my older son is probably like half gay. He is really into art and music and stuff. He us also slightly effeminate. He looks like me though buy is tall so he does slay pussy. So thats why he is only half gay
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Being straight is not wrong.
You just got reported for this comment bigot
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
The point is, kids don't even know what to be "straight" means. They only know it's a bad thing because there's no reward for it.
Not mine. I teach him Spanish so he naturally gravitated towards the Christian Hispanic kids and he knows that homosexual behavior is a sin. The other day my male neighbor wished him happy valentines day. He yelled at the guy that he does not swing that way and he will never say happy valentines day to a boy
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
It's like the Superbowl, no matter what team you bet on, Taylor Swift is destined to win it all in the end.
I hate that fucker so much for living my dream. Winning a superbowl and then celebrating by fucking Taylor swift. He is living my dream. She is the only female celebrity I simp for. Well, her and salma Hayek. There is just something about her that makes Mr want to choke the shit out of her. I suspect she would be into it.
Created:
1. Biden has done a good job on border security despite the right being in control of the narrative somehow.
2. Biden has started a war on Cancer which could bring radical life extension closer and possibly extend my life a few years.
3. If the show trials and banana Republic style court hearings continue it will embolden the right to go after their political enemies in a similar fashion when thy inevitably win .
4. Accelerationism. The left winning will cause them to be start moving really fast into their plot to trans all kids, erase women from women sports, end the 2nd amendment and remove the bill of rights. The sooner they cause civilization to collapse the sooner we can start rebuilding it. I would rather still be around to see the collapse that we are heading for if they keep winning so I can help reverse it
5. Pro abortion policies can be implemented at a wider scale to kill off dyslexic people who would grow up to vote democrat anyway
Created:
Posted in:
I know that ventura did speak out publicly against trump when Trump mentioned strong arming foreign civilians related to known terrorists and it was a particularly big issue for Ventura
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
What about the US vs Denmark or Sweden?
All 3 are economic interventionists. If we see the pattern that the economic freedom index shows us, we can see countries more near the top, have better outcomes. Many Scandinavian countries are above the United States on the index. All the countries have social programs.
What does this tell us? If the scale is a measure of how Laissez-Faire a country is and the least Laissez-Faire is at the bottom and most Laissez-Faire is at the top and countries like north korea and venezuala are the bottom one, then ye we should probably do what we can to become more free than the Scandinavian countries that o defeat us on the index, but we should go further. We should drop all social programs so we can drop all poverty as well and have a prosperous cou try.
Let's look at the effects of economic interventionism
Early 1900s affordable Healthcare. Then Roosevelt created salary caps and then employers got around the salary caps by offering health insurance. This health insurance caused Americans to not realize the cost of health services due to being insulated from the costs. The result run away health care costs. So if we can see the root cause is government interventionism, it would be stupid to say. "Let's keep doing more of what caused the problem derp"
Early 1900s, mot food comes from independent businesses and local farmers. Some reports put it at about 80%. FDA is created and small business owners are destroyed and millions of people are turned into wage slaves. 80% of th food supply is brought to you by less than 10 corporations.
"Derp let's destroy the last remaining business owners by economic interventionism and make more starving wage slaves"
We can see the same thing happened with baking. Prior to glass steagull nearly all banking was by mom and pop banks. Now nearly all of it is with evil billion dollar corporations.
You have all this evidence that economic interventionism can be linked to all bad economic outcomes, you have this evidence that per the economic freedom index that countries with less economic interventionism do better than countries with more economic interventionism.
Honestly it's time to stop believing double digit IQ takes like
"Derp we can solve homelessness by economic interventionism in making them all houses"
(Aka nationalizing houseownership)
Or "derp the best way to get everyone to get good Healthcare is from free Healthcare so they can be put on 3 year waiting lists for life saving surgeries, derp"
Just follow the evidence my man.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Yes; by letting poor people starve to death, therefore reducing the poverty rate. If this was true, then no place would have a welfare state
No by creating more prosperity. Take a look at th economic freedom index which measures how capitalist vs socialist a nation is. The most economic intervention in say North korea and venezuala have the most poverty, where as the more free market societies have a higher standard of living.
America isn't killing more hungry people than North korea, it's just more of a free market so less poverty exists.
What does this have to do with whether or not the welfare state saves people's lives?
The welfare state and economic interventionism caused it. Just ask yourself this. Was food more wholesome and delicious today with all the economic interventionism or I it when everyone got things from local farmers and grocers and there was almost no economic interventionism?
Ideally just so you can get a better philosophy. I would suggest you take a look at systems that work and compare them to systems that don't work and fund out the differences between the systems that work and the ones which don't.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
https://youtu.be/j_QLzthSkfM?si=AbeCbPOlenCzBRkc
Created:
Posted in:
Is this hatred because Dave Thomas was a big donor to the republican party?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I never worked at Dennys. I told you at one time that I managed a fast food place and apparently your bigotry extends to all people who also work fast food. That's fine. You can repeat the insults about the working class adnauseum whether it is about substitute teachers, food service workers. I am sure that will bring people to your cause and help them to agree with you
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Said the lying racist hypocrite...
That is your typical democrat. At least she is honest about being racist, sexist, and classist. I am a bit confused about why she is shocked that people would oppose the democratic party when she openly admits to the racism, sexism and hatred of poor people
Created:
Most Republicans are for some sort of welfare state, which is why trump has used Nikki Haley's attempts to weaken social security to turn more people against her. However let's be honest. A Laissez-Faire economy would almost entirely eradicate poverty. So people who actually support that would in fact harm significantly less people than the welfare state. Look at how families prior to the welfare state in the 50s easily fed their children and now these fucks are just too poor so feed them calorie dense low nutrient food and are nturitio ally starving children while making them fat with empty calories.
Created:
Posted in:
All I can say is that they are so lucky for the type of right-wing that exists in America. The right in America will use this as an opportunity to fix the system but had this been a different class of right wingers or even had this sort of banana republic happenings occurred to the left, they would no doubt see it as an excuse to do the same thing back 10 fold. Thank God for the libertarian influence on Republicans.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
And if you want neither to happen, then you post a big message in the sky telling the Egypitians to free their slaves if you are god.
Yeah it's up to him how he deals with it.
God can say a similar message in the Sky for the Romans and that Christianity is real and should be the religion that should be followed.He didn't do that because God doesn't exist.
I am just here to discuss whether the phrase is the bible agreeing with slavery not to defend whether it is true or not. I wouldn't mind a discussion on the truth of the Bible but it's not something I would be good at attacking or defending.
Created:
Posted in:
Reason is libertarian they actually agree with the green party on a lot so I don't think they would reflexively just oppose what the green party is for. I also think the green party would not reflexively do that either. I think both the green and libertarian party are far more true to their principles than Republicans or democrats who do reflexively oppose stuff based on what the other party does. For example we saw that Trumps policies were at least half stolen from the democratic party platform and democrats reflexively opposed the policies they supported a year prior and only half of Republicans reflexively supported trumps policies that they opposed the prior year in 2015.
For example trump was looking to replace Obama care with basically the exact same thing but implement the 3 or 4 biggest gripes that democrats had and he would have probably called it trump care, but it got shut down by every single liberal and half of conservatives. Now I thought Obama care was bad whether it was trump just renaming it or when Obama named it, but those who too closely identify s democrat or republican literally just flipped their stance on obamacare the second trump planned on literally just passing a bill to abolish Obama care but really was just a renaming of it and fixing the 3 or 4 biggest gripes that democrats themselves had with it.
Created:
Posted in:
It just seems incongruity sometimes. Calling somebody an antivaxxer doesn't tell you anything about them .
Are they pro Vax and anti mandate?
Does it just mean they oppose the hundreds of vaccines rejected by the FDA each year?
Are they pro covid vaccine but anti MMR?
I am however judgemental of anyone claiming to be pro vaccine as technically that would mean they even support the thousands of harmful vaccines rejected by the FDA every year.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
1. The bible is pro slavery.2. The bible is pro obeying your master if you are a slave.
One is advice to your followers so they don't embarass you or perhaps a different motivation could be so they avoid getting too many beatings.
The others is thinking that slavery should be implemented.
I was an anarchist or close to it at one point and u would definitely advocate for my son to kiss a judges ass no matter how much I thought that courts and judges should be abolished.
I don't think you can really tell much by how a slave is advised to behave in a situation where the obly power he has is obedience to his master. At least a good slave may be able to become head slave and advocate for kinder treatment to other slaves. Even if he couldn't endure kinder treatment of others at least his life would be better by being obedient.
I might be remembering the wrong stoic. I can't verify because my internet is slow at the moment, but I think Seneca would give advise in a similar way.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
1. The bible is pro slavery.2. The bible is pro obeying your master if you are a slave.How is claim 1 different from claim 2?
Because of the concern about how your believers represent you and the quality of their lives. If you want the Jews to be safe when enslaved by Egypt it is probably better to tell them to be the best slaves they can be, to incentivize the Egyptians not to genocide them.
Being pro slavery would be advocating for the institution of slavery. I think it would be similar to hating the institution of court as an anarchist but still realizing you should kiss the judges ass.
I am not going to claim the bible is anti-slavery only that giving a person a guide for how to act should they become enslaved is not the same as saying they should be enslaved. I don't see how it's much different from Jesus telling people to turn their cheek if they are bitch smacked. He isn't advocating for the romans to bitch slap his people. He is just telling his people to endure in an honorable way.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I’m mocking a conservative who obviously must rely on Democratic programs to survive even though he had every opportunity to be successful in this country.
so is welfare a good thing or are republicans correct in opposing things like open borders and the welfare state?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
In fact, word "brave" wasnt used at all.What was used is "high intellect".
You did claim it was an act of a free thinker to literally agree with every corporation and media institutuion on homosexuality while simultaneously acting like it is an act of rebellion
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Every major corporation and every pro establishment politicians and most anti establishment politicians are pushing for more acceptance of homosexuality and more gayness in society. I can't even buy a beer or oreos without gay shit being promoted by them or watch a tv show without gayness somehow shoe horned in and pushed on me. I am probably 32% faggot just by existing in modern society. You aren't being a rebel by being a homo or pro homo.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
This does not make the bible pro slavery. It makes the bible pro obeying your master if you are a slave.
Created:
Posted in:
The new president has chosen to use his fathers decapitated head as a prop in his call to arms so maybe just turn your face while listening to it if you are a little girl who can't see a decapitated head without crying.
Created:
Posted in:
Biden has just been replaced as President and America is in a state of civil war. The new president has called for armed rebellion against the woke mob and the 5th pillar. https://www.livegore.com/480836/police-has-arrested-year-old-wanted-beheading-father-infos
Created:
Posted in:
Are democrats now against welfare. I might need to switch parties or is roosevelt just a retard?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
how do you survive? How do you not starve to death? You must get a government check, either disability or social security.
Thats the democratic party platform. Why would you have a problem with this?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Trump spent months telling his supporters that the election (and by extension their voices) were being stolen from them. He then invited them to the capitol on January 6 the claiming it "will be wild". He then held the speech where he told them they have to "fight like hell or you're not going to have a country anymore". This BTW followed a speech by Giuliani saying "let's have trial by combat".
Cherry picked quotes clearly meant to be metaphorical. You fight through legal means not by physical combat. Also having the opinion that the election was stolen is not illegal. Hillary thought the 2016 election was stolen, and by the way saying the election was stolen was something Al Gore also said and it could mean any number of things. It's such a vague statement and at best the only thing you can glean from it is that the election is being called unfair. It's not inciting a riot to have that opinion or to say you have to fight, there are videos of Nancy pelosi saying to fight for your rights also. Nobody with a 3 digit IQ takes it as a call to actual violence,
he months long effort by Trump to convince his supporters that the country was being stolen from them and his clearly violent rhetoric on the 6th do not get cancelled out because Trump slipped in the words "peacefully and patrioticly" in one sentence of his speech. One of these things is clearly not like the others. And you know who understood that? His supporters.
Dumb interpretation of his words. I took it to mean that he didn't want his words to be misinterpreted as meaning to be violent. Do revolutions such as by Mao, or Hitler or Mussolini, did any of those guys add anything after their rhetoric to say "peacefully" . Is this something that violent revolutionaries do? Did Thomas Jefferson hedge his bets by saying "We need to go to war, but in a peaceful way with the British" ?
And then there's the 3 hours or so that Trump spent watching the riots on TV while taking no official action whatsoever to stop it. That demonstrates his intent very clearly.
The secret service would not have allowed him to wear a uniform and go down there to police the situation himself.
So instead of railing against us for "believing whatever CNN tells us", maybe it is you who needs to question where you are getting your information and talking points fr
Not from anyy news agency that has proven they are biased that is for sure. By the way, I am sure you are not a partisan hack so what footage released by tucker carlson that painted an alternate vision of that day did you think was the most compelling?
Why do you think a lot of the footage he released seemed to contradict CNNs narrative? I would assume an unbiased news agency wouldn't push a narrative so you would get a wide range of footage that could be interpreted any number of ways.
By the way what is with your attack on Trump anyway? People literally can't afford rent or groceries because America is ruled by Democrats now. Even if Trump is that dirty he is still a better alternative than people literally starving in the streets.
Created:
Posted in:
It seems like Tucker's presence helped to start negotiations to free Gershkovich
Created:
-->
@Sam_Flynn
There are no dragons.
The chinese were proven correct about this when dinosaurs were discovered. We have more evidence of them now and can piece together what they looked like better, but it doesn't make the theory of their existence untrue.
There are no unicorns.There are no warrior dwarfs.
My wife is a warrior dwarf
There are no HobbitsThere are no aliens.
The fermi paradox indicates it is highly unlikely for aliens not to exist
There are no Kryptonians.There are no Amazonians.
There are definitely Amazonians
Need I go on?
Unless there is evidence to the contrary it seems just as reasonable to presuppose a creator as presuppose no creator
Created:
If anything I am pissed at Trump for not pardoning the based God known as Joe Exotic
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Omnipotence eh. Just can't believe everything we're told, can we?
I don't know where the belief God is omnipotent or in this case omniscient came from. It clearly wasn't a belief when Genesis was written. I don't even think it was really a thing in anything prior to when proverbs was written. I guess I would have to see the arguments rabbis had with each other to figure out how the belief in God's omniscience came about.
Created: