Vici

The incompetent moderators have accused me of being of being the alt of a seperate individual. To outline how utterly incompetent the moderator is, I would like the community to take a wild guess at who this user may be. I will identify this user (It wont be a call out from the POV of the mods I am them lmao) in two days time when the community can have their guess. 

Also, mods, I do not want you to identify this user. This is a mater of privacy. I will reveal who this person is at the set time. 

Despite what you may think of me, I implore you all to read this post, as I seriously think it poses a significant issue which should be solved. This is serious - I know many of you may not like me, but this is an issue which effects all debaters and the integrity of this site. 

In my recent debate, the following vote was provided 

The bolded shows the pivotal thing which made the voter vote for the Negative side. However, this was refuted in the second round (you don't need to read it if you don't want to, just know that it is there and quite substantial (for a debate of 5,000 characters, this is quite a substantial part of the argument). 

It seems clear that a he solely focuses on arguments presented by Con and does not engage with responses from Pro or any of Pro's arguments. Keep this  in mind.

Another vote which was casted against me was based on the following. 

Notice how the voter mentions ONLY a single argument which was a 760 characters placed at the argument which I took care in saying was a kritik which was *cheeky*. It seems clear then that the voter solely focuses on arguments presented by Con and does not engage with responses from Pro or any of Pro's arguments. 

Now this is the most important bit. In Oromagi's recent debate, a vote was removed for the following reason. 

Is it not clear that there is a double standard in play? The two votes clearly violate what Whiteflames says! They don't focus on arguments Pro debated, and does not engage with responses from Pro!

There is a clear bias on this site. When it comes to defending Oromagi, the moderators will enact their "reason". When it is used to defend Barney, opposing reason is imployed to protect him. 

clearly there is a bias. 

Best Korea had a bad vote against a leftist Oromagi. he got banned from voting

FLRW had a vote against a right wing view. he was not banned from voting 

is this not clear? Wake up from the matrix

MAKE SURE YOU VOTE. MY OPPONENT HAS HAD A DECADE LONG WIN STREAK (88 IN DDO) AND IT IS ABOUT TO END. HIS ENTIRE LIFE WHICH IS THIS STREAK IS ABOUT TO END. MAKE SUR EYOU VOTE SO YOU CAN BE APART OF HISTORY. 

their numbers are all so high even though they turned into a concentration camp where people could go more than a kilometre outside of their house? Tell me, liberals, did it work?? Look at the number now they are consistently high. the government said "we want to help you" but now that we've moved on, now that the narrative has moved on to Ukraine, who cares about covid? Why is it that they don't need vaccine passports (yes they actually had that) anymore if they really care? Its because they never cared. 

Also, if they really care about your health, why don't they shut down all fast food places? They already show they don't care about small business so why not, for the sake of health, stop fast-food???its because they don't care about you

Logical absolutes exist. Logical absolutes are conceptual by nature, are not dependent on space, time, physical properties, or human nature. They are not the product of the physical universe (space, time, matter), because if the physical universe were to disappear, logical absolutes would still be true. Logical Absolutes are not the product of human minds, because human minds are different, not absolute. But, since logical absolutes are always true everywhere, and not dependent upon human minds, it must be an absolute transcendent mind that is authoring them. This mind is called God.

its bs. there are only two. I don't get why people want 52 genders its so dumb they defend it by saying "well it helps trans people" well actually NO because the trans issue is a different thing, I still allow trans people to do their thing if there are only 2 genders. 

two questions

who would win? If we take the best debaters (not the noob snipers like orosadmi), and put them against the best of ddo, which would win? Which has higher quality minds? 

second, why don't some of the DDO people call back to this cite the OG's?? I know a lot of people here have contact through discord and google messengers, so to actually make this ddo vs dart thing real, we can actually start a face off of this sort if we call them back. it will 1. bring a bunch of activity and also be a huge event. 

ANDREW TATE GOT BANNED FROM INSTAGRAM AND FACEBOOK

ANDREW TATE GOT BANNED FROM INSTAGRAM AND FACEBOOK

WTF. THIS IS THE ULTIMATE CENSORSHIP ALL FOR YOU TOO SEE. THIS IS THE MANIFESTATION OF LIBERAL DEMOACRATS. THEY ARE BANNING THOSE WHO THEY DISAGREE WITH. 

TO ANYONE WHO ISN'T CONCERNED, THIS IS VERY ORWELLIAN. THE BANNING OF SPEECH IS THE RESTRICTION OF THOUGHT. 

When trump does it, it's "oh he's a racist". when sleep sniffing Joe does it, the public left just let it slide. Where's all the outrage from the lefties???

THIS IS NOT MY ARGUMENT. THIS IS NOT. I READ THIS FROM THIS GUY NAMED RICHARD SPENCER. I AM BLACK (hence me having the n word pass) AND HATED SLAVERY. 

the argument is like this. if the europeans didn't come and swoop into the land of the indigenous, the indigenous would still be in their primitive lives without medicine, security of housing, nutritious food etc. but since the european boys came, even tho they enslaved some of them, OVER ALL, we can see that black people live better lives than they did 500. years ago. 

DONT CANCEL ME, IM JUST A PUPPET FOR RICHARD SPENCER. IM JUST SAYING HIS ARGUMENT. IM NOT A RIGHT WINGER, I VOTED FOR BERNIE SANDERS  

for those of you who believe in the religion known as evolution, i recommend you read some dr kent hovind. 

if u think evolution is real, you really think we came from an ameba and that we are related to bananas. if you ask any farmer, they will tell you that all their animals have only ever brought forth after their kind just as how god had said in the bible. is there ever a case wher ea dog gave birht to a cat? NO!!!!!!! a dog ONLY EVER GIVES BIRTH TO A DOG. 

as to why. we are taught this propaganda, well it's just a liberal ploy. 

also can any one of you evolution religous pastors tell me - do you think a dog can give birth to a non dog ?

i see that hof is an annual thing. is it happening this year? where can i sign up? 

he's great. if you contend, you are using logic, which he made, so you are using god to disprove god which is silly logic. 

It is common knowledge that people want to know what others think and are egoistic punks (evidenced by the success of the rationalmadmans threads summarising others characters). To capitalize on this (capatalism is good not silly socialism), I will make a new game. The first person on here expresses interest through their comment. The second person then makes some comment about them (length at least 50 plus words) which can include some of. the following

Please put some thought to the responses. Give a response with enough detail such that if someone commented the stuff to you, you would be happy. 

After the second person has made the comment about the first person, they have entered into the game. The third person can then comment on the second person etc etc etc. 

To give more fluidity, you can comment on whoever you want if you wish (doing this will prompt others to also give a description on you), but please try to respond to everyone (lets be inclusive here)

Enjoy!

What actual critisisms of red pill is there? LIke it is clear that our lives are dominates by hierarchal contructs - governemtn, big farma, etc.  

What do we think of Andrew Tate? Is he good for men? 

Who's the best debater here? I wish to challenge them.