this game < mafia

Author: Vici

Posts

Total: 23
Topic's author
#1
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
It is common knowledge that people want to know what others think and are egoistic punks (evidenced by the success of the rationalmadmans threads summarising others characters). To capitalize on this (capatalism is good not silly socialism), I will make a new game. The first person on here expresses interest through their comment. The second person then makes some comment about them (length at least 50 plus words) which can include some of. the following

  • How you see the user (the impression you get of them, are they cool, annoying stoic.  Are they intimidating?). 
  • How good they are at debating
  • How they can improve. 
  • Would you personally believe you would beat them in a debate
    • If so, propose a topic which you will likely debate. 
Please put some thought to the responses. Give a response with enough detail such that if someone commented the stuff to you, you would be happy. 

After the second person has made the comment about the first person, they have entered into the game. The third person can then comment on the second person etc etc etc. 

To give more fluidity, you can comment on whoever you want if you wish (doing this will prompt others to also give a description on you), but please try to respond to everyone (lets be inclusive here)

Enjoy!
Topic's author
#2
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
sorry, i put the < the wrong way arround. It's supposed to be this game > mafia because this game is cool and for the capatalist whilst mafia is for silly socialists
Topic's author
#3
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
also, im not participating because im too new here. 
Topic's author
#4
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
also also please like my original post i want to be loved because my dad left me
#5
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
You don't need to participate for us to know you are among the egotistical punks of the site.
#6
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
This doesn't sound like a game in a normal sense and just sounds like it would be done in no more than one long thread and several egotistical punks(trust me, some of us don't want to get involved with forum games for the most part, myself often included).

What Mafia has that makes it a great forum game is that it can be themed, twitched, and swapped. You choose a bunch of roles, jacket them up with different characters, and there is a new game for the fortnight, a different one.

This sounds just like descriptions, and any twists on this would lose the essence as I could imagine. I guess you can try, but before any formal attempts, saying that it is >Mafia is arrogant to my ears or eyes.
Topic's author
#7
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@RationalMadman
How am i egotistic i literally said i dont want to play this egotistic game. if i was egotistic i would play and get complimented as the best debater here. 
Topic's author
#8
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
rational mad man tried this kind of stuff and it worked. 


these are both based on rational mad man fuelling peoples desires to know what otheres think about them. What is the issue here?  
#9
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Vici
That is the shit Tate will never teach you.

Topic's author
#10
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@RationalMadman
andrew tate would knock your socks off
Topic's author
#11
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@RationalMadman
@Intelligence_06
since this game is so dead, i'll start it off. 

@Irrational sad man 

  • How you see the user (the impression you get of them, are they cool, annoying stoic.  Are they intimidating?). 
I love them. I really do. I feel very bad for roasting them in the recent rap battle, but they did call the top g (me, VICI) egotistical so as much as I am in love with the irrational sad man, I had to sit him back down. I think in terms of personality, they have mood swings, hence them being able to be number 1 on the leaderboard and a clearly good debater, whilst also being a bit of a child in the comments occasionally (why you declaring war you bozo). A true embodiment of ying and yang!

In terms of intimidation, idk RM be kinda cute *kiss kiss no homo because i am deeply religious*

  • How good they are at debating
Pretty good eh. Obviously they got to number 1 but my recent (intellectual) victory over orosadmi throws the heirchy into absolute shambles. 

  • How they can improve. 
i havent really read ur debate sorry I cant give advice. if you send me bitcoin (just 1), i'll be happy to give you a consultation. one note, can you hyperlink your sources instead of pasting them out? 

  • Would you personally believe you would beat them in a debate
yes
    • If so, propose a topic which you will likely debate. 
we are in a rap battle, but thats hardly a debate (a debate is usually fair whilst our contest is not i will mop the floor over him)

@unintelligent_bum

  • How you see the user (the impression you get of them, are they cool, annoying stoic.  Are they intimidating?). 
a look at their profile reveals that they are a child, so I cannot comment on them (I am an adult and commenting on a little itsy bitsy child would be improper, albeit priest like). he comes from China so I am surprised Xi hasn't thrown him into a camp. also, doesn't china monitor it's people's conversations, especially with Aerian whites like me? If you, you suck Xi, ur a communist fool and andrew tate would knock you out in a fight. also, stop killing the muslims. Also, dont put unintelligent_bum into a camp, because if you do, I'll lose a close friend. 

  • How good they are at debating
orosadmi rip off

  • Would you personally believe you would beat them in a debate
yes
    • If so, propose a topic which you will likely debate. 
as i said, just name the site i'll beat his ass (non-homo) in any topic.  anything. any topic whatsoever. absolute distruction is inevitable. 





Topic's author
#12
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
come on guys this is fun get invovled. 
#13
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Vici
Nothing you said about me was constructive, basically. Most of them are just slander. You can do better.
Topic's author
#14
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
look its just a game and i am trying to give you an honest (ik you dirty liberals dont like that word) assessment of what i think of you
#15
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Vici
I think Vici is a suitable name for what you wish you were but there is a reason you prematurely came before you saw me.
Topic's author
#16
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@RationalMadman
vici is latin for to come so yes i made the name because i have been stalking ur account since the DDO (see how i know that lil phrase) account and been sexually aroused by your syntax and the term "man" in your name. 
#17
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Vici
  • How you see the user (the impression you get of them, are they cool, annoying stoic.  Are they intimidating?). 
  • How good they are at debating
  • How they can improve. 
  • Would you personally believe you would beat them in a debate
    • If so, propose a topic which you will likely debate. 
  • I see Vici as a relatively friendly user, albeit extraordinarily arrogant when it comes to this site. Vici is willing to take everything as a joke, no matter when he is supposed to or not, which is a good sign of a user(unlike some who outright bashes me for not getting the joke).
  • Vici can indeed write good arguments like shown here(albeit bland for DART standards, that is what happens with inexperience). The biggest problem is with forfeitures. Vici forfeits after instigating a debate, which is not the strategy to go, effectively placing him worse statistically compared to who he actually is. Though, I am sure that Vici debates for fun and doesn't nearly care about the rating as some of us do.
  • First, drop your arrogance. Don't think you are better than you are or your opponents worse than they are, they are what leads to you losing. Second, just gain general experience. Play around with other styles until you get the hang of it.
  • Like I said, it is near impossible to measure Vici's actual skills due to he has only written 2 arguments that I know, one of them heavily bounded by the structure(500c, 1r), the other one a 50% forfeit. I assuredly could beat anyone if they forfeit, but please don't.
    • It is dynamic. I pick topics from the tab and research them on the spot. I haven't got one but I will be sure to look into every open challenge. Good luck!

Topic's author
#18
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
thanks for your advice, unintelligent_bum, i truly appreciate it. as i said, i had to forfeit because of circumstances, and after all, orosadmi is the "best" debater on this site. im sure with time ai can get my 100% win streak back. 
#19
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Vici
You simultaneously stated that you are 13 and that you are an adult. Please drop this behavior regardless of age. We value truth, or at least interpretations that could be interpreted as true. This is not one of them.
#20
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@Vici
this game is cool and for the capatalist whilst mafia is for silly socialists
Can I get an explanation why mafia is for socialists? (As neither a mafia player or a socialist)
#21
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@K_Michael
@Vici
Can I get an explanation why mafia is for socialists? (As neither a mafia player or a socialist)
I would argue that this game is less capitalist than Mafia due to this "game", if you even call it that, is based on constructive feedback as in a community. Mafia meanwhile is themed an illegal scheme and has two opposite sides interdependent but also in rivalry. That is pretty oligopolistic if you ask me.



#22
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
The user above me hates China and supports the revolutionaries who stole China and destroyed it. 

8 days later

#23
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
The user above me knows way too little to say that about China and is not playing the game.