Total votes: 42
FF
He's a seven year old guys, give him a break.
Pro conceded,
50% forfeit
Little Georgie from the Apple Tree
What Dr.Franklin said
WP did a variety of poems, with better flow, and Pro literally just alliterated.
Full forfeit
I feel as if KING8 was the better debater here.
For sources and conduct, PRO PLAGIARIZED HALF OF HIS ARGUMENT. Whereas Ragnar, being himself wrote out a nice long rebuttal, and argument with many sources.
Concession.
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLLLFFFFFOOOOOOOORRRFFFFFEEEEEIIIIIIIIITTTTTTT
KAMEHAMEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
FF
Great Job to both sides, this was a tough one. No but seriously, FF.
Full forfeit
I feel as if K8 was the better rapper here. He added the definitions in one of his raps which I know is really hard to do. Also SD made a grammatical mistake.
Plagiarism, full forfeit.
Full forfeit
Well first of all, one of them FF'd and DarthVader1 extended arguments, but he didn't have any???
Full Forfeit
Concession and Forfeiture
I feel as if King_8's word flow was better, and he mainly was "bragging" about himself, not roasting others.
Con FF
Pro almost FF'd but did less forfeits
Con conceded to pro, so that's better arguments. Both provided equally good sources, CUPS, and conduct.
Well both sides had good points but in my POV con won.
First Round
One of the only statements Pro made that was good about nukes was about how it saves lives. Yes, in some cases it does but not all. The rest was just saying how a nuclear war would never happen.
"No one wants to declare war. This is simple. When a big country has nukes it would only make sense that the other big country wouldn't have fought with nukes because nukes are SO devastating."
Pro concedes with most of cons points right here, saying how nukes are "SO devastating". How is this a point that proves nukes are good? It doesn't. Saying there is no possibility of a devastating nuclear warfare is dissing nukes itself.
Second Round
Most of Pro's responses had to deal with how A DEVASTATING NUCLEAR WAR WOULDN'T HAPPEN... AGAIN DISSSING NUKES
"This is of course IF a Nuclear War happened. A nuclear war will never happen. Nuclear deterrence is the key. No side wants to use nukes do you know how many "close calls" we have had but NONE OF THEM TURNED INTO A NUCLEAR WAR. The fact is that if America had nuke sin the 30's WW2 would never have happened. Germany would never take the risk. Unless you can prove this war will happen these argument is invalid"
Third Round
Con forfeited the round, and Pro makes good points, but still not enough to convince me to make him/her win, because he/she conceded.
Pro Conceded
Full Forfeit, and also because that Con kept on adding to his argument until he realized that it was going to be a full forfeit.
Forfeiture
Forfeiture
Pro waived the last round.
While I agree that minimum wage should be increased, Con obviously provided better arguments.