And if you are a murderer, believing in God doesn’t changethe fact that you are a murderer.
Yes, but thats irrelevant to your claim "I dont believe in God, therefore I am not a murderer".
None of those examples corresponds to your claim that childrenare punished for the crimes of their parents.
Well, let us hear you.
The first is an accident, not a punishment.
No. Its a punishment which results in death. An accident would be something out of your control, not something that you produced knowing the end result. Therefore, when your society produces a system that punishes uncared children with death, your society carries responsibility. Further, when your society doesnt punish uncaring parents, that too contributes to death. Usually, people want to deny responsibility for their actions in order to continue doing evil. Therefore, I am not surprised when you deny that your society is responsible for the things it intentionally caused. Denying reality is usually necessary when faced with truth.
If parents die and leave a child no crime has been committed.
Unless the death is suicide. Death by itself is not a crime or an intentional action. Suicide is. I believe we are talking about intentional actions here.
Poverty isn’t a crime.
So why does your society punish children who have poor parents? If parent's actions caused them to be poor, why are children put to difficulties for the actions of their parents?
Circumcision isn’t a crime
It is by God's law. Your society punishes children with circumcision if their parents agree.
If parents go to prison, society will try to provided care for that child not punish them.
Therefore, when a child lives in one of government's horrible caring facilities and gets drugged there, that is same as child who has parents and who is not drugged? Usually, when we have two opposites, we consider one better than the other. The worse option is a punishment done to the child due to actions of his parents.
The accepted definition would probably be punishment carried out for wrong doing by a legal authority
No. The definition of punishment cannot include the word punishment. Otherwise, we dont need definitions at all. We can just say: logic is logic, punishment is punishment, crime is crime...
Of course, you would prefer to find a definition that doesnt include "causing death, pain, mutilation, disadvantage and drugging". However, if "causing these things to a child for the crimes of his parents" is not punishment, then surely nothing is punishment.
Therefore, when you cause "death, pain, mutilation, disadvantage and drugging" to the child for the actions of his parents, you have no right to complain when God punishes disobedient children for the sins of their parents and rewards the good children for their faith.