Now you’re talking about men dressing up in drag. Please make up your mind.
A man does not need makeup and a dress to do whatever he wanted to.
A trans woman is a biological man who thinks he is a woman. So by this logic we can assume that they would dress up in more feminine clothing.
Now what is to say that a man could dress up in woman's clothing, call himself a transwoman, and go in the woman's bathroom?
Is was talking about the anti-LGBTQ movement.
Movements that are intellectually legitimate base themselves on actual trends in our society, not on a handful of occurrences within a population of over 300 million people.
Christianity is and has been a trend in American society. So is Christianity a movement? No, its a religion.
By the way, Christianity is the biggest religion in the world capping in at over 2.2 billion people.
Transgender student…” - ok, we can stop there. I asked you for evidence that trans women should be regarded as pedophiles, so not only was your first article immediately disqualifying as it was a story of one person, but it has nothing to do with sexual assault. She was arrested for punching two other girls in the face, probably because they were talking shit to her. I really hope you have something better.
It's not sexual assault, but it is still assault. Even though that student might identify as a woman, they are still a biological man whether they like it or not. That means they have an advantage in strength over women. The whole reason why men can't hit women, is because they are biologically way stronger than women. So why does it change when the guy calls himself a woman? This still stands as a valid point.
Oklahoma trans gender student…” - not reading this, another one off and a complete waste of time.
What? This is complete denial of evidence that you asked for. So you are just going to deny the facts?
The next as article claiming story hour “admits” to grooming kids is just plain stupid. Apparently “grooming” on the political right is being defined as teaching kids that the LGBTQ community exists. In a way this really says more than you’ve said in this entire thread. It really speaks to the right’s bigotry here that the very idea of teaching our kids to accept the community would be categorized along with child abuse.
What are you talking about. Listen to what your saying.
The LGBTQ+ community is a belief, not based in any fact whatsoever.
When schools are trying to indoctrinate kids to accept LGBTQ+ people, that is grooming. It is teaching kids that if you don't like or agree with this way of thinking, you are a bigot, and a racist, homophobic, transphobic person.
But for some reason, the minute someone brings up Christianity, or any other religion, the schools say it's not allowed. You don't see Christians saying if you don't believe or agree with us, then you are a horrible person.
It is radical leftist belief that has been politicized so much, that teachers and schools are trying to indoctrinate our kids into believing this stuff is mandatory to learn. The left has no other way to keep this idea moving forward.
The rest of your articles are about library books which has nothing to do with this subject except the last one which is another YouTube video. Not watching that until you can show that you even understand what kind of evidence it would take to support your claim.
Well, you asked for the evidence dude. I responded and came up with evidence. If your just going to deny the facts that proves how based your argument really is. This is what the left loves to do. They argue and argue, up until real hard evidence shows up, then they just decide to deny that evidence of being or having any truth. I provided evidence. You decided to deny it. That's up to you buddy.
