Then any police officer who fires his gun can be reasonably considered a bad person.
Why did you clip out the part before that where I said self-defense shootings aren’t gun violence. I’d add defending other people from violence to that too. So, false
In other words, if you accept that gun violence is mostly committed by black people and you accept that gun violence is the result of "bad guys with guns", then by extension, you must accept that black people are just far more likely to be bad.
That belief is by definition, racist
You keep avoiding my point: if we both agree that we can call murderers bad people, and black people are more likely to commit murder, are we by extension being racist because that would mean blacks are more likely to be bad people (murderers)? An objective, provable fact is that they commit more murders than any other racial group, and according to you murderers can be called bad people.
So it sounds like you believe certain facts are ‘racist’
No, my evidence is the arguments that are being used to advocate for gun prevalence, which I already explained in detail.
And when it comes to wants and/or needs, I prioritize stopping needles loss of life over preserving people's hobbies. I don't consider that racist.
Have you ever even owned a gun? If you have, you’d know the primary purpose of most guns is self-defense or hunting. Another slogan relates to when seconds count, police are minutes away.
I don’t care if you’re a woman, smaller man, outnumbered by criminals, or whatever the case may be, people desire the ability to defend oneself without waiting for the cleanup crew (cops) to get there after the fact
Most fun hobby guns are not used to commit violence, as most gun violence is committed using pistols. So restricting people from buying an AR-15 for fun is going to have a pretty negligible effect