Adam could not have been the original human, it had to be Eve. Lilith wasn't human.

Author: RationalMadman
Islam
Christianity
RM
Judaism
Biology

Posts

Total: 24
Topic's author
#1
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
XX

XY

stop. just stop and think, very very hard.

Which is the default you as a creator would generate in chromosomes?

XX same, nothing new needs to be invented, this being can reproduce automatically via its womb or equivalent and needs no additional being to handle its dualistic chromosomal nature.

XY... competes hardcore to get to reproduce with XX, serves to be disposable meatshield during war and at other times puts in the work hunting and gathering. Can't feel orgasm nearly as deep and well as XX can. Organ is blatantly designed for entry to XX's organ but the reverse is not at all the case, it was built around bearing a child and exit strategy.

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmm

which was made for which?

try detectives, let's get it going!!!!!
#2
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
The penis is round. The vagina is a slit. The anus is round.

Clearly the penis was made for anal penetration.
Topic's author
#3
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@K_Michael
Anyone who has tried anal without artificial lube and prep knows you are wrong but I'm not here for that chat which can become homophobic.
Topic's author
#4
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@K_Michael
Look at the exact thing a penis delivers and rethink your statement.
#5
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@RationalMadman
It's just a dumb joke, not something I actually believe.
#6
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
So we get to just make up our own myths and tell people they have to buy it, lol. Science should. Not be mixed with faith.
#7
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@RationalMadman
XY... competes hardcore to get to reproduce with XX, serves to be disposable meatshield during war and at other times puts in the work hunting and gathering. Can't feel orgasm nearly as deep and well as XX can. Organ is blatantly designed for entry to XX's organ but the reverse is not at all the case, it was built around bearing a child and exit strategy.
Are you perhaps using this as an argument against the traditional creationism? Because according to the widely-accepted evolutionary theory, biological sexes are developed long before these animals are human in the first place.

Topic's author
#8
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Intelligence_06
Yes, this is the 'Religion' subforums and my thread title makes this crystal clear.
#9
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@K_Michael
The penis is round. The vagina is a slit. The anus is round.
Clearly the penis was made for anal penetration.
The barrel of the gun is longer, more rigid, and rounder than the average penis. Therefore, they are good substitutes to penises.

Unless you leave the trigger activated. In that case, it is more than a good substitute.

/s
#10
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Just because it's the religion forum doesn't mean you get to make things up and then expect people to converse about it. There's no context, no reference points, nothing. The question you're posing sounds more like a science question which has nothing to do with religion.
Topic's author
#11
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Poly, you don't believe in Adam and Eve or that god made men first and women second, correct?

Therefore, you're accurate in saying this thread is irrelevant to your thesis, theologically.
#12
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,198
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@RationalMadman
Poly thinks that men aren't qualified to talk about women.

Even though we've known each other forever* and are fully aware of each other's anatomical differences.


Nonetheless, genetic diversity necessitates binary reproductive systems.

One could easily assume that it was designed that way.


And Adam and Eve just rolls of the tongue better than Eve and Adam.


Presumably when GODDO was developing its binary species concept, it was necessary to give equal consideration to both.


#13
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
And you don't believe in anything either. You're sitting here making shit up and then want people to discuss it like it's religion it's just your own personal fucking opinion about science.
Topic's author
#14
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Science is not about opinions, I'm talking facts.

The default entity is the XX entity, XY is the later edition/deviation. That is completely obvious from not only the fact XX is a replicated sub-chromosome to make the chromosome but also because women are functionally able to birth more women, men would never ever be able to produce more men.
#15
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Men don't give birth so your statement is completely asinine
And women being XX doesn't have anything to do with how many other women they produce men determine the sex of a baby because men give the x or the y chromosome. This is not a religion topic you're talking about creation and evolution and those are science topics and they have nothing to do with religion you aren't even arguing them in a religious context. And you've only chosen one religious context to argue about why don't you address the other 700 religious creation stories that might be out there oh no you can't do that cuz that will require you to actually study something other than Christianity which you hate because you're a bigot.
Topic's author
#16
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Men don't give birth so your statement is completely asinine
No, in fact that's a wonderful point to notice, the default being should be capable of reproduction, in any sexual species that should blatantly be the case.
And women being XX doesn't have anything to do with how many other women they produce
It has to do with what god defaulted.
men determine the sex of a baby because men give the x or the y chromosome.
That's because god made it that way,  in the eyes of the religious and the y chromosome in the men is only relevant to making a boy whereas the default being (women/female) is involved in the making of both regardless in the same default chromosome manner.
This is not a religion topic you're talking about creation and evolution and those are science topics and they have nothing to do with religion
Adam couldn't have been the non-default being, Jesus couldn't have been a virgin-born male from a female. Chromosomes destroy Abrahamic faiths in 2 differetn ways at the very least.

#17
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@RationalMadman
Let's disregard pure evolution here, if I am the creator and I made humans like this, it would be apparent that at the beginning, it was a pair, let's just call then Adam and Eve for convenience.

If I am the creator and I want humans to thrive in the most efficient way possible, why would I create 2 sexes? Why wouldn't I just introduce asexual reproduction? I think this argument disprove Christian creationism better. The fact there are 2 sexes at all suggest that the roots of human genders and sexes go way beyond before we were even people at all.
#18
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Adam couldn't have been the non-default being, Jesus couldn't have been a virgin-born male from a female. Chromosomes destroy Abrahamic faiths in 2 differetn ways at the very least.
Only you, atheists and Christians think these are a true stories and not myth/ allegory.
#19
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,832
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@RationalMadman

What you say about Eve is true. That is why men have nipples.
Topic's author
#20
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@FLRW
100%, boys are female in the womb at first.
#21
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,261
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Moms are the closest things to these god things. 

Religious people stop loving there moms WAYYYYYYYYY to early , (  i think ) 
Im pretty sure. 

Imagine the brotherD kissing his mom on the cheek and telling her he loves her. 

Who the fuck is more important then mom ? 

And what Zed said. Eve and Adam sounds odd. 
HOWEVER 
HANG ON. 
After saying it 70 times
Eve and Adam. Works. 
Eve and adam
Even adam
Up and at em 

No but. 
Nice thought . /  nice argument Madman. 
That into god doing the 4 blood types thing he did for two humans. 

 
#22
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,671
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull

Religious people stop loving there moms WAYYYYYYYYY to early , (  i think ) 
Im pretty sure. 
Maybe because of this, Deb


Matthew 10:35-36
35 For I have come to turn
“‘a man against his father,
    a daughter against her mother,
a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law—
 a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’


#23
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,261
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Its such a fucking mans world hey.
Look how male oriented that verse is. 

I suspect  God likes men more then women.  
Unless the next scripture reads. 

Lauren 72. :  33
A womens enemies will be the members of his own household'   (  Now that sounds silly ) 


Did reckon God said to Matthew. 
Oh And .  ( A son-in-law against his father-in-law )  but matty just ummm,  forgot to jot that shit down . 




#24
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,261
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
I bet god was ok with women laying next to women. 


Gay females have the same chance to enter heaven as heterosexual women..
Because like ,  it doesn't really  matter if women are gay. 
Becauseeeeeeeeee,   Women don't really matter much.