Vote on debate

Author: Mopac

Posts

Archived
Total: 242
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@secularmerlin
no. i don't know how they think and make decisions. i cant even really guess with a dog. But i do believe they have awareness,and the ability to make decisions. even a bacteria does.
Plisken
Plisken's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 706
2
1
5
Plisken's avatar
Plisken
2
1
5
-->
@janesix
You think your cells have free will too?

secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@janesix
Is it possible that making decisions rewuires only external stimuli and an internal state?
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
You don't believe that free will exists because you think you know better. You even "reject" it which means you won't consider the possibility.

Well, you certainly have made your choice.




janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@secularmerlin
I don't think it is possible without awareness. this is why i have changed my mind on all things having free will, such as electrons. i think things need to be alive to have consciousness, and thus free will. 
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
I'm sorry do not accept. I tried to explain what I mean by reject but since you could not understand allow me to amend my statement. I do not accept any claim about the existence or non existence of freewill especially if the term is not well defined.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@janesix
What is your preferred definition of conciousness?
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@secularmerlin
I don't really have a definition. But i know what it feels like. awareness of my own thoughts, my emotions, my environment to some extent. 
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@janesix
And how do we determine whether or not some other entity or force possesses these qualities?
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
Free will.

The free will that you have is the freedom of consciousness.

Obviously, you can't jump to the moon. And back on a whim. You can make choice though.


For example, accepting God or rejecting God.

Things are a lot better for you if you choose God. Detachment from God is hell.

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@secularmerlin
we can't. we can only make guesses based on our own experience.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,052
3
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
3
3
3
-->
@secularmerlin
In the hands of theists free will is how to let the gods off the hook.  If something's good the gods get the credit; if it's bad it's our fault.

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@keithprosser
Everyone is responsible for their own actions. even God.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@keithprosser
Not all theists make that argument but I have heard it made. It would be very convenient for Yahweh in particular if he were considered good by fiat rather than being judged by his actions as described in the bible.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@janesix
I agree. We can only guess.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
@keithprosser
Judging God as bad because you don't like what goes on in the world is kind of like judging gravity as bad because it causes people to trip or fall.


It is universally a good mental health decision accept feality. Rejecting reality is universally a bad mental health decision.



janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
The difference is God has a mind and can make decisions. Gravity can't. You really don't think God is responsible for his own actions?
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,052
3
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
Judging God as bad because you don't like what goes on in the world is kind of like judging gravity as bad because it causes people to trip or fall.
I don't judge God as bad; I judge God as a figment of theistic imagination.   Many theists explain how evil exists in the world despite God being good by blaming it on human free will.  The atheistic explanation for the existence of evil boils down to 'shit happens'.


secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
Good and bad are qualia not quanta. Something can only be said to be good or bad in relation to something else. Good for your health bad for the environment good for the company bad for the poor. These are all arbitrary standards. I have no reason to think that the ultimate reality is capable of assigning judgements based on any standards arbitrary or otherwise. I do not accept any claim that it can.

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
@janesix
Everything God does is good because God is the standard of good. 

The Truth is what is good. God is The Truth.


God is good, it's really simple.


So what is good? To love The Truth. What is evil? To disregard or even hate The Truth.

What did God do? God made everything the way it is. God also gave us the gift to accept God or reject God.

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@keithprosser
The Ultimate Reality is not a figment of anyone's imagination, that's just silly.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
Ultimate reality (the noumana) is unknowable. You cannot say what is good using it as a standard if you cannot know anything about that standard. 

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
Did God create spider wasps? Carnivores who eat living beings? 
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
You say there is nothing that can be known.

Maybe that is why you have no standards.

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@janesix
Sure did.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
I have personal standards. I do not base my standards on unknowables.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@secularmerlin
Arbitrary standards.

No kidding.

Plisken
Plisken's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 706
2
1
5
Plisken's avatar
Plisken
2
1
5
-->
@keithprosser
Christians should not be telling you that people are evil, or that free will is the source of evil.  Actually I'm suprised you don't get the impression of a profoundly positive image.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
2
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
2
2
-->
@Mopac
Rejecting reality is universally a bad mental health decision.

Why do you reject reality, then?
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@Mopac
Yes arbitrary. I did not say there is anything wrong with that only that your standards are not any more objective.