-->
@3RU7AL
it could be either an honest oversightor a misinterpretation on your part
Or deliberate deception on theirs.
it could be either an honest oversightor a misinterpretation on your part
Or deliberate deception on theirs.
perhaps, but you have no way of knowing that
AND, in a debate, negative characterizations are AD HOMINEM ATTACKS
perhaps, but you have no way of knowing thatI know a conflicting argument when I see one.
--> @Tarikperhaps, but you have no way of knowing thatI know a conflicting argument when I see one.maybe, sometimes, but you can't see anyone's level of sincerity
maybe, sometimes, but you can't see anyone's level of sincerity
-> @3RU7ALmaybe, sometimes, but you can't see anyone's level of sincerityThere is no sincerity regarding a lie.
Because objectivity means not subject to opinion. So everyone sharing the same opinion is irrelevant
Double_R said: when people agree and share the same opinion they become irrelevant.
The context here made that very clear.
maybe, sometimes, but you can't see anyone's level of sinceritySo far Tarik has not shown any poor judgement regarding anyone's level of sincerity.
maybe, sometimes, but you can't see anyone's level of sincerityThere is no sincerity regarding a lie.
But one can sincerely believe in a lie.
And once you’ve done that, explain how getting into heaven is an objective basis for morality.Because only moral people can get into it
That’s a self refuting definition when you take into account the diametrically opposed judgements people have regarding the same action
And once you’ve done that, explain how getting into heaven is an objective basis for morality.Because only moral people can get into itThere is nothing about that answer which justifies the assertion that getting into heaven is an objective basis for morality. That is simply the basis which you chose because it makes sense to you, just as I choose well being because it makes sense to me.
--> @Shilamaybe, sometimes, but you can't see anyone's level of sinceritySo far Tarik has not shown any poor judgement regarding anyone's level of sincerity.how can we verify the quality of their judgement regarding anyone's level of sincerity ?
--> @Shilahow can we verify the quality of their judgement regarding anyone's level of sincerity ?
accusing someone of insincerity (and or being disingenuous) is accusing someone of lyingthey are synonymous
There is nothing about that answer which justifies the assertion that getting into heaven is an objective basis for morality. That is simply the basis which you chose because it makes sense to you, just as I choose well being because it makes sense to me.
We’re all using a different moral standard which is why we have disagreements about right vs wrong.
And you’re telling me this because?
That makes no sense, in order for morality to make sense and we grasp the concept of right and wrong it must be consistent across the board otherwise it refutes itself
--> @TarikThat makes no sense, in order for morality to make sense and we grasp the concept of right and wrong it must be consistent across the board otherwise it refutes itselfbingo
Right and wrong is actually quite consistent across the board.
still probably an honest misunderstanding, at least initially
immoral people get into heaven all the timeall they have to do is ask forgiveness and believe the jesus will save them
--> @ShilaRight and wrong is actually quite consistent across the board.what does jesus teach us about copyright law ?
all they have to do is ask forgiveness and believe the jesus will save them
Why didn’t you start with that rather than asking me to explain? Because you saying my answer makes sense to me isn’t a retort in the slightest.
in order for morality to make sense and we grasp the concept of right and wrong it must be consistent across the board
My answer isn’t supposed to be a retort, it’s a description of what’s wrong with your position.
If we have conflicting moral standards then we are not going to agree on matters of right vs wrong, which happens all the time.
Right and wrong is actually quite consistent across the board.what does jesus teach us about copyright law ?Jesus demanded his name be mentioned.Matthew 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
all they have to do is ask forgiveness and believe the jesus will save themAsking for forgiveness means nothing if you’re not remorseful.